Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Suzuki DF4 vs. DF6
On Apr 13, 4:19*am, wrote:
Nice boat :-) Frankly, I don't think you can go wrong with anything that's been mentioned so far. By the sounds of your current needs, electric will work fine. And it has price and maintenance advantages over gas. Problem is, your boat has potential to be so much more. *If you think you may ever expand your horizons, you might do better spending the extra $$ now on gas, just in case. Actually, the next boat, if there is one in the future, will be a 21' Party Barge pontoon type. I've already received the "word" on that from above. And it will come with a mega-horsepower motor so that won't be a decision I'll have to make. Electric is almost dead silent. I would especially like that on a small quiet lake. And if you store it for years, it'll work when you drag it out. Gas can be more cantankerous when out of mind for that long. There's advantages/disadvantages to both. I already own a 30 lb. thrust Minn-Kota electric motor and have a big marine deep cycle battery but didn't think that would even get the Guide V14 moving at all. How does a 30 lb. thrust electric equate to a gas outboard. What equivalent horsepower? Another consideration. It's natural for people to want more than they have.. We'll always want something a little bigger, a little faster, a little more. So if you fall into that category, you might as well consider 15-20hp and be done with it lol! *OR go electric for very few dollars now and start saving for when the expansion bug bites. I don't fall into that category nor do I buy compulsively I carefully choose my purchases after looking into possible future needs and if I'm gonna pull water skiers or jet across the reservoir at Mach 1 it won't be in that G3 Guide V14. Nope, that boat has been strictly designated the floating raft that moves occasionally to a shady nook or inlet to the lake while the babe and I relax on the water. And I can relax more if I not rowing. You have no wrong options here (nothing wrong with oars either). My 2 cents.............. *;-) Rick Not true, there IS something wrong with oars. I have to use my arms and hands to make them move! That's what this whole gig is about. Hiowever, with all of the input I'm sorta leaning between the Suzuki 2.5 HP 4-stroke, the Tohatsu 4 HP 4-stroke and the Tohatsu 3.5 HP 2-stroke. Check out this nice review on the Suzuki 2.5 hp which I can have delivered to my front door for $721.00. vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv Suzuki's DF2.5 is the world's most fuel efficient tender outboard, reports Andrew Norton The DF2.5 is the smallest and lightest four-stroke outboard Suzuki Marine has released. Weighing just 30 lbs., the DF2.5 has a 68cc single-cylinder OHV powerhead with thermostatically-controlled watercooling. Developing 2.4hp at 5500 revs (based on 1hp equaling 746W) with a Wide Open Throttle operating range of 5250 to 5750rpm, the DF2.5 has a forward-neutral gearshift, 360-degree steering, twist-grip throttle control, four easily-adjusted trim positions and an automatically- engaging full tilt lock. Sensibly, Suzuki has incorporated a stopper device that prevents the powerhead rotating more than a few degrees when the outboard is fully tilted. Effective steering and throttle friction adjusters are provided. Unlike its Honda BF2D competition, the DF2.5 has a moulded carry handle on the aft end of the lower cowl, ensuring the outboard will always be carried the correct way to prevent sump oil from flooding the cylinder. Alternatively, the outboard may be stored on its side on the moulded lower cowl lugs provided. Like the Honda, the DF2.5 has an easily-read oil level sight glass in the lower cowl, with the sump accessed by unscrewing a plug to one side of the sump, which holds 0.38lt of oil. But, unlike the Honda, which relies on splash or 'mist' lubrication and can only use Honda SAE 10W30 oil that's rated to a maximum ambient temperature of 32 degrees, the pressure-lubricated DF2.5 can use oils from 10W30 up to 20W40. However the Quicksilver four-cycle watercooled 10W30 oil used by my local Suzuki dealer can be used in all ambient temperatures from minus 20 degrees to over 40 degrees and provides rapid crankshaft, piston ring and rocker gear lubrication on cold starting. Servicing intervals for the DF2.5 are every 50 hours or six months after the initial check-up at 20 hours. The waterpump impeller should be checked and/or replaced every 100 hours or once a year. A nice touch is the chrome rocker cover, which allows for valve clearance adjustment by removing four bolts, whereas this adjustment in the Honda necessitates removing the entire air cooling shroud, including the overhead recoil starter. The DF2.5's large-capacity zinc anode just above the anti-ventilation plate should handle any leg electrolysis when the tender is rafted up alongside a yacht or cruiser. Compared to the BF2D, the DF2.5 swings a relatively coarse-pitch prop for such a small outboard, even allowing for its 2.15:1 reduction ratio. But whereas the Honda has a 2.42:1 gear reduction and a 4.5- inch pitch prop compared to 5.4 inches for the Suzuki, the latter's prop is weedless and able to 'slip' a lot more under load compared to the Honda's 'high thrust' prop. The swept-back weedless blades also catch less weed than the Honda's prop. The DF2.5 normally starts first pull, hot or cold, and reaches normal operating temperature in about two minutes from cold. The lack of water spraying from the exhaust relief holes until the thermostat has opened is a bit disconcerting and Suzuki should fit a separate pilot water discharge similar to the DF4 to DF6 range of four strokes. Because of its small displacement powerhead, the DF2.5 idles in neutral at around 2000rpm and 1500 in gear, whereas with its centrifugal clutch the Honda idles at about 1500 in neutral. But, when trolling, the Suzuki would run for up to 10 hours on a litre of fuel compared to eight for the Honda. And, despite its 19 per cent greater piston displacement, the Suzuki has lower vibration levels and, being watercooled, it is significantly quieter across the entire rev range. xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx So Tohatsu 3.5 HP 2-stroke ($650), Suzuki 2.5 HP 4-stroke ($721), Tohatsu 3.5 HP 4-stroke ($835) or Tohatsu 4 HP 4-stroke) $965? Decisions, decisions.....any preferences out there for one of these if my 30 lb. Minn-Kota electric won't push it around with 500 lbs. on board? -Jay |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Suzuki DF4 vs. DF6 | General | |||
Suzuki 2hp Tell Tale | General | |||
200 hp Suzuki | General | |||
150 HP Suzuki | General | |||
FS: Suzuki 15 HP 4-stroke in NC | Marketplace |