Wally is one of the
dumbest clucks who posts here.

Quack, Quack


Wrong bird, Wally. :-)

On 17 Nov 2003 19:11:38 GMT, (Gould 0738) wrote:

Wally is one of the
dumbest clucks who posts here.

Quack, Quack


Wrong bird, Wally. :-)

At least he's consistant. Consistantly wrong, but consistant.

bb

In article , gould0738
@aol.com says...
Wally is one of the
dumbest clucks who posts here.

Quack, Quack


Wrong bird, Wally. :-)

ZIIIIINNNNNNNGGGGGG!!!!

Dave,
I take exception to your term of "liberal", I may be more liberal than
yourself, but no where near where Harry is at. Perhaps you should use the
term "Extreme" as a definer, just so you don't paint such a wide swatch. I
guess this is a problem with labels, we wear so many different ones on
different issues. I rather doubt that when we vote for someone, we vote for
a person that believes just like we do.All of life is a compromise.
Paul

"Dave Hall" wrote in message
...
deleted
Like a typical liberal, you once again pick and chose what you read,
spin it in a way as to reveal it in the most unfavorable light, and then
repost it as if it were the truth. I NEVER said that psychaitry was
*never* necessary, only that there are a great many people who are
"addicted" to therapy today, because they've never learned how to deal
with problems. Go ahead, deny that this happens.

I'm not "forcing" my daughter to act in an "acceptable way". I'm just
guiding her down a proper path, and not giving her the chance to adopt
bad habits.

Dave




Wally probably thinks karma is the candy coating sometimes applied to
apples on a stick.

--
Email sent to is never read.

Iggy,
Your sister did the right thing. If they weren't interested in having
the second carriage returned than she did her part. What I don't understand
is your statement that they were running a scam. Why the hostility towards
them?
Paul

"Ignoramus14460" wrote in message
...
Oftentimes, just calling them and asking to pay them would actually
get you nowhere.

I once bought a gift for my sister which was a baby carriage.

Instead of one, she received two.

So, being a good girl, she calle them and advised them of that. Their
reaction was kinda cold and not very interested. She decided to screw
them and not pursue this matter. So she received two carriages instead
of one.

Naturally she gave the second one to me.

Was it unethical that she did not talk to a supervisor or something?

My answer is: **** them. They were running a scam to cheat investors
and so taking a puny baby carriage ($225) was not a big deal.

i

WaIIy wrote:

On Mon, 17 Nov 2003 19:19:00 GMT, bb wrote:

On 17 Nov 2003 19:11:38 GMT, (Gould 0738) wrote:

Wally is one of the
dumbest clucks who posts here.

Quack, Quack


Wrong bird, Wally. :-)

At least he's consistant. Consistantly wrong, but consistant.

bb

I guess it went over your heads.


Nothing you post here, Wally, would go over the head of a two-day-old slug.



--
Email sent to is never read.

Paul Schilter wrote:

Dave,
I take exception to your term of "liberal", I may be more liberal than
yourself, but no where near where Harry is at. Perhaps you should use the
term "Extreme" as a definer, just so you don't paint such a wide swatch. I
guess this is a problem with labels, we wear so many different ones on
different issues. I rather doubt that when we vote for someone, we vote for
a person that believes just like we do.All of life is a compromise.


Point taken. And you are correct. Harry displays a form of liberalism
that is equivilent in position to Jerry Falwell on the opposite side.

Dave

In article ,
says...
Paul Schilter wrote:

Dave,
I take exception to your term of "liberal", I may be more liberal than
yourself, but no where near where Harry is at. Perhaps you should use the
term "Extreme" as a definer, just so you don't paint such a wide swatch. I
guess this is a problem with labels, we wear so many different ones on
different issues. I rather doubt that when we vote for someone, we vote for
a person that believes just like we do.All of life is a compromise.


Point taken. And you are correct. Harry displays a form of liberalism
that is equivilent in position to Jerry Falwell on the opposite side.

Dave

Oh my God. You don't refer to yourself as a Chrisitian do you?

Jesus was a socialist.

Oh my God. You don't refer to yourself as a Chrisitian do you?

Jesus was a socialist.

No he wasn't, he was a compassionate Conservative.

In article ,
says...

Oh my God. You don't refer to yourself as a Chrisitian do you?

Jesus was a socialist.

No he wasn't, he was a compassionate Conservative.


Bwaaaaaahaaaaaaahaaaaaaaaahaaaaaaaa!!!

He would laugh at the irony of "conservative christians" assuming his
mantle, or be incredibly saddened.

He was a socialist. He wanted to spread the wealth. Compassionate
conservatives want to horde the wealth. They're anything but Christian.

His agenda is served far more effectively by the left. He was an "all
ships" sort of guy.

The devil, however, is a much better fit for compassionate
conservatives, for, as you know, the road to hell is paved with good
intentions.