Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#172
|
|||
|
|||
Say NO NO NO to Wal-Mart!!!
Good, does that mean this discussion is over?
Only if: Every person is entitled to compensation for honest labor. If we can't agree on that basic premise, there is no hope for any additional discussion. In that case, there's no purpose in hollering into a void. Free market spin? "Every person is entitled to compensation for honest labor- unless we can figure a way to screw them out of compensation, (in which case they are free to go work elsewhere, if they can)." |
#173
|
|||
|
|||
Say NO NO NO to Wal-Mart!!!
jps wrote:
In article , says... I think that is sufficient proof that the claim was accurate. LZ Thanks LZ. Mr. Jonathan Ball should probably look into Swiss history a little more. It's pretty clear they're a mercantile lot living under the misperception of neutrality. The Jewish people are just one of many who've been stolen from and then stiff armed by Swiss banking laws. There are folks around the globe who've been screwed by creeps, thugs and the like whose ill-gotten gains are "protected" by the Swiss banking system. It's a pretty country hiding some of the ugliest secrets in the world. jps Ball probably is very young, very smug, inexperienced in the reality of the world and likely believes the holocaust was a myth. He's best ignored. -- Email sent to is never read. |
#174
|
|||
|
|||
Say NO NO NO to Wal-Mart!!!
Doug Kanter wrote: Tangential to this (sort of): A large number of Russians fled Stalin's terror during WWII. If I recall from my reading, the largest number of them ended up in Northern Italy, somehow under the auspices of the U.S. and the British. At the end of the war, we sent them back. I don't recall the reason, but it was one of those things that makes you say "WTF????" Some sort of handy political settlement with our "ally", Josef Stalin. No saints anywhere. Sweden also ended up with quite a few. Their version of "neutrality" was not much different than Switzerland's. The Swedes got rich off the war The Russian POWs and DPs that were in Sweden all ended up in Siberia. Stalin felt that anyone exposed to outside influences was not going to be content with his version of the USSR. LZ |
#175
|
|||
|
|||
Say NO NO NO to Wal-Mart!!!
Where do you get the information that Wal-Mart does not make health
Insurance available to its employees? According to a news article in last week's paper- that insurance costs $250 a month (which is a heck of a lot of you're grossing $1200 and taking home $950)- and carries a $3000 deductible. If so, must be underwritten by Middle Finger Life and Casualty 25% of your take home pay for health insurance, and 25% of your annual income for deductible. Nice. |
#176
|
|||
|
|||
Say NO NO NO to Wal-Mart!!!
Amen!
"Gould 0738" wrote in message ... Our jobs are going overseas because our politicians have no interest in fighting corporations from sending jobs overseas. Our jobs are going overseas faster than they would have partially because WALMART is so super aggressive in their buying. When they want to carry toasters, for example, they invite all the major manufacturers of toasters down to Arkansas and pit them against one another. During the last cost cutting cycle, everybody who wanted to sell anyhing to WALMART *had* to go to China for labor or lose out. WALMART doesn't tell a mfg that they *must* build in China- only that if they can't meet or beat the price of those who do they are, effectively, out of business starting next month. What will the next sacrifice be? Quality? Or, when WALMART can no longer increase profits by forcing suppliers to cheaper sources of labor, will WALMART raise prices? Will we soon be paying as much as we used to pay for a US built, item but buying stuff from China instead? WALMART's vision for America is a place where a $9 an hour job, with no benefits, is a *great* opportunity. They envision a country where obedient workers volunteer to work off the clock every week, and where all will shop a the "company store." In Walmart's world, there is no middle class. Unless $9 an hour, with a few extra hours thrown in unpaid every week, is going to be the new "middle class." In Walmart's World, there are some opportunities for better income. If you're willing to work 50-51 weeks a year, 12-18 hours a day, 6-7 days a week, you can eventually rise to "store manager" and approach 6-figures a year. :-( One of the great hypocrisies of the WalMart culture is the great emphasis on quality "family" experiences. How many of the managers working 80 hours a week or more have any quality time left to spend with the family? How many of the people earing $9 an hour get to go home after work, rather than to the second,part time job they need to pay basic living expenses? |
#177
|
|||
|
|||
Say NO NO NO to Wal-Mart!!!
On Mon, 01 Dec 2003 14:01:55 GMT, Fred Ziffel wrote:
We don't make much of anything anymore, and we are becoming poorer because of it. Not true. The value of our total manufacturing output is higher today than it has ever been. Our productivity is the highest in the world, and our manufacturing output is greater than that of any other nation in the world. Sure, manufacturing is a smaller percentage of our GDP today than in the past, but that's because the service sector has grown so much faster than manufacturing. In other words, our GDP is much larger than in the past, so while the value produced by the manufacturing sector has increased, the value produced by the service sector has increased much more, leaving manufacturing a smaller percentage of the total. Manufacturing employment is down about 2 million from its peak in the 1970s, but still higher than it was in 1950. Mainly, those jobs have been lost to automation and increased productivity. In other words, output per worker is larger than in the past. That's generally a good thing, because it means a manufacturing worker today is worth more than he was in 1950, and that means he can be paid more than in 1950 without being inflationary. The median US worker income today is also higher than it has ever been ($32,200), and with the present low rate of inflation, it represents an absolute increase in buying power over wages of times past. The one cloud on the horizon is our trade balance. To put it bluntly, we buy a lot more from the rest of the world than we sell to the rest of the world. We can only do that because we are so much richer than the rest of the world. This won't become a problem for us as long as our GDP continues to grow at a rate of 2 to 3 percent a year (we've just had a 3rd quarter with an annualized growth rate of 8.2%, that isn't sustainable, but we're on track for 2 to 3 percent growth for the year, which is where we need to be). We have been sloughing off our low profit low productivity industries (for example, textiles, basic steel, etc) to countries with lower absolute cost structures. That's also generally a good thing, because it lowers the costs of our businesses which depend on those things, and it frees our capital and our workers to pursue higher value activities. This causes displacements, which can be painful to those workers who aren't adaptable, but it is necessary if we are to retain our comparative advantage vis the rest of the world. Our current unemployment is hovering around 6%. That's a couple of percentage points above what economists consider full employment. But because of demographics (baby boomers are nearing retirement) that will rapidly change. In fact, without immigration, we'd be facing severe labor shortages by 2023. Gary |
#178
|
|||
|
|||
Say NO NO NO to Wal-Mart!!!
Doug Kanter wrote:
"Dave Hall" wrote in message ... A real store would've moved those women out of the line, and perhaps even called the police. Not WM, though. As far as they're concerned, their customers' time is worthless. You can't put the blame on that type of behavior squarely on the shoulders of Wal-Mart exclusively. Many other department stores work in the same way. Any time you have a store which attracts a clientele which is not "bloomingdales" quality, you employ people at or near minimum wage, and do not offer line managers any incentive to do any more than babysit the employees, you will get this sort of situation. I've been in similar situations (I always end up picking the worst line) in grocery stores as well as department stores. Dave I have, too. In the "other" store I shop at, the cashier's blinking light would've gone on and a manager or security person would've been there in 30 seconds. Not Wal Mart, though. Again, it's probably a local thing, and not something endemic to the Walmart business plan. Something else interesting about the WM near me: You know how you hear a gentle beep from some cash registers each time an item is dragged across the scanner? At WM, they've connected that to the public address system at the front. Unbelievably loud and annoying. WTF? This is supposed to make the place sound interesting? What? You've got to be kidding. That would drive me nuts if I had to listen to that for hours on end.... Dave |
#179
|
|||
|
|||
Say NO NO NO to Wal-Mart!!!
Gould 0738 wrote:
What do you do with people who don't have enough skills to command jobs that 'pay a living wage'? There are a few "don't do's"..... High on the list would be "don't threaten your powerless mini-wage employee with termination if he or she is unwilling to go clock out and then return to work for a few 'free' hours." WalMart has been fined and penalized in scores of cases for this exact practice. On the clock work: Mini-wage but legal. Off the clock work: Slavery. Outlawed 140 years ago. Every person is entitled to compensation for honest labor. If we can't agree on that basic premise, there is no hope for any additional discussion. If you can cite cases of this practice being endorsed by Wal-Mart corporate, then I am in complete agreement with you. A few isolated cases may be nothing more than a few overzealous store managers bucking for a promotion, by lowering overhead costs... Dave |
#180
|
|||
|
|||
Say NO NO NO to Wal-Mart!!!
"Gould 0738" wrote in message
... Where do you get the information that Wal-Mart does not make health Insurance available to its employees? According to a news article in last week's paper- that insurance costs $250 a month (which is a heck of a lot of you're grossing $1200 and taking home $950)- and carries a $3000 deductible. If so, must be underwritten by Middle Finger Life and Casualty 25% of your take home pay for health insurance, and 25% of your annual income for deductible. Nice. In all fairness, Chuck, the cost of buying your own Blue Choice policy here (Rochester) is about $6-7k per year. I imagine it's not much different elsewhere. Sounds like WM is splitting the cost with the employees. Plenty of employers do that. My ex works for a non-profit which only picks up about 20% of the BC tab. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Economy Rebounds - Productivity Soars, Jobless Claims Drop | General |