Remember Me?
Menu
Home
Search
Today's Posts
Home
Search
Today's Posts
BoatBanter.com
»
rec.boats
»
General
>
Update on ecigs...
LinkBack
Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Display Modes
Prev
Next
#
11
posted to rec.boats
JustWait[_2_]
external usenet poster
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,333
Update on ecigs...
On 2/28/2012 11:58 AM, Oscar wrote:
On 2/28/2012 10:17 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,
says...
On 2/28/2012 9:01 AM, oscar wrote:
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 08:53:39 -0500, wrote:
In ,
says...
On 2/27/2012 9:02 PM, BAR wrote:
In articleEfydnbLGk7GcY9bSnZ2dnUVZ_vadnZ2d@earthlink .com,
dump-on-
says...
On 2/27/12 4:59 PM, Happy John wrote:
On Sun, 26 Feb 2012 11:44:04 -0500, X `
wrote:
On 2/26/12 11:36 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 2/26/2012 11:30 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 2/26/12 11:20 AM, BAR wrote:
In
articlebeCdnXwnuLSUytfSnZ2dnUVZ_jCdnZ2d@earthlink .com, dump-on-
says...
On 2/26/12 10:56 AM, BAR wrote:
Where are the independently duplicated and peer
reviewed research that
shows that second hand smoke causes health problems?
The medical and scientific fields are rife with
incorrect conclusions,
sub-standard methods and politically driven persons.
What are your qualifications to find, understand, and
judge legitimate
medical research?
You are too funny. What are you qualifications to
question anyone else's
qualifications?
I think if you are going to try to challenge peer-reviewed
medical
research in scientific publications, you ought to have
some recognizable
qualifications.
And that might be relevant if you could show him some
"peer-reviewed
medical research in scientific publications".
Why? He doesn't have the medical/scientific qualifications
to judge it.
I don't, and I have two university degrees.
He didn't say he wanted to judge it. He asked where it was.
He obviously would like to see it. If
one has a smattering of statistics under their belt, much
legitimate medical research is
understandable - especially the conclusions.
He obviously would like someone to do his homework for him. I
posted a
long, long lists of mostly scientifically acceptable URLs.
Mostly scientifically acceptable URLs?
I didn't see any URL's.
I saw World Health Organization, and when I stopped snickering, I
went
to the next post...
I posted SEVERAL, but you and BAR choose to ignore them..... I
wonder
why....
Probably because you are a fruitcake.
I keep telling him he is in my filters but he chooses to ignore that...
I wonder why....??
And you keep replying. SO you know the studies are here, go read them
and get back to me.
You sure are a bossy little girl, Plume.
I don't chase red herrings...
Reply With Quote
Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Show Printable Version
Search this Thread
:
Advanced Search
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode
Switch to Hybrid Mode
Threaded Mode
Posting Rules
Smilies
are
On
[IMG]
code is
Off
HTML code is
Off
Trackbacks
are
On
Pingbacks
are
On
Refbacks
are
On
Similar Threads
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
update
Paul Oman
Boat Building
0
June 20th 08
06:37 PM
GB update
Eisboch
General
38
November 16th 04
05:03 PM
"26 Again" update
FamilySailor
ASA
3
August 20th 04
08:44 PM
All times are GMT +1. The time now is
10:05 PM
.
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
Contact Us
BoatBanter Home
Privacy Statement
Copyright © 2017
LinkBack
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks