This is not a test
 

On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 14:53:40 -0700, Fred J. McCall
wrote:

hk wrote:
:
:Once again, the issue is the girl's mother and Republican hypocrisy on
:sex education, abstinence and contraception, not the girl.
:

What 'hypocrisy'? Do you even know what that word means?

Hint: Her daughter is marrying the father, not that it's any of your
business.

Her daughter is marrying her father? Now that's just SICK. Poor
Eisboch.

This is not a test
 

"Vincent" wrote in message
news:hRZuk.263$1a2.170@trnddc04...
Fred J. McCall wrote:
hk wrote:
:
:Once again, the issue is the girl's mother and Republican hypocrisy on
:sex education, abstinence and contraception, not the girl.
:

What 'hypocrisy'? Do you even know what that word means?

Hint: Her daughter is marrying the father, not that it's any of your
business.



So she says

haven't seen the boy myself



I hope she is not feeling pressured into marrying somebody, just because it
will help her mother politically. 17 is awfully young.

- nilita

This is not a test
 

On Mon, 1 Sep 2008 18:13:14 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:


"hk" wrote in message
...


The girl is not the issue, the mother is. Perhaps if mama weren't so dead
set against the teaching of the mechanics of sex and the ways to prevent
pregnancy, her daughter would be progressing into adulthood in a more
normal fashion, eh?

Remember, the *mother* is the issue. Not the daughter.



A 17 year old gets knocked up and the blame is on the mother for not
explaining the birds and the bees?

By God Harry, we'll make a Republican out of you yet!

Eisboch




Don't you know that her husbands alledged DUI years ago is also her
fault?

This is not a test
 

Fred J. McCall wrote:
hk wrote:

:Fred J. McCall wrote:
: hk wrote:
: :
: :Once again, the issue is the girl's mother and Republican hypocrisy on
: :sex education, abstinence and contraception, not the girl.
: :
:
: What 'hypocrisy'? Do you even know what that word means?
:
: Hint: Her daughter is marrying the father, not that it's any of your
: business.
:
:
:Yeah, teenybopper marriages usually are successful, too.
:
:The girl is not the issue, the mother is. Perhaps if mama weren't so
:dead set against the teaching of the mechanics of sex and the ways to
:prevent pregnancy, her daughter would be progressing into adulthood in a
:more normal fashion, eh?
:

Do you SERIOUSLY think that teenagers don't know about sex,
contraception, and pregnancy by the age of 17? We certainly did when
I was that age, and that was a LONG time ago.

In Europe, no problem
The staggering ignorance of American teenagers is well documented

Vince

This is not a test
 

Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
...


The girl is not the issue, the mother is. Perhaps if mama weren't
so dead set against the teaching of the mechanics of sex and the
ways to prevent pregnancy, her daughter would be progressing into
adulthood in a more normal fashion, eh?

Remember, the *mother* is the issue. Not the daughter.



A 17 year old gets knocked up and the blame is on the mother for not
explaining the birds and the bees?

By God Harry, we'll make a Republican out of you yet!

Eisboch

No its the mother's insistence that other children not be taught the
truth about contraception

The concept is lying by omission

Vince

This is not a test
 

Vincent wrote:
Fred J. McCall wrote:
hk wrote:

:Fred J. McCall wrote:
: hk wrote:
: :
: :Once again, the issue is the girl's mother and Republican
hypocrisy on : :sex education, abstinence and contraception, not the
girl.
: :
: : What 'hypocrisy'? Do you even know what that word means?
: : Hint: Her daughter is marrying the father, not that it's any of
your
: business.
: :
:Yeah, teenybopper marriages usually are successful, too.
:
:The girl is not the issue, the mother is. Perhaps if mama weren't so
:dead set against the teaching of the mechanics of sex and the ways to
:prevent pregnancy, her daughter would be progressing into adulthood
in a :more normal fashion, eh?
:

Do you SERIOUSLY think that teenagers don't know about sex,
contraception, and pregnancy by the age of 17? We certainly did when
I was that age, and that was a LONG time ago.

In Europe, no problem
The staggering ignorance of American teenagers is well documented

Vince

I wouldn't bet on "conservative" evangelical parents doing much in the
way of explaining the birds and the bees, contraception, and avoiding of
STDs to their children, being preaching abstinence.

This is not a test
 

Vincent wrote:
Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
...


The girl is not the issue, the mother is. Perhaps if mama weren't
so dead set against the teaching of the mechanics of sex and the
ways to prevent pregnancy, her daughter would be progressing into
adulthood in a more normal fashion, eh?

Remember, the *mother* is the issue. Not the daughter.



A 17 year old gets knocked up and the blame is on the mother for not
explaining the birds and the bees?

By God Harry, we'll make a Republican out of you yet!

Eisboch

No its the mother's insistence that other children not be taught the
truth about contraception

The concept is lying by omission

Vince



A sin of omission, as it were.

This is not a test
 

hk wrote:
:
:Nope. You still don't get it. It is the hypocrisy of the mother, not the
: pregnancy of the daughter.
:

You really don't know what "hypocrisy" means, do you?

--
"Ignorance is preferable to error, and he is less remote from the
truth who believes nothing than he who believes what is wrong."
-- Thomas Jefferson

This is not a test
 

On Mon, 1 Sep 2008 18:13:14 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:


"hk" wrote in message
...


The girl is not the issue, the mother is. Perhaps if mama weren't so dead
set against the teaching of the mechanics of sex and the ways to prevent
pregnancy, her daughter would be progressing into adulthood in a more
normal fashion, eh?

Remember, the *mother* is the issue. Not the daughter.

A 17 year old gets knocked up and the blame is on the mother for not
explaining the birds and the bees?

By God Harry, we'll make a Republican out of you yet!

Please don't. :)

This is not a test
 

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Mon, 1 Sep 2008 18:13:14 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:

"hk" wrote in message
...


The girl is not the issue, the mother is. Perhaps if mama weren't so dead
set against the teaching of the mechanics of sex and the ways to prevent
pregnancy, her daughter would be progressing into adulthood in a more
normal fashion, eh?

Remember, the *mother* is the issue. Not the daughter.
A 17 year old gets knocked up and the blame is on the mother for not
explaining the birds and the bees?

By God Harry, we'll make a Republican out of you yet!

Please don't. :)


I certainly wouldn't want to be in a party dominated by Good Job
Brownies like Tom.