Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Paul Schilter" paulschilter@comcast,dot,net wrote in message ... Chuck, Correct, after they corner the market, they can charge what ever they like, they'll be no more competitors left. Paul Then somebody else will open another store. Its not like there is a limited supply of stores that can ever be opened. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Then somebody else will open another store.
and sell what? a retailer needs a supplier not already in bed with Walmart |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
-v-,
Somebody else opening a store at that point is like trying to go into the car business today, DeLorian tried a couple others as well but it's hard to compete against the big boys. Probably the only exception are those intended for a small, rich, nitch market. The thing is can you match the foreign labor rates to compete? Paul "-v-" wrote in message om... "Paul Schilter" paulschilter@comcast,dot,net wrote in message ... Chuck, Correct, after they corner the market, they can charge what ever they like, they'll be no more competitors left. Paul Then somebody else will open another store. Its not like there is a limited supply of stores that can ever be opened. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Chuck,
I agree with you. I try to give my business to the small business owner. They are the ones who pioneered to make this country what it was. At the present rate the rich get richer and the poor get poorer. We know what that eventually leads to. Government should represent the people as a whole rather than the rich political special interest groups. Enough said. Paul "Gould 0738" wrote in message ... Our jobs are going overseas because our politicians have no interest in fighting corporations from sending jobs overseas. Our jobs are going overseas faster than they would have partially because WALMART is so super aggressive in their buying. When they want to carry toasters, for example, they invite all the major manufacturers of toasters down to Arkansas and pit them against one another. During the last cost cutting cycle, everybody who wanted to sell anyhing to WALMART *had* to go to China for labor or lose out. WALMART doesn't tell a mfg that they *must* build in China- only that if they can't meet or beat the price of those who do they are, effectively, out of business starting next month. What will the next sacrifice be? Quality? Or, when WALMART can no longer increase profits by forcing suppliers to cheaper sources of labor, will WALMART raise prices? Will we soon be paying as much as we used to pay for a US built, item but buying stuff from China instead? WALMART's vision for America is a place where a $9 an hour job, with no benefits, is a *great* opportunity. They envision a country where obedient workers volunteer to work off the clock every week, and where all will shop a the "company store." In Walmart's world, there is no middle class. Unless $9 an hour, with a few extra hours thrown in unpaid every week, is going to be the new "middle class." In Walmart's World, there are some opportunities for better income. If you're willing to work 50-51 weeks a year, 12-18 hours a day, 6-7 days a week, you can eventually rise to "store manager" and approach 6-figures a year. :-( One of the great hypocrisies of the WalMart culture is the great emphasis on quality "family" experiences. How many of the managers working 80 hours a week or more have any quality time left to spend with the family? How many of the people earing $9 an hour get to go home after work, rather than to the second,part time job they need to pay basic living expenses? |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gould 0738 wrote:
Our jobs are going overseas because our politicians have no interest in fighting corporations from sending jobs overseas. Our jobs are going overseas faster than they would have partially because WALMART is so super aggressive in their buying. It's directly on behalf of you the consumer, you don't "have" to buy any particular thing; however they do "allow" you the choice. I know in a socialist dream system free choice is to be crushed at every opportunity, but you haven't got that far yet & hopefully never will......... When they want to carry toasters, for example, they invite all the major manufacturers of toasters down to Arkansas and pit them against one another. During the last cost cutting cycle, everybody who wanted to sell anyhing to WALMART *had* to go to China for labor or lose out. It's referred to as "competition" Chuckster & I know you like to tag it so it's only competition when it's "competition" on your terms i.e. you win, but sorry competition is competition. It's you the consumer, if you can get the same quality at a lower price , then exercise your free choice & buy what you want. Thank people like Walmart for taking the commercial risks involved in protecting your right to choose. WALMART doesn't tell a mfg that they *must* build in China- only that if they can't meet or beat the price of those who do they are, effectively, out of business starting next month. China is not a "cheap" place to produce as such after all they're communists like Harry:-) Small timers can't just swan into China & exercise their free choice of factory or location like you're used to in the US, no it's all govt. "planned". They have zones which allow certain factories to be built for export & it's mostly only the big people who can meet their endless "rules", then & only then will that factory be "allowed" (licensed) to export. Yes they give free sites in the "zones" & assistance to encourage big players to set up there, however once in operation they try to tax the bejeesus out of any profits etc, needless to say the mostly US owned factories, can play that game reasonably well. The end result is with all the surrounding BS corruption & featherbedding of "licensed" middlemen China is not "cheap. I've commented before don't be overly worried about China, so long as they remain socialist we're safe. What will the next sacrifice be? Quality? Very well maybe, although walmart stuff isn't exactly high tech:-), whatever don't worry about it too much Chuck because you'll still have your free choice to assess if the quality price mix suits you before you buy, just allow every other individual the same free choice that's all. I can assure you if individuals weren't buying things they wouldn't be selling them for long. Or, when WALMART can no longer increase profits by forcing suppliers to cheaper sources of labor, Again this is your socialist mantra, "wages" are a small part of the issue, it's the union demanded BS that really costs & then the silent partners at ever turn which make the license holders, corruption, etc. in China look tame. Even the local council tries to "extra" tax Corps in the GM style what's good for us is good for .... Anyone not subject to rigorous & constant pressure from competition gets slack, excessive wages & perks leach like leeches through every sector, one always trying to best the other & the only thing that puts any sort of lid on it is consumer resistance at the retail level when the price/quality mix gets too far out of whack. will WALMART raise prices? Will we soon be paying as much as we used to pay for a US built, item but buying stuff from China instead? It's always "your" individual choice, there will always be people eager to supply widgets from somewhere, even from within the US at a lower price, it's giving each individual that free choice that you should be worried about protecting, not corrupt union thugs ala Harry. WALMART's vision for America is a place where a $9 an hour job, with no benefits, is a *great* opportunity. They envision a country where obedient workers volunteer to work off the clock every week, and where all will shop a the "company store." This is protectionist poppycock & you have more brains than to just parrot it. If you artificially protect anyone, worker, management, Corp, or whatever from competition they will have no incentive to be efficient. Yes in the short term the "chosen" noisy few will clean up big time because they can just raise prices or lower quality & there's not much you the consumer can do, they've effectively stolen your free choice. These few industries rarely actually sell much overseas because...., well they're overpriced & low quality so other consumers who still have a choice just laugh. Needless to say with no market expansion available these "chosen" noisy few who are effectively stealing from every other non protected worker/consumer just sit back & well...... become Harrys behind their wall of protection & apparent union power. Notice how unions seem to predominate in the industries that need the rest of you to subsidise that sector every time you buy??? even if you purchase the imported item, you're still subsidising the parasites??? So your country gets less & less foreign dollars in to pay these overpriced lower quality manufacturers, which means your country needs to borrow more money from overseas (you're the one wingeing about this just the other day Chuck) so either your currency drops (i.e most things will cost more because debts effectively go up) or your interest rates go up to attract more foreign money (i.e. most things cost more) I give you your car industry as an historical case study or you can watch it in real time with your steel industry. (ours too by the way, but the players are the same:-) In Walmart's world, there is no middle class. Unless $9 an hour, with a few extra hours thrown in unpaid every week, is going to be the new "middle class." It's not the shareholders of Walmart's job to protect you nor anyone else, they take a considerable risk with their own money by investing in walmart, hoping to make a return better than putting it in safe banks interest etc. In order to make that return walmart are just trying to satisfy your demands for products that meet your standards of price vs quality. Sure you can be a good little socialist soldier & refuse to buy things from China in an extra effort to subsidise your unionist mates, or slack management, or voracious local authorities, state govts making unrealistic demands, or the noisy greenies, that's hopefully always your choice & you should be thankful they're there giving it to you. But let others have the same "free" choice. All levels need constant pressure on them to be more efficient particularly in the west the "silent" partners, the instrumentalities, the councils, the state govts, the unilateralists. I give you CA as a case study. (Can it be right 1 in 7 workers is on the govt payroll??? scary bananas!!) In Walmart's World, there are some opportunities for better income. If you're willing to work 50-51 weeks a year, 12-18 hours a day, 6-7 days a week, you can eventually rise to "store manager" and approach 6-figures a year. :-( So what you're saying is all US corps should be "protected" from competition so they can be as inefficient as they like, badly managed as they like, pay whatever their local competition pays when the union make industry wide claims, so even at the individual's level a good hard & smart worker gets no more than a Harry type.??? America won't be great much longer if you try that, even a little. One of the great hypocrisies of the WalMart culture is the great emphasis on quality "family" experiences. How many of the managers working 80 hours a week or more have any quality time left to spend with the family? How many of the people earing $9 an hour get to go home after work, rather than to the second,part time job they need to pay basic living expenses? So again you're a protectionist, which usually means you want someone else to subsidise your lifestyle every time they purchase something, & you want to be exempt from any competitive pressure to individually perform. Thankfully it's mostly only the Harry types that subscribe to this view. K |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
K Smith wrote:
Gould 0738 wrote: Our jobs are going overseas because our politicians have no interest in fighting corporations from sending jobs overseas. Our jobs are going overseas faster than they would have partially because WALMART is so super aggressive in their buying. It's directly on behalf of you the consumer, you don't "have" to buy any particular thing; however they do "allow" you the choice. I know in a socialist dream system free choice is to be crushed at every opportunity, but you haven't got that far yet & hopefully never will......... When they want to carry toasters, for example, they invite all the major manufacturers of toasters down to Arkansas and pit them against one another. During the last cost cutting cycle, everybody who wanted to sell anyhing to WALMART *had* to go to China for labor or lose out. It's referred to as "competition" Chuckster & I know you like to tag it so it's only competition when it's "competition" on your terms i.e. you win, but sorry competition is competition. It's actually the fight for the bottom. You *really* are a corporate whore, Karen. China is not a "cheap" place to produce as such after all they're communists like Harry:-) Small timers can't just swan into China & exercise their free choice of factory or location like you're used to in the US, no it's all govt. "planned". China uses slave labor and labor that is grossly underpaid even by the total absence of any sort of standards. I've commented before don't be overly worried about China, so long as they remain socialist we're safe. Safe from what? You? WALMART's vision for America is a place where a $9 an hour job, with no benefits, is a *great* opportunity. They envision a country where obedient workers volunteer to work off the clock every week, and where all will shop a the "company store." This is protectionist poppycock & you have more brains than to just parrot it. It's absolute truth. Yet another overwrought, right-wing post from Karen Elizabeth Smith of Australia, who once again proves that she doesn't know scheiss from shoepolish. How's that non-existent factory of yours, Karen? Your production line is up to what, zero diesel outboards a week? Cripes, you even stole someone else's trademark. -- Email sent to is never read. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Harry Krause wrote:
K Smith wrote: Gould 0738 wrote: Our jobs are going overseas because our politicians have no interest in fighting corporations from sending jobs overseas. Our jobs are going overseas faster than they would have partially because WALMART is so super aggressive in their buying. It's directly on behalf of you the consumer, you don't "have" to buy any particular thing; however they do "allow" you the choice. I know in a socialist dream system free choice is to be crushed at every opportunity, but you haven't got that far yet & hopefully never will......... When they want to carry toasters, for example, they invite all the major manufacturers of toasters down to Arkansas and pit them against one another. During the last cost cutting cycle, everybody who wanted to sell anyhing to WALMART *had* to go to China for labor or lose out. It's referred to as "competition" Chuckster & I know you like to tag it so it's only competition when it's "competition" on your terms i.e. you win, but sorry competition is competition. It's actually the fight for the bottom. You *really* are a corporate whore, Karen. Now there's the usual Harry abuse. China is not a "cheap" place to produce as such after all they're communists like Harry:-) Small timers can't just swan into China & exercise their free choice of factory or location like you're used to in the US, no it's all govt. "planned". China uses slave labor and labor that is grossly underpaid even by the total absence of any sort of standards. So because you're a racist this is just you saying the Chinese are stupid, well guess what............ I've commented before don't be overly worried about China, so long as they remain socialist we're safe. Safe from what? You? Safe from you union types. WALMART's vision for America is a place where a $9 an hour job, with no benefits, is a *great* opportunity. They envision a country where obedient workers volunteer to work off the clock every week, and where all will shop a the "company store." This is protectionist poppycock & you have more brains than to just parrot it. It's absolute truth. Yet another overwrought, right-wing post from Karen Elizabeth Smith of Australia, who once again proves that she doesn't know scheiss from shoepolish. How's that non-existent factory of yours, Karen? Your production line is up to what, zero diesel outboards a week? Cripes, you even stole someone else's trademark. You & your simpleton mate Jack the whack, don't seem to know much. There are "classes" Harry, if you look there are many many registrations of the exact same trade marks in most jurisdictions, last time I looked there were about 18 in the US of mine. You know toys vs marine engines???? Surely even you can grasp this simple concept???? However the name can only be validly registered once in each "class". That's why I have the exact same mark registered twice here & only one there. I know better than to expect the truth from you of course. K Harry has claimed to have a 20 yrs his junior beautiful wife, he even put a fake pic of a beautiful woman on a website once claiming it was his "young bride", he may have a wife, although I doubt it, we don't like nor tolerate misogynists for long. Needless to say he's made up many "dramatic" over the top stories over the years about this lie to feed his ego & pretend he's the centre of attention, but as with his boat claims & other crap, there's never once been even a shred of independently verifiable material. After he stalked Madcow in real life, which was most frightening, I do suspect he's very very dangerous & that this "bride" story is his delusional appropriation of his, probably court ordered, treating psychotherapist as "wife" (it seems he was under lock & key for what?? over a year??? a sexual deviant maybe??), have a read of just a small part of his BS & make up your own mind, it's all about free choice:-) 1. She *is* my bride. There are no rules that determine the end of "bride-hood." If I want to refer to her as my bride, I may. 2. As a professional writer, I know the rules of language and am entitled to break them in exercise of my license. 3. I doubt many married women would object to their husbands lovingly referring to them as brides. The connotations are pleasant. 4. She's 20 years younger than I am. Naw. What happened was that I handled a couple of "political" consulting jobs funded out of the DC area to help a few candidates and defeat a couple of ballot issues. Through no fault of mine, we won each of the races, so some of the deep pockets types based in the DC area think I actually *know something* about the process. I was offered a contract that requires my presence in DC quite frequently. My bride also was offered a job up here that represented a significant professional career move. So, we're "up here" much of the time and "down there" the rest of it, except when we're "somewhere else." I've been back to Jax (well, really south of Jax) five times since coming "up here" late last summer and my bride just returned from a business trip there. I swear this is true. Here's a funny. My bride had to fly out to San Diego Wednesday and hitched a ride on her company's corporate jet. They landed in Salina, Kansas, which is due north of Wichita and Skippy's suburb of Derby. So when she gets to San Diego, I get a call asking, "What the hell did you do in Kansas...we didn't fly over one significant patch of water...?" Harry, you make over 500 posts a week to this group and you don't own a boat? And why are you so crabby? Maybe these two factors are related? One has to own something to use it? Hmmm. My bride drives off in her car every day, but she doesn't own it. I'm not crabby. You asked for advice I gave you some. I questioned your wanting to take a very small boat out into high seas and suddenly you turned sour. It's your pot; you are the one stewing in it. No, it is the boat of a friend. It is a 24' ProLine center console with, if I recall, a 225 hp Merc on it. It was a dark and stormy day in January (1997) when we went out, but the sky cleared once we got out to the Gulf Stream. Bride and I caught and released: 1 white marlin 12-15 yellowtail snappers, maybe two pounds each. Pretty, pretty fish. Assorted red snappers 1 amberjack 2 jack crevalle jacks 1 snook Nondescript sharks Did you spend a year as a line psychotherapist at a 650-bed state hospital for forensic patients? Did you spend a year as senior psychotherapist at a county facility for substance abusers? Did you spend two years as chief of therapy at a private, 200-bed facility for the mentally and emotionally ill, at which approximately half the patients were trying to beat drugs or alcohol? Are you currently chief of therapy for a for a multi-practitioner practice of some 825 patients, about a third of which are seeking help for substance abuse problems? Licensed psychotherapist Screening as to character and background for each degree earned On-going screening by faculty while in educational system Interviews and screenings for required years of internships, plus, at the same time, supervision by a licensed professional. Close professional and personal supervision by a licensed therapist for two years of employment before being allowed to apply for licensure Licensure background check, submission of recommendations by licensed practitioners Four hour written examination on state laws Five hour written examination on diagnosis, procedure and practice My wife went through this before becoming licensed. Her final internship was as a psychotherapist at a 600-bed high security state psychiatric hospital where, on a daily basis, she was exposed to more danger than your average soldier. My wife worked for a year as psychotherapist in a Florida 600-bed state mental institution for forensic patients. She saw and treated numerous sexual deviants who do a bit more than expose themselves. Such "treatment" is part of being in the mental health professions. You see, I'm a nautical psychotherapist, and for only $125 an hour, until their health insurance runs out, I help Bayliner owners overcome their feelings of boatable inadequacy. She is a licensed, practicing psychotherapist and often tells me I am the sanest person she sees each day. Which can be taken any way one likes. 1. I'm married to a psychotherapist. Live-in therapy, dontcha know? And much of Freud is passe. My ex-wife surpassed the anti-Christ at least a decade ago. They're not actually "free" moments. I go to boat dealers to round-up Bayliner owners who are trying to find one who will take their own version of flotsam and jetsam in on trade. 1. The address listed is not a home address. It is an office. 2. I have three phone numbers. The phone number listed is not one of mine. It has never been one of mine. The phone number *did* belong to an after-hours message recording hotline my wife maintained for her most mentally disturbed patients. Some of these troubled souls were court-ordered referrals. *Every* call to that phone number--every call--was recorded AND because of the nature of the line, my wife had the ability to alert the telephone company to trace the phone number of every incoming call to that line, *even* if the person making the call tried to block his number. Why, you might ask? Because when you are dealing with suicidal people, they'll liable to tell their therapist over the phone that they are planning to take their life. If the therapist believes the threat is real, she or he will want to dispatch emergency srvices and perhaps the police. In the years my wife has provided this pro bono service, she has never received a threatening or abusive call from a mentally ill patient or court-ordered referral. However, after the ranking Flaming Ass of this newsgroup posted the hotline number in this newsgroup, she received a number of abusive, foul-mouthed AND life-threatening calls. These were mostly directed at me but, of course, I never received them BECAUSE (duh!) the phone is not mine and I've never answered it. Naturally, my wife alerted the authorities, with whom she works closely because of her court-referred patients. The authorities are investigating the callers and have involved both the FBI *and* authorities in other states, including Florida, Georgia, California and Texas. Working with the telephone company, the authorities have been able to trace the origin of virtually every abusive call. And, of course, they have the tape recordings of the abusive messages. Several suspects have been identified. I really don't know what the outcome of all this will be. We haven't had an update in several weeks, nor are either of us here that interested in the sleazeballs that would make such calls. The phone number, of course, is "wired," so when the obnoxious calls came in from the idiot rec.boaters, the numbers were easy enough to trace. The local police handled a complaint, the local telco was involved and when it was discovered the point of origin was out of state, the FBI got involved. At least one of the idiots was caught and prosecuted. As far as I can tell, he has not posted here again. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
K Smith wrote:
Harry Krause wrote: K Smith wrote: Gould 0738 wrote: Our jobs are going overseas because our politicians have no interest in fighting corporations from sending jobs overseas. Our jobs are going overseas faster than they would have partially because WALMART is so super aggressive in their buying. It's directly on behalf of you the consumer, you don't "have" to buy any particular thing; however they do "allow" you the choice. I know in a socialist dream system free choice is to be crushed at every opportunity, but you haven't got that far yet & hopefully never will......... When they want to carry toasters, for example, they invite all the major manufacturers of toasters down to Arkansas and pit them against one another. During the last cost cutting cycle, everybody who wanted to sell anyhing to WALMART *had* to go to China for labor or lose out. It's referred to as "competition" Chuckster & I know you like to tag it so it's only competition when it's "competition" on your terms i.e. you win, but sorry competition is competition. It's actually the fight for the bottom. You *really* are a corporate whore, Karen. Now there's the usual Harry abuse. China is not a "cheap" place to produce as such after all they're communists like Harry:-) Small timers can't just swan into China & exercise their free choice of factory or location like you're used to in the US, no it's all govt. "planned". China uses slave labor and labor that is grossly underpaid even by the total absence of any sort of standards. So because you're a racist this is just you saying the Chinese are stupid, well guess what............ Stupid? Where did I say the Chinese were stupid? I've commented before don't be overly worried about China, so long as they remain socialist we're safe. Safe from what? You? Safe from you union types. Free trade unions eventually will improve the plight of workers in the PRC. How's that non-existent factory of yours, Karen? Your production line is up to what, zero diesel outboards a week? Cripes, you even stole someone else's trademark. You & your simpleton mate Jack the whack, don't seem to know much. There are "classes" Harry, if you look there are many many registrations of the exact same trade marks in most jurisdictions, last time I looked there were about 18 in the US of mine. You know toys vs marine engines???? Surely even you can grasp this simple concept???? How many diesel outboards did your non-existent factory produce this year, Karen? The only thing you produce is the crap you post in this newsgroup. Harry has claimed to have a 20 yrs his junior beautiful wife, he even put a fake pic of a beautiful woman on a website once claiming it was his "young bride", he may have a wife, although I doubt it, we don't like nor tolerate misogynists for long. I was born in 1944. My wife was born in 1962. Do the math, crap for brains. And I agree, she is quite lovely. And for sure bathes more often than you do. -- Email sent to is never read. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() You *really* are a corporate whore, Karen. oooh Harry, what a nasty response, but true. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Harry Krause wrote: You *really* are a corporate whore, Karen. This quote from the Microsoft and Merc Optimax corporate whore. -- Charlie ----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Economy Rebounds - Productivity Soars, Jobless Claims Drop | General |