|
This is not a test
On Tue, 02 Sep 2008 07:52:02 -0400, hk wrote:
Fred J. McCall wrote: wrote: :On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 15:44:32 -0700, Fred J. McCall wrote: : : : Oh, and I note you dodged the question. Let's try again. If the issue : is the mother and not the daughter, WHAT DID THE MOTHER DO THAT WARRANTS : DRAGGING SOME POOR 17 YEAR OLD GIRL OUT INTO PUBLIC SCRUTINY? : :I'd point out, the mother is the one who did the dragging. One, she is :the one who released the statement. Two, if she didn't know she should :have known, that this would come out. : Still waiting for an answer to the question that was asked... The mother decided to accept John McCain's invitation to be his running mate in his quest for the presidency. In this country, that means your entire life history and that of your family becomes grist for the mill. Perhaps if Mama Moose had not been so adamantly opposed to sex education in the schools, including proper instruction on birth control, Baby Moose might have avoided getting pregnant. My guess is that parents who oppose the teaching of proper sex education in the schools don't provide that education at home, either. Instead, they preach abstinence. Well, the rhythm method and abstinence probably are the two best ways to get pregnant when you don't want to, since neither method works well on horny teenagers. For all we know, Baby Moose came to Mama Moose several months ago and asked for help in getting an abortion, and was turned down. Or perhaps Baby Moose doesn't want to marry the father of her child, but Mama Moose is forcing her into it. I hope *that* doesn't become part of the daily news. I wish Baby Moose well. The best thing she can do, probably, is move away from that dysfunctional family. The Baby Moose's boyfriend had a Myspace page that is now removed. On it, he described himself as a M_F_ing Redneck, and stated that he never wants kids. I see a bright future for all of them... |
This is not a test
|
This is not a test
"La N" wrote in message news:cmdvk.12061$%b7.1346@edtnps82... "Vincent" wrote in message news:lpcvk.232$Dj1.109@trnddc02... wrote: On Tue, 02 Sep 2008 08:05:01 -0400, hk wrote: How do you think Palin will fare at a *real* press conference for a couple of hours where *real* reporters ask the usual sort of tough questions? Or, do you think McCain will let her have such an event? I don't think he'll be able to avoid it. So far, I don't see anything that will disqualify her, depending on the results of the trooper investigation. However, I can't for the life of me, see what she brings to the ticket. And her vetting? McCain's campaign is starting to look amateurish. She was clearly named on pure merit without regard to gender or any other issues She is not an affirmative action token She made it on her own merit She is unquestionably the most qualified person any Republican ever saw She is a gun nut on the cover of Vogue to Republicans there are no other qualifications that matter No wonder they are swooning with pleasure Vince btw, Vince ... you said you didn't believe she had a boyfriend, coz you haven't seen him? Well, here he is: http://www.nypost.com/seven/09012008...s_127025.ht m btw, he has since set his MySpace profile to private. With good reason, I s'pose. I meant to say, Vince, you didn't believe the daughter had a boyfriend, that it was all made up. He's a cute kid. I do hope that she thinks long and hard before getting married .... so young, and everything. - nilita |
This is not a test
On Tue, 02 Sep 2008 16:08:43 GMT, "La N"
wrote: "La N" wrote in message news:cmdvk.12061$%b7.1346@edtnps82... "Vincent" wrote in message news:lpcvk.232$Dj1.109@trnddc02... wrote: On Tue, 02 Sep 2008 08:05:01 -0400, hk wrote: How do you think Palin will fare at a *real* press conference for a couple of hours where *real* reporters ask the usual sort of tough questions? Or, do you think McCain will let her have such an event? I don't think he'll be able to avoid it. So far, I don't see anything that will disqualify her, depending on the results of the trooper investigation. However, I can't for the life of me, see what she brings to the ticket. And her vetting? McCain's campaign is starting to look amateurish. She was clearly named on pure merit without regard to gender or any other issues She is not an affirmative action token She made it on her own merit She is unquestionably the most qualified person any Republican ever saw She is a gun nut on the cover of Vogue to Republicans there are no other qualifications that matter No wonder they are swooning with pleasure Vince btw, Vince ... you said you didn't believe she had a boyfriend, coz you haven't seen him? Well, here he is: http://www.nypost.com/seven/09012008...s_127025.ht m btw, he has since set his MySpace profile to private. With good reason, I s'pose. I meant to say, Vince, you didn't believe the daughter had a boyfriend, that it was all made up. He's a cute kid. I do hope that she thinks long and hard before getting married .... so young, and everything. - nilita Before he set his MySpace page to private, it said: "I'm a M-Fing Redneck. It also said: I never want any kids. A real winner! The Palins are starting to make the Spears family look high class. |
This is not a test
La N wrote:
"La N" wrote in message news:cmdvk.12061$%b7.1346@edtnps82... "Vincent" wrote in message news:lpcvk.232$Dj1.109@trnddc02... wrote: On Tue, 02 Sep 2008 08:05:01 -0400, hk wrote: How do you think Palin will fare at a *real* press conference for a couple of hours where *real* reporters ask the usual sort of tough questions? Or, do you think McCain will let her have such an event? I don't think he'll be able to avoid it. So far, I don't see anything that will disqualify her, depending on the results of the trooper investigation. However, I can't for the life of me, see what she brings to the ticket. And her vetting? McCain's campaign is starting to look amateurish. She was clearly named on pure merit without regard to gender or any other issues She is not an affirmative action token She made it on her own merit She is unquestionably the most qualified person any Republican ever saw She is a gun nut on the cover of Vogue to Republicans there are no other qualifications that matter No wonder they are swooning with pleasure Vince btw, Vince ... you said you didn't believe she had a boyfriend, coz you haven't seen him? Well, here he is: http://www.nypost.com/seven/09012008...s_127025.ht m btw, he has since set his MySpace profile to private. With good reason, I s'pose. I meant to say, Vince, you didn't believe the daughter had a boyfriend, that it was all made up. He's a cute kid. I do hope that she thinks long and hard before getting married .... so young, and everything. - nilita I doubt she has a choice in the matter. Mama sez: "Married! And before the elections!" |
This is not a test
"Eisboch" wrote in message ... The fact that a 17 year old is pregnant and you are making such a big deal about it speaks volumes to your credibility. when jamie lynn spears got pregnant you rightwingers went ballistic saying it was more proof of a decaying depraved society. now when its a republican's kid its okay, no big deal, happens. |
This is not a test
On Sun, 31 Aug 2008 22:56:20 -0400, hk wrote:
Eisboch wrote: "hk" wrote in message . .. In my heart, I believe the anti-abortionists are that way because of psychological, rather than religious reasons, anyway. It is a patriarchal belief, even though some women share in it. It is a method to control women. Sure. Right. A method to control women...... It has absolutely nothing to do with the rights of the unborn child, does it? Eisboch Ahh...the Fetus Rights Movement, a division of the Fundamentalist Borg Church, no doubt. Now *that's* damn respectful! -- *****Have a Spectacular Day!***** John H |
This is not a test
Raymond O'Hara wrote:
"Eisboch" wrote in message ... The fact that a 17 year old is pregnant and you are making such a big deal about it speaks volumes to your credibility. when jamie lynn spears got pregnant you rightwingers went ballistic saying it was more proof of a decaying depraved society. now when its a republican's kid its okay, no big deal, happens. After Gerry Ford, there's very little to be impressed about with the kids of the top of the ticket GOP'ers |
This is not a test
"D.Duck" wrote in message ... "hk" wrote in message . .. Fred J. McCall wrote: hk wrote: :Fred J. McCall wrote: : hk wrote: : : :Fred J. McCall wrote: : : hk wrote: : : : : : :Once again, the issue is the girl's mother and Republican hypocrisy on : : :sex education, abstinence and contraception, not the girl. : : : : : : : What 'hypocrisy'? Do you even know what that word means? : : : : Hint: Her daughter is marrying the father, not that it's any of your : : business. : : : : : :Yeah, teenybopper marriages usually are successful, too. : : : :The girl is not the issue, the mother is. Perhaps if mama weren't so : :dead set against the teaching of the mechanics of sex and the ways to : :prevent pregnancy, her daughter would be progressing into adulthood in a : :more normal fashion, eh? : : : : Do you SERIOUSLY think that teenagers don't know about sex, : contraception, and pregnancy by the age of 17? We certainly did when : I was that age, and that was a LONG time ago. : : : : :Remember, the *mother* is the issue. Not the daughter. : : : : And just what did the mother do wrong, other than disagree with your : politics? : : :snerk : :Gee, if the kids already know about sex, contraception and pregnancy, :then why is mama against it being talked about by a health teacher in :the public schools? : Gee, because perhaps she thinks that sort of thing is the realm of the PARENTS to advise their children on rather than the government? Are you always this stupid? Oh, and I note you dodged the question. Let's try again. If the issue is the mother and not the daughter, WHAT DID THE MOTHER DO THAT WARRANTS DRAGGING SOME POOR 17 YEAR OLD GIRL OUT INTO PUBLIC SCRUTINY? The problem is, I suspect, that evangelical parents do not teach their children about sex, contraception and avoidance of disease. What they teach is abstinence, which, along with the rhythm method, leads to...pregnancy. What did the mother do? Obviously, a ****-poor job of preparing her daughter for the side effects of sexuality. Through your life have you followed everything your parents taught you? Teaching and acceptance by the student don't necessisarily go hand in hand. when jamie lynn spears was pregnant you ruight wingers acted like civilization was falling. now its "it happens no big deal" if chelsea clinton had gotten knocked up the right would have gone into hyper-drive attacking teenage promiscuity. now its "well, gee, it can't be helped" that's why dems favor adequate sex education. now palin wants to make a law for others of what she can't successfully teach at home. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:36 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com