Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Friday Ethics Question
Says you. According to an on-line survey that was features here a month or so back, I fall to the left of GWB, and only slightly to the right of center. You're a right-wing control freak, Dave Control? Hardly. I'm for freedom, the freedom of choice. As long as those choices are not morally wrong. But you want to control determining what is morally right or morally wrong. I don't want to control anything. What is morally right or wrong *should* be fairly obvious to anyone with a conscience. It should also be a standard, not something subject to change with the politcal wind. If murder was immoral yesterday, and it is also today, then there is no reason to think that it should not be tomorrow as well. with an overlay of rigid personality. Your posts here over the years prove it. You mistaken a rigid personality with adherence to principles. Nope. You've got a rigid personality. And you have cranial-rectal dysfunction. The priciples of logic are unwavering, and dedication to those principles is as well. I think your principles went over a precipice long ago. What you *think*, is irrelevant as usual. Dave |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Friday Ethics Question
Dave Hall wrote:
Says you. According to an on-line survey that was features here a month or so back, I fall to the left of GWB, and only slightly to the right of center. You're a right-wing control freak, Dave Control? Hardly. I'm for freedom, the freedom of choice. As long as those choices are not morally wrong. But you want to control determining what is morally right or morally wrong. I don't want to control anything. What is morally right or wrong *should* be fairly obvious to anyone with a conscience. It's morally wrong to allow children to be hungry, cold and in need of good medical care. Do you agree? -- Email sent to is never read. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Friday Ethics Question
Harry Krause wrote:
Dave Hall wrote: Says you. According to an on-line survey that was features here a month or so back, I fall to the left of GWB, and only slightly to the right of center. You're a right-wing control freak, Dave Control? Hardly. I'm for freedom, the freedom of choice. As long as those choices are not morally wrong. But you want to control determining what is morally right or morally wrong. I don't want to control anything. What is morally right or wrong *should* be fairly obvious to anyone with a conscience. It's morally wrong to allow children to be hungry, cold and in need of good medical care. Do you agree? I do. I also agree that it's morally wrong, and highly irresponsible to bring children into a world where they will be hungry, cold and in need of medical care. Dave |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Friday Ethics Question
Dave Hall wrote:
Harry Krause wrote: Dave Hall wrote: Says you. According to an on-line survey that was features here a month or so back, I fall to the left of GWB, and only slightly to the right of center. You're a right-wing control freak, Dave Control? Hardly. I'm for freedom, the freedom of choice. As long as those choices are not morally wrong. But you want to control determining what is morally right or morally wrong. I don't want to control anything. What is morally right or wrong *should* be fairly obvious to anyone with a conscience. It's morally wrong to allow children to be hungry, cold and in need of good medical care. Do you agree? I do. I also agree that it's morally wrong, and highly irresponsible to bring children into a world where they will be hungry, cold and in need of medical care. Dave But once those children are here...they must be supported properly, either by their parents or society. After all, they didn't ask to be born. -- Email sent to is never read. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Friday Ethics Question
Harry Krause wrote:
Dave Hall wrote: Harry Krause wrote: Dave Hall wrote: Says you. According to an on-line survey that was features here a month or so back, I fall to the left of GWB, and only slightly to the right of center. You're a right-wing control freak, Dave Control? Hardly. I'm for freedom, the freedom of choice. As long as those choices are not morally wrong. But you want to control determining what is morally right or morally wrong. I don't want to control anything. What is morally right or wrong *should* be fairly obvious to anyone with a conscience. It's morally wrong to allow children to be hungry, cold and in need of good medical care. Do you agree? I do. I also agree that it's morally wrong, and highly irresponsible to bring children into a world where they will be hungry, cold and in need of medical care. Dave But once those children are here...they must be supported properly, either by their parents or society. After all, they didn't ask to be born. Right, they didn't. But all too often children are born to people who do not have the necessary skills (or even desire) to be parents (ties right in to the teacher's thread), whether emotionally, psychologically, or financially. But rather than just giving those families money, I'd adopt a more pro-active approach that focuses on the kids, and how to put them in a more productive environment. Society, unfortunately, tends to favor the notion that kids are better off with their own family, even if they might be crack addicts..... Dave |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Winterizing question plus. | General | |||
Exhaust question on inboard 1958 Chris Craft | General | |||
aid to navigation question | General | |||
Posting Guide-on question | General | |||
Transom Height - Dumb Question Alert | General |