Just Plain Insane wrote in
:

On Thu, 7 Aug 2003 16:26:04 +0000 (UTC) I replied to Soque
on a piece of toilet paper while scribbling
their name and phone number on the bathroom wall in alt.sailing.asa

Care
to tell us who pays for your system -and do they know what its being
used for?

Bwhahahahahahahahaha!

My sentiments exactly. Tis a pity that none of the regulars in this
group have an iota of common sense.

I disagree!

It isn't a pity at all.

bertie

The_navigator© wrote in
:



Peter J Ross wrote:



By the way, this is Usenet, not the Internet. As with top-posting,
it's a mistake you're allowed to make only once or twice.


Well aren't you a tough little boy! Grow up.


No, I support free speech.


I wonder why you think certain groups flame/cross posting groups
are not hosted/served by universities?

Actually, they are. Our biggest feed is Stanford. (That's a
university)


These cretins may need a further clue, such as that Stanford is
somewhere in the USA.


Soemewehere in the USa? I guess you didn't go there?


I would be interested to see just how fast your server is by it's
ability to handle a DOSA.

Yeah, but denial of service attacks are illegal.

Of course they are. But if a sysadmin boats about how fasd thgeir
system is one wonders how big the transaction bandwidth is.

It's big enough. Isn't that what he said?


Bertie

"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in
:

Nav, forget it. He's such a flaming fag.

Ooow!


This one is dangerous!

Bertie







"The_navigator©" wrote in message
...


Peter J Ross wrote:



By the way, this is Usenet, not the Internet. As with top-posting,
it's a mistake you're allowed to make only once or twice.


Well aren't you a tough little boy! Grow up.


No, I support free speech.


I wonder why you think certain groups flame/cross posting groups are
not
hosted/served by universities?

Actually, they are. Our biggest feed is Stanford. (That's a
university)


These cretins may need a further clue, such as that Stanford is
somewhere in the USA.


Soemewehere in the USa? I guess you didn't go there?


I would be interested to see just how fast your server is by it's
ability to handle a DOSA.

Yeah, but denial of service attacks are illegal.

Of course they are. But if a sysadmin boats about how fasd thgeir system
is one wonders how big the transaction bandwidth is.


Cheers MC

"Scout" wrote in news:35WdnY42SvZ4d6-
:

Just keep top posting, it seems to have them stumped.

Yes, it's sent me into a positive tizzy.

If nothing else comes of all of this, it will at least gauruntee that scout
is tattoed an idiot on usenet for all time.





Bertie

"Jonathan Ganz" wrote
Nav, forget it. He's such a flaming fag.

Peter J Ross wrote in
:

On Thu, 7 Aug 2003 20:12:04 -0400, a team of surgeons from
alt.sailing.asa removed the following benign growth from Scout:

Just keep top posting, it seems to have them stumped.
Scout


"Jonathan Ganz" wrote
Nav, forget it. He's such a flaming fag.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

I admit it. I'm stumped.











































I confess, I'm confused














Bertie

The_navigator© wrote in news:bgv8vp$so1n6$1@ID-
58816.news.uni-berlin.de:

I just did.

No you didn't.


Bertie
Cheers MC

Gary L. Burnore wrote:
On Fri, 08 Aug 2003 15:56:53 +1200, The_navigator©
wrote:


You mean you don't know?


YOU used the term Transaction Bandwidth. Go on, dufus, explain what
you mean.

"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in
:

Not true. His mom would miss his feeble attempt to impregnate
her.

Good lord.

Bertie




"The_navigator©" wrote in message
...
I've met some real losers, but you must be one of the biggest. Imagine a
whole life ahead with no prospects at all. Why don't you end it all now?
No one will miss you at all.

Cheers MC


Peter J Ross wrote:



You really woudn't want to feel my horny hand spanking your soft
little bottom, tough guy.

Come on, Taddy. A tunicate has a notochord. Trust me. Other than that,
you're pretty spot on. They stay in one place, they're bottom feeders
sucking up the detritus of the ocean and what small amount of spine
they started with has atrophied. They're creatures of pure reflex.
Prod them and they shrink in on themselves, emitting a stream of
processed water.

I point out their reflex reactions to Nav as evidence in support.
Twitch squirt, twitch squirt is all they do. The real pity is that
they can't come to terms with their own inadequacies.

The other thing we use tunicates for, of course, is........... bait.
Here they're dual purpose - both baited and bait.

We wait with bated breath for their next stumbling reply. Will it be a
coherent sentence? Will it comprise more than 3 words? Can they rise
above obscenities to witty and original insult? One doubts it. They
set low standards, and consistently fail to meet them.

On Fri, 08 Aug 2003 15:17:53 +0930, Flying Tadpole
wrote:

I think you and Peter Wiley are defaming the invertebrata, now.
OTOH the x-posts do clearly possess an enteron, for their intake
and output obviously ome from the same orifice,so we can't shove
them _too_ far down the scale. i think the medusoid model, where
the mouth and oral tentacles are placed adjoing the testes, is
probably close.

Flying Tadpole
A creature with true backbone

The navigator© wrote:

Wonder indeed, accord is definitely lacking. Perhaps an elasmobranch?

Cheers MC

Flying Tadpole wrote:

Nonsense MC! THere's not even any _sign_ of a brow. Does it even
have a notochord, is what I'm wondering...

FT

The navigator© wrote:

Highbrow wig for a low brow?

Cheers MC

Flying Tadpole wrote:


Scout wrote:



K. A. Cannon, by association, defiles the good name of Friedrich Nietzsche

with this telling gem:


Hi!!
Can I **** your mom?


You realise that the poor child probably watched A Fish Called
Wanda and thought the armpitting and Nietzsche-quoting bits were
heroic?

Sorry, can you repeat as top post? I don't scroll for trolls.
--
be back later - gotta take a Bertie
Scout


"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote something but didn't top post so it goes
unread:

Oh, come on, Nav. give them some credit. Surely they're capable of
bigger sins than that. After all, it appears Burnmore is a child
molester and it's well known that pedophiles hang out together.

On Fri, 08 Aug 2003 18:08:09 +1200, The_navigator©
wrote:

Don't you mean pecadillo playing?

Cheers MC

Peter Wiley wrote:

I'm afraid that their piccolo playing has caused a few sour notes.
Apologies.

On Fri, 08 Aug 2003 17:31:27 +1200, The_navigator©
wrote:


There's no need to add reverberation!

Cheers MC

Peter Wiley wrote:


No, no - Mooron is an elasmobranch. These sorry excuses are tunicates.

On Fri, 08 Aug 2003 15:08:39 +1200, The_navigator©
wrote:



Wonder indeed, accord is definitely lacking. Perhaps an elasmobranch?

Cheers MC

Flying Tadpole wrote:



Nonsense MC! THere's not even any _sign_ of a brow. Does it even
have a notochord, is what I'm wondering...

FT

The navigator© wrote:



Highbrow wig for a low brow?

Cheers MC

Flying Tadpole wrote:




Scout wrote:





K. A. Cannon, by association, defiles the good name of Friedrich Nietzsche

with this telling gem:




Hi!!
Can I **** your mom?


You realise that the poor child probably watched A Fish Called
Wanda and thought the armpitting and Nietzsche-quoting bits were
heroic?