Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #161   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,333
Default Update on ecigs...

On 2/29/2012 10:26 AM, Oscar wrote:
On 2/29/2012 10:19 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 2/29/2012 10:17 AM, Oscar wrote:
On 2/29/2012 10:03 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 2/29/2012 9:51 AM, Oscar wrote:
On 2/29/2012 9:48 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 2/29/2012 9:41 AM, Oscar wrote:
On 2/29/2012 6:55 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 2/29/2012 6:33 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 2/28/12 9:55 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 2/28/2012 8:46 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 2/28/12 8:11 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 2/28/2012 8:02 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 2/28/12 7:56 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 2/26/2012 3:20 PM, BAR wrote:
In articlep_Kdnelbdrumw9fSnZ2dnUVZ_qKdnZ2d@earthlink .com,
dump-on-
says...

On 2/26/12 11:20 AM, BAR wrote:
In
articlebeCdnXwnuLSUytfSnZ2dnUVZ_jCdnZ2d@earthlink .com,
dump-on-
says...

On 2/26/12 10:56 AM, BAR wrote:


Where are the independently duplicated and peer reviewed
research
that
shows that second hand smoke causes health problems?

The medical and scientific fields are rife with
incorrect
conclusions,
sub-standard methods and politically driven persons.


What are your qualifications to find, understand, and
judge
legitimate
medical research?

You are too funny. What are you qualifications to question
anyone
else's
qualifications?




I think if you are going to try to challenge peer-reviewed
medical
research in scientific publications, you ought to have some
recognizable
qualifications.

What are your qualifications to question anyone else's
qualifications?

It is having a huge effect on the market.. Changing the whole
dynamic.
Taking the manufacture and distribution to a totally
different
level.
Away from organized criminal organizations, and directly to
Suzie
Homemaker...


You must have excised the content here.

I think so. My comment was directed at the notion that 350
dollar an
ounce pot was not having an effect on the market... And it
certainly
is...

Ahh. I missed that. Is that up or down? And what effect is it
having?


I do not endorse the use of any illegal substance, all of my
information
is based on hearsay, my own research over the internet, and other
sources over the years who wish to remain anonymous.

OK,...here we go...
Well, back in 1976 an ounce was less than ten dollars. It would
come
over from Jamaica or Vietnam with traveling service men, and
other
world
travelers, average Joes, it was still somewhat casual but
beginning to
go more main stream (move to the suburbs) from about 69 on.

At that time there were two distinctive levels of quality
available.
Regular like I said, less than ten buck an ounce, and then the
specialty
stuff like Colombian Gold, and Panama Red which cold reach the
amazing
price of 40 dollars an ounce...

Things really changed quickly in the 80's when criminal elements
realized how much money was to be made on pot, and really
decided to
take over the business. One of the things they did right away was
begin
to develop domestic production by sending growers from California
all
over the country, north western Mass, and particularly to Canada
where a
lot of the production moved indoors. This all made for a much
fresher
and significantly more potent, hand tended product rather than
the
imported stuff which was often beat to **** and smelling of
something
foul by the time it gotpot to the US. Although the imported stuff
was
still
available, by the mid 80's it was almost completely replaced by
the
domestic crop and the prices skyrocketed to an average 200 an
ounce by
the mid 80's ten times more than it had been just a decade
earlier.

The whole market swung back in the last couple decades for
suburban
consumers anyway. With the availability of technology,
information on
the net, genetically superior seeds in the mail with
practically no
possibility of discovery has turned the whole market right back
where it
started with random, unconnected (mostly non criminal except for
the
pot) producers all over the country. Distribution has gone
back to
the
days of the local farmer, mostly serving local friends and
family.

Stronger and better (taste, smoothness, etc.) is being
genetically
developed all the time and some of the higher priced strains now
can go
for nearly 500 an ounce for top bud (top plant material)...

There is still a good amount of poor quality imported stuff
coming
over
the border, but no longer the great strains of the past like the
golds
and reds, just commercial bunk, mostly sold in the inner city in
dime
bags on the street corner. That can still go for close to 200 an
ounce
if you were to find a distributor willing to sell that much.
Most of
them want to cut it to dime bags and make a fortune...

So, that's how the price of pot has effected the industry... in a
nutshell


Ahh, thanks. I don't follow the pot price curve... :)


Hummm, yeah I know a couple here will get stupid but it's all on
the up
and up. I get my info mostly from legal sites representing legal
retail
stores across the country and world... I tend to stir them up a
bit as
although I know there are some very legitimate medical reasons for
some
folks to smoke, I don't subscribe to the whole "medical marijuana"
hoax,
I just believe in straight legalization... 95 to probably 98% of
the
folks using "medical marijuana" are full of crap...

Dope is dope Scotty. Do you suggest that all regulations on dope be
rescinded?


No, I think Marijuana should be treated like Tobacco or Alcohol...

Why tobacco?

I really don't understand the question... But I think it should be sold
over the counter like cigarettes, or if necessary in more controlled
retail setting like hard liquor and wine, here.

That's pretty liberal thinking.


You got me, I am a closet liberal But seriously, I have been telling
you folks I am a Libertarian for years...


Why is it that you and Harry don't get along with each other better, then?


Because we set our standards on a vastly different set of values...
  #162   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Feb 2012
Posts: 880
Default Update on ecigs...

On 2/29/2012 10:28 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In raweb.com, 5@
5.com says...

On 2/29/2012 9:56 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 2/29/2012 9:47 AM, JustWait wrote:



Two guys take their cars out for a joyride in the country one of them
lights up a tobacco cigarette. The other lights up a dope cigarette.
Which guy is more likely to wrap his car around a tree or light pole?



Pretty much depends on who is a better driver...


So, you wouldn't mind sharing the road with a doper or alkey vs a
cigarette smoker?


When I was young, a lady friend of mine wrecked her car going to school
because she dropped a lit cigarette, so what's your point?


Did she quit smoking?

Scotty partially got it. I'm surprised you didn't.

--
O M G
  #163   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Feb 2012
Posts: 880
Default Update on ecigs...

On 2/29/2012 10:36 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 2/29/2012 10:26 AM, Oscar wrote:
On 2/29/2012 10:19 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 2/29/2012 10:17 AM, Oscar wrote:
On 2/29/2012 10:03 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 2/29/2012 9:51 AM, Oscar wrote:
On 2/29/2012 9:48 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 2/29/2012 9:41 AM, Oscar wrote:
On 2/29/2012 6:55 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 2/29/2012 6:33 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 2/28/12 9:55 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 2/28/2012 8:46 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 2/28/12 8:11 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 2/28/2012 8:02 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 2/28/12 7:56 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 2/26/2012 3:20 PM, BAR wrote:
In articlep_Kdnelbdrumw9fSnZ2dnUVZ_qKdnZ2d@earthlink .com,
dump-on-
says...

On 2/26/12 11:20 AM, BAR wrote:
In
articlebeCdnXwnuLSUytfSnZ2dnUVZ_jCdnZ2d@earthlink .com,
dump-on-
says...

On 2/26/12 10:56 AM, BAR wrote:


Where are the independently duplicated and peer
reviewed
research
that
shows that second hand smoke causes health problems?

The medical and scientific fields are rife with
incorrect
conclusions,
sub-standard methods and politically driven persons.


What are your qualifications to find, understand, and
judge
legitimate
medical research?

You are too funny. What are you qualifications to
question
anyone
else's
qualifications?




I think if you are going to try to challenge peer-reviewed
medical
research in scientific publications, you ought to have
some
recognizable
qualifications.

What are your qualifications to question anyone else's
qualifications?

It is having a huge effect on the market.. Changing the
whole
dynamic.
Taking the manufacture and distribution to a totally
different
level.
Away from organized criminal organizations, and directly to
Suzie
Homemaker...


You must have excised the content here.

I think so. My comment was directed at the notion that 350
dollar an
ounce pot was not having an effect on the market... And it
certainly
is...

Ahh. I missed that. Is that up or down? And what effect is it
having?


I do not endorse the use of any illegal substance, all of my
information
is based on hearsay, my own research over the internet, and
other
sources over the years who wish to remain anonymous.

OK,...here we go...
Well, back in 1976 an ounce was less than ten dollars. It would
come
over from Jamaica or Vietnam with traveling service men, and
other
world
travelers, average Joes, it was still somewhat casual but
beginning to
go more main stream (move to the suburbs) from about 69 on.

At that time there were two distinctive levels of quality
available.
Regular like I said, less than ten buck an ounce, and then the
specialty
stuff like Colombian Gold, and Panama Red which cold reach the
amazing
price of 40 dollars an ounce...

Things really changed quickly in the 80's when criminal elements
realized how much money was to be made on pot, and really
decided to
take over the business. One of the things they did right away
was
begin
to develop domestic production by sending growers from
California
all
over the country, north western Mass, and particularly to Canada
where a
lot of the production moved indoors. This all made for a much
fresher
and significantly more potent, hand tended product rather than
the
imported stuff which was often beat to **** and smelling of
something
foul by the time it gotpot to the US. Although the imported
stuff
was
still
available, by the mid 80's it was almost completely replaced by
the
domestic crop and the prices skyrocketed to an average 200 an
ounce by
the mid 80's ten times more than it had been just a decade
earlier.

The whole market swung back in the last couple decades for
suburban
consumers anyway. With the availability of technology,
information on
the net, genetically superior seeds in the mail with
practically no
possibility of discovery has turned the whole market right back
where it
started with random, unconnected (mostly non criminal except for
the
pot) producers all over the country. Distribution has gone
back to
the
days of the local farmer, mostly serving local friends and
family.

Stronger and better (taste, smoothness, etc.) is being
genetically
developed all the time and some of the higher priced strains now
can go
for nearly 500 an ounce for top bud (top plant material)...

There is still a good amount of poor quality imported stuff
coming
over
the border, but no longer the great strains of the past like the
golds
and reds, just commercial bunk, mostly sold in the inner city in
dime
bags on the street corner. That can still go for close to 200 an
ounce
if you were to find a distributor willing to sell that much.
Most of
them want to cut it to dime bags and make a fortune...

So, that's how the price of pot has effected the industry...
in a
nutshell


Ahh, thanks. I don't follow the pot price curve... :)


Hummm, yeah I know a couple here will get stupid but it's all on
the up
and up. I get my info mostly from legal sites representing legal
retail
stores across the country and world... I tend to stir them up a
bit as
although I know there are some very legitimate medical reasons for
some
folks to smoke, I don't subscribe to the whole "medical marijuana"
hoax,
I just believe in straight legalization... 95 to probably 98% of
the
folks using "medical marijuana" are full of crap...

Dope is dope Scotty. Do you suggest that all regulations on dope be
rescinded?


No, I think Marijuana should be treated like Tobacco or Alcohol...

Why tobacco?

I really don't understand the question... But I think it should be
sold
over the counter like cigarettes, or if necessary in more controlled
retail setting like hard liquor and wine, here.

That's pretty liberal thinking.


You got me, I am a closet liberal But seriously, I have been telling
you folks I am a Libertarian for years...


Why is it that you and Harry don't get along with each other better,
then?


Because we set our standards on a vastly different set of values...


What libertarian held values do you two disagree on?

--
O M G
  #164   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,333
Default Update on ecigs...

On 2/29/2012 10:34 AM, Oscar wrote:
On 2/29/2012 10:26 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In , says...

On 2/29/2012 9:41 AM, Oscar wrote:
On 2/29/2012 6:55 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 2/29/2012 6:33 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 2/28/12 9:55 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 2/28/2012 8:46 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 2/28/12 8:11 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 2/28/2012 8:02 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 2/28/12 7:56 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 2/26/2012 3:20 PM, BAR wrote:
In articlep_Kdnelbdrumw9fSnZ2dnUVZ_qKdnZ2d@earthlink .com,
dump-on-
says...

On 2/26/12 11:20 AM, BAR wrote:
In articlebeCdnXwnuLSUytfSnZ2dnUVZ_jCdnZ2d@earthlink .com,
dump-on-
says...

On 2/26/12 10:56 AM, BAR wrote:


Where are the independently duplicated and peer reviewed
research
that
shows that second hand smoke causes health problems?

The medical and scientific fields are rife with incorrect
conclusions,
sub-standard methods and politically driven persons.


What are your qualifications to find, understand, and judge
legitimate
medical research?

You are too funny. What are you qualifications to question
anyone
else's
qualifications?




I think if you are going to try to challenge peer-reviewed
medical
research in scientific publications, you ought to have some
recognizable
qualifications.

What are your qualifications to question anyone else's
qualifications?

It is having a huge effect on the market.. Changing the whole
dynamic.
Taking the manufacture and distribution to a totally different
level.
Away from organized criminal organizations, and directly to
Suzie
Homemaker...


You must have excised the content here.

I think so. My comment was directed at the notion that 350
dollar an
ounce pot was not having an effect on the market... And it
certainly
is...

Ahh. I missed that. Is that up or down? And what effect is it
having?


I do not endorse the use of any illegal substance, all of my
information
is based on hearsay, my own research over the internet, and other
sources over the years who wish to remain anonymous.

OK,...here we go...
Well, back in 1976 an ounce was less than ten dollars. It would come
over from Jamaica or Vietnam with traveling service men, and other
world
travelers, average Joes, it was still somewhat casual but
beginning to
go more main stream (move to the suburbs) from about 69 on.

At that time there were two distinctive levels of quality available.
Regular like I said, less than ten buck an ounce, and then the
specialty
stuff like Colombian Gold, and Panama Red which cold reach the
amazing
price of 40 dollars an ounce...

Things really changed quickly in the 80's when criminal elements
realized how much money was to be made on pot, and really decided to
take over the business. One of the things they did right away was
begin
to develop domestic production by sending growers from California
all
over the country, north western Mass, and particularly to Canada
where a
lot of the production moved indoors. This all made for a much
fresher
and significantly more potent, hand tended product rather than the
imported stuff which was often beat to **** and smelling of
something
foul by the time it gotpot to the US. Although the imported stuff
was
still
available, by the mid 80's it was almost completely replaced by the
domestic crop and the prices skyrocketed to an average 200 an
ounce by
the mid 80's ten times more than it had been just a decade earlier.

The whole market swung back in the last couple decades for suburban
consumers anyway. With the availability of technology,
information on
the net, genetically superior seeds in the mail with practically no
possibility of discovery has turned the whole market right back
where it
started with random, unconnected (mostly non criminal except for the
pot) producers all over the country. Distribution has gone back
to the
days of the local farmer, mostly serving local friends and family.

Stronger and better (taste, smoothness, etc.) is being genetically
developed all the time and some of the higher priced strains now
can go
for nearly 500 an ounce for top bud (top plant material)...

There is still a good amount of poor quality imported stuff
coming over
the border, but no longer the great strains of the past like the
golds
and reds, just commercial bunk, mostly sold in the inner city in
dime
bags on the street corner. That can still go for close to 200 an
ounce
if you were to find a distributor willing to sell that much. Most of
them want to cut it to dime bags and make a fortune...

So, that's how the price of pot has effected the industry... in a
nutshell


Ahh, thanks. I don't follow the pot price curve... :)


Hummm, yeah I know a couple here will get stupid but it's all on
the up
and up. I get my info mostly from legal sites representing legal
retail
stores across the country and world... I tend to stir them up a bit as
although I know there are some very legitimate medical reasons for
some
folks to smoke, I don't subscribe to the whole "medical marijuana"
hoax,
I just believe in straight legalization... 95 to probably 98% of the
folks using "medical marijuana" are full of crap...

Dope is dope Scotty. Do you suggest that all regulations on dope be
rescinded?


No, I think Marijuana should be treated like Tobacco or Alcohol...


I agree. We spend WAY too much time and money on the fight to stamp out
pot. Those resources could be used for much better things.


Why don't you guys come up with a list of dope that you deem acceptable
for general consumption. I'll start the list for you.

1. The hallucinogen, marijuana


Well, that's my list.. Let's turn the tables.. Would you rather get in
the car with somebody smoking pot, or somebody on Oxycontin or Vicodin?
  #165   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,333
Default Update on ecigs...

On 2/29/2012 10:47 AM, Oscar wrote:
On 2/29/2012 10:28 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In raweb.com, 5@
5.com says...

On 2/29/2012 9:56 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 2/29/2012 9:47 AM, JustWait wrote:



Two guys take their cars out for a joyride in the country one of them
lights up a tobacco cigarette. The other lights up a dope cigarette.
Which guy is more likely to wrap his car around a tree or light pole?



Pretty much depends on who is a better driver...

So, you wouldn't mind sharing the road with a doper or alkey vs a
cigarette smoker?


When I was young, a lady friend of mine wrecked her car going to school
because she dropped a lit cigarette, so what's your point?


Did she quit smoking?

Scotty partially got it. I'm surprised you didn't.


There is an old saying.. "The most dangerous aspect of smoking pot is
the cops kicking in your doors and shooting your dog"... snerk


  #166   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,333
Default Update on ecigs...

On 2/29/2012 10:51 AM, Oscar wrote:
On 2/29/2012 10:36 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 2/29/2012 10:26 AM, Oscar wrote:
On 2/29/2012 10:19 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 2/29/2012 10:17 AM, Oscar wrote:
On 2/29/2012 10:03 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 2/29/2012 9:51 AM, Oscar wrote:
On 2/29/2012 9:48 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 2/29/2012 9:41 AM, Oscar wrote:
On 2/29/2012 6:55 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 2/29/2012 6:33 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 2/28/12 9:55 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 2/28/2012 8:46 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 2/28/12 8:11 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 2/28/2012 8:02 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 2/28/12 7:56 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 2/26/2012 3:20 PM, BAR wrote:
In
articlep_Kdnelbdrumw9fSnZ2dnUVZ_qKdnZ2d@earthlink .com,
dump-on-
says...

On 2/26/12 11:20 AM, BAR wrote:
In
articlebeCdnXwnuLSUytfSnZ2dnUVZ_jCdnZ2d@earthlink .com,
dump-on-
says...

On 2/26/12 10:56 AM, BAR wrote:


Where are the independently duplicated and peer
reviewed
research
that
shows that second hand smoke causes health problems?

The medical and scientific fields are rife with
incorrect
conclusions,
sub-standard methods and politically driven persons.


What are your qualifications to find, understand, and
judge
legitimate
medical research?

You are too funny. What are you qualifications to
question
anyone
else's
qualifications?




I think if you are going to try to challenge
peer-reviewed
medical
research in scientific publications, you ought to have
some
recognizable
qualifications.

What are your qualifications to question anyone else's
qualifications?

It is having a huge effect on the market.. Changing the
whole
dynamic.
Taking the manufacture and distribution to a totally
different
level.
Away from organized criminal organizations, and directly to
Suzie
Homemaker...


You must have excised the content here.

I think so. My comment was directed at the notion that 350
dollar an
ounce pot was not having an effect on the market... And it
certainly
is...

Ahh. I missed that. Is that up or down? And what effect is it
having?


I do not endorse the use of any illegal substance, all of my
information
is based on hearsay, my own research over the internet, and
other
sources over the years who wish to remain anonymous.

OK,...here we go...
Well, back in 1976 an ounce was less than ten dollars. It would
come
over from Jamaica or Vietnam with traveling service men, and
other
world
travelers, average Joes, it was still somewhat casual but
beginning to
go more main stream (move to the suburbs) from about 69 on.

At that time there were two distinctive levels of quality
available.
Regular like I said, less than ten buck an ounce, and then the
specialty
stuff like Colombian Gold, and Panama Red which cold reach the
amazing
price of 40 dollars an ounce...

Things really changed quickly in the 80's when criminal
elements
realized how much money was to be made on pot, and really
decided to
take over the business. One of the things they did right away
was
begin
to develop domestic production by sending growers from
California
all
over the country, north western Mass, and particularly to
Canada
where a
lot of the production moved indoors. This all made for a much
fresher
and significantly more potent, hand tended product rather than
the
imported stuff which was often beat to **** and smelling of
something
foul by the time it gotpot to the US. Although the imported
stuff
was
still
available, by the mid 80's it was almost completely replaced by
the
domestic crop and the prices skyrocketed to an average 200 an
ounce by
the mid 80's ten times more than it had been just a decade
earlier.

The whole market swung back in the last couple decades for
suburban
consumers anyway. With the availability of technology,
information on
the net, genetically superior seeds in the mail with
practically no
possibility of discovery has turned the whole market right back
where it
started with random, unconnected (mostly non criminal except
for
the
pot) producers all over the country. Distribution has gone
back to
the
days of the local farmer, mostly serving local friends and
family.

Stronger and better (taste, smoothness, etc.) is being
genetically
developed all the time and some of the higher priced strains
now
can go
for nearly 500 an ounce for top bud (top plant material)...

There is still a good amount of poor quality imported stuff
coming
over
the border, but no longer the great strains of the past like
the
golds
and reds, just commercial bunk, mostly sold in the inner
city in
dime
bags on the street corner. That can still go for close to
200 an
ounce
if you were to find a distributor willing to sell that much.
Most of
them want to cut it to dime bags and make a fortune...

So, that's how the price of pot has effected the industry...
in a
nutshell


Ahh, thanks. I don't follow the pot price curve... :)


Hummm, yeah I know a couple here will get stupid but it's all on
the up
and up. I get my info mostly from legal sites representing legal
retail
stores across the country and world... I tend to stir them up a
bit as
although I know there are some very legitimate medical reasons
for
some
folks to smoke, I don't subscribe to the whole "medical
marijuana"
hoax,
I just believe in straight legalization... 95 to probably 98% of
the
folks using "medical marijuana" are full of crap...

Dope is dope Scotty. Do you suggest that all regulations on
dope be
rescinded?


No, I think Marijuana should be treated like Tobacco or Alcohol...

Why tobacco?

I really don't understand the question... But I think it should be
sold
over the counter like cigarettes, or if necessary in more controlled
retail setting like hard liquor and wine, here.

That's pretty liberal thinking.


You got me, I am a closet liberal But seriously, I have been telling
you folks I am a Libertarian for years...

Why is it that you and Harry don't get along with each other better,
then?


Because we set our standards on a vastly different set of values...


What libertarian held values do you two disagree on?


I know this is where you want to take the group, but I'm not going there...
  #168   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Feb 2012
Posts: 880
Default Update on ecigs...

On 2/29/2012 10:53 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 2/29/2012 10:34 AM, Oscar wrote:
On 2/29/2012 10:26 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In , says...

On 2/29/2012 9:41 AM, Oscar wrote:
On 2/29/2012 6:55 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 2/29/2012 6:33 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 2/28/12 9:55 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 2/28/2012 8:46 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 2/28/12 8:11 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 2/28/2012 8:02 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 2/28/12 7:56 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 2/26/2012 3:20 PM, BAR wrote:
In articlep_Kdnelbdrumw9fSnZ2dnUVZ_qKdnZ2d@earthlink .com,
dump-on-
says...

On 2/26/12 11:20 AM, BAR wrote:
In articlebeCdnXwnuLSUytfSnZ2dnUVZ_jCdnZ2d@earthlink .com,
dump-on-
says...

On 2/26/12 10:56 AM, BAR wrote:


Where are the independently duplicated and peer reviewed
research
that
shows that second hand smoke causes health problems?

The medical and scientific fields are rife with incorrect
conclusions,
sub-standard methods and politically driven persons.


What are your qualifications to find, understand, and judge
legitimate
medical research?

You are too funny. What are you qualifications to question
anyone
else's
qualifications?




I think if you are going to try to challenge peer-reviewed
medical
research in scientific publications, you ought to have some
recognizable
qualifications.

What are your qualifications to question anyone else's
qualifications?

It is having a huge effect on the market.. Changing the whole
dynamic.
Taking the manufacture and distribution to a totally different
level.
Away from organized criminal organizations, and directly to
Suzie
Homemaker...


You must have excised the content here.

I think so. My comment was directed at the notion that 350
dollar an
ounce pot was not having an effect on the market... And it
certainly
is...

Ahh. I missed that. Is that up or down? And what effect is it
having?


I do not endorse the use of any illegal substance, all of my
information
is based on hearsay, my own research over the internet, and other
sources over the years who wish to remain anonymous.

OK,...here we go...
Well, back in 1976 an ounce was less than ten dollars. It would
come
over from Jamaica or Vietnam with traveling service men, and other
world
travelers, average Joes, it was still somewhat casual but
beginning to
go more main stream (move to the suburbs) from about 69 on.

At that time there were two distinctive levels of quality
available.
Regular like I said, less than ten buck an ounce, and then the
specialty
stuff like Colombian Gold, and Panama Red which cold reach the
amazing
price of 40 dollars an ounce...

Things really changed quickly in the 80's when criminal elements
realized how much money was to be made on pot, and really
decided to
take over the business. One of the things they did right away was
begin
to develop domestic production by sending growers from California
all
over the country, north western Mass, and particularly to Canada
where a
lot of the production moved indoors. This all made for a much
fresher
and significantly more potent, hand tended product rather than the
imported stuff which was often beat to **** and smelling of
something
foul by the time it gotpot to the US. Although the imported stuff
was
still
available, by the mid 80's it was almost completely replaced by the
domestic crop and the prices skyrocketed to an average 200 an
ounce by
the mid 80's ten times more than it had been just a decade earlier.

The whole market swung back in the last couple decades for suburban
consumers anyway. With the availability of technology,
information on
the net, genetically superior seeds in the mail with practically no
possibility of discovery has turned the whole market right back
where it
started with random, unconnected (mostly non criminal except for
the
pot) producers all over the country. Distribution has gone back
to the
days of the local farmer, mostly serving local friends and family.

Stronger and better (taste, smoothness, etc.) is being genetically
developed all the time and some of the higher priced strains now
can go
for nearly 500 an ounce for top bud (top plant material)...

There is still a good amount of poor quality imported stuff
coming over
the border, but no longer the great strains of the past like the
golds
and reds, just commercial bunk, mostly sold in the inner city in
dime
bags on the street corner. That can still go for close to 200 an
ounce
if you were to find a distributor willing to sell that much.
Most of
them want to cut it to dime bags and make a fortune...

So, that's how the price of pot has effected the industry... in a
nutshell


Ahh, thanks. I don't follow the pot price curve... :)


Hummm, yeah I know a couple here will get stupid but it's all on
the up
and up. I get my info mostly from legal sites representing legal
retail
stores across the country and world... I tend to stir them up a
bit as
although I know there are some very legitimate medical reasons for
some
folks to smoke, I don't subscribe to the whole "medical marijuana"
hoax,
I just believe in straight legalization... 95 to probably 98% of the
folks using "medical marijuana" are full of crap...

Dope is dope Scotty. Do you suggest that all regulations on dope be
rescinded?


No, I think Marijuana should be treated like Tobacco or Alcohol...

I agree. We spend WAY too much time and money on the fight to stamp out
pot. Those resources could be used for much better things.


Why don't you guys come up with a list of dope that you deem acceptable
for general consumption. I'll start the list for you.

1. The hallucinogen, marijuana


Well, that's my list.. Let's turn the tables.. Would you rather get in
the car with somebody smoking pot, or somebody on Oxycontin or Vicodin?


I assume those drugs are powerful hallucinogens, just like marijuana.
You aren't really offering a safe alternative. To answer your question,
I would not knowingly be around any machinery being operated by a person
under the influence of any of those dangerous controlled substances,
including pot.

--
O M G
  #169   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Feb 2012
Posts: 880
Default Update on ecigs...

On 2/29/2012 10:55 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 2/29/2012 10:47 AM, Oscar wrote:
On 2/29/2012 10:28 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In raweb.com, 5@
5.com says...

On 2/29/2012 9:56 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 2/29/2012 9:47 AM, JustWait wrote:



Two guys take their cars out for a joyride in the country one of
them
lights up a tobacco cigarette. The other lights up a dope cigarette.
Which guy is more likely to wrap his car around a tree or light
pole?



Pretty much depends on who is a better driver...

So, you wouldn't mind sharing the road with a doper or alkey vs a
cigarette smoker?

When I was young, a lady friend of mine wrecked her car going to school
because she dropped a lit cigarette, so what's your point?


Did she quit smoking?

Scotty partially got it. I'm surprised you didn't.


There is an old saying.. "The most dangerous aspect of smoking pot is
the cops kicking in your doors and shooting your dog"... snerk


Who says that; dope smokers?

--
O M G
  #170   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Sep 2011
Posts: 7,588
Default Update on ecigs...

In article om, 5@
5.com says...

On 2/29/2012 10:53 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 2/29/2012 10:34 AM, Oscar wrote:
On 2/29/2012 10:26 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In , says...

On 2/29/2012 9:41 AM, Oscar wrote:
On 2/29/2012 6:55 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 2/29/2012 6:33 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 2/28/12 9:55 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 2/28/2012 8:46 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 2/28/12 8:11 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 2/28/2012 8:02 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 2/28/12 7:56 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 2/26/2012 3:20 PM, BAR wrote:
In articlep_Kdnelbdrumw9fSnZ2dnUVZ_qKdnZ2d@earthlink .com,
dump-on-
says...

On 2/26/12 11:20 AM, BAR wrote:
In articlebeCdnXwnuLSUytfSnZ2dnUVZ_jCdnZ2d@earthlink .com,
dump-on-
says...

On 2/26/12 10:56 AM, BAR wrote:


Where are the independently duplicated and peer reviewed
research
that
shows that second hand smoke causes health problems?

The medical and scientific fields are rife with incorrect
conclusions,
sub-standard methods and politically driven persons.


What are your qualifications to find, understand, and judge
legitimate
medical research?

You are too funny. What are you qualifications to question
anyone
else's
qualifications?




I think if you are going to try to challenge peer-reviewed
medical
research in scientific publications, you ought to have some
recognizable
qualifications.

What are your qualifications to question anyone else's
qualifications?

It is having a huge effect on the market.. Changing the whole
dynamic.
Taking the manufacture and distribution to a totally different
level.
Away from organized criminal organizations, and directly to
Suzie
Homemaker...


You must have excised the content here.

I think so. My comment was directed at the notion that 350
dollar an
ounce pot was not having an effect on the market... And it
certainly
is...

Ahh. I missed that. Is that up or down? And what effect is it
having?


I do not endorse the use of any illegal substance, all of my
information
is based on hearsay, my own research over the internet, and other
sources over the years who wish to remain anonymous.

OK,...here we go...
Well, back in 1976 an ounce was less than ten dollars. It would
come
over from Jamaica or Vietnam with traveling service men, and other
world
travelers, average Joes, it was still somewhat casual but
beginning to
go more main stream (move to the suburbs) from about 69 on.

At that time there were two distinctive levels of quality
available.
Regular like I said, less than ten buck an ounce, and then the
specialty
stuff like Colombian Gold, and Panama Red which cold reach the
amazing
price of 40 dollars an ounce...

Things really changed quickly in the 80's when criminal elements
realized how much money was to be made on pot, and really
decided to
take over the business. One of the things they did right away was
begin
to develop domestic production by sending growers from California
all
over the country, north western Mass, and particularly to Canada
where a
lot of the production moved indoors. This all made for a much
fresher
and significantly more potent, hand tended product rather than the
imported stuff which was often beat to **** and smelling of
something
foul by the time it gotpot to the US. Although the imported stuff
was
still
available, by the mid 80's it was almost completely replaced by the
domestic crop and the prices skyrocketed to an average 200 an
ounce by
the mid 80's ten times more than it had been just a decade earlier.

The whole market swung back in the last couple decades for suburban
consumers anyway. With the availability of technology,
information on
the net, genetically superior seeds in the mail with practically no
possibility of discovery has turned the whole market right back
where it
started with random, unconnected (mostly non criminal except for
the
pot) producers all over the country. Distribution has gone back
to the
days of the local farmer, mostly serving local friends and family.

Stronger and better (taste, smoothness, etc.) is being genetically
developed all the time and some of the higher priced strains now
can go
for nearly 500 an ounce for top bud (top plant material)...

There is still a good amount of poor quality imported stuff
coming over
the border, but no longer the great strains of the past like the
golds
and reds, just commercial bunk, mostly sold in the inner city in
dime
bags on the street corner. That can still go for close to 200 an
ounce
if you were to find a distributor willing to sell that much.
Most of
them want to cut it to dime bags and make a fortune...

So, that's how the price of pot has effected the industry... in a
nutshell


Ahh, thanks. I don't follow the pot price curve... :)


Hummm, yeah I know a couple here will get stupid but it's all on
the up
and up. I get my info mostly from legal sites representing legal
retail
stores across the country and world... I tend to stir them up a
bit as
although I know there are some very legitimate medical reasons for
some
folks to smoke, I don't subscribe to the whole "medical marijuana"
hoax,
I just believe in straight legalization... 95 to probably 98% of the
folks using "medical marijuana" are full of crap...

Dope is dope Scotty. Do you suggest that all regulations on dope be
rescinded?


No, I think Marijuana should be treated like Tobacco or Alcohol...

I agree. We spend WAY too much time and money on the fight to stamp out
pot. Those resources could be used for much better things.

Why don't you guys come up with a list of dope that you deem acceptable
for general consumption. I'll start the list for you.

1. The hallucinogen, marijuana


Well, that's my list.. Let's turn the tables.. Would you rather get in
the car with somebody smoking pot, or somebody on Oxycontin or Vicodin?


I assume those drugs are powerful hallucinogens, just like marijuana.
You aren't really offering a safe alternative. To answer your question,
I would not knowingly be around any machinery being operated by a person
under the influence of any of those dangerous controlled substances,
including pot.


Pot isn't a "powerful hallucinogen". Why must you hysterical people
automatically assume that if someone drinks alcohol, smokes pot or
whatever that they are driving around?
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
update Paul Oman Boat Building 0 June 20th 08 06:37 PM
GB update Eisboch General 38 November 16th 04 05:03 PM
"26 Again" update FamilySailor ASA 3 August 20th 04 08:44 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:44 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017