"Clave" wrote in
:

"Yer Pal Al" wrote in message
..
. On Oct 18, 1:43 pm, "RD (The Sandman)" rdsandman(spamlock)
@comcast.net wrote:
"Clave" wrote
innews:nKudnW3sNKyq_kfXnZ2dnUVZ_rKdnZ2d@cablespeed mi.com:

...

http://www.google.com/search?sourcei...-8&rlz=1T4GWYE
_en
US316US317&q=court+rules+fox+can+lie

Those are opinion sites like Daily Kos, Huffingon Post,
democraticunderground, etc.. I did not see any that sited the actual
case nor were any of the cites AP, UPI or a news site.

I forgot to mention what an amazing feat that was for you to have
looked through all 82,300 of those links that fast.

Congratulations, retard.


I called it...

You got me curious here, Al.

What exactly are you denying? That Wilson and Akre v Fox never
existed, that Fox lost the initial case, or that Fox appealed and won,
the court affirming that they had a right to lie?

I anxiously await your mother-of-all-retards reply.

And we anxiously await a cite to the case from you. I want to read the
actual case, not a Daily Kos take on it.


--
Sleep well tonight,

RD (The Sandman)

Let's see if I have this healthcare thingy right. Congress is to pass
a plan written by a committee whose head has said he doesn't understand
it, passed by a Congress that hasn't read it, signed by a president who
hasn't read it, with funding administered by a Treasury chief who didn't
pay his taxes because he didn't understand TurboTax, overseen by an obese
Surgeon General and financed by a country that's nearly broke.
What could possibly go wrong?

"RD (The Sandman)" wrote in message
...
"Clave" wrote in
news:RJGdnQXeVYHNCkbXnZ2dnUVZ_vudnZ2d@cablespeedmi .com:

"RD (The Sandman)" wrote in message
...
"Clave" wrote in
news:nKudnW3sNKyq_kfXnZ2dnUVZ_rKdnZ2d@cablespeedmi .com:

..

You can take your pick too, moron. Or are you still allergic to
facts?

http://www.google.com/search?sourcei...8&rlz=1T4GWYE_
en US316US317&q=court+rules+fox+can+lie

Those are opinion sites...

OK, you retards just go on believing it never happened. Your
collective need to deny recent history is even more well-documented
than the FOX case.

Then why do you have such a problem producing a cite for it?


I produced 83,000 of them.

I'm not interested in playing birther games with you or any of your slurp
buddies.

Jim

"Gray Ghost" wrote in message
. 97.142...
"Clave" wrote in news:sf-dnR--
:

I forgot to mention what an amazing feat that was for you to have looked
through all 82,300 of those links that fast.


After 2 pages of links and only opinion pieces and no actual news quotes
form
any network or newspaper, one can presume that it's hot air.

Your ignorance is not my problem.

Jim

"RD (The Sandman)" wrote in message
...
"Clave" wrote in

...

What exactly are you denying? That Wilson and Akre v Fox never
existed, that Fox lost the initial case, or that Fox appealed and won,
the court affirming that they had a right to lie?

I anxiously await your mother-of-all-retards reply.

And we anxiously await a cite to the case from you. I want to read the
actual case, not a Daily Kos take on it.

DYOFH, retard.

Jim

On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 18:46:07 -0700, "Clave"
wrote:

"RD (The Sandman)" wrote in message
...
"Clave" wrote in
news:RJGdnQXeVYHNCkbXnZ2dnUVZ_vudnZ2d@cablespeedmi .com:

"RD (The Sandman)" wrote in message
...
"Clave" wrote in
news:nKudnW3sNKyq_kfXnZ2dnUVZ_rKdnZ2d@cablespeedmi .com:

..

You can take your pick too, moron. Or are you still allergic to
facts?

http://www.google.com/search?sourcei...8&rlz=1T4GWYE_
en US316US317&q=court+rules+fox+can+lie

Those are opinion sites...

OK, you retards just go on believing it never happened. Your
collective need to deny recent history is even more well-documented
than the FOX case.

Then why do you have such a problem producing a cite for it?


I produced 83,000 of them.

I'm not interested in playing birther games with you or any of your slurp
buddies.

Jim

Birthers. Weren't they formerly known as "The Klan"?

They'll never believe anything if it goes against the grain of their
assumed/ratified/cemented ignorance. Cannot compute.

Clave wrote:
"RD (The Sandman)" wrote in message
...
"Clave" wrote in

...

What exactly are you denying? That Wilson and Akre v Fox never
existed, that Fox lost the initial case, or that Fox appealed and won,
the court affirming that they had a right to lie?

I anxiously await your mother-of-all-retards reply.
And we anxiously await a cite to the case from you. I want to read the
actual case, not a Daily Kos take on it.

DYOFH, retard.

Jim


Eat your own ****, clam****.

Clave wrote:
"RD (The Sandman)" wrote in message
...
"Clave" wrote in
news:RJGdnQXeVYHNCkbXnZ2dnUVZ_vudnZ2d@cablespeedmi .com:

"RD (The Sandman)" wrote in message
...
"Clave" wrote in
news:nKudnW3sNKyq_kfXnZ2dnUVZ_rKdnZ2d@cablespeedmi .com:
..

You can take your pick too, moron. Or are you still allergic to
facts?

http://www.google.com/search?sourcei...8&rlz=1T4GWYE_
en US316US317&q=court+rules+fox+can+lie
Those are opinion sites...
OK, you retards just go on believing it never happened. Your
collective need to deny recent history is even more well-documented
than the FOX case.
Then why do you have such a problem producing a cite for it?


I produced 83,000 of them.

That was your total sperm count?

Amazing.

jps wrote:
On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 18:46:07 -0700, "Clave"
wrote:

"RD (The Sandman)" wrote in message
...
"Clave" wrote in
news:RJGdnQXeVYHNCkbXnZ2dnUVZ_vudnZ2d@cablespeedmi .com:

"RD (The Sandman)" wrote in message
...
"Clave" wrote in
news:nKudnW3sNKyq_kfXnZ2dnUVZ_rKdnZ2d@cablespeedmi .com:
..

You can take your pick too, moron. Or are you still allergic to
facts?

http://www.google.com/search?sourcei...8&rlz=1T4GWYE_
en US316US317&q=court+rules+fox+can+lie
Those are opinion sites...
OK, you retards just go on believing it never happened. Your
collective need to deny recent history is even more well-documented
than the FOX case.
Then why do you have such a problem producing a cite for it?

I produced 83,000 of them.

I'm not interested in playing birther games with you or any of your slurp
buddies.

Jim

Birthers.

****ters?

Oh sorry, shouldn't have cited your family...

jps sucks wet doggy dick.

On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 11:06:50 -0500, "RD (The Sandman)"
wrote:

"Clave" wrote in
:

"Yer Pal Al" wrote in message
..
. On Oct 18, 1:43 pm, "RD (The Sandman)" rdsandman(spamlock)
@comcast.net wrote:
"Clave" wrote
innews:nKudnW3sNKyq_kfXnZ2dnUVZ_rKdnZ2d@cablespeed mi.com:

...

http://www.google.com/search?sourcei...-8&rlz=1T4GWYE
_en
US316US317&q=court+rules+fox+can+lie

Those are opinion sites like Daily Kos, Huffingon Post,
democraticunderground, etc.. I did not see any that sited the actual
case nor were any of the cites AP, UPI or a news site.

I forgot to mention what an amazing feat that was for you to have
looked through all 82,300 of those links that fast.

Congratulations, retard.


I called it...

You got me curious here, Al.

What exactly are you denying? That Wilson and Akre v Fox never
existed, that Fox lost the initial case, or that Fox appealed and won,
the court affirming that they had a right to lie?

I anxiously await your mother-of-all-retards reply.

And we anxiously await a cite to the case from you. I want to read the
actual case, not a Daily Kos take on it.

There were plenty of entrees available that had nothing to do with
Daily Kos.

You simply don't want to see them because it'll cause you to have to
reevaluate your fragile reality. Wouldn't want your hair to
spontaneously combust find that your cranium exploded from the
pressure of a severely constipated cortex.