Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
Manual marine head
Dennis Gibbons wrote:
Peggy, Have you ever heard of the following setup: The waste tank is ABOVE the water line with a bottom drain to a seacock. There is a second drain from the top of the tank to the deck pumpout. The head pumps up to the top of the tank. Close the seacock in protected water to keep the bad stuff aboard and then open the seacock when you get out.When offshore, simply leave the seacock open to drain as you go (so to speak). I'm not crazy about that set up. When the seacock is closed waste has to sit in the line to thru-hull, permeating the hose...any sludge in the tank will end up in that hose, so if you're in coastal waters very long, that can cause problems...and I can't see any reason to go through a tank at sea instead of flushing directly overboard. If the tank vent should become blocked, you'll have problems flushing the toilet due to the backpressure. Worst case would be a blocked tank vent AND a clogged overboard discharge hose at sea in 8'+. -- Peggie ---------- Peggie Hall Specializing in marine sanitation since 1987 Author "Get Rid of Boat Odors - A Guide To Marine Sanitation Systems and Other Sources of Aggravation and Odor" http://www.seaworthy.com/html/get_ri...oat_odors.html |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
Manual marine head
Dennis Gibbons wrote: Peggy, Have you ever heard of the following setup: The waste tank is ABOVE the water line with a bottom drain to a seacock. There is a second drain from the top of the tank to the deck pumpout. The head pumps up to the top of the tank. Close the seacock in protected water to keep the bad stuff aboard and then open the seacock when you get out.When offshore, simply leave the seacock open to drain as you go (so to speak). That is _nearly_ exactly the set-up that I have, with one important modification, see after Peggie's comment. Peggie Hall writes: I'm not crazy about that set up. When the seacock is closed waste has to sit in the line to thru-hull, permeating the hose...any sludge in the tank will end up in that hose, so if you're in coastal waters very long, that can cause problems Right. So what I did is to have a PVC ball valve right at the drain, then go with sanitation hose (the good one, of course) to the seacock. Both the PVC ball valve and the seacock are usually closed and only open off-shore for draining the tank. Thus, the hose ONLY ever contains sea water (or antifreeze, in winter), except for brief periods during draining. And after draining the tank I would pump enough sea water through it (using the existing pump, i.e. through the head) to make sure it is clean before closing both valves again. Just like you pump fresh water into the tank when pumping it out. Of course, I have never done it so far since I was always within 3 miles. ...and I can't see any reason to go through a tank at sea instead of flushing directly overboard. Oh, reason is options, and simplicity. I can sail legally in coastal waters and without problems off-shore. True, having some construction with Y-valves, or additional pumps and dip tubes would also work (and actually have some advantages), but this setup is far simpler. If the tank vent should become blocked, you'll have problems flushing the toilet due to the backpressure. Worst case would be a blocked tank vent AND a clogged overboard discharge hose at sea in 8'+. -- Peggie OK, this part I don't understand. Why would a second drain block the vent(s)?? --Ernst |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
Manual marine head
Dennis Gibbons wrote: Peggy, Have you ever heard of the following setup: The waste tank is ABOVE the water line with a bottom drain to a seacock. There is a second drain from the top of the tank to the deck pumpout. The head pumps up to the top of the tank. Close the seacock in protected water to keep the bad stuff aboard and then open the seacock when you get out.When offshore, simply leave the seacock open to drain as you go (so to speak). That is _nearly_ exactly the set-up that I have, with one important modification, see after Peggie's comment. Peggie Hall writes: I'm not crazy about that set up. When the seacock is closed waste has to sit in the line to thru-hull, permeating the hose...any sludge in the tank will end up in that hose, so if you're in coastal waters very long, that can cause problems Right. So what I did is to have a PVC ball valve right at the drain, then go with sanitation hose (the good one, of course) to the seacock. Both the PVC ball valve and the seacock are usually closed and only open off-shore for draining the tank. Thus, the hose ONLY ever contains sea water (or antifreeze, in winter), except for brief periods during draining. And after draining the tank I would pump enough sea water through it (using the existing pump, i.e. through the head) to make sure it is clean before closing both valves again. Just like you pump fresh water into the tank when pumping it out. Of course, I have never done it so far since I was always within 3 miles. ...and I can't see any reason to go through a tank at sea instead of flushing directly overboard. Oh, reason is options, and simplicity. I can sail legally in coastal waters and without problems off-shore. True, having some construction with Y-valves, or additional pumps and dip tubes would also work (and actually have some advantages), but this setup is far simpler. If the tank vent should become blocked, you'll have problems flushing the toilet due to the backpressure. Worst case would be a blocked tank vent AND a clogged overboard discharge hose at sea in 8'+. -- Peggie OK, this part I don't understand. Why would a second drain block the vent(s)?? --Ernst |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
Manual marine head
brain wrote:
...and I can't see any reason to go through a tank at sea instead of flushing directly overboard. Oh, reason is options, and simplicity. "Options?" What options? It offers none...all the waste has to go through the tank, no way to bypass it. It also means that waste has to go uphill to the tank, leaving the head discharge hose full of standing waste. So you have two hoses begging to become permeated. And in your case, a ball valve that prob'ly won't work because you don't sail outside 3 miles often enough to keep it from seizing. A pump in one of the tank discharge lines, a y-valve in the head discharge line...not much more complicated, and now you have options. OK, this part I don't understand. Why would a second drain block the vent(s)?? It wouldn't...one has nothing whatever to do with the other. But Murphy was an optimist who prob'ly based his law on the typical boat owner's approach to marine sanitation system maintenance. Tank vents, especially on sailboats due to waste running out them when heeled, are highly prone to clogging if owners don't backflush 'em regularly--which few do (and when the tank pressurizes, it's last thing owners think of...they think it's due to a clog in the discharge line, often with disastrous results). Nor do many owners ever flush out their tanks to eliminate sludge buildup. Worst case would be a blockage in both lines occurring simultaneously...no escape for displaced air in either direction--out the vent or down the discharge. -- Peggie ---------- Peggie Hall Specializing in marine sanitation since 1987 Author "Get Rid of Boat Odors - A Guide To Marine Sanitation Systems and Other Sources of Aggravation and Odor" http://www.seaworthy.com/html/get_ri...oat_odors.html |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
Manual marine head
Peggy -- I think SunMar makes one that doesn't need any power, but they do
require that "excess fluid drainage" that you mention. Some of those that require power claim to be able to dry the "fluid" sufficiently not to actually use the overflow under lower usage (one or two people full-time), but they're also way too big for my boat. -- Karin Conover-Lewis Fair and Balanced since 1959 klc dot lewis at centurytel dot net "Peggie Hall" wrote in message ... Karin Conover-Lewis wrote: Ditto the "Lavac" recommendation. I would have no other. Well, I'd go for a composting head if I didn't need to carry mountains of peat moss and it fit the same space as the Lavac, but such a creature doesn't exist. Composting toilets also need power 24/7, Karin, to run the blower and evaporator. Also a means of draining off liquids that exceed what can be evaporated, which in coastal waters means some kind of container for 'em...'cuz they can't legally be drained overboard. Composter are an alternative worth considering on a large powerboat on inland "no discharge" waters, but IMO are totally impractical on any boat in coastal waters. -- Peggie ---------- Peggie Hall Specializing in marine sanitation since 1987 Author "Get Rid of Boat Odors - A Guide To Marine Sanitation Systems and Other Sources of Aggravation and Odor" http://www.seaworthy.com/html/get_ri...oat_odors.html http://shop.sailboatowners.com/detai...=400&group=327 |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
Manual marine head
Peggy -- I think SunMar makes one that doesn't need any power, but they do
require that "excess fluid drainage" that you mention. Some of those that require power claim to be able to dry the "fluid" sufficiently not to actually use the overflow under lower usage (one or two people full-time), but they're also way too big for my boat. -- Karin Conover-Lewis Fair and Balanced since 1959 klc dot lewis at centurytel dot net "Peggie Hall" wrote in message ... Karin Conover-Lewis wrote: Ditto the "Lavac" recommendation. I would have no other. Well, I'd go for a composting head if I didn't need to carry mountains of peat moss and it fit the same space as the Lavac, but such a creature doesn't exist. Composting toilets also need power 24/7, Karin, to run the blower and evaporator. Also a means of draining off liquids that exceed what can be evaporated, which in coastal waters means some kind of container for 'em...'cuz they can't legally be drained overboard. Composter are an alternative worth considering on a large powerboat on inland "no discharge" waters, but IMO are totally impractical on any boat in coastal waters. -- Peggie ---------- Peggie Hall Specializing in marine sanitation since 1987 Author "Get Rid of Boat Odors - A Guide To Marine Sanitation Systems and Other Sources of Aggravation and Odor" http://www.seaworthy.com/html/get_ri...oat_odors.html http://shop.sailboatowners.com/detai...=400&group=327 |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
Manual marine head
Peggie,
Question have you ever heard of or used forded mechanical aeration of marine holding tanks? Two options come to mind 1.) install a 10 VDC computer chip cooling fan in a tank vent line where the tank has two vents. for example a 5.3 CFM (free air) fan draws 1.08 watts power (at 24/7 operation this is about 2.2 AH draw) and is about 1-1/2" diameter which can be adapted to fit in-line in one of the vent hoses. 2.) better solution a battery powered AQUARIUM AIR PUMP available on the shelf at PETCO for $13.00. It comes with its own air release stone that would be dropped into the holding tank and feed through a 3/8? O.D. plastic hose that is run-through the wall of one vent line. the air pump is quite and aerates the stored liquid much as a commercial wastewater sewage treatment facility not just the surface layer like tank vents. The air pump is designed to hold two C-size batteries with an estimated 2-week life or about 1.3 AH on a 24/7 operation schedule. KISS would be to replace the "Dry-Cells" every two weeks, but if someone wanted to get really fancy with this installation they could install rechargeable C-Cells and hook them into either a solar panel (al-a NICRO-VENT or into the 12 VDC "House" battery through a dropping resister to get the 3 VDC at the air pump. I realize that these options add another level of complication to the marine head equation but it does away with all odor problems without the cost of additional of chemicals. What is your opinion on either of these mechanical aeration schemes. Jim Maxey ME "Peggie Hall" wrote in message ... Peggie, I have a question, kinda related to this thread. I think I've read/understood that a well "aired" holding tank is the best way to reduce oders. Yep...oxygen is the key to odor elimination. So, being an engineer, I'm wondering if a two hose holding tank vent arrangement...one "inlet" and one "outlet", might work. The forward hose leads to the bow, the aft hose leads to the stern. It would actually work better if both lines went forward...'cuz that would mean air would be forced into the tank no matter which tack you're on. Nor does it require two vent lines if the vent line is short enough ( 5') and has a 1" ID...'cuz air forced in has no trouble pushing gasses in the tank out the same line. The theory is that there would be constant airflow into, (and out of) the holding tank. assuming the vents at each end encouraged such flow. A line leading aft that's too long wouldn't be under enoug pressure to get the job done without an inline exhaust fan to help it. You'd actually be better off with a single 1" short vent. Is this a stupid idea? Noooo...not stupid at all! It only proves you're thinking in the right direction. I'd have to see a diagragm of your installation before I could tell you what you need to do to make it work. -- Peggie ---------- Peggie Hall Specializing in marine sanitation since 1987 Author "Get Rid of Boat Odors - A Guide To Marine Sanitation Systems and Other Sources of Aggravation and Odor" http://www.seaworthy.com/html/get_ri...oat_odors.html |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
Manual marine head
On Sun, 9 May 2004 16:54:04 -0700, something compelled "jmax"
, to say: What is your opinion on either of these mechanical aeration schemes. Simpler is better, at least for me. I have ordered a seat that will sit on top of a five gallon bucket. You line it with a plastic garbage bag. Use it, tie the bag shut, and store it until you find a trash can. No leaks, no clogs, no thru hulls, no funky odor. Yes, it's a little gross, but not more so than when the whole system packs it in and you're reduced to hanging it over the rail. |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
Manual marine head
jmax wrote:
Peggie, Question have you ever heard of or used forced mechanical aeration of marine holding tanks? Yep...in fact, Groco makes a holding tank aeration system...they call it the Sweetank System. See it at http://www.groco.net Two options come to mind... You seem to be describing two different systems...a fan in a vent line doesn't aerate, it only ventilates the airspace above the surface. And in tanks smaller than about 30 gallons, that aren't more than about 18", ventilation along with with an organic (bio-active or nitrate) tank treatment should be enough to create the aerobic environment needed to prevent odor. It does require two vents, and the fan should be be an exhaust fan that pulls air through, not one that pushes air into the tank. An aerator oxygenates the contents, and properly designed and installed for the size of the tank, completely eliminates odor without the use of any tank products. But the key is a pump big enough for the tank size, and a system inside the tank that distributes the air throughout the whole tank...a too-small pump and/or just a single column of air would only push noxious gasses out the vent. It's also important to remember that while fish tanks only contain water, waste is full of animals fats that routinely clog up gauge senders...and can clog up the aerator too if the design doesn't prevent it. By the time you go through all that's needed to design and retrofit a DIY aerator that won't create more problems than it solves, it might be cheaper just to buy one. The Groco Sweetank has a list price of around $250...WM quite often has it on sale for around $150. Even that sounds like a lot till you compare it to the total amount spent on holding tank products over a couple of years. Both aerators and vent fans have to run 24/7/365 (except during winter layup of course) to keep the tank aerobic. A tank that's turned septic can be recovered, but it takes several hours, and the odor forced out the vent is horrific for at least the first hour...then gradually diminishes over the next 3-6 hours depending on the size of the tank. That COULD make your battery powered pump a bit problematic if the batteries aren't changed regularly...and batteries run up the cost too. IMO, a far better solution than any of the above is a Type I MSD (CG certified device that treats waste and discharges overboard legally in all waters except those specifically designated "no discharge," which are few and far between in coastal waters. Why have to deal with the problems of storing waste aboard if you don't have to? -- Peggie ---------- Peggie Hall Specializing in marine sanitation since 1987 Author "Get Rid of Boat Odors - A Guide To Marine Sanitation Systems and Other Sources of Aggravation and Odor" http://69.20.93.241/store/customer/p...40&cat=&page=1 |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
replace head on a mercruiser 350 engine | General | |||
Just a few names... | General | |||
Manual marine head | Boat Building | |||
Source for cheap tinned marine battery cable | Boat Building | |||
Head Gasket on 50 HP 93 Evinrude | General |