Please provide what "evidence" you have that I am an "alcohol abuser".
Please provide the "evidence" that I was "drunk" when I replied to
your post.

http://tinyurl.com/l60z

"Joe" wrote in message
...

Please provide what "evidence" you have that I am an "alcohol abuser".
Please provide the "evidence" that I was "drunk" when I replied to
your post.

http://tinyurl.com/l60z



I didn't know you were only a white belt.

Steve,
While bass has admitted he grows dope, he has never admitted that he smokes
it, so while he might brew and drink his own beer, I for one don't think he
actually swallows it.


"Steven Shelikoff" wrote in message
...
On 25 Aug 2003 04:53:23 -0700, (basskisser) wrote:

(Steven Shelikoff) wrote in message
...
On 22 Aug 2003 04:10:23 -0700, (basskisser) wrote:

(Steven Shelikoff) wrote in message
Yup, I just knew you couldn't behave like a normal person. Your
despondency and frustrations are obviously gnawing at you. You
really
should take a vacation before you pop a gasket. And you should stop
posting while you're drunk from all that homebrew.

Steve

Please provide any evidence that I was "drunk on homebrew". I love it.
I mention that I homebrew, and because you know I'm right, you simply
use that as a crutch, and probably will a lot! What do you disagree
with in my replys on this subject?

Your simplistic belligerant attitude which was obvious from your post:
Takes a real simpleton to neglect to change something as
common of a maintenence item as zincs on a boat.

Then when I explained why I didn't change heat exhanger pencil zinc and
that the real reason was more than just neglect, you snipped out the
explanation and responded with:
You LIAR!! See here, you yourself said that you are guilty of NEGLECT.
So, yes, I can read plain English, where you said that you neglected

Your simplistic belligerance and foolish bluster is the evidence that
you're an alcohol abuser, and is a common indicator. Since there is
evidence you were drunk and since you said you're a homebrewer, put 2
and 2 together and it's likely that you were drunk on your own
homebrew.
But I'll conceed that there is also the possibility you went to the
store to buy your hooch.

Stev e

Bwaaahaa!!! What a ****ing IDIOT you are!! You WERE a liar, and still
are. You originally said that you didn't change the damned zinc,
because you were guilty of NEGLECTING it. Then you tried to say that
you didn't change it because you didn't think it needed it. That is
lying. Now, because I caught you in a STUPID lie, to save face you try

You just proved you don't even know what lying is. Of course I said I
neglected to change it. And I said why I neglected to change it,
because I didn't think it needed to be changed. Simple english is
obviously not your forte' if you think there was lying involved. You
seem to be confusing the word neglect with forget. They really do mean
two different things, really. And it really is possible to purposefully
neglect to do something and have a reason for doing so.. really, it is.
Brush up on your language skills a little and you might not seem like
such an idiot to everyone.

to say I was drunk. You have no evidence at all. To make such a
statement is TRUE ignorance, right out of the dictionary.
Please provide what "evidence" you have that I am an "alcohol abuser".
Please provide the "evidence" that I was "drunk" when I replied to
your post.

Again for the simpleminded like you who obviously need everything
repeated many times before you even have a slim chance of understanding
it, the evidence that you are an alcohol abuser is your simplistic
belligerance and foolish bluster which is evident in this thread and
several others. The simplistic belligerance and foolish bluster that
you exhibit are two prime indicators of alcohol abuse.

Steve

(Steven Shelikoff) wrote in message ...
On 22 Aug 2003 04:10:23 -0700, (basskisser) wrote:

(Steven Shelikoff) wrote in message
Yup, I just knew you couldn't behave like a normal person. Your
despondency and frustrations are obviously gnawing at you. You really
should take a vacation before you pop a gasket. And you should stop
posting while you're drunk from all that homebrew.

Steve

Please provide any evidence that I was "drunk on homebrew". I love it.
I mention that I homebrew, and because you know I'm right, you simply
use that as a crutch, and probably will a lot! What do you disagree
with in my replys on this subject?

Your simplistic belligerant attitude which was obvious from your post:
Takes a real simpleton to neglect to change something as
common of a maintenence item as zincs on a boat.

Then when I explained why I didn't change heat exhanger pencil zinc and
that the real reason was more than just neglect, you snipped out the
explanation and responded with:
You LIAR!! See here, you yourself said that you are guilty of NEGLECT.
So, yes, I can read plain English, where you said that you neglected

Your simplistic belligerance and foolish bluster is the evidence that
you're an alcohol abuser, and is a common indicator. Since there is
evidence you were drunk and since you said you're a homebrewer, put 2
and 2 together and it's likely that you were drunk on your own homebrew.
But I'll conceed that there is also the possibility you went to the
store to buy your hooch.

"Evidence" I was drunk? You are one dumb person!!! Let's see, you'd be
able to establish, as "evidence" that someone is drunk by a newsgroup
post? Police agencies everywhere will want you to do this for them.
They'll call you and say, Steve, I think we've got a drunk driver
here, and want you to take a look at a newsgroup post we'll have him
make, to see if indeed he is!!! What a stupid, stupid man....

"Joe" wrote in message .. .
"Joe" wrote in message
...

Please provide what "evidence" you have that I am an "alcohol abuser".
Please provide the "evidence" that I was "drunk" when I replied to
your post.

http://tinyurl.com/l60z



I didn't know you were only a white belt.

And I didn't know you were only an idiot, and a cable puller, JoeTechnician.

On 26 Aug 2003 04:26:22 -0700, (basskisser) wrote:

(Steven Shelikoff) wrote in message ...
On 22 Aug 2003 04:10:23 -0700, (basskisser) wrote:

(Steven Shelikoff) wrote in message
Yup, I just knew you couldn't behave like a normal person. Your
despondency and frustrations are obviously gnawing at you. You really
should take a vacation before you pop a gasket. And you should stop
posting while you're drunk from all that homebrew.

Steve

Please provide any evidence that I was "drunk on homebrew". I love it.
I mention that I homebrew, and because you know I'm right, you simply
use that as a crutch, and probably will a lot! What do you disagree
with in my replys on this subject?

Your simplistic belligerant attitude which was obvious from your post:
Takes a real simpleton to neglect to change something as
common of a maintenence item as zincs on a boat.

Then when I explained why I didn't change heat exhanger pencil zinc and
that the real reason was more than just neglect, you snipped out the
explanation and responded with:
You LIAR!! See here, you yourself said that you are guilty of NEGLECT.
So, yes, I can read plain English, where you said that you neglected

Your simplistic belligerance and foolish bluster is the evidence that
you're an alcohol abuser, and is a common indicator. Since there is
evidence you were drunk and since you said you're a homebrewer, put 2
and 2 together and it's likely that you were drunk on your own homebrew.
But I'll conceed that there is also the possibility you went to the
store to buy your hooch.

"Evidence" I was drunk? You are one dumb person!!! Let's see, you'd be
able to establish, as "evidence" that someone is drunk by a newsgroup
post? Police agencies everywhere will want you to do this for them.

Yes, it is evidence you were drunk.

They'll call you and say, Steve, I think we've got a drunk driver
here, and want you to take a look at a newsgroup post we'll have him
make, to see if indeed he is!!! What a stupid, stupid man....

There's another one of your stupid strawman arguments. Just because
there is evidence you were drunk doesn't mean it's evidence that will
hold up in court in a drunk driver case. The way your simple, idiotic
mind works is really flabbergasting sometimes.

Steve

(Steven Shelikoff) wrote in message
There's another one of your stupid strawman arguments. Just because
there is evidence you were drunk doesn't mean it's evidence that will
hold up in court in a drunk driver case. The way your simple, idiotic
mind works is really flabbergasting sometimes.

Steve

Again, what an idiot. Please, do tell, just what kind of "evidence" do
you have that I was drunk when I posted? Answer, NONE. It is called
speculation. Plain and simple. Just because you think, in your own
stupid mind, that there is "evidence", doesn't mean that there IS. The
flabbergasting part is the way that you think that, because YOU rant
about something, that there is some factual basis in it. Again, please
provide the EVIDENCE, NOT SPECULATION that I was drunk when I made the
post. No idiotic diatribe, etc., just the evidence, please. Where is
it?

When are we going to hear from Walt again?

On 26 Aug 2003 12:04:05 -0700, (basskisser) wrote:

(Steven Shelikoff) wrote in message
There's another one of your stupid strawman arguments. Just because
there is evidence you were drunk doesn't mean it's evidence that will
hold up in court in a drunk driver case. The way your simple, idiotic
mind works is really flabbergasting sometimes.

Steve

Again, what an idiot. Please, do tell, just what kind of "evidence" do
you have that I was drunk when I posted? Answer, NONE. It is called

For the third time, your simplistic belligerance and foolish bluster is
the evidence that you're an alcohol abuser and were drunk when you
posted. Those are common indicators. It doesn't mean you positively
100% absolutely were drunk when you posted. But it is simply evidence
that you were.

speculation. Plain and simple. Just because you think, in your own
stupid mind, that there is "evidence", doesn't mean that there IS. The

But there is evidence you were drunk. Again, evidence of something
doesn't necessarily mean it must be so. But in your case, the evidence
I posted in addition to the fact that you have an abundant supply of
alcohol available makes a pretty good case.

flabbergasting part is the way that you think that, because YOU rant
about something, that there is some factual basis in it. Again, please
provide the EVIDENCE, NOT SPECULATION that I was drunk when I made the
post. No idiotic diatribe, etc., just the evidence, please. Where is
it?

I've provided it at least 3 times. You're just too much of a moron to
understand the difference between evidence and verdict. More proof that
you really do need some basic english language courses.

Steve

"Joe" wrote in message . ..
When are we going to hear from Walt again?

When are you going to be an engineer, JoeTechnician?