On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 12:58:26 GMT, KK wrote:


And - even if it did - it's been almost a ****ing *year*, dummy.

You're a real asshole, KK. You always have to resort to name calling.
I'm beginning to despise you.

On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 18:55:54 -0400, queenie
wrote:

On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 12:58:26 GMT, KK wrote:


And - even if it did - it's been almost a ****ing *year*, dummy.

You're a real asshole, KK. You always have to resort to name calling.
I'm beginning to despise you.



Yah. LIEberals, like Obammy, hate it when their faults are made
public. That's why Obammy wants to put FOX NEWS on his "enemies"
list. Amazingly, even CBS pointed this out.

On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 12:55:22 GMT, KK wrote:

Who are you to say who "needs" money they've made? This entitlement you
feel to others' property is disgusting.

You are an idiot.

We all invest in and support the infrastructure that allows the
enterprising to profit from their good ideas and industry.

Those that profit extraordinarily owe it back to the system in equal
measure.

You greedy sons of bitches that never learned to share are the
problem. Voting against your own interests with the fantasy that
you'll be taxed at an extraordinary rate someday.

Not gonna happen silly ass.

On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 19:38:27 -0500, Fiftycal
wrote:

On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 18:55:54 -0400, queenie
wrote:

On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 12:58:26 GMT, KK wrote:


And - even if it did - it's been almost a ****ing *year*, dummy.

You're a real asshole, KK. You always have to resort to name calling.
I'm beginning to despise you.



Yah. LIEberals, like Obammy, hate it when their faults are made
public. That's why Obammy wants to put FOX NEWS on his "enemies"
list. Amazingly, even CBS pointed this out.

Oh, did Obama admit to faults? Geez, what a giant step forward from
our last president.

He should get another Nobel. The not GW Bush Nobel Prize.

On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 18:27:29 -0700, jps wrote:

And - even if it did - it's been almost a ****ing *year*, dummy.

You're a real asshole, KK. You always have to resort to name calling.
I'm beginning to despise you.



Yah. LIEberals, like Obammy, hate it when their faults are made
public. That's why Obammy wants to put FOX NEWS on his "enemies"
list. Amazingly, even CBS pointed this out.

Oh, did Obama admit to faults? Geez, what a giant step forward from
our last president.

Reading comprehension problem? Where in the above 3 lines did I
intimate that Obammy "admit" to anything?

He should get another Nobel. The not GW Bush Nobel Prize.

He already got that one. BTW, the reason the eurotrash socialists
gave him the "piece" prize was for not stopping the AIG bailout. If
he had, then the euros wouldn't have gotten about $120 billion in
"insurance" that AIG had sold for "derivatives". Most of that going
to eurotrash banks owned/controlled by states and their cronys.

On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 19:38:27 -0500, Fiftycal
wrote:

Yah. LIEberals, like Obammy, hate it when their faults are made
public. That's why Obammy wants to put FOX NEWS on his "enemies"
list. Amazingly, even CBS pointed this out.

Most mainstream media is owned by big corporations so it's no surprise
that they'd want to defend Faux News.

On Sat, 24 Oct 2009 08:27:47 -0400, queenie
wrote:

On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 19:38:27 -0500, Fiftycal
wrote:

Yah. LIEberals, like Obammy, hate it when their faults are made
public. That's why Obammy wants to put FOX NEWS on his "enemies"
list. Amazingly, even CBS pointed this out.

Most mainstream media is owned by big corporations so it's no surprise
that they'd want to defend Faux News.

Really? SO corporations exist to "share the wealth"??? If this was
mere corporatism, then it would make sense for them to SUPPORT
excluding one of the partners. Ideally, ONE corporation would be the
mouthpiece for Obammy.

I say that the news media finally remembered the Nixon administration
and how the "enemies" list worked. They realized THEY could end up on
it if they EVER dissed Obammy.

queenie wrote in
news
On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 13:09:37 -0500, "RD (The Sandman)"
wrote:

queenie wrote in
m:

On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 19:27:41 -0400, "Scout"
wrote:

And the health care reform has NOTHING to do with Bush.

That's for damn sure. After all, the Republican party is the Party
of
NO

Still getting your talking points from the Daily Kos?

Is that a site you think I'd be interested in? As far as the Party of
No is concerned, what have they done for you?

I am not a member of it so why should they do anything for me?

--
Sleep well tonight,

RD (The Sandman)

Let's see if I have this healthcare thingy right. Congress is to pass
a plan written by a committee whose head has said he doesn't understand
it, passed by a Congress that hasn't read it, signed by a president who
hasn't read it, with funding administered by a Treasury chief who didn't
pay his taxes because he didn't understand TurboTax, overseen by an obese
Surgeon General and financed by a country that's nearly broke.
What could possibly go wrong?

queenie wrote in
:

On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 13:13:45 -0500, "RD (The Sandman)"
wrote:

queenie wrote in
m:

On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 18:24:33 -0500, "RD (The Sandman)"
wrote:

queenie wrote in
m:

On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 16:00:10 GMT, KK wrote:

In other words, hats off to Obama for honestly talking about his
past (unlike W who said some cop-out bull****, or Clinton with the
oh-so- clintony "didn't break the laws of my country" and later "I
didn't inhale") ... but F him for dismissing serious questions
about decriminialization and F him for ignoring the waste,
expense, and injustice of the 60% of federal prisoners who are
non-violent drug offenders.

He's been in office TEN months and he already has a lot on his
plate due to the disastrous policies of the previous
administration. Give him time. Right now, the wars, health care
reform and the economy come first. Geez!!

Bush's war was Iraq. Both the Democrats and Obama have been saying
that the right war was Afghanistan.....well, now he has it. Don't
blame Bush for the war that the liberals wanted and felt was the
right one.

But Obama never said war with Iraq was the right thing.

I didn't claim that he did.

Now he's
stuck with it.

A war which is winding down, particularly since the surge.

He's been in office ten months and people are bitching
like he's been in office for years.

He promised to close Guantanamo, pull the troops out of Iraq, etc..
within a year. He is not even close to doing either. He was aware of
the economy, Afghanistan, Iraq, public opinion, and the goals of his own
party when he decided to run.

Was Bush president when those wars started or not? And were both
wars still going on when he left? I believe both answers are "Yes".

How quickly you forget all the talk from Democrats about Afghanistan
being the right war.

What is it with you and the war in Afghanistan? Oh, you want to
remind everybody that Bush took his eye off Afghanistan and went to
Iraq and that's why so many soldiers have died unnecessarily.

Nope, I wish for Democrats to keep in mind that this was their war. This
was the war that Pelosi and company said was the right war and the one
that Bush should have been waging. Well, now, they have their wish.
Afghanistan is their war.

All under Bush's watch and his stupid tax cuts. He even gave a tax
credit to people who bought the gas-guzzling Hummer.

With errors from both sides of the aisle. After all, the biggest
collapse in real estate financing was Freddie Mac and Fannie
Mae....under oversight from Barney Frank and Chris Dodd as the House
and Senate Finance Committee chairmen respectively.

The bottom line is there are problems Obama inherited and he has to
resolve them. And he cannot fix EVERYTHING in TEN fricking
months!!!

And not all of them are due to Bush. Until folks understand that
there were errors in regulation and oversight from both sides of the
aisle, we will never fully recover. All people will be too busy
trying to place blame on the other side.

Republican had control of all three branches of government for six
years. They blew it big time and now they want to distract from that
by blaming Obama for not getting anything accomplished in less than a
year. That is why the Republicans, the Party of No, is determined to
see that Obama fails while they gave Bush a blank check to do whatever
he wanted.

Bush's administration was a failure although I believe that history will
show him to be a better president than most think.....Obama's appears to
be headed that way. The problem I have is the next few generations
slowly watching their country go broke trying to fix problems that belong
to both sides of the aisle while spending more time blaming Bush than
doing much of anything.


--
Sleep well tonight,

RD (The Sandman)

Let's see if I have this healthcare thingy right. Congress is to pass
a plan written by a committee whose head has said he doesn't understand
it, passed by a Congress that hasn't read it, signed by a president who
hasn't read it, with funding administered by a Treasury chief who didn't
pay his taxes because he didn't understand TurboTax, overseen by an obese
Surgeon General and financed by a country that's nearly broke.
What could possibly go wrong?

queenie wrote in
news
On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 19:38:27 -0500, Fiftycal
wrote:

Yah. LIEberals, like Obammy, hate it when their faults are made
public. That's why Obammy wants to put FOX NEWS on his "enemies"
list. Amazingly, even CBS pointed this out.

Most mainstream media is owned by big corporations so it's no surprise
that they'd want to defend Faux News.



Nope, freedom of the press is the reason they defend FOX news. The
administration should not be in the business of trying to direct news
outlets.

--
Sleep well tonight,

RD (The Sandman)

Let's see if I have this healthcare thingy right. Congress is to pass
a plan written by a committee whose head has said he doesn't understand
it, passed by a Congress that hasn't read it, signed by a president who
hasn't read it, with funding administered by a Treasury chief who didn't
pay his taxes because he didn't understand TurboTax, overseen by an obese
Surgeon General and financed by a country that's nearly broke.
What could possibly go wrong?