![]() |
This is not a test
BAR wrote:
:hk wrote: : Fred J. McCall wrote: : hk wrote: : : : :Of course not. If I were "pushing" my beliefs, I'd be actively : seeking :judicial or legislative solutions, : : : And Roe v Wade is certainly nothing like that... : : You know, you're as big an ass as the people you attack. : : : : D'oh. Roe v. Wade is the law of the land. : :Roe vs. Wade is a judicial interpretation. If Congress ever grew a pair :and enacted legislation Roe vs. Wade would disappear with the stroke of :a pen. : Uh, no. Congress can't legislate away the Constitution. Only the Court can do that. -- "It's always different. It's always complex. But at some point, somebody has to draw the line. And that somebody is always me.... I am the law." -- Buffy, The Vampire Slayer |
This is not a test
hk wrote:
: :Ah, yes...abstinence education, about as realistic as, say, creationism. : So your claim is that virgin births are common? Who knew? -- "Some people get lost in thought because it's such unfamiliar territory." --G. Behn |
This is not a test
hk wrote:
:Vincent wrote: : wrote: : On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 12:28:32 -0400, hk wrote: : : : Well, I wasn't going to be the one to spill the alleged details. If it : is true, it is an immediate disqualifier for the woman, not because of : the act, but because of the basic dishonesty it exhibits. : : BS, there are times a lie is justified. This is one of them. Again, : it's their business. : : : Her daughter is pregnant right now : : http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...100710_pf.html : : :Birth control isn't available in Alaska? : Brains aren't available above your neck? -- "Some people get lost in thought because it's such unfamiliar territory." --G. Behn |
This is not a test
hk wrote:
:Raymond O'Hara wrote: : "Fred J. McCall" wrote in message : ... : hk wrote: : : : :Of course not. If I were "pushing" my beliefs, I'd be actively seeking : :judicial or legislative solutions, : : : : And Roe v Wade is certainly nothing like that... : : : what does roe v wade force on anybody? : it stops the government from having control over women. : : :Right-wingers don't seem to understand the concept...or the :underpinnings of of Roe v. Wade. : Or the lack of support. Perhaps it's left-wingers who don't seem to understand? :By all that is holy to them Constitutionally and legally, they should be :supporters of Roe v. Wade. : Please point to the text in the Constitution that Roe v. Wade is based on. -- "False words are not only evil in themselves, but they infect the soul with evil." -- Socrates |
This is not a test
Fred J. McCall wrote:
hk wrote: : :Ah, yes...abstinence education, about as realistic as, say, creationism. : So your claim is that virgin births are common? Who knew? Maybe in your family, not in mine. |
This is not a test
"Wayne.B" wrote in message ... On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 10:43:46 -0400, hk wrote: I haven't worked for thugs for years, and they weren't uneducated. Now *that* is funny. Really. I am still getting belly spasms. Eisboch |
This is not a test
Fred J. McCall wrote:
hk wrote: :Raymond O'Hara wrote: : "Fred J. McCall" wrote in message : ... : hk wrote: : : : :Of course not. If I were "pushing" my beliefs, I'd be actively seeking : :judicial or legislative solutions, : : : : And Roe v Wade is certainly nothing like that... : : : what does roe v wade force on anybody? : it stops the government from having control over women. : : :Right-wingers don't seem to understand the concept...or the :underpinnings of of Roe v. Wade. : Or the lack of support. Perhaps it's left-wingers who don't seem to understand? :By all that is holy to them Constitutionally and legally, they should be :supporters of Roe v. Wade. : Please point to the text in the Constitution that Roe v. Wade is based on. Not the issue The Constitution is interpreted, not read http://www.usscplus.com/info/interp.htm The court was interpreting the "Liberty" portion of the due process clause, as It has since Meyer v Nebraska http://www.oyez.org/cases/1901-1939/1922/1922_325/ Vince |
This is not a test
On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 06:59:35 -0400, hk wrote: * BTW, there is a very interesting and juicy rumor floating about regarding Ms. Palin and that pregnancy. It's too salacious for even me to repeat it here or discuss it before the story breaks. Is the news that her 17 year old daughter is pregnant the "juicy" news you have been awaiting? yawn Eisboch |
This is not a test
Eisboch wrote:
"Wayne.B" wrote in message ... On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 10:43:46 -0400, hk wrote: I haven't worked for thugs for years, and they weren't uneducated. Now *that* is funny. Really. I am still getting belly spasms. Eisboch :) Some of them were quite scary...or worse. |
This is not a test
hk wrote:
: :Bush thinks he has dictatorial powers. Just check his history of :"signing statements." : Hint: Bush didn't invent "signing statements". President Clinton (for example) used more "signing statements" during his 8 years than Bush has (381 to 157). Hint: Clinton didn't invent them, either. The first was penned by James Monroe. -- "Ignorance is preferable to error, and he is less remote from the truth who believes nothing than he who believes what is wrong." -- Thomas Jefferson |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:22 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com