In bob's case that wouldn't be possible anyway.

"Flying Tadpole" wrote in message
...
Jon, please...try to ignore what's right in front of you, and
think, instead, of turning the connection between "lard" and
"drip" into a connection with "drip" and something else. You
know? "A is to B as B is to C but C and A normally appear totally
unrelated". Then, simply find a "B" that means both "B" and "C",
depending on context. It is the surprise juxtaposition of "A" and
"C" that brightens the day. You do not need turds for a pungent
repsonse.

FT

Jonathan Ganz wrote:

Yeh, but the analogy doesn't fit. If you take away the lard,
you'd be left with a turd.

"Capt. Mooron" wrote in message
...
Jon... notice the graceful arc of the blade.... the subtle unexpected
strike.... so swift and surgical as to not mar the blade edge with
blood..... blood is drawn yet the victim is only critically wounded.
That, Ganz is a true display of the mastery in the art form of the NG
Ginshu
Ninja....

CM

"Flying Tadpole" wrote in message
...

| Ignore those who would blind you with science, for the answer is
| obvious: take away all the lard and you'll still be left with a
| drip.