Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#131
|
|||
|
|||
otnmbrd wrote:
JAXAshby wrote: a.) all chain rode only became popular on recreational boats when boat owner got old, fat and bought boats big enough to need need anchors over 20#, and All chain rodes have been used and reasonably popular since long before you started going to boat shows. b.) all chain doesn't hold very well at all in a blow. If you doubt that, check the anchorages during and after the next blow, see which boats dragged -- due to an "act of god", of course -- and which did not. then check to see how they anchored. A "blanket" statement, you obviously can't back up with experience and show that you are unaware that there may be various causes for a boat dragging which have little to do with the all chain rode. otn JaxAss's boat doesn't have enough forward flotation to handle an all-chain rode. -- We today have a president of the United States who looks like he is the son of Howdy Doody or Alfred E. Newman, who isn't smarter than either of them, who is arrogant about his ignorance, who is reckless and incompetent, and whose backers are turning the United States into a pariah. What, me worry? |
#132
|
|||
|
|||
All chain rodes have been used and reasonably popular since long before
you started going to boat shows. My boatshow going experience goes back to the 1950's. All chain rodes didn't start to become popular until the later 1980's and didn't really hit stride until the mid 1990's. Some people did it long ago, but most of them lost their boats early on. |
#133
|
|||
|
|||
A "blanket" statement, you obviously can't back up with experience and
show that you are unaware that there may be various causes for a boat dragging which have little to do with the all chain rode. actually, it comes from direct experience watching ****heads dragging down on me. |
#134
|
|||
|
|||
JaxAss's boat doesn't have enough forward flotation to handle an
all-chain rode. 350# of chain and anchor in the bow of any boat harms the sailing capability of that boat in the same fashion as having 350# of rail meat standing on the bow. |
#135
|
|||
|
|||
In article , JAXAshby wrote: All chain rodes have been used and reasonably popular since long before you started going to boat shows. My boatshow going experience goes back to the 1950's. All chain rodes didn't start to become popular until the later 1980's and didn't really hit stride until the mid 1990's. Some people did it long ago, but most of them lost their boats early on. Really? That would include all the ships that have all chain rodes, right? -- -- Karl Denninger ) Internet Consultant & Kids Rights Activist http://www.denninger.net My home on the net - links to everything I do! http://scubaforum.org Your UNCENSORED place to talk about DIVING! http://www.spamcuda.net SPAM FREE mailboxes - FREE FOR A LIMITED TIME! http://genesis3.blogspot.com Musings Of A Sentient Mind |
#137
|
|||
|
|||
Around 10/3/2004 3:50 PM, otnmbrd wrote:
JAXAshby wrote: a.) all chain rode only became popular on recreational boats when boat owner got old, fat and bought boats big enough to need need anchors over 20#, and All chain rodes have been used and reasonably popular since long before you started going to boat shows. b.) all chain doesn't hold very well at all in a blow. If you doubt that, I do doubt it, especially since you leave "a blow" undefined. Are we talking hurricane force? check the anchorages during and after the next blow, see which boats dragged -- due to an "act of god", of course -- and which did not. then check to see how they anchored. My guess as to how they anchored? One word: Improperly. Namely, not enough scope of *whatever* kind of rode. A "blanket" statement, you obviously can't back up with experience and show that you are unaware that there may be various causes for a boat dragging which have little to do with the all chain rode. I'm guessing that all this hypothetical dragging that Jax is talking about is either due to improper technique or poor bottom, and not what kind of rode someone chooses to use. Whatever. For the record, my boat has always had mixed rode. Anyone anchoring in a 14' open runabout during "a blow" would have to be nuts, regardless of what kind of rode they're using. -- ~/Garth - 1966 Glastron V-142 Skiflite: "Blue-Boat" "There is nothing - absolutely nothing - half so much worth doing as simply messing about in boats." -Kenneth Grahame, The Wind in the Willows |
#138
|
|||
|
|||
garth, a blow is 20 knots with waves. Under those conditions, an all-chain
rode will jerk the anchor from the bottom unless the boat owner put out a LOT of scope (more than a proper rode of some chain and a lot of nylon) and/or hung 50 or 100 pounds of dead weight in the middle of the rode. chain don't stretch, and when the winds pull the chain more or less tight, wind gusts can and do put HUGE loads on the anchor system, and jerking from wave actions as put orders of magnitude more load on the system. Like I said, NObody chains a boat to a dock or rock on shore. Why would anyone think they can chain a boat to a rock under the water? ans: they don't think so. they KNOW the anchor will drag. they are just too lazy to use anything but all chain in their electric windlass. From: Garth Almgren Date: 10/3/2004 7:54 PM Eastern Daylight Time Message-id: Around 10/3/2004 3:50 PM, otnmbrd wrote: JAXAshby wrote: a.) all chain rode only became popular on recreational boats when boat owner got old, fat and bought boats big enough to need need anchors over 20#, and All chain rodes have been used and reasonably popular since long before you started going to boat shows. b.) all chain doesn't hold very well at all in a blow. If you doubt that, I do doubt it, especially since you leave "a blow" undefined. Are we talking hurricane force? check the anchorages during and after the next blow, see which boats dragged -- due to an "act of god", of course -- and which did not. then check to see how they anchored. My guess as to how they anchored? One word: Improperly. Namely, not enough scope of *whatever* kind of rode. A "blanket" statement, you obviously can't back up with experience and show that you are unaware that there may be various causes for a boat dragging which have little to do with the all chain rode. I'm guessing that all this hypothetical dragging that Jax is talking about is either due to improper technique or poor bottom, and not what kind of rode someone chooses to use. Whatever. For the record, my boat has always had mixed rode. Anyone anchoring in a 14' open runabout during "a blow" would have to be nuts, regardless of what kind of rode they're using. -- ~/Garth - 1966 Glastron V-142 Skiflite: "Blue-Boat" "There is nothing - absolutely nothing - half so much worth doing as simply messing about in boats." -Kenneth Grahame, The Wind in the Willows |
#139
|
|||
|
|||
Of course I know the difference.
As for ships heading to sea to ride out a bad blow, that depends on if they can clearly get away from it or not, and exactly what kind and design of ship it is that we are talking about. My point stands - you won't find "ships" with rope being used for their rode, and if you think that ships have not sought refuge from storms in various harbors, you'd be wrong - many of them indeed do, sometimes successfully, sometimes not..... Many ships that have sought to ride out storms at sea have been unsuccessful in doing so. Indeed, some of our more interesting scuba diving is done on ships that have succumbed to the weather. All things being equal I will choose to move a vessel out of harms way. The issue becomes determining exactly which way I need to move, the speed said vessel can achieve, the port(s) along the intended route in the event that I am wrong about the path of said storm, and my computation (as skipper) of the risk of moving the vessel .vs. staying in my existing port. This is NOT a simple calculation, and it is NEVER free of risk. Hurricane Mitch got two ships that illustrate how you can be wrong with EITHER decision - one which went to sea to face the storm rather than being up against a lee shore in an uncertain harbor, and a second which reached what it thought was a safe harbor and, while at dock, broke loose in the storm. Both cases resulted in loss of both the vessel and life. Does that make the skipper's decision wrong in each case? Not necessarily. Mitch, as with many of these storms, did not go where people thought it would. By the time it was clear WHERE it was going, escape was cut off. Judging from the vessels that I have seen being put up in the "wrecked boats" salvage yard around here that were sunk by Ivan, I'll simply note that I've not yet seen one that appeared to have an all-chain rode in use. Ivan got a number of vessels around here due to simple bad luck. They went west from here thinking that this would put them on the west side of the storm, which is where you want to be if you have a choice. When it became clear that these skipper's decision was WRONG, and that they were now sitting right under where it was going to come in, they had to turn 180 and hightail it back east. Not all of them made it. Around here, getting caught on the east side of a storm with no safe place to run to is VERY possible; the "pocket" formed by the panhandle and peninsula is the absolute worst place in the world to get caught in a serious blow as it is quite shallow and yet has no safe harbor available from Appalachicola east to Steinhatchee - with many vessels unable to get into Steinhatchee due to draft constraints. Florida has a number of places where such errors in track can be relatively minor in terms of degrees of diversion yet have profound consquences. The Panhandle is one, and the west coast is another, given the usual path of approach of storms in both areas. I was in some ways lucky and in others it was fortunate that I did not make a decision to run early - if I had I would have probably gone west as did virtually everyone else, and given the maximum speed of my vessel I would have been forced to attempt to secure her where she almost certainly would not have survived. In this case my late decision to move - which was only partially "voluntary" - turned out to be the saving grace, as I was able to determine that EAST was the only possible direction I could run under the circumstances. It turned out to be a good call; she's undamaged, where many others with skippers that have many, many years of experience beyond mine are total losses. -- -- Karl Denninger ) Internet Consultant & Kids Rights Activist http://www.denninger.net My home on the net - links to everything I do! http://scubaforum.org Your UNCENSORED place to talk about DIVING! http://www.spamcuda.net SPAM FREE mailboxes - FREE FOR A LIMITED TIME! http://genesis3.blogspot.com Musings Of A Sentient Mind In article , JAXAshby wrote: karl, you of all people really should know the difference between a boat and a ship. you should also know (I bet you do) that a ship at anchor is under constant positive watch and control. you should also know (I bet you do) that in a really bad approaching blow, ships head to sea away from the storm. From: (Karl Denninger) Date: 10/3/2004 7:25 PM Eastern Daylight Time Message-id: et In article , JAXAshby wrote: All chain rodes have been used and reasonably popular since long before you started going to boat shows. My boatshow going experience goes back to the 1950's. All chain rodes didn't start to become popular until the later 1980's and didn't really hit stride until the mid 1990's. Some people did it long ago, but most of them lost their boats early on. Really? That would include all the ships that have all chain rodes, right? -- -- Karl Denninger ) Internet Consultant & Kids Rights Activist http://www.denninger.net My home on the net - links to everything I do! http://scubaforum.org Your UNCENSORED place to talk about DIVING! http://www.spamcuda.net SPAM FREE mailboxes - FREE FOR A LIMITED TIME! http://genesis3.blogspot.com Musings Of A Sentient Mind |
#140
|
|||
|
|||
In article , Garth Almgren wrote: Whatever. For the record, my boat has always had mixed rode. Anyone anchoring in a 14' open runabout during "a blow" would have to be nuts, regardless of what kind of rode they're using. A neighbor of mine anchored an 18' open runabout during a "blow" a couple of years ago. He sunk it four times in three days of singificant wind/wave action; it was quite funny watching him bail it with a 5-gallon paint bucket (the only reason this was possible is that the water in which it sunk wasn't deep enough to allow it to go completely under) in his boxers.... -- -- Karl Denninger ) Internet Consultant & Kids Rights Activist http://www.denninger.net My home on the net - links to everything I do! http://scubaforum.org Your UNCENSORED place to talk about DIVING! http://www.spamcuda.net SPAM FREE mailboxes - FREE FOR A LIMITED TIME! http://genesis3.blogspot.com Musings Of A Sentient Mind |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Para anchors dont work in breaking waves | Cruising | |||
FS: 1996 "The Liquid Quarter-Mile Missiles" (Drag Boat) VHS Video Cassette | Power Boat Racing | |||
FS: 1996 "The Liquid Quarter-Mile Missiles" (Drag Boat) VHS Video Cassette | General | |||
FS: 1996 "The Liquid Quarter-Mile Missiles" (Drag Boat) VHS Video Cassette | Power Boat Racing | |||
FS: 1996 "The Liquid Quarter-Mile Missiles" (Drag Boat) VHS Video Cassette | Power Boat Racing |