Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#82
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Update on ecigs...
On 2/27/12 4:16 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 27 Feb 2012 08:54:41 -0500, wrote: Did you and Scotty see the "peer reviewed" studies I posted? You haven't responded.... odd.... Every majority that wants to discriminate against a minority has Peer Reviewed studies to prove they are right whether it is Goebbels, David Duke or Rick Santorum. When all of the "peers" are anti smoking groups it is not surprising that they come to the same conclusion about very low levels of second hand smoke. You think "peers" should be pro-smoking? -- http://tinyurl.com/7mhuxdj |
#83
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Update on ecigs...
|
#84
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Update on ecigs...
On Sun, 26 Feb 2012 11:30:51 -0500, X ` Man wrote:
On 2/26/12 11:20 AM, BAR wrote: In articlebeCdnXwnuLSUytfSnZ2dnUVZ_jCdnZ2d@earthlink .com, dump-on- says... On 2/26/12 10:56 AM, BAR wrote: Where are the independently duplicated and peer reviewed research that shows that second hand smoke causes health problems? The medical and scientific fields are rife with incorrect conclusions, sub-standard methods and politically driven persons. What are your qualifications to find, understand, and judge legitimate medical research? You are too funny. What are you qualifications to question anyone else's qualifications? I think if you are going to try to challenge peer-reviewed medical research in scientific publications, you ought to have some recognizable qualifications. Hate to interrupt, but you gotta admit he got you with that question! The conclusions he stated regarding the incorrect conclusions, etc, of research doesn't require special qualifications. An hour or two of 60 Minutes once in a while will demonstrate same. |
#85
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Update on ecigs...
On 2/27/12 4:41 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 2/27/2012 4:16 PM, wrote: On Mon, 27 Feb 2012 08:54:41 -0500, wrote: Did you and Scotty see the "peer reviewed" studies I posted? You haven't responded.... odd.... Did you know I don't see your posts, until somebody else snerks at them? I don't see iboater's posts, either. And there are others on my "Don't Bother to Read" list. |
#86
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Update on ecigs...
On Sun, 26 Feb 2012 11:44:04 -0500, X ` Man wrote:
On 2/26/12 11:36 AM, JustWait wrote: On 2/26/2012 11:30 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 2/26/12 11:20 AM, BAR wrote: In articlebeCdnXwnuLSUytfSnZ2dnUVZ_jCdnZ2d@earthlink .com, dump-on- says... On 2/26/12 10:56 AM, BAR wrote: Where are the independently duplicated and peer reviewed research that shows that second hand smoke causes health problems? The medical and scientific fields are rife with incorrect conclusions, sub-standard methods and politically driven persons. What are your qualifications to find, understand, and judge legitimate medical research? You are too funny. What are you qualifications to question anyone else's qualifications? I think if you are going to try to challenge peer-reviewed medical research in scientific publications, you ought to have some recognizable qualifications. And that might be relevant if you could show him some "peer-reviewed medical research in scientific publications". Why? He doesn't have the medical/scientific qualifications to judge it. I don't, and I have two university degrees. He didn't say he wanted to judge it. He asked where it was. He obviously would like to see it. If one has a smattering of statistics under their belt, much legitimate medical research is understandable - especially the conclusions. |
#87
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Update on ecigs...
On 2/27/12 4:57 PM, Happy John wrote:
On Sun, 26 Feb 2012 11:30:51 -0500, X ` wrote: On 2/26/12 11:20 AM, BAR wrote: In articlebeCdnXwnuLSUytfSnZ2dnUVZ_jCdnZ2d@earthlink .com, dump-on- says... On 2/26/12 10:56 AM, BAR wrote: Where are the independently duplicated and peer reviewed research that shows that second hand smoke causes health problems? The medical and scientific fields are rife with incorrect conclusions, sub-standard methods and politically driven persons. What are your qualifications to find, understand, and judge legitimate medical research? You are too funny. What are you qualifications to question anyone else's qualifications? I think if you are going to try to challenge peer-reviewed medical research in scientific publications, you ought to have some recognizable qualifications. Hate to interrupt, but you gotta admit he got you with that question! The conclusions he stated regarding the incorrect conclusions, etc, of research doesn't require special qualifications. An hour or two of 60 Minutes once in a while will demonstrate same. I don't see how he "got" me. I'm smart enough and educated enough to know I don't have the education and knowledge to reasonably dispute published, peer-reviewed research in medical/scientific areas. I have two college degrees; BAR has none. I don't dispute that from time to time there have been problems with research, but that doesn't mean I am going to accept the Luddite view of the world presented by Fox News and the other non-believers in science. -- http://tinyurl.com/7mhuxdj |
#88
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Update on ecigs...
On 2/27/12 4:59 PM, Happy John wrote:
On Sun, 26 Feb 2012 11:44:04 -0500, X ` wrote: On 2/26/12 11:36 AM, JustWait wrote: On 2/26/2012 11:30 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 2/26/12 11:20 AM, BAR wrote: In articlebeCdnXwnuLSUytfSnZ2dnUVZ_jCdnZ2d@earthlink .com, dump-on- says... On 2/26/12 10:56 AM, BAR wrote: Where are the independently duplicated and peer reviewed research that shows that second hand smoke causes health problems? The medical and scientific fields are rife with incorrect conclusions, sub-standard methods and politically driven persons. What are your qualifications to find, understand, and judge legitimate medical research? You are too funny. What are you qualifications to question anyone else's qualifications? I think if you are going to try to challenge peer-reviewed medical research in scientific publications, you ought to have some recognizable qualifications. And that might be relevant if you could show him some "peer-reviewed medical research in scientific publications". Why? He doesn't have the medical/scientific qualifications to judge it. I don't, and I have two university degrees. He didn't say he wanted to judge it. He asked where it was. He obviously would like to see it. If one has a smattering of statistics under their belt, much legitimate medical research is understandable - especially the conclusions. He obviously would like someone to do his homework for him. I posted a long, long lists of mostly scientifically acceptable URLs. -- http://tinyurl.com/7mhuxdj |
#89
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Update on ecigs...
On Mon, 27 Feb 2012 15:23:34 -0500, X ` Man
wrote: On 2/26/12 10:25 PM, BAR wrote: In b.com, says... On Sun, 26 Feb 2012 15:20:09 -0500, wrote: In articlep_Kdnelbdrumw9fSnZ2dnUVZ_qKdnZ2d@earthlink .com, dump-on- says... On 2/26/12 11:20 AM, BAR wrote: In articlebeCdnXwnuLSUytfSnZ2dnUVZ_jCdnZ2d@earthlink .com, dump-on- says... On 2/26/12 10:56 AM, BAR wrote: Where are the independently duplicated and peer reviewed research that shows that second hand smoke causes health problems? The medical and scientific fields are rife with incorrect conclusions, sub-standard methods and politically driven persons. What are your qualifications to find, understand, and judge legitimate medical research? You are too funny. What are you qualifications to question anyone else's qualifications? I think if you are going to try to challenge peer-reviewed medical research in scientific publications, you ought to have some recognizable qualifications. What are your qualifications to question anyone else's qualifications? He learned English real good in Kansas. That's gotta count fer sumpin. I am curious as to why the great Harry Krause went to a school out in the middle of nowhere. Couldn't he get into any of the local schools of higher learning? It is also interesting that he was only able to secure a job at a newspaper with little to no significance. Funny too that he never got another newspaper job. He did go into union organizing, not much needed there but the ability to rabble rouse. You should refocus your curiosity on the academic incompetence that kept you out of even an open enrollment two year community college. As for the Kansas City Star, when I worked there it was considered one of the 10 best newspapers in the United States. Some years later, the newsroom employees who owned the paper sold it off to a conglomerate and it began its downward slide, as virtually all formerly independent newspapers do once they are acquired. I never actually applied for a newspaper or news job anywhere. During a journalism honorary society induction ceremony in Kansas City sponsored by the Kansas City Star, at which everyone got roaring drunk, I was asked by the then managing editor of the morning edition if I wanted a summer job. I stopped by the paper the next day and the managing editor hired me on the spot, without an application or resume. Turns out one of my professors at school knew the managing editor and had recommended I be hired for the summer job. At the end of the summer, just before I started my senior year, the managing editor asked me if I thought I could finish up school and work on the paper. He got the city editor to jiggle schedules so I was able to take my remaining classes in the AM and through mid-day and drive my derelict car to the paper five late afternoons a week. After some years at the Kansas City, I was recruited by The Associated Press at the behest of Harry F. Rosenthal, a very well known senior AP reported and editor, and David Halberstam, an author. I was flown to New York and interviewed directly by Keith Fuller of the AP and Wes Gallagher, who at that time was the AP's general manager. While with the AP, I was promoted to Correspondent in Charge of smaller bureaus in three states, and covered first-hand two horrific disasters, one involving a bridge and the other a huge coal mine explosion. On the basis of that work, I was invited to New York again and offered a TV news job at ABC News. I wasn't that interested, but I did get to meet Jimmy Breslin at ABC. His last newspaper gig went down the drain with the collapse of the World Journal Tribune. Breslin took me to an "expensive" lunch at his favorite hot dog stand, where we became friends after both of us dripped mustard on our shirts. So, you see, I never sought a newspaper job, not my first one and not my last "news" job. I did OK in the news biz for a guy with a B.A. in English and an M.A. in English and, of course, along the way, I managed to take a number of university level science and math classes. But even with that formal education in my background, I don't feel comfortable predicting what the fuel will be for cars two decades from now. So, Bertie, have you ever taken and passed any university-level courses in math or science? Didn't think so. You are such an interesting fella. You ought to write an autobiography |
#90
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Update on ecigs...
In article ,
says... On 2/26/12 10:25 PM, BAR wrote: In b.com, says... On Sun, 26 Feb 2012 15:20:09 -0500, wrote: In articlep_Kdnelbdrumw9fSnZ2dnUVZ_qKdnZ2d@earthlink .com, dump-on- says... On 2/26/12 11:20 AM, BAR wrote: In articlebeCdnXwnuLSUytfSnZ2dnUVZ_jCdnZ2d@earthlink .com, dump-on- says... On 2/26/12 10:56 AM, BAR wrote: Where are the independently duplicated and peer reviewed research that shows that second hand smoke causes health problems? The medical and scientific fields are rife with incorrect conclusions, sub-standard methods and politically driven persons. What are your qualifications to find, understand, and judge legitimate medical research? You are too funny. What are you qualifications to question anyone else's qualifications? I think if you are going to try to challenge peer-reviewed medical research in scientific publications, you ought to have some recognizable qualifications. What are your qualifications to question anyone else's qualifications? He learned English real good in Kansas. That's gotta count fer sumpin. I am curious as to why the great Harry Krause went to a school out in the middle of nowhere. Couldn't he get into any of the local schools of higher learning? It is also interesting that he was only able to secure a job at a newspaper with little to no significance. Funny too that he never got another newspaper job. He did go into union organizing, not much needed there but the ability to rabble rouse. You should refocus your curiosity on the academic incompetence that kept you out of even an open enrollment two year community college. As for the Kansas City Star, when I worked there it was considered one of the 10 best newspapers in the United States. Some years later, the newsroom employees who owned the paper sold it off to a conglomerate and it began its downward slide, as virtually all formerly independent newspapers do once they are acquired. I never actually applied for a newspaper or news job anywhere. During a journalism honorary society induction ceremony in Kansas City sponsored by the Kansas City Star, at which everyone got roaring drunk, I was asked by the then managing editor of the morning edition if I wanted a summer job. I stopped by the paper the next day and the managing editor hired me on the spot, without an application or resume. Turns out one of my professors at school knew the managing editor and had recommended I be hired for the summer job. At the end of the summer, just before I started my senior year, the managing editor asked me if I thought I could finish up school and work on the paper. He got the city editor to jiggle schedules so I was able to take my remaining classes in the AM and through mid-day and drive my derelict car to the paper five late afternoons a week. After some years at the Kansas City, I was recruited by The Associated Press at the behest of Harry F. Rosenthal, a very well known senior AP reported and editor, and David Halberstam, an author. I was flown to New York and interviewed directly by Keith Fuller of the AP and Wes Gallagher, who at that time was the AP's general manager. While with the AP, I was promoted to Correspondent in Charge of smaller bureaus in three states, and covered first-hand two horrific disasters, one involving a bridge and the other a huge coal mine explosion. On the basis of that work, I was invited to New York again and offered a TV news job at ABC News. I wasn't that interested, but I did get to meet Jimmy Breslin at ABC. His last newspaper gig went down the drain with the collapse of the World Journal Tribune. Breslin took me to an "expensive" lunch at his favorite hot dog stand, where we became friends after both of us dripped mustard on our shirts. So, you see, I never sought a newspaper job, not my first one and not my last "news" job. I did OK in the news biz for a guy with a B.A. in English and an M.A. in English and, of course, along the way, I managed to take a number of university level science and math classes. But even with that formal education in my background, I don't feel comfortable predicting what the fuel will be for cars two decades from now. So, Bertie, have you ever taken and passed any university-level courses in math or science? Didn't think so. Why do you feel compelled to open up and explain your entire professional life to a guy on the Internet whom you have declared many times is an idiot and not worth your time. I am on schedule to retire in 8 years, prior to reaching the age of 60. Accomplished without a pension from any company or relying upon social security. I think I have done pretty well for myself. Pretty well for an uneducated former jar-head. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
update | Boat Building | |||
GB update | General | |||
"26 Again" update | ASA |