Just for you stupid (duhh... scroll to the bottom, bottom-feeder)...

"Horvath" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 17 Jul 2003 08:17:02 -0400, "Scott Vernon"
wrote this crap:

What's the big deal about sailing to/from a mooring?

On your little boat there's no problem. On my boat, nobody at the bow
can reach down far enough to grab the mooring ball.

I find it's far easier to back up to the ball, with someone standing
on the swim platform.

http://216.255.29.178/page12.htm

Scroll to near the bottom (just for you... a low class bottom feeder)
and check out the B203 Happy HookerT.

You are just too stupid for words.

Sorry, Bobadil, but your boat on it's best day, isn't really considered one of
C&C's finest efforts.

C&C's finest efforts were in the 70s. The old 27 is twice the boat you own. The
old 30, 33 are also amazing. Perry wrote that the 32 was essentailly a slightly
larger version of the 30. High praise indeed! I don't think your 27 is a bad
boat.

RB

Well considering that you drive a Subaru Forrester (the lesbian car of
choice)...

I don't drive a forester, dopey.

RB

wrote:
snip

Well considering that you drive a Subaru Forrester (the lesbian car of
choice)...


Fighting words...come up and see me sometime, sailor...bring your
car...
26deg 46' 50" S 140deg 59' 29" E, or if not there, then knock
next door at 27 13' 55" S 140 69'32"E, or drive around the block
to 26 57' 06" S 140 54' 46" E

Flying Tadpole's towing buddy Chubby

wrote:

On Fri, 18 Jul 2003 20:10:09 +0930, Flying Tadpole
wrote:



wrote:
snip

Well considering that you drive a Subaru Forrester (the lesbian car of
choice)...


Fighting words...come up and see me sometime, sailor...bring your
car...
26deg 46' 50" S 140deg 59' 29" E, or if not there, then knock
next door at 27 13' 55" S 140 69'32"E, or drive around the block
to 26 57' 06" S 140 54' 46" E

Flying Tadpole's towing buddy Chubby

Would that be "Chubby the Lesbo"? 8^)


I don't know, I never asked. But why is it your emoticon is
smacking its lips? and wearing spectacles?

"Horvath" wrote in message

| Duh! I have a hook, but when you hook the ball, how are you going to
| tie a line to it? At the bow, you're standing four feet above the
| water.


Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha ha ha ha ha ah......... Oh man that was just
too funny!!

Heh Horvath..... on my bowsprit you are standing 4 feet above the water as
well.

CM

"Horvath" wrote in message

| When you're standing on the bow, and you are four feet off the water,
| and you hook the mooring ball,
|
| How the **** do you tie a line to it?

Okay... I thought you were pulling our collective leg here.... it's obvious
why you prefer a slip at the dock. Once you hook the ball you pull it up to
the deck and tie on with a mooring painter to each cleat at the bow. If you
have a regular mooring you fit it with two 15 ft floating mooring painters
about 3/4" dia. It's much easier to "hook" the painters and secure than
yanking the ball up to the boat each time.


|
| It's much easier to have someone stand on the swim platform, and back
| up to the ball to moor stern first dumbass.

Yes Horvath... I've seen people moor stern to... it's cute and sets your
place in the pecking order of sailors.

CM

I'm beginning to lose all faith in the possibility of inducing Jon to reply
with his brain engaged. He has claimed a 162 IQ yet has shown a flagrant
refusal to employ his supposed superior intellect. It casts doubt on his
abilities and offers Bob the venue of merely remaining silent while Ganz
hangs himself time and again with his own ill thought replies.

I here by officially abandon my efforts to coach Jon.... the constant chore
of beating my head against a stone wall is interfering with my drinking.

Good Luck Ganz...

CM


"Flying Tadpole" wrote in message
...
| I give up. Let no-one claim I didn't at least try.
|
| FT
|
| Jonathan Ganz wrote:
|
| In bob's case that wouldn't be possible anyway.
|
| "Flying Tadpole" wrote in message
| ...
| Jon, please...try to ignore what's right in front of you, and
| think, instead, of turning the connection between "lard" and
| "drip" into a connection with "drip" and something else. You
| know? "A is to B as B is to C but C and A normally appear totally
| unrelated". Then, simply find a "B" that means both "B" and "C",
| depending on context. It is the surprise juxtaposition of "A" and
| "C" that brightens the day. You do not need turds for a pungent
| repsonse.
|
| FT
|
| Jonathan Ganz wrote:
|
| Yeh, but the analogy doesn't fit. If you take away the lard,
| you'd be left with a turd.
|
| "Capt. Mooron" wrote in message
| ...
| Jon... notice the graceful arc of the blade.... the subtle
unexpected
| strike.... so swift and surgical as to not mar the blade edge
with
| blood..... blood is drawn yet the victim is only critically
wounded.
| That, Ganz is a true display of the mastery in the art form of the
NG
| Ginshu
| Ninja....
|
| CM
|
| "Flying Tadpole" wrote in message
| ...
|
| | Ignore those who would blind you with science, for the answer is
| | obvious: take away all the lard and you'll still be left with a
| | drip.
|
|

BB,

Foresters are great cars. Please don't criticize RB for this.
He does the best he can.

wrote in message
...
On 18 Jul 2003 10:25:16 GMT, (Bobsprit) wrote:

Well considering that you drive a Subaru Forrester (the lesbian car of
choice)...

I don't drive a forester, dopey.


Hard to belive you only drive it when you are not dopey. That doesn't
leave much
time!

BB

Keep drinking. You'll get it eventually!

"Capt. Mooron" wrote in message
...
I'm beginning to lose all faith in the possibility of inducing Jon to
reply
with his brain engaged. He has claimed a 162 IQ yet has shown a flagrant
refusal to employ his supposed superior intellect. It casts doubt on his
abilities and offers Bob the venue of merely remaining silent while Ganz
hangs himself time and again with his own ill thought replies.

I here by officially abandon my efforts to coach Jon.... the constant
chore
of beating my head against a stone wall is interfering with my drinking.

Good Luck Ganz...

CM


"Flying Tadpole" wrote in message
...
| I give up. Let no-one claim I didn't at least try.
|
| FT
|
| Jonathan Ganz wrote:
|
| In bob's case that wouldn't be possible anyway.
|
| "Flying Tadpole" wrote in message
| ...
| Jon, please...try to ignore what's right in front of you, and
| think, instead, of turning the connection between "lard" and
| "drip" into a connection with "drip" and something else. You
| know? "A is to B as B is to C but C and A normally appear totally
| unrelated". Then, simply find a "B" that means both "B" and "C",
| depending on context. It is the surprise juxtaposition of "A" and
| "C" that brightens the day. You do not need turds for a pungent
| repsonse.
|
| FT
|
| Jonathan Ganz wrote:
|
| Yeh, but the analogy doesn't fit. If you take away the lard,
| you'd be left with a turd.
|
| "Capt. Mooron" wrote in message
| ...
| Jon... notice the graceful arc of the blade.... the subtle
unexpected
| strike.... so swift and surgical as to not mar the blade edge
with
| blood..... blood is drawn yet the victim is only critically
wounded.
| That, Ganz is a true display of the mastery in the art form of
the
NG
| Ginshu
| Ninja....
|
| CM
|
| "Flying Tadpole" wrote in message
| ...
|
| | Ignore those who would blind you with science, for the answer
is
| | obvious: take away all the lard and you'll still be left with
a
| | drip.
|
|