This is not a test
 

hk wrote:
:
:Once again, the issue is the girl's mother and Republican hypocrisy on
:sex education, abstinence and contraception, not the girl.
:

What 'hypocrisy'? Do you even know what that word means?

Hint: Her daughter is marrying the father, not that it's any of your
business.

--
"False words are not only evil in themselves, but they infect the
soul with evil."
-- Socrates

This is not a test
 

Fred J. McCall wrote:
hk wrote:
:
:Once again, the issue is the girl's mother and Republican hypocrisy on
:sex education, abstinence and contraception, not the girl.
:

What 'hypocrisy'? Do you even know what that word means?

Hint: Her daughter is marrying the father, not that it's any of your
business.



Yeah, teenybopper marriages usually are successful, too.

The girl is not the issue, the mother is. Perhaps if mama weren't so
dead set against the teaching of the mechanics of sex and the ways to
prevent pregnancy, her daughter would be progressing into adulthood in a
more normal fashion, eh?

Remember, the *mother* is the issue. Not the daughter.

This is not a test
 

"hk" wrote in message
. ..
Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
...

The issue is the mother, not the daughter, and McCain. It's the
Republican b.s. and hypocrisy about abstinence, sex education, and
availability of contraception.


Harry's upset because a 17 year old became pregnant.

Think about that.

Eisboch




You don't read for content, either? I'm disappointed.

Try again:


"The issue is the mother, not the daughter, and McCain. It's the
Republican b.s. and hypocrisy about abstinence, sex education, and
availability of contraception."

I'm not sure I could have stated it more directly.

The issue is the mother, not the daughter...

Got it?



I got it the first, second, third and one hundred and fifty second time.

If Biden had a 17 year old pregnant daughter, it would be ok because they
are more *understanding* and permissive in these sort of things, huh?

Eisboch

This is not a test
 

hk wrote:

:Fred J. McCall wrote:
: hk wrote:
: :
: :Once again, the issue is the girl's mother and Republican hypocrisy on
: :sex education, abstinence and contraception, not the girl.
: :
:
: What 'hypocrisy'? Do you even know what that word means?
:
: Hint: Her daughter is marrying the father, not that it's any of your
: business.
:
:
:Yeah, teenybopper marriages usually are successful, too.
:
:The girl is not the issue, the mother is. Perhaps if mama weren't so
:dead set against the teaching of the mechanics of sex and the ways to
:prevent pregnancy, her daughter would be progressing into adulthood in a
:more normal fashion, eh?
:

Do you SERIOUSLY think that teenagers don't know about sex,
contraception, and pregnancy by the age of 17? We certainly did when
I was that age, and that was a LONG time ago.

:
:Remember, the *mother* is the issue. Not the daughter.
:

And just what did the mother do wrong, other than disagree with your
politics?

--
"You take the lies out of him, and he'll shrink to the size of
your hat; you take the malice out of him, and he'll disappear."
-- Mark Twain

This is not a test
 

Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
. ..
Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
...
The issue is the mother, not the daughter, and McCain. It's the
Republican b.s. and hypocrisy about abstinence, sex education, and
availability of contraception.

Harry's upset because a 17 year old became pregnant.

Think about that.

Eisboch



You don't read for content, either? I'm disappointed.

Try again:


"The issue is the mother, not the daughter, and McCain. It's the
Republican b.s. and hypocrisy about abstinence, sex education, and
availability of contraception."

I'm not sure I could have stated it more directly.

The issue is the mother, not the daughter...

Got it?



I got it the first, second, third and one hundred and fifty second time.

If Biden had a 17 year old pregnant daughter, it would be ok because they
are more *understanding* and permissive in these sort of things, huh?

Eisboch




Nope. You still don't get it. It is the hypocrisy of the mother, not the
pregnancy of the daughter.

This is not a test
 

hk wrote:
Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
. ..
Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
...
The issue is the mother, not the daughter, and McCain. It's the
Republican b.s. and hypocrisy about abstinence, sex education, and
availability of contraception.

Harry's upset because a 17 year old became pregnant.

Think about that.

Eisboch



You don't read for content, either? I'm disappointed.

Try again:


"The issue is the mother, not the daughter, and McCain. It's the
Republican b.s. and hypocrisy about abstinence, sex education, and
availability of contraception."

I'm not sure I could have stated it more directly.

The issue is the mother, not the daughter...

Got it?



I got it the first, second, third and one hundred and fifty second time.

If Biden had a 17 year old pregnant daughter, it would be ok because
they are more *understanding* and permissive in these sort of things,
huh?

Eisboch



Nope. You still don't get it. It is the hypocrisy of the mother, not the
pregnancy of the daughter.

You are not going to sell it to this crowd Harry. We don't subscribe to
your your duplicity nor your hypocrisy.

This is not a test
 

Fred J. McCall wrote:
hk wrote:

:Fred J. McCall wrote:
: hk wrote:
: :
: :Once again, the issue is the girl's mother and Republican hypocrisy on
: :sex education, abstinence and contraception, not the girl.
: :
:
: What 'hypocrisy'? Do you even know what that word means?
:
: Hint: Her daughter is marrying the father, not that it's any of your
: business.
:
:
:Yeah, teenybopper marriages usually are successful, too.
:
:The girl is not the issue, the mother is. Perhaps if mama weren't so
:dead set against the teaching of the mechanics of sex and the ways to
:prevent pregnancy, her daughter would be progressing into adulthood in a
:more normal fashion, eh?
:

Do you SERIOUSLY think that teenagers don't know about sex,
contraception, and pregnancy by the age of 17? We certainly did when
I was that age, and that was a LONG time ago.

:
:Remember, the *mother* is the issue. Not the daughter.
:

And just what did the mother do wrong, other than disagree with your
politics?



snerk

Gee, if the kids already know about sex, contraception and pregnancy,
then why is mama against it being talked about by a health teacher in
the public schools?

This is not a test
 

"hk" wrote in message
...


The girl is not the issue, the mother is. Perhaps if mama weren't so dead
set against the teaching of the mechanics of sex and the ways to prevent
pregnancy, her daughter would be progressing into adulthood in a more
normal fashion, eh?

Remember, the *mother* is the issue. Not the daughter.



A 17 year old gets knocked up and the blame is on the mother for not
explaining the birds and the bees?

By God Harry, we'll make a Republican out of you yet!

Eisboch

This is not a test
 

Fred J. McCall wrote:
hk wrote:

:Fred J. McCall wrote:
: hk wrote:
: :
: :Ah, yes...abstinence education, about as realistic as, say, creationism.
: :
:
: So your claim is that virgin births are common?
:
: Who knew?
:
:
:Maybe in your family, not in mine.
:

So it would seem that abstinence will prevent pregnancy after all. So
much for your silly comparison to creationism, above.


you are confusing abstinence and abstinence education

The question is whether abstinence education produces abstinence


There will be a quiz


Vince

This is not a test
 

Fred J. McCall wrote:
hk wrote:
:
:Once again, the issue is the girl's mother and Republican hypocrisy on
:sex education, abstinence and contraception, not the girl.
:

What 'hypocrisy'? Do you even know what that word means?

Hint: Her daughter is marrying the father, not that it's any of your
business.



So she says

haven't seen the boy myself

Vince