"Bobsprit" wrote in message

He's a self-absorbed sad asshole who gets a kick out of dissing a bunch of
names on his computer screen. All day, every day.

Let's hope you don't call me names tomorrow, dopey!

It was an observation.


--
Wally
I demand rigidly-defined areas of uncertainty!
www.art-gallery.myby.co.uk

Wally wrote:



Engage your brain and look up "hypocryte" in a dictionary.

He won't find it. The word, that is, not the brain.

You're a slavering mouthpiece who has a pathological need to dominate a
forum full of people you'll likely never meet.

Unfair slur, sir. This forum is full of those with a
pathological need to dominate a forum full of people they'll
likely never meet. The other regulars, however, don't need to
slaver. They just dominate, often by their apparent abstinence
at the feast.

I would like to see a reduction in frequency of posting ex
Bobsprit, as wading through 100 posts is just too tedious. I
just wish he'd finish the current script he's compiling from this
group's thrashings, then possibly we could return to simple
stabs, cuts and thrusts, rather than crude bludgeoning, with
proprotionately more sailing content.

Flying Tadpole

Make up your mind Taddy. First you encourage him and then object. Try
and steer a straight course eh?

"What is this I see before me, it's handle toward my hand... Go back to
the grave from whence thou came thou foul shadow"

Cheers MC

Flying Tadpole wrote:

Wally wrote:



Engage your brain and look up "hypocryte" in a dictionary.


He won't find it. The word, that is, not the brain.


You're a slavering mouthpiece who has a pathological need to dominate a
forum full of people you'll likely never meet.


Unfair slur, sir. This forum is full of those with a
pathological need to dominate a forum full of people they'll
likely never meet. The other regulars, however, don't need to
slaver. They just dominate, often by their apparent abstinence
at the feast.

I would like to see a reduction in frequency of posting ex
Bobsprit, as wading through 100 posts is just too tedious. I
just wish he'd finish the current script he's compiling from this
group's thrashings, then possibly we could return to simple
stabs, cuts and thrusts, rather than crude bludgeoning, with
proprotionately more sailing content.

Flying Tadpole

On Thu, 17 Jul 2003 21:09:01 -0400, "Scott Vernon"
wrote this crap:

"Horvath" wrote

On your little boat there's no problem. On my boat, nobody at the bow
can reach down far enough to grab the mooring ball.

you can't afford a boat hook?

Duh! I have a hook, but when you hook the ball, how are you going to
tie a line to it? At the bow, you're standing four feet above the
water.





Ave Imperator Bush!
Bush Was Right! Four More Beers!

Jon, please...try to ignore what's right in front of you, and
think, instead, of turning the connection between "lard" and
"drip" into a connection with "drip" and something else. You
know? "A is to B as B is to C but C and A normally appear totally
unrelated". Then, simply find a "B" that means both "B" and "C",
depending on context. It is the surprise juxtaposition of "A" and
"C" that brightens the day. You do not need turds for a pungent
repsonse.

FT

Jonathan Ganz wrote:

Yeh, but the analogy doesn't fit. If you take away the lard,
you'd be left with a turd.

"Capt. Mooron" wrote in message
...
Jon... notice the graceful arc of the blade.... the subtle unexpected
strike.... so swift and surgical as to not mar the blade edge with
blood..... blood is drawn yet the victim is only critically wounded.
That, Ganz is a true display of the mastery in the art form of the NG
Ginshu
Ninja....

CM

"Flying Tadpole" wrote in message
...

| Ignore those who would blind you with science, for the answer is
| obvious: take away all the lard and you'll still be left with a
| drip.

Well that little problem must have prevented sailors from tying up to
mooring buoys for ... years. You great TWIT

Cheers MC

Horvath wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jul 2003 21:09:01 -0400, "Scott Vernon"
wrote this crap:


"Horvath" wrote

On your little boat there's no problem. On my boat, nobody at the bow
can reach down far enough to grab the mooring ball.

you can't afford a boat hook?


Duh! I have a hook, but when you hook the ball, how are you going to
tie a line to it? At the bow, you're standing four feet above the
water.





Ave Imperator Bush!
Bush Was Right! Four More Beers!

In bob's case that wouldn't be possible anyway.

"Flying Tadpole" wrote in message
...
Jon, please...try to ignore what's right in front of you, and
think, instead, of turning the connection between "lard" and
"drip" into a connection with "drip" and something else. You
know? "A is to B as B is to C but C and A normally appear totally
unrelated". Then, simply find a "B" that means both "B" and "C",
depending on context. It is the surprise juxtaposition of "A" and
"C" that brightens the day. You do not need turds for a pungent
repsonse.

FT

Jonathan Ganz wrote:

Yeh, but the analogy doesn't fit. If you take away the lard,
you'd be left with a turd.

"Capt. Mooron" wrote in message
...
Jon... notice the graceful arc of the blade.... the subtle unexpected
strike.... so swift and surgical as to not mar the blade edge with
blood..... blood is drawn yet the victim is only critically wounded.
That, Ganz is a true display of the mastery in the art form of the NG
Ginshu
Ninja....

CM

"Flying Tadpole" wrote in message
...

| Ignore those who would blind you with science, for the answer is
| obvious: take away all the lard and you'll still be left with a
| drip.

"The_navigator©" wrote in message

Make up your mind Taddy. First you encourage him and then object. Try
and steer a straight course eh?

I suspect his purpose was to give me a slap, but without appearing to defend
The Twazzock.


--
Wally
I demand rigidly-defined areas of uncertainty!
www.art-gallery.myby.co.uk

Wally wrote:

"Flying Tadpole" wrote in message

He won't find it. The word, that is, not the brain.

True, but he'll find something very similar.


I'm chastened by your polite reply, especially when I saw my own
spelling of "noncommittal" in another post...


This forum is full of those with a
pathological need to dominate a forum full of people they'll
likely never meet.

Are you sure that the need of others is pathological?


Well, pathos is the root of it all, yes?

snip

I'd be amazed if anyone could condense the sheer volume into something
approximating a scirpt.

Not so much "be amazed" as "Be afraid. Be very afraid"
http://www.internetopera.netfirms.com

... then possibly we could return to simple
stabs, cuts and thrusts, rather than crude bludgeoning, with
proprotionately more sailing content.

The 'spot the error' photos are good.

Cruel, cruel....perhaps we could promote you to "skate"...
("fiddler" is already taken by another bottomfeeder)

Flying Tadpole

"Flying Tadpole" wrote in message

True, but he'll find something very similar.

I'm chastened by your polite reply, especially when I saw my own
spelling of "noncommittal" in another post...

Such errors are eminently forgivable, but mine less so for not checking my
own dictionary before admonishing Matrix Boy to do just that.


Are you sure that the need of others is pathological?

Well, pathos is the root of it all, yes?

In a monochrome photograph, there are many shades of grey.


Not so much "be amazed" as "Be afraid. Be very afraid"
http://www.internetopera.netfirms.com

Blimey (as they say in Englandshire). I find myself wondering if I should
adopt a nautical stage name, lest I find myself appearing (in a bit part, if
at all) in this fine thespian production. (I have one in mnd, but I've been
saving it for when my vast, ocean-going 18-foot mega-yacht hits the water.)


The 'spot the error' photos are good.

Cruel, cruel....

You mean his pics *aren't* a quiz?? sweet, innocent n00b look


... perhaps we could promote you to "skate"...
("fiddler" is already taken by another bottomfeeder)

An accolade indeed!


--
Wally
I demand rigidly-defined areas of uncertainty!
www.art-gallery.myby.co.uk