Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
Manual marine head
Steve Daniels, Seek of Spam wrote:
Simpler is better, at least for me. I have ordered a seat that will sit on top of a five gallon bucket. You line it with a plastic garbage bag. Use it, tie the bag shut, and store it until you find a trash can. Your guests should just love that! And how do plan to dispose of the bucket contents? It's illegal to dump 'em overboard within 3 miles of the nearest point on the whole US coastline....nor can you put the bags in a trash can or dumpster legally either. No leaks...no funky odor. Wanna bet? Otoh, you'll have so little invested in it that replacing it with a viable system won't be financially painful. If you want simple and cheap, why not just go with a portpotty? Carrying it off the boat to dump down a toilet legally would be no more effort than carrying bags of toilet waste off the boat to put a dumpster illegally....but would be a LOT more pleasant to use. -- Peggie ---------- Peggie Hall Specializing in marine sanitation since 1987 Author "Get Rid of Boat Odors - A Guide To Marine Sanitation Systems and Other Sources of Aggravation and Odor" http://69.20.93.241/store/customer/p...40&cat=&page=1 |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
Manual marine head
On Mon, 10 May 2004 15:21:17 GMT, Peggie Hall wrote:
good comments snipped It does require two vents, and the fan should be be an exhaust fan that pulls air through, not one that pushes air into the tank. Peggie, I wondered about your statement above...until it occured to me that you're entirely correct. The reason (tell me if I'm wrong) is that by sucking air out, a slightly negative tank pressure is created. This prevents odors from escaping into the boat via the vent loop, (or any other "air leak"), which it would if the tank had positive pressure. I'll probably try this when I (finally) get my own boat, but I'll be sure to make the fan easily replacable, since I suspect the "fumes" will be somewhat corrosive. Norm B. |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
Manual marine head
engsol wrote: On Mon, 10 May 2004 15:21:17 GMT, Peggie Hall wrote: good comments snipped It does require two vents, and the fan should be be an exhaust fan that pulls air through, not one that pushes air into the tank. Peggie, I wondered about your statement above...until it occured to me that you're entirely correct. The reason (tell me if I'm wrong) is that by sucking air out, a slightly negative tank pressure is created. This prevents odors from escaping into the boat via the vent loop, (or any other "air leak"), which it would if the tank had positive pressure. I dunno about that...I think you're over-thinking it. Compare it to an attic or "whole house" fan in a house, or even a hood fan over a stove. They pull air out of the house because that's the most efficient way to do it. To replace/exchange air being pulled out requires a source...in a house, the source is open windows or doors...in a holding tank tank it's a second vent line. I'll probably try this when I (finally) get my own boat, but I'll be sure to make the fan easily replacable, since I suspect the "fumes" will be somewhat corrosive. More often than not, a single 1" diameter short (3') straight vent line will work all by itself. It's only when the tank location makes a short straight vent line impossible that more complex solutions are needed. -- Peggie ---------- Peggie Hall Specializing in marine sanitation since 1987 Author "Get Rid of Boat Odors - A Guide To Marine Sanitation Systems and Other Sources of Aggravation and Odor" http://69.20.93.241/store/customer/p...40&cat=&page=1 |
#54
|
|||
|
|||
Manual marine head
Peggie, am I remembering correctly that a Type I MSD has to be mounted
lower than the head? In that case, I can never use one 'cause understandably the head is about as low as you can get on the boat. Jim. Peggie Hall wrote: IMO, a far better solution than any of the above is a Type I MSD (CG certified device that treats waste and discharges overboard legally in all waters except those specifically designated "no discharge," which are few and far between in coastal waters. Why have to deal with the problems of storing waste aboard if you don't have to? |
#56
|
|||
|
|||
Manual marine head
Peggy
I would really like to install an electrasan or other treatment system, but as near as I can tell ALL of Lake Michigan and Green Bay have been declared "No Discharge Zones" by Wisconsin and Michigan -- probably others of the Great Lakes as well. I seriously dislike the idea of discharging into the lakes, and understand that it's not legal to do so even though a whole lot of folks do so anyway. My boat will probably be on the hard until next year anyway, so it's not an immediate concern, and it won't be on the Great Lakes forever, but I'd sure appreciate any tips you can give me on this topic. If it's in your book, I can obtain it. ;-) -- Karin Conover-Lewis Fair and Balanced since 1959 klc dot lewis at centurytel dot net |
#57
|
|||
|
|||
Manual marine head
Karin Conover-Lewis wrote:
I would really like to install an electrasan or other treatment system, but as near as I can tell ALL of Lake Michigan and Green Bay have been declared "No Discharge Zones" by Wisconsin and Michigan -- probably others of the Great Lakes as well. I'm afraid that's true...all the Great Lakes are "no discharge"--in fact have been so longer than there have been any US marine sanitation laws, under an agreement with Canada. So till you leave there for coastal waters, you're stuck with a holding tank. I seriously dislike the idea of discharging into the lakes, and understand that it's not legal to do so even though a whole lot of folks do so anyway. That's one of the major problems with "no discharge"...several studies indicate that more people are dumping holding tanks illegally than are pumping out. Some have no choice due to lack of pumpout facilities--none within miles, or they're inaccessible, not working or closed...some just don't care. Yet those who are determined to shove "no discharge" down our throats don't seem to realize that the raw sewage and chemical holding tank products in just ONE illegally dumped holding tank has more negative impact on the environment than a 1,000 boats discharging treated waste from a Type I or II MSD in the same area. My boat will probably be on the hard until next year anyway, so it's not an immediate concern, and it won't be on the Great Lakes forever, but I'd sure appreciate any tips you can give me on this topic. If it's in your book, I can obtain it. ;-) I'd love it if you bought my book, and it does include chapters that explain US marine sanitation laws, and lists the most popular Type I and II MSDs and explains how they work...AND how to eliminate holding tank odor...but I don't think you need it till your boat goes back into the water. Meanwhile, the EPA maintains a list of all the "no discharge" waters...it's at http://www.epa.gov/owow/oceans/regul...vsdnozone.html And if you want more detailed information about the advantages of onboard treatment, email me...I have a large and growing collection of articles and research reports. You might also pick up a copy of the next issue of DIY magazine when it comes out...it'll cost you a lot less than my book. -- Peggie ---------- Peggie Hall Specializing in marine sanitation since 1987 Author "Get Rid of Boat Odors - A Guide To Marine Sanitation Systems and Other Sources of Aggravation and Odor" http://69.20.93.241/store/customer/p...40&cat=&page=1 |
#58
|
|||
|
|||
Manual marine head
Peggy
Thanks! That's a good link, and it shows Lake Superior as exempt, but I don't know that I'll be heading up that way. Maybe Sault St. Marie, but that's not quite Superior, so a holding tank does still look like my only bet for now. Well, for then anyway. ;-) I'll look for the DIY magazine (I think I've seen it at Home Depot and Menard's) and will probably get your book just because. :-D -- Karin Conover-Lewis Fair and Balanced since 1959 klc dot lewis at centurytel dot net "Peggie Hall" wrote in message ... Karin Conover-Lewis wrote: I would really like to install an electrasan or other treatment system, but as near as I can tell ALL of Lake Michigan and Green Bay have been declared "No Discharge Zones" by Wisconsin and Michigan -- probably others of the Great Lakes as well. I'm afraid that's true...all the Great Lakes are "no discharge"--in fact have been so longer than there have been any US marine sanitation laws, under an agreement with Canada. So till you leave there for coastal waters, you're stuck with a holding tank. I seriously dislike the idea of discharging into the lakes, and understand that it's not legal to do so even though a whole lot of folks do so anyway. That's one of the major problems with "no discharge"...several studies indicate that more people are dumping holding tanks illegally than are pumping out. Some have no choice due to lack of pumpout facilities--none within miles, or they're inaccessible, not working or closed...some just don't care. Yet those who are determined to shove "no discharge" down our throats don't seem to realize that the raw sewage and chemical holding tank products in just ONE illegally dumped holding tank has more negative impact on the environment than a 1,000 boats discharging treated waste from a Type I or II MSD in the same area. My boat will probably be on the hard until next year anyway, so it's not an immediate concern, and it won't be on the Great Lakes forever, but I'd sure appreciate any tips you can give me on this topic. If it's in your book, I can obtain it. ;-) I'd love it if you bought my book, and it does include chapters that explain US marine sanitation laws, and lists the most popular Type I and II MSDs and explains how they work...AND how to eliminate holding tank odor...but I don't think you need it till your boat goes back into the water. Meanwhile, the EPA maintains a list of all the "no discharge" waters...it's at http://www.epa.gov/owow/oceans/regul...vsdnozone.html And if you want more detailed information about the advantages of onboard treatment, email me...I have a large and growing collection of articles and research reports. You might also pick up a copy of the next issue of DIY magazine when it comes out...it'll cost you a lot less than my book. -- Peggie ---------- Peggie Hall Specializing in marine sanitation since 1987 Author "Get Rid of Boat Odors - A Guide To Marine Sanitation Systems and Other Sources of Aggravation and Odor" http://69.20.93.241/store/customer/p...40&cat=&page=1 |
#59
|
|||
|
|||
Manual marine head
Karin Conover-Lewis wrote:
I'll look for the DIY magazine (I think I've seen it at Home Depot and Menard's) That's DIY-Boats. Apparently the same company publishes several DIY magazines for various fields of endeavor. ...and will probably get your book just because. :-D I'm flattered! Fwiw, signed copies are available from he http://shop.sailboatowners.com/detai...=400&group=327 -- Peggie ---------- Peggie Hall Specializing in marine sanitation since 1987 Author "Get Rid of Boat Odors - A Guide To Marine Sanitation Systems and Other Sources of Aggravation and Odor" http://69.20.93.241/store/customer/p...40&cat=&page=1 |
#60
|
|||
|
|||
Manual marine head
That EPA list only mentions something like "several areas in Texas". I've
never been able to find specific information for places in Texas... does anyone have a link that might clear this up? I've had people try to tell me Clear Lake is a "no discharge" area, including gray water. I know it's BS, but I'd like to point them to something specific. -- Keith __ There is no substitute for good manners, except perhaps fast reflexes. "Peggie Hall" wrote in message ... Karin Conover-Lewis wrote: I would really like to install an electrasan or other treatment system, but as near as I can tell ALL of Lake Michigan and Green Bay have been declared "No Discharge Zones" by Wisconsin and Michigan -- probably others of the Great Lakes as well. I'm afraid that's true...all the Great Lakes are "no discharge"--in fact have been so longer than there have been any US marine sanitation laws, under an agreement with Canada. So till you leave there for coastal waters, you're stuck with a holding tank. I seriously dislike the idea of discharging into the lakes, and understand that it's not legal to do so even though a whole lot of folks do so anyway. That's one of the major problems with "no discharge"...several studies indicate that more people are dumping holding tanks illegally than are pumping out. Some have no choice due to lack of pumpout facilities--none within miles, or they're inaccessible, not working or closed...some just don't care. Yet those who are determined to shove "no discharge" down our throats don't seem to realize that the raw sewage and chemical holding tank products in just ONE illegally dumped holding tank has more negative impact on the environment than a 1,000 boats discharging treated waste from a Type I or II MSD in the same area. My boat will probably be on the hard until next year anyway, so it's not an immediate concern, and it won't be on the Great Lakes forever, but I'd sure appreciate any tips you can give me on this topic. If it's in your book, I can obtain it. ;-) I'd love it if you bought my book, and it does include chapters that explain US marine sanitation laws, and lists the most popular Type I and II MSDs and explains how they work...AND how to eliminate holding tank odor...but I don't think you need it till your boat goes back into the water. Meanwhile, the EPA maintains a list of all the "no discharge" waters...it's at http://www.epa.gov/owow/oceans/regul...vsdnozone.html And if you want more detailed information about the advantages of onboard treatment, email me...I have a large and growing collection of articles and research reports. You might also pick up a copy of the next issue of DIY magazine when it comes out...it'll cost you a lot less than my book. -- Peggie ---------- Peggie Hall Specializing in marine sanitation since 1987 Author "Get Rid of Boat Odors - A Guide To Marine Sanitation Systems and Other Sources of Aggravation and Odor" http://69.20.93.241/store/customer/p...40&cat=&page=1 |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
replace head on a mercruiser 350 engine | General | |||
Just a few names... | General | |||
Manual marine head | Boat Building | |||
Source for cheap tinned marine battery cable | Boat Building | |||
Head Gasket on 50 HP 93 Evinrude | General |