This is not a test
 

"hk" wrote in message
...


The issue is the mother, not the daughter, and McCain. It's the Republican
b.s. and hypocrisy about abstinence, sex education, and availability of
contraception.


Harry's upset because a 17 year old became pregnant.

Think about that.

Eisboch

This is not a test
 

Eisboch wrote:
On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 06:59:35 -0400, hk wrote:


* BTW, there is a very interesting and juicy rumor floating about
regarding Ms. Palin and that pregnancy. It's too salacious for even me
to repeat it here or discuss it before the story breaks.


Is the news that her 17 year old daughter is pregnant the "juicy" news you
have been awaiting?


yawn

Eisboch



Nope.

This is not a test
 

Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
...

The issue is the mother, not the daughter, and McCain. It's the Republican
b.s. and hypocrisy about abstinence, sex education, and availability of
contraception.


Harry's upset because a 17 year old became pregnant.

Think about that.

Eisboch




You don't read for content, either? I'm disappointed.

Try again:


"The issue is the mother, not the daughter, and McCain. It's the
Republican b.s. and hypocrisy about abstinence, sex education, and
availability of contraception."

I'm not sure I could have stated it more directly.

The issue is the mother, not the daughter...

Got it?

This is not a test
 

"hk" wrote in message
...


What is conclusive is that the 17-year-old Palin daughter is pregnant
right now. Would it be news if her mother had not come out so strongly
against school-based sex education and contraception counseling and so
strongly in favor of abstinence?

What's worse...McCain knew about this before he named Palin as his running
mate. Did he think it was going to remain a secret?




The fact that a 17 year old is pregnant and you are making such a big deal
about it speaks volumes to your credibility.

Next thing we'll hear is that you have converted over to a right-wing
Republican.

Eisboch

This is not a test
 

"BAR" wrote in message
. ..

hk wrote:

What is conclusive is that the 17-year-old Palin daughter is pregnant
right now. Would it be news if her mother had not come out so strongly
against school-based sex education and contraception counseling and so
strongly in favor of abstinence?

What's worse...McCain knew about this before he named Palin as his
running mate. Did he think it was going to remain a secret?



You have a problem with sex now?


Heh. LOL... I love it ...

Eisboch

This is not a test
 

Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
...

What is conclusive is that the 17-year-old Palin daughter is pregnant
right now. Would it be news if her mother had not come out so strongly
against school-based sex education and contraception counseling and so
strongly in favor of abstinence?

What's worse...McCain knew about this before he named Palin as his running
mate. Did he think it was going to remain a secret?




The fact that a 17 year old is pregnant and you are making such a big deal
about it speaks volumes to your credibility.

Next thing we'll hear is that you have converted over to a right-wing
Republican.

Eisboch




Once again, the issue is the girl's mother and Republican hypocrisy on
sex education, abstinence and contraception, not the girl.

This is not a test
 

hk wrote:
Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
. ..

Eisboch wrote:
That's not an indication of intelligence. It's a confirmation of
arrogance.

Eisboch


Do you get it now?

Did I make it simple enough?

:}



You are good. But, you're not *that* good. To some of us your
transparency is obvious.

But, that's ok. It takes all kinds in the world to make it interesting.

Eisboch



Ohh, I'm a pretty damn good writer, but I don't waste effort here.
There's no point to it, and no money, either. :)


Your true colors are shinning thru Harry. You are of the I want mine,
screw everyone else crowd.

This is not a test
 

This is not a test
 

Jack Linthicum wrote:
On Sep 1, 11:10 am, BAR wrote:
hk wrote:
Fred J. McCall wrote:
hk wrote:
:
:Of course not. If I were "pushing" my beliefs, I'd be actively
seeking :judicial or legislative solutions, :
And Roe v Wade is certainly nothing like that...
You know, you're as big an ass as the people you attack.
D'oh. Roe v. Wade is the law of the land.
Roe vs. Wade is a judicial interpretation. If Congress ever grew a pair
and enacted legislation Roe vs. Wade would disappear with the stroke of
a pen.

Looks like a law to me, do you have a citation that says otherwise?

http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/script...l=410&page=113

That is a judicial decision/interpretation. A law is where the chief
executive has signed a bill from a legislative body.

This is not a test
 

hk wrote:

:Fred J. McCall wrote:
: hk wrote:
: :
: :Ah, yes...abstinence education, about as realistic as, say, creationism.
: :
:
: So your claim is that virgin births are common?
:
: Who knew?
:
:
:Maybe in your family, not in mine.
:

So it would seem that abstinence will prevent pregnancy after all. So
much for your silly comparison to creationism, above.

--
"Some people get lost in thought because it's such unfamiliar
territory."
--G. Behn