Eisboch wrote:
"DK" wrote in message
news
Eisboch wrote:
"Boater" wrote in message
...

There isn't a good looking woman in any of those photos...most should
not be wearing bikinis, either.

Unfortunately for Harry, Hillary couldn't make it to the event.

Maybe next year.

Eisboch
He was looking for Pelosi.


She is one scary woman. Best not to stare.

Meanwhile, I suffered through watching a TV interview with Harry Reid, the
smug, sneering wimp of a majority leader. He announced that Congress (the
legislative branch) is "equal" to the President in terms of authority.
Hmmmm. Seems to me all they do is approve funding for Bush's programs and
policies, then sit around and condemn him while claiming they never
supported his initiatives to begin with. What a bunch of spineless,
ball-less pompus asses!

Hopefully Obama will snap Pelosi and Reid into line. But, I doubt it.

Eisboch




Reid is correct in his interpretation of the Constitution. Bush, of
course, paid no attention to that document.

Boater wrote:
Eisboch wrote:
"DK" wrote in message
news
Eisboch wrote:
"Boater" wrote in message
...

There isn't a good looking woman in any of those photos...most
should not be wearing bikinis, either.

Unfortunately for Harry, Hillary couldn't make it to the event.

Maybe next year.

Eisboch
He was looking for Pelosi.


She is one scary woman. Best not to stare.

Meanwhile, I suffered through watching a TV interview with Harry
Reid, the smug, sneering wimp of a majority leader. He announced that
Congress (the legislative branch) is "equal" to the President in
terms of authority. Hmmmm. Seems to me all they do is approve
funding for Bush's programs and policies, then sit around and condemn
him while claiming they never supported his initiatives to begin
with. What a bunch of spineless, ball-less pompus asses!

Hopefully Obama will snap Pelosi and Reid into line. But, I doubt it.

Eisboch




Reid is correct in his interpretation of the Constitution. Bush, of
course, paid no attention to that document.


Why was the executive branch described before the legislative branch?

"BAR" wrote in message
...
Boater wrote:
Eisboch wrote:
"DK" wrote in message
news Eisboch wrote:
"Boater" wrote in message
...

There isn't a good looking woman in any of those photos...most should
not be wearing bikinis, either.

Unfortunately for Harry, Hillary couldn't make it to the event.

Maybe next year.

Eisboch
He was looking for Pelosi.


She is one scary woman. Best not to stare.

Meanwhile, I suffered through watching a TV interview with Harry Reid,
the smug, sneering wimp of a majority leader. He announced that
Congress (the legislative branch) is "equal" to the President in terms
of authority. Hmmmm. Seems to me all they do is approve funding for
Bush's programs and policies, then sit around and condemn him while
claiming they never supported his initiatives to begin with. What a
bunch of spineless, ball-less pompus asses!

Hopefully Obama will snap Pelosi and Reid into line. But, I doubt it.

Eisboch




Reid is correct in his interpretation of the Constitution. Bush, of
course, paid no attention to that document.



Why was the executive branch described before the legislative branch?

Congress has "oversight" authority, including the ability to impeach and
overturn Presidential vetos, if they have enough collective votes. Reid
made himself sound as if each member of Congress, including him
individually, was authoritatively equal to the POTUS. That isn't so.

Eisboch

"Boater" wrote in message
...
Eisboch wrote:
"DK" wrote in message
news
Eisboch wrote:
"Boater" wrote in message
...

There isn't a good looking woman in any of those photos...most should
not be wearing bikinis, either.

Unfortunately for Harry, Hillary couldn't make it to the event.

Maybe next year.

Eisboch
He was looking for Pelosi.


She is one scary woman. Best not to stare.

Meanwhile, I suffered through watching a TV interview with Harry Reid,
the smug, sneering wimp of a majority leader. He announced that Congress
(the legislative branch) is "equal" to the President in terms of
authority. Hmmmm. Seems to me all they do is approve funding for
Bush's programs and policies, then sit around and condemn him while
claiming they never supported his initiatives to begin with. What a
bunch of spineless, ball-less pompus asses!

Hopefully Obama will snap Pelosi and Reid into line. But, I doubt it.

Eisboch





Reid is correct in his interpretation of the Constitution.


I didn't say he wasn't. It was his sneering, smug "announcement" of the
fact that got under my skin and the recognition that while acknowledging
oversight authority, he is, as usual, a total hypocrite in his actions.

Don't like the man, don't trust him, nor do I like or trust Pelosi. In
fact, there are only a few in the total make up of Congress (House and
Senate) that I know of who I have any respect for.

Believe it or not, Ted Kennedy is one of them, even though I don't agree
with much of his thinking.
He's not a hypocrite.

Eisboch