![]() |
This is not a test
"hk" wrote in message . .. Eisboch wrote: "hk" wrote in message . .. In my heart, I believe the anti-abortionists are that way because of psychological, rather than religious reasons, anyway. It is a patriarchal belief, even though some women share in it. It is a method to control women. Sure. Right. A method to control women...... It has absolutely nothing to do with the rights of the unborn child, does it? Eisboch Ahh...the Fetus Rights Movement, a division of the Fundamentalist Borg Church, no doubt. You are truly unbelievable. On one hand you are for freedom of expression, thought and to a degree, deed. But on the other, all above is subject to your approval and beliefs. Those that don't subscribe are lacking in intelligence, rightwing religious nut cases, schitt heads or dumbfochs. Do you have any idea of how narrow minded you are? Eisboch |
This is not a test
On Aug 31, 11:02*pm, "Eisboch" wrote:
"hk" wrote in message . .. Eisboch wrote: "hk" wrote in message m... In my heart, I believe the anti-abortionists are that way because of psychological, rather than religious reasons, anyway. It is a patriarchal belief, even though some women share in it. It is a method to control women. Sure. *Right. *A method to control women...... It has absolutely nothing to do with the rights of the unborn child, does it? Eisboch Ahh...the Fetus Rights Movement, a division of the Fundamentalist Borg Church, no doubt. You are truly unbelievable. * On one hand you are for freedom of expression, thought and to a degree, deed. But on the other, all above is subject to your approval and beliefs. * Those that don't subscribe are lacking in intelligence, rightwing religious nut cases, schitt heads or dumbfochs. Do you have any idea of how narrow minded you are? Eisboch- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I really don't think they do. Just like most hard core liberal/ progressive (repressive) folks I know. Self centered, and intolerant to anyone who does not subscribe, lock step. I guess when you are that insecure, you don't like any opposition.. That's why they are so against free speech. |
This is not a test
ohama bin laden wrote:
Perhaps the Obamessiah could stand on the levees and order the ocean not to come in. He Canute do that. Dennis |
This is not a test
|
This is not a test
In article , payer33859
@mypacks.net says... CalifBill wrote: "Raymond O'Hara" wrote in message ... "CalifBill" wrote in message m... "Raymond O'Hara" wrote in message ... "CalifBill" wrote in message m... the Feds had no responsibility. They are prohibited from sending in the troops until the state asks. They did not. Nagin did not ask, the Gov did not ask. I was there the next year with Habitat Fro Humanity in Slidell when the election was be contested. could not believe the statements that Nagin was only mayor for 3 years, what could he do? And they reelected him sad. LIAR Saturday, August 27 GOV. HALEY BARBOUR DECLARES STATE OF EMERGENCY IN MISSISSIPPI [Office of the Governor] 5AM CDT - KATRINA UPGRADED TO CATEGORY 3 HURRICANE [CNN] GOV. BLANCO ASKS BUSH TO DECLARE FEDERAL STATE OF EMERGENCY IN LOUISIANA: "I have determined that this incident is of such severity and magnitude that effective response is beyond the capabilities of the State and affected local governments, and that supplementary Federal assistance is necessary to save lives, protect property, public health, and safety, or to lessen or avert the threat of a disaster." [Office of the Governor] http://thinkprogress.org/katrina-timeline/ I am not a liar, and you are stupid! Declaring an disaster does not allow the Feds to send in troops. Find out about the law before you make stupid statements. The Mississippi govenor asked for troop. defore the hurricane season started the state and federal officials held a meeting in which they worked out a plan should something like katrina happen, when it did the governor requested it be implemented and the feds failed to comply.. Hurricane Pam exercise Hurricane Pam was a hypothetical hurricane used as a disaster scenario to drive planning for a 13-parish area in Southeastern Louisiana, including the city of New Orleans, in 2004.[8][9] Developed by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, the Louisiana Office of Homeland Security, Emergency Preparedness, the National Weather Service, and Innovative Emergency Management, Inc., the mock hurricane scenario and its projected consequences were the focal point of an eight-day exercise held at the State Emergency Operations Center in Baton Rouge in July, 2004. Hurricane Pam was a slow-moving Category 3 storm with sustained winds of 120 mph. It brought with it up to 20 inches (510 mm) of rain to some parts of southeastern Louisiana and caused levee-topping storm surge. The consequence assessment for Hurricane Pam indicated that more than one million people would be displaced and that 600,000 buildings would be damaged, with some completely destroyed. The report on the simulation, TIME reported, warned that transportation would be a major problem in any storm situation paralleling the fictional "Hurricane Pam." [10] And according to the law, The Federal Gov't could not send troops until requested by the state. You are so antiBush. Probably a HarryBot, that you would not admit anything the Government did right in the last 8 years. Are you trying to say that the Bush Admin handled Katrina "right"? NOBODY, handled the situation right. Can't you see that ? -- Meddle ye not in the Affairs of Dragons, for Thou art Crunchy and taste Goode with Ketchup. |
This is not a test
"hk" wrote in message . .. Fred J. McCall wrote: hk wrote: :Eisboch wrote: : "hk" wrote in message : . .. : : Ain't that the truth. It is amazing and disgusting how the far right uses : religion. If there is a hell, they'll all burn in it for hypocrisy's sake : alone. : : Right beside the "pro-choicers" who condemn women for choosing not to abort : a child with a handicap. : : :Pro-choicers do not force their beliefs on anti-abortionists, ... : Well, yeah, they do. : :... but :anti-abortionists want to force their beliefs on pro-choicers. : I know it's hard for folks like you, but let's try and look at this from the other side and then form an analogy that will feel the same to you as abortion does to them. Suppose I believe I should be able to murder unwanted people pretty much at will for any reason or for no reason at all other than that they inconvenience me. You disagree and go on about the sanctity of human life and how killing them is wrong and want laws to stop me. My response is that very few of the two leggers are actually human, so killing the others is no worse than cutting a fingernail. So, wouldn't there be something wrong with you NOT wanting to 'force your view' on me? That's how they feel about abortion. For you it's an intellectual question. For them it's a case of whether murder is acceptable. Discussion of the issue as if it is just an intellectual question for them, as well, is simply a waste of time and effort and pretending that there is something 'wrong' because they don't view it the way you do is merely specious. Your supposition is silliness. If the anti-abortionists were truly against killing human beings, they would be opposed to capital punishment and war. But most aren't; they pervert their religious texts to justify capital punishment and war. In my heart, I believe the anti-abortionists are that way because of psychological, rather than religious reasons, anyway. It is a patriarchal belief, even though some women share in it. It is a method to control women. "republicans believe the right to life starts at conception and ends with birth" barney frank. |
This is not a test
On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 13:52:23 -0700, CalifBill wrote:
the Feds had no responsibility. They are prohibited from sending in the troops until the state asks. They did not. Nagin did not ask, the Gov did not ask. I was there the next year with Habitat Fro Humanity in Slidell when the election was be contested. could not believe the statements that Nagin was only mayor for 3 years, what could he do? And they reelected him sad. Something that has been overlooked in this discussion, 90% of Greater New Orleans was successfully evacuated, over 1 million people. I can't think of a more successful or complete evacuation in American history, can you? Could it have been better? Sure, but from my standpoint, besides the inadequate levees, most of the problems were after the storm, not before or during. It took far too long to get the needed resources into place. |
This is not a test
"hk" wrote in message . .. CalifBill wrote: "Raymond O'Hara" wrote in message ... "CalifBill" wrote in message m... "Raymond O'Hara" wrote in message ... "CalifBill" wrote in message m... the Feds had no responsibility. They are prohibited from sending in the troops until the state asks. They did not. Nagin did not ask, the Gov did not ask. I was there the next year with Habitat Fro Humanity in Slidell when the election was be contested. could not believe the statements that Nagin was only mayor for 3 years, what could he do? And they reelected him sad. LIAR Saturday, August 27 GOV. HALEY BARBOUR DECLARES STATE OF EMERGENCY IN MISSISSIPPI [Office of the Governor] 5AM CDT - KATRINA UPGRADED TO CATEGORY 3 HURRICANE [CNN] GOV. BLANCO ASKS BUSH TO DECLARE FEDERAL STATE OF EMERGENCY IN LOUISIANA: "I have determined that this incident is of such severity and magnitude that effective response is beyond the capabilities of the State and affected local governments, and that supplementary Federal assistance is necessary to save lives, protect property, public health, and safety, or to lessen or avert the threat of a disaster." [Office of the Governor] http://thinkprogress.org/katrina-timeline/ I am not a liar, and you are stupid! Declaring an disaster does not allow the Feds to send in troops. Find out about the law before you make stupid statements. The Mississippi govenor asked for troop. defore the hurricane season started the state and federal officials held a meeting in which they worked out a plan should something like katrina happen, when it did the governor requested it be implemented and the feds failed to comply.. Hurricane Pam exercise Hurricane Pam was a hypothetical hurricane used as a disaster scenario to drive planning for a 13-parish area in Southeastern Louisiana, including the city of New Orleans, in 2004.[8][9] Developed by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, the Louisiana Office of Homeland Security, Emergency Preparedness, the National Weather Service, and Innovative Emergency Management, Inc., the mock hurricane scenario and its projected consequences were the focal point of an eight-day exercise held at the State Emergency Operations Center in Baton Rouge in July, 2004. Hurricane Pam was a slow-moving Category 3 storm with sustained winds of 120 mph. It brought with it up to 20 inches (510 mm) of rain to some parts of southeastern Louisiana and caused levee-topping storm surge. The consequence assessment for Hurricane Pam indicated that more than one million people would be displaced and that 600,000 buildings would be damaged, with some completely destroyed. The report on the simulation, TIME reported, warned that transportation would be a major problem in any storm situation paralleling the fictional "Hurricane Pam." [10] And according to the law, The Federal Gov't could not send troops until requested by the state. You are so antiBush. Probably a HarryBot, that you would not admit anything the Government did right in the last 8 years. Are you trying to say that the Bush Admin handled Katrina "right"? Nope, they did not. Did the Louisiana people handle it right? They screwed up even worse than the Feds. Would Clinton have screwed it up. Probably the same as Bush. Is N.O. worth rebuilding? Probably not as they are trying to do. |
This is not a test
On Sun, 31 Aug 2008 23:02:42 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:
"hk" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: "hk" wrote in message . .. In my heart, I believe the anti-abortionists are that way because of psychological, rather than religious reasons, anyway. It is a patriarchal belief, even though some women share in it. It is a method to control women. Sure. Right. A method to control women...... It has absolutely nothing to do with the rights of the unborn child, does it? Eisboch Ahh...the Fetus Rights Movement, a division of the Fundamentalist Borg Church, no doubt. You are truly unbelievable. On one hand you are for freedom of expression, thought and to a degree, deed. But on the other, all above is subject to your approval and beliefs. Those that don't subscribe are lacking in intelligence, rightwing religious nut cases, schitt heads or dumbfochs. Do you have any idea of how narrow minded you are? What Harry knows about anything can be written on the tip of a stick pin using a railroad spike as a chisel and a twelve pound sledge hammer as a striker. In 72 point Gothic script. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:17 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com