The_navigator© wrote in
:

do you want to dance for .asa tonight?

Snort!


How tarveresque of you.

Bertie

Cheers MC

Peter J Ross wrote:

On Fri, 08 Aug 2003 15:45:50 +1200, a team of surgeons from
alt.sailing.asa removed the following benign growth from
The_navigator©:


Peter J Ross wrote:


On Fri, 08 Aug 2003 11:17:05 +1200, a team of surgeons from
alt.sailing.asa removed the following benign growth from
The_navigator©:


Peter J Ross wrote:


By the way, this is Usenet, not the Internet. As with top-posting,
it's a mistake you're allowed to make only once or twice.

Well aren't you a tough little boy! Grow up.

You must be really tough too, since you snipped the newsgroups line
in case I saw your reply.

S'funny, even a newbie could have guessed that I was not cross
posting...


I'm so sorry. I've just got into the habit of thinking that kooks
like you have RUN AWAY when I don't see a reply in any of the
newsgroups I read. Next time I'll remember to check all of Usenet in
case I've missed your words of wisdom.


As for tough, I don't ever need to 'talk tough'. Now who's
'allowing' me only one ot two top posts -is that you 'tough' boy?


You really woudn't want to feel my horny hand spanking your soft
little bottom, tough guy.


But there's nowhere you can hide, you know.

Sounds like you want to meet me in person? Are you sure?


Get on the plane NOW! And bring all the sex aids you own!!


No, I went to New College, Oxford, and had the distinction (rare,
these days) of leaving without taking a degree. Stanford is for
uppity colonials. Next question?

Am I supposed to be impressed by you continued failures in life?


No, but I must admit I'm very impressed by you spellchecker.


I have to be very, very drunk before I start typing like that,
Navvie. What's your excuse?

Leaning over typing while doing more interesting things leads to
typo's.


Were you arranging your stamp collection?


Still you got the idea. Here it's called katytype.


I'm sure the whole world cares what it's called "here".


Are you glued to your
phosphorescent world?


What's the ugliest part of your body?

The_navigator© wrote in news:bgvbk2$sg5no$1@ID-
58816.news.uni-berlin.de:

I hope you don't mean it because don't often get such a good
demonstration from a delightful dancing coprophiliac like you!

But of course he's a coprophiliac.

You'd have to be to be here, woudln't you?

Bertie

Peter J Ross wrote:

On Fri, 08 Aug 2003 16:56:40 +1200, a team of surgeons from
alt.sailing.asa removed the following benign growth from
The_navigator©:


But Pet, we've only just begun to entertain the regulars. Come on, pick
up your plates and do an idiot's shuffle -we know you can!


You tempt me, but no; I'll never post here again. My word is my bond.

Flying Tadpole wrote in
:

Xref: news alt.sailing.asa:262829
Path:
news.alt.net!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net !newsfeed.fjserv.net!
newsfeed.freenet.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!dialup-248.55.221.203.ac
c05-waym-adl.comindico.com.AU!not-for-mail From: Flying Tadpole
Newsgroups: alt.sailing.asa
Subject: Hey Peter Ross 2
Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2003 15:09:25 +0930
Lines: 29
Message-ID:
References:










NNTP-Posting-Host:
dialup-248.55.221.203.acc05-waym-adl.comindico.com.au (203.221.55.248)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de 1060321095 30620239 203.221.55.248 (16
[85917]) X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language: en

No, just another one gone and sold his soul
To lose himself in that Ross'n'Roll,
And drift away...

mm hmm.

Bertie
FT

The navigator© wrote:

But Pet you made it on a previous post. All these spins are making
you dizzy. Are you losing count or just not very good with numbers?

Cheers MC

Peter J Ross wrote:

On Fri, 08 Aug 2003 16:59:28 +1200, a team of surgeons from
alt.sailing.asa removed the following benign growth from
The_navigator©:


That's the second spin! They are so tight it's a delight. I really
don't think your old mother would like you using such vulgarities.
I'm sure you didn't learn them from the old girl. But you need to
slow down a bit 'cos you may get too hot and hurt yourself!


Are you already working on "3"?

(Peter Wiley) wrote in
:

I'm afraid that their piccolo playing has caused a few sour notes.
Apologies.


My god, where are your minds?

Bertie





On Fri, 08 Aug 2003 17:31:27 +1200, The_navigator©
wrote:

There's no need to add reverberation!

Cheers MC

Peter Wiley wrote:

No, no - Mooron is an elasmobranch. These sorry excuses are
tunicates.

On Fri, 08 Aug 2003 15:08:39 +1200, The_navigator©
wrote:


Wonder indeed, accord is definitely lacking. Perhaps an
elasmobranch?

Cheers MC

Flying Tadpole wrote:


Nonsense MC! THere's not even any _sign_ of a brow. Does it even
have a notochord, is what I'm wondering...

FT

The navigator© wrote:


Highbrow wig for a low brow?

Cheers MC

Flying Tadpole wrote:



Scout wrote:




K. A. Cannon, by association, defiles the good name of
Friedrich Nietzsche

with this telling gem:



Hi!!
Can I **** your mom?


You realise that the poor child probably watched A Fish Called
Wanda and thought the armpitting and Nietzsche-quoting bits were
heroic?

(Peter Wiley) wrote in
:

Oh, come on, Nav. give them some credit. Surely they're capable of
bigger sins than that. After all, it appears Burnmore is a child
molester and it's well known that pedophiles hang out together.

Snort!


Getting a bit desperate, aren't you?

Bertie

On Fri, 08 Aug 2003 18:08:09 +1200, The_navigator©
wrote:

Don't you mean pecadillo playing?

Cheers MC

Peter Wiley wrote:

I'm afraid that their piccolo playing has caused a few sour notes.
Apologies.

On Fri, 08 Aug 2003 17:31:27 +1200, The_navigator©
wrote:


There's no need to add reverberation!

Cheers MC

Peter Wiley wrote:


No, no - Mooron is an elasmobranch. These sorry excuses are
tunicates.

On Fri, 08 Aug 2003 15:08:39 +1200, The_navigator©
wrote:



Wonder indeed, accord is definitely lacking. Perhaps an
elasmobranch?

Cheers MC

Flying Tadpole wrote:



Nonsense MC! THere's not even any _sign_ of a brow. Does it even
have a notochord, is what I'm wondering...

FT

The navigator© wrote:



Highbrow wig for a low brow?

Cheers MC

Flying Tadpole wrote:




Scout wrote:





K. A. Cannon, by association, defiles the good name of
Friedrich Nietzsche

with this telling gem:




Hi!!
Can I **** your mom?


You realise that the poor child probably watched A Fish Called
Wanda and thought the armpitting and Nietzsche-quoting bits
were heroic?

"Scout" wrote in
:

Sadly this is true. We can't have them feeling badly about
themselves, so graduate high school they must.

Oh, do go on.

And you do!

I see this same behavior in my students, particularly the emotionally
troubled children. They can be quite clever with technology (e.g., a
computer), because no social skills are necessary. However, when
forced to sustain a logical debate, or even friendly discussion, they
tend to fall apart quickly, resorting to such low-brow activities as
mom insults, foul language, threats, and all variations of homophobic
name calling. We can only hope their guidance counselors are astute
enough to hear their cries for help.

Oh yes, help me.

Please

Bertie






Scout


"Flying Tadpole" wrote
year by year, it's easier and easier "to sashay under the ever-rising
academic limbo bar".

"Scout" wrote in
:

I'll give him credit for a brain-stem. But I'd be hard pressed to call
his involuntary twitching an actual dance.

Mmm.

Yes.

I'm learning.
Do go on.



Bertei
Scout

"Flying Tadpole" wrote
Nonsense MC! THere's not even any _sign_ of a brow. Does it even
have a notochord, is what I'm wondering...

Flying Tadpole wrote in
:

I think you and Peter Wiley are defaming the invertebrata, now.
OTOH the x-posts do clearly possess an enteron, for their intake
and output obviously ome from the same orifice,so we can't shove
them _too_ far down the scale. i think the medusoid model, where
the mouth and oral tentacles are placed adjoing the testes, is
probably close.

and yet you keep talking to us.

Go figure.

Bertie

Flying Tadpole
A creature with true backbone

The navigator© wrote:

Wonder indeed, accord is definitely lacking. Perhaps an elasmobranch?

Cheers MC

Flying Tadpole wrote:

Nonsense MC! THere's not even any _sign_ of a brow. Does it even
have a notochord, is what I'm wondering...

FT

The navigator© wrote:

Highbrow wig for a low brow?

Cheers MC

Flying Tadpole wrote:


Scout wrote:



K. A. Cannon, by association, defiles the good name of Friedrich
Nietzsche

with this telling gem:


Hi!!
Can I **** your mom?


You realise that the poor child probably watched A Fish Called
Wanda and thought the armpitting and Nietzsche-quoting bits were
heroic?

(Peter Wiley) wrote in
:

Come on, Taddy. A tunicate has a notochord. Trust me. Other than that,
you're pretty spot on. They stay in one place, they're bottom feeders
sucking up the detritus of the ocean and what small amount of spine
they started with has atrophied. They're creatures of pure reflex.
Prod them and they shrink in on themselves, emitting a stream of
processed water.

I point out their reflex reactions to Nav as evidence in support.
Twitch squirt, twitch squirt is all they do. The real pity is that
they can't come to terms with their own inadequacies.

The other thing we use tunicates for, of course, is........... bait.
Here they're dual purpose - both baited and bait.

We wait with bated breath for their next stumbling reply.


I'm honored.

Will it be a
coherent sentence?

Does it matter? Once you're waiting with bated breath I am fulfilled.

Bertie

"Scout" wrote in
:

Sorry, can you repeat as top post? I don't scroll for trolls.

No

Bertie