| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Overheating Perkins revisited.....
On 27 Aug 2003 03:52:13 -0700, (basskisser) wrote:
(Steven Shelikoff) wrote in message ... On 26 Aug 2003 04:26:22 -0700, (basskisser) wrote: (Steven Shelikoff) wrote in message ... On 22 Aug 2003 04:10:23 -0700, (basskisser) wrote: (Steven Shelikoff) wrote in message Yup, I just knew you couldn't behave like a normal person. Your despondency and frustrations are obviously gnawing at you. You really should take a vacation before you pop a gasket. And you should stop posting while you're drunk from all that homebrew. Steve Please provide any evidence that I was "drunk on homebrew". I love it. I mention that I homebrew, and because you know I'm right, you simply use that as a crutch, and probably will a lot! What do you disagree with in my replys on this subject? Your simplistic belligerant attitude which was obvious from your post: Takes a real simpleton to neglect to change something as common of a maintenence item as zincs on a boat. Then when I explained why I didn't change heat exhanger pencil zinc and that the real reason was more than just neglect, you snipped out the explanation and responded with: You LIAR!! See here, you yourself said that you are guilty of NEGLECT. So, yes, I can read plain English, where you said that you neglected Your simplistic belligerance and foolish bluster is the evidence that you're an alcohol abuser, and is a common indicator. Since there is evidence you were drunk and since you said you're a homebrewer, put 2 and 2 together and it's likely that you were drunk on your own homebrew. But I'll conceed that there is also the possibility you went to the store to buy your hooch. "Evidence" I was drunk? You are one dumb person!!! Let's see, you'd be able to establish, as "evidence" that someone is drunk by a newsgroup post? Police agencies everywhere will want you to do this for them. Yes, it is evidence you were drunk. They'll call you and say, Steve, I think we've got a drunk driver here, and want you to take a look at a newsgroup post we'll have him make, to see if indeed he is!!! What a stupid, stupid man.... There's another one of your stupid strawman arguments. Just because there is evidence you were drunk doesn't mean it's evidence that will hold up in court in a drunk driver case. The way your simple, idiotic mind works is really flabbergasting sometimes. Steve Do you understand, the difference between speculation and evidence. Apparently you don't. I'm speculating you were drunk because there is evidence you were. If there wasn't any evidence you were drunk, then I wouldn't have speculated you were. Again, you are just speculating. You think that because the all mighty twit Steve says so, that it is evidence. What a ****ing moron you are. So, let's see, everything that I say, whether there is ANY shred of truth, or real evidence, I can, because I say so, CALL it evidence? I can't? Hmm, you are! So, I have evidence that Steve is a blow hard, who thinks he is always right, and also thinks he is therefore an expert in everything. THAT "evidence" proves, without a doubt that he is suffering from some dilussional mental deficency. THAT in turn, is evidence that he should be commited to a mental institution to get off of the drugs he is taking. See how that works, Steve? THAT is exactly what happens when people like you are stupid enough to not know the difference between speculation, and evidence. Chasing your tail will only get you dizzy. Doing so in public will get you laughed at. Steve |
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
|
Overheating Perkins revisited.....
(Steven Shelikoff) wrote in message ...
On 28 Aug 2003 04:52:04 -0700, (basskisser) wrote: (Steven Shelikoff) wrote in message Again, you are just speculating. You think that because the all mighty twit Steve says so, that it is evidence. What a ****ing moron you are. So, let's see, everything that I say, whether there is ANY shred of truth, or real evidence, I can, because I say so, CALL it evidence? I can't? Hmm, you are! So, I have evidence that Steve is a blow hard, who thinks he is always right, and also thinks he is therefore an expert in everything. THAT "evidence" proves, without a doubt that he is suffering from some dilussional mental deficency. THAT in turn, is evidence that he should be commited to a mental institution to get off of the drugs he is taking. See how that works, Steve? THAT is exactly what happens when people like you are stupid enough to not know the difference between speculation, and evidence. Chasing your tail will only get you dizzy. Doing so in public will get you laughed at. so again, using YOUR ignorant reasoning, if someone says something in a newsgroup, then anybody else that reads it, can, at there whim, say something like "by the way you posted that, it appears that you are a heroin addict", then that in fact, becomes EVIDENCE?? What a stupid No. That's your ignorant interpretation of my reasoning, proof that you've lost your ability to reason. You idiot, it's EXACTLY the reasoning you used to come to the conclusion, with your so called "evidence" that I was "drunk" when I posted. Not a lot like it, EXACTLY like it. ****ing putz you are!! So, because I have caught you trying to impersonate someone who is trained in Karate, I have evidence that you are schizophrenic. Now, are you seeking help for your schizophrenic tendencies? See how, using YOUR idiotic methodology, you are forever deemed as a schizophrenic, due to your tendencies to think you are trained in things you know nothing about. Now remember, using your stupid reasoning, I have actual evidence of this. Watching your mental breakdown as it happens in a public forum has been interesting. There's a case study in you just waiting to be done. If it were anyone else, I'd feel pity. But in your case, I'll just keep prodding. Steve You are an idiot schizophrenic. The concrete evidence is in this thread. |
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
|
Overheating Perkins revisited.....
On 29 Aug 2003 05:13:04 -0700, (basskisser) wrote:
(Steven Shelikoff) wrote in message ... On 28 Aug 2003 04:52:04 -0700, (basskisser) wrote: (Steven Shelikoff) wrote in message Again, you are just speculating. You think that because the all mighty twit Steve says so, that it is evidence. What a ****ing moron you are. So, let's see, everything that I say, whether there is ANY shred of truth, or real evidence, I can, because I say so, CALL it evidence? I can't? Hmm, you are! So, I have evidence that Steve is a blow hard, who thinks he is always right, and also thinks he is therefore an expert in everything. THAT "evidence" proves, without a doubt that he is suffering from some dilussional mental deficency. THAT in turn, is evidence that he should be commited to a mental institution to get off of the drugs he is taking. See how that works, Steve? THAT is exactly what happens when people like you are stupid enough to not know the difference between speculation, and evidence. Chasing your tail will only get you dizzy. Doing so in public will get you laughed at. so again, using YOUR ignorant reasoning, if someone says something in a newsgroup, then anybody else that reads it, can, at there whim, say something like "by the way you posted that, it appears that you are a heroin addict", then that in fact, becomes EVIDENCE?? What a stupid No. That's your ignorant interpretation of my reasoning, proof that you've lost your ability to reason. You idiot, it's EXACTLY the reasoning you used to come to the conclusion, with your so called "evidence" that I was "drunk" when I posted. Not a lot like it, EXACTLY like it. Actually, it was nothing like it. You forgot the main difference is that there has to be evidence. It can't be at there [sic] whim. It can't be just anything someone says in a newsgroup. But if there's evidence in what they say that they are a heroin addict, then of couse they can say it. But we all know you're to stupid to see the difference. Hell, you've admitted you're to stupid to see the differece just above. ****ing putz you are!! So, because I have caught you trying to impersonate someone who is trained in Karate, I have evidence that you are schizophrenic. Now, are you seeking help for your schizophrenic tendencies? See how, using YOUR idiotic methodology, you are forever deemed as a schizophrenic, due to your tendencies to think you are trained in things you know nothing about. Now remember, using your stupid reasoning, I have actual evidence of this. Watching your mental breakdown as it happens in a public forum has been interesting. There's a case study in you just waiting to be done. If it were anyone else, I'd feel pity. But in your case, I'll just keep prodding. You are an idiot schizophrenic. The concrete evidence is in this thread. You've only proven you don't know the meaning of the evidence, proven you don't know the warning signals of schizophrenia, proven you don't know how to use google to find anywhere I've said I'm trained in karate .... because if you could find it you would have posted it by now. The simple fact that I've never told you what my training is in karate blows your whole stupid schizophrenic argument out of the water and proves yet again that you are a liar ... as if we need more proof of that fact, Walt. You've proven you don't know how to lay out a logical argument. You've proven you don't know the meaning of the word neglect. In short, you've proven you are a lying stupid moron. Care to continue with this and provide even more solid proof of that fact? Steve |
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
|
Overheating Perkins revisited.....
|
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
|
Overheating Perkins revisited.....
On 3 Sep 2003 04:13:27 -0700, (basskisser) wrote:
(Steven Shelikoff) wrote in message ... On 2 Sep 2003 04:43:12 -0700, (basskisser) wrote: (Steven Shelikoff) wrote in message You've proven you don't know how to lay out a logical argument. You've proven you don't know the meaning of the word neglect. In short, you've proven you are a lying stupid moron. Care to continue with this and provide even more solid proof of that fact? Again, you idiot, I have just as much of YOUR "evidence", that you are a heroin addict, as you do that I was drunk when I posted. Understand? That's where you're wrong, as usual. I gave you the evidence you were drunk when you posted. You haven't given any that I'm a heroin addict. It's very simple, I honestly thought you'd get it, but alas, I guess not. It's really pretty simple but you obviously don't get it. I honestly didn't think you would. Because as proven in at least 3 different threads so far, you can't comprehend even the simplest of ideas or learn even the most basic of lessons. Haahaa!! I've given you the EXACT SAME "evidence" as you've given!!! What a ****ing moron you are! You try to spin SO hard!!! You haven't given ANY evidence and I gave 2 points of evidence. So how could they possibly be the exact same? Obviously they can't be, and you're just being a stupid moron again. Steve |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| TWIN diesels overheating | General | |||
| Mercruiser V8 overheating.. | General | |||
| Boat overheating? | General | |||
| Overheating, Hydrostatic lock, ring gears and starters | General | |||
| Generator Overheating Question | General | |||
Linear Mode
