Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Wayne.B" wrote
Roger, with all due respect, a large wake should be regarded as just another wave in a seaworthy and decent sized boat such as yours. It is unreasonable to expect people to slow down except in a confined area where you could lose control. Agreed and I am not a wake nazi. But we're talking here about the wake within the first two or three waves as a result of a vessel passing far closer than is prudent. No danger but it took some finesse in those conditions to get through without getting soaked. Actually, the wind blanketing of the close approach was more of an issue. I can coax a boat through just about anything but I could have been one of many people out there that could have gotten knocked down or backed trying to get the boat moving again. With regard to the right of way situation, did you sound a danger signal or attempt contact on channel 13 or 16? That is the proper course of action, preferably before the situation becomes critical. You really think someone in a an enclosed, air conditioned, pilothouse is going to hear the pipsqueak horn a sailboat can carry far enough against a 20 -25 knot wind to have any beneficial influence on the situation? Back when I used blow horns because I believed what I read in books, I never noticed that anyone seemed to hear them in situations like this. As for the radio, my theory is that someone oblivious enough miss seeing a 32 foot sailboat directly ahead isn't going to be on the ball enough that I want to waste time talking to them. It was another of those days when I was using both hands for the boat. I doubt he could have understood the handheld out in the wind even if he hadn't been out on the bridge wing sucking a cig. -- Roger Long |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roger Long wrote:
"Wayne.B" wrote Roger, with all due respect, a large wake should be regarded as just another wave in a seaworthy and decent sized boat such as yours. It is unreasonable to expect people to slow down except in a confined area where you could lose control. Agreed and I am not a wake nazi. But we're talking here about the wake within the first two or three waves as a result of a vessel passing far closer than is prudent. No danger but it took some finesse in those conditions to get through without getting soaked. Actually, the wind blanketing of the close approach was more of an issue. I can coax a boat through just about anything but I could have been one of many people out there that could have gotten knocked down or backed trying to get the boat moving again. With regard to the right of way situation, did you sound a danger signal or attempt contact on channel 13 or 16? That is the proper course of action, preferably before the situation becomes critical. You really think someone in a an enclosed, air conditioned, pilothouse is going to hear the pipsqueak horn a sailboat can carry far enough against a 20 -25 knot wind to have any beneficial influence on the situation? Back when I used blow horns because I believed what I read in books, I never noticed that anyone seemed to hear them in situations like this. As for the radio, my theory is that someone oblivious enough miss seeing a 32 foot sailboat directly ahead isn't going to be on the ball enough that I want to waste time talking to them. It was another of those days when I was using both hands for the boat. I doubt he could have understood the handheld out in the wind even if he hadn't been out on the bridge wing sucking a cig. It's funny how these things always seem to happen to you. What was it last time, a small ferry? Gary |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Gary" wrote
It's funny how these things always seem to happen to you. What was it last time, a small ferry? Gary Twice in 36 years doesn't add up to "always" in my book and, while I may be the only one reporting in this particular venue, I'm sure I'm not the only one this happens to. Twice in a summer may be a interesting statistical cluster. What I think I'm really seeing here is a change in culture and expectations of professionals on the water made more obvious by my having been a pleasure boating Rip Van Winkle for 15 years. Far fewer people have a clue about the right of way rules than they used to and I'm sure this effects the thinking of commercial operators. Effectively, there are no right of way rules for pleasure boats now or between pleasure boats and commercial craft. Perhaps it's reasonable for the commercial boats to just go in straight lines and keep the right of way rules between them and their peers whose behavior can be predicted. The responses about large vessels are off the mark. Both of these were boats that could, and would, have diverted around a floating log without a second thought to avoid possible damage to their props. They held their courses either because of inattention or because they assumed I would adopt the role of the burdened vessel in violation of my duty to maintain a straight and predictable course. Neither reflects well on them. I would happily put the plots of my courses down an any USCG inquiry table. I maintained a straight and consistent course as the stand on vessel. When it became clear that the burdened vessel was not going to respond appropriately, I diverted or slowed in time to avoid danger of collision as well as danger that they would divert in the same direction. Regarding the radio, it is only a means of communication. The handling of your vessel can be an excellent and even more convenient method of indicating your intent. If you intend to depart your stand on course, make a big and obvious change, show the other vessel the whole side of your boat for a few moments and then come back to the course that will clear. If they are watching, they'll get the message. If they aren't watching, they probably aren't going to make any sudden course changes before taking a look around. -- Roger Long |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Is this the boat?
http://www.yachtportfolio.com/yacht.cfm?yid=357 Gary wrote: Roger Long wrote: "Wayne.B" wrote Roger, with all due respect, a large wake should be regarded as just another wave in a seaworthy and decent sized boat such as yours. It is unreasonable to expect people to slow down except in a confined area where you could lose control. Agreed and I am not a wake nazi. But we're talking here about the wake within the first two or three waves as a result of a vessel passing far closer than is prudent. No danger but it took some finesse in those conditions to get through without getting soaked. Actually, the wind blanketing of the close approach was more of an issue. I can coax a boat through just about anything but I could have been one of many people out there that could have gotten knocked down or backed trying to get the boat moving again. With regard to the right of way situation, did you sound a danger signal or attempt contact on channel 13 or 16? That is the proper course of action, preferably before the situation becomes critical. You really think someone in a an enclosed, air conditioned, pilothouse is going to hear the pipsqueak horn a sailboat can carry far enough against a 20 -25 knot wind to have any beneficial influence on the situation? Back when I used blow horns because I believed what I read in books, I never noticed that anyone seemed to hear them in situations like this. As for the radio, my theory is that someone oblivious enough miss seeing a 32 foot sailboat directly ahead isn't going to be on the ball enough that I want to waste time talking to them. It was another of those days when I was using both hands for the boat. I doubt he could have understood the handheld out in the wind even if he hadn't been out on the bridge wing sucking a cig. It's funny how these things always seem to happen to you. What was it last time, a small ferry? Gary |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for the heads-up, Roger - we'll keep an eye out. Makes me shudder
to think of being out in a kayak when that guy is in Maine. It would be nice if more people considered the consequences of their wakes. We have a handful of large vessels, such as the "Pink Lady" out of Boothbay, that can make life pretty exciting sometimes. One neighbor had his 17' outboard wrecked, while on the dock. Of course no one was watching it at that moment, so there was no "proof" that the only large vessel to pass by was at fault... It is entirely possible that there will be children or less-experienced adults in small boats, or along the shoreline; on a calm day some of the wakes exceed what we see in the stormiest conditions. Vessels and experience should be appropriate for the conditions you are likely to run into, but this doesn't mean we must all be prepared for a 4' wake at all times. Sal's Dad "boatgeek" wrote in message ups.com... Is this the boat? http://www.yachtportfolio.com/yacht.cfm?yid=357 Gary wrote: Roger Long wrote: "Wayne.B" wrote Roger, with all due respect, a large wake should be regarded as just another wave in a seaworthy and decent sized boat such as yours. It is unreasonable to expect people to slow down except in a confined area where you could lose control. Agreed and I am not a wake nazi. But we're talking here about the wake within the first two or three waves as a result of a vessel passing far closer than is prudent. No danger but it took some finesse in those conditions to get through without getting soaked. Actually, the wind blanketing of the close approach was more of an issue. I can coax a boat through just about anything but I could have been one of many people out there that could have gotten knocked down or backed trying to get the boat moving again. |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Is the Pink lady still there? There is a party boat here in Fort
Lauderdale with Boothbay registration with that exact name. Sal's Dad wrote: Thanks for the heads-up, Roger - we'll keep an eye out. Makes me shudder to think of being out in a kayak when that guy is in Maine. It would be nice if more people considered the consequences of their wakes. We have a handful of large vessels, such as the "Pink Lady" out of Boothbay, that can make life pretty exciting sometimes. One neighbor had his 17' outboard wrecked, while on the dock. Of course no one was watching it at that moment, so there was no "proof" that the only large vessel to pass by was at fault... It is entirely possible that there will be children or less-experienced adults in small boats, or along the shoreline; on a calm day some of the wakes exceed what we see in the stormiest conditions. Vessels and experience should be appropriate for the conditions you are likely to run into, but this doesn't mean we must all be prepared for a 4' wake at all times. Sal's Dad "boatgeek" wrote in message ups.com... Is this the boat? http://www.yachtportfolio.com/yacht.cfm?yid=357 Gary wrote: Roger Long wrote: "Wayne.B" wrote Roger, with all due respect, a large wake should be regarded as just another wave in a seaworthy and decent sized boat such as yours. It is unreasonable to expect people to slow down except in a confined area where you could lose control. Agreed and I am not a wake nazi. But we're talking here about the wake within the first two or three waves as a result of a vessel passing far closer than is prudent. No danger but it took some finesse in those conditions to get through without getting soaked. Actually, the wind blanketing of the close approach was more of an issue. I can coax a boat through just about anything but I could have been one of many people out there that could have gotten knocked down or backed trying to get the boat moving again. |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes, there is a Pink Lady, and a smaller Pink Lady II, and Island Lady,
running multiple daily trips out of Boothbay Harbor. http://www.mainewhales.com/d_cf_fleet.htm Website says 78-100 feet. And one hell of a wake, when they are moving - about the biggest wake we see, far bigger than the tugs or destroyers.... of course we haven't seen Floridian yet. Sal's Dad Is the Pink lady still there? There is a party boat here in Fort Lauderdale with Boothbay registration with that exact name. Sal's Dad wrote: Thanks for the heads-up, Roger - we'll keep an eye out. Makes me shudder to think of being out in a kayak when that guy is in Maine. It would be nice if more people considered the consequences of their wakes. We have a handful of large vessels, such as the "Pink Lady" out of Boothbay, that can make life pretty exciting sometimes. One neighbor had his 17' outboard wrecked, while on the dock. Of course no one was watching it at that moment, so there was no "proof" that the only large vessel to pass by was at fault... It is entirely possible that there will be children or less-experienced adults in small boats, or along the shoreline; on a calm day some of the wakes exceed what we see in the stormiest conditions. Vessels and experience should be appropriate for the conditions you are likely to run into, but this doesn't mean we must all be prepared for a 4' wake at all times. Sal's Dad "boatgeek" wrote in message ups.com... Is this the boat? http://www.yachtportfolio.com/yacht.cfm?yid=357 Gary wrote: Roger Long wrote: "Wayne.B" wrote Roger, with all due respect, a large wake should be regarded as just another wave in a seaworthy and decent sized boat such as yours. It is unreasonable to expect people to slow down except in a confined area where you could lose control. Agreed and I am not a wake nazi. But we're talking here about the wake within the first two or three waves as a result of a vessel passing far closer than is prudent. No danger but it took some finesse in those conditions to get through without getting soaked. Actually, the wind blanketing of the close approach was more of an issue. I can coax a boat through just about anything but I could have been one of many people out there that could have gotten knocked down or backed trying to get the boat moving again. |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yup. That looks like it.
-- Roger Long "boatgeek" wrote in message ups.com... Is this the boat? http://www.yachtportfolio.com/yacht.cfm?yid=357 Gary wrote: Roger Long wrote: "Wayne.B" wrote Roger, with all due respect, a large wake should be regarded as just another wave in a seaworthy and decent sized boat such as yours. It is unreasonable to expect people to slow down except in a confined area where you could lose control. Agreed and I am not a wake nazi. But we're talking here about the wake within the first two or three waves as a result of a vessel passing far closer than is prudent. No danger but it took some finesse in those conditions to get through without getting soaked. Actually, the wind blanketing of the close approach was more of an issue. I can coax a boat through just about anything but I could have been one of many people out there that could have gotten knocked down or backed trying to get the boat moving again. With regard to the right of way situation, did you sound a danger signal or attempt contact on channel 13 or 16? That is the proper course of action, preferably before the situation becomes critical. You really think someone in a an enclosed, air conditioned, pilothouse is going to hear the pipsqueak horn a sailboat can carry far enough against a 20 -25 knot wind to have any beneficial influence on the situation? Back when I used blow horns because I believed what I read in books, I never noticed that anyone seemed to hear them in situations like this. As for the radio, my theory is that someone oblivious enough miss seeing a 32 foot sailboat directly ahead isn't going to be on the ball enough that I want to waste time talking to them. It was another of those days when I was using both hands for the boat. I doubt he could have understood the handheld out in the wind even if he hadn't been out on the bridge wing sucking a cig. It's funny how these things always seem to happen to you. What was it last time, a small ferry? Gary |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roger Long wrote:
Yup. That looks like it. Note flag here re Cayman Islands Civil Ensign http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v2...renoJul21C.jpg Bad view but does it resemble this flag on stern of your mega yacht.. http://www.yachtportfolio.com/yacht.cfm?yid=357 or.. http://www.pch.gc.ca/progs/cpsc-ccsp/sc-cs/df2_e.cfm |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Don White wrote:
Roger Long wrote: Yup. That looks like it. ** correction** (I hope) Note flag here re Cayman Islands Civil Ensign ** try this ** http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:C...an_Islands.svg Bad view but does it resemble this flag on stern of your mega yacht.. http://www.yachtportfolio.com/yacht.cfm?yid=357 or.. http://www.pch.gc.ca/progs/cpsc-ccsp/sc-cs/df2_e.cfm |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Yacht charter Croatia | Cruising | |||
HELP! Stain on seats!! | General | |||
So where is...................... | General | |||
Yacht Charter Vancouver - Five Star Yacht Charters | Cruising | |||
Update on Marina Damage -- FL Coasts | Cruising |