In talk.politics.guns queenie wrote:

You're a real asshole, KK. You always have to resort to name calling.


[chuckle]

On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 20:37:31 -0500, Fiftycal wrote:

On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 18:27:29 -0700, jps wrote:

And - even if it did - it's been almost a ****ing *year*, dummy.

You're a real asshole, KK. You always have to resort to name calling.
I'm beginning to despise you.



Yah. LIEberals, like Obammy, hate it when their faults are made
public. That's why Obammy wants to put FOX NEWS on his "enemies" list.
Amazingly, even CBS pointed this out.

Oh, did Obama admit to faults? Geez, what a giant step forward from our
last president.

Reading comprehension problem? Where in the above 3 lines did I
intimate that Obammy "admit" to anything?

He should get another Nobel. The not GW Bush Nobel Prize.

He already got that one. BTW, the reason the eurotrash socialists gave
him the "piece" prize was for not stopping the AIG bailout. If he had,
then the euros wouldn't have gotten about $120 billion in "insurance"
that AIG had sold for "derivatives". Most of that going to eurotrash
banks owned/controlled by states and their cronys.

Why did you put those "things" in "quotes"? Do you not think that
derivatives are real things?

On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 17:39:59 -0700, jps wrote:

On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 12:55:22 GMT, KK wrote:

Who are you to say who "needs" money they've made? This entitlement you
feel to others' property is disgusting.

You are an idiot.

Right, the guy who produces something and pays for all the rest of you is
the idiot. Hey, wait a second ...





We all invest in and support the infrastructure that allows the
enterprising to profit from their good ideas and industry.

No, you ****ing don't. I pay far more than I use. Far, far, far more.




Those that profit extraordinarily owe it back to the system in equal
measure.

Spoken like a true collectivist.




You greedy sons of bitches that never learned to share are the problem.

Again I'm rendered nearly speechless after paying six figures' worth of
tax (that's *just* income tax and *just* federal) and being called
"greedy".


Voting against your own interests with the fantasy that you'll be taxed
at an extraordinary rate someday.

I'm taxed at an extraordinary rate *today*. And no politician I've seen
represents *my* interests.


My problem with your party's dimwitted sophomore-dorm-bull-session-
redistributionism isn't primarily one of self-interest. If the pols
steal a few grand more from me, I'll be annoyed but I'll live.

It's the idea - embodied by your angry insistence that you're entitled to
what I earn - that there's a bottomless pit of treasure to take from,
that dampening the incentive to produce will somehow not decrease
production. The idea that it's justified to ratchet up spending
regardless of the economy - to jack up taxes when times are good, spend
it like a drunk sailor on programs which insanely grow on autopilot, then
being surprised every time when a waning economy means decreasing
revenue, then tying another bad of cement to the horse and - *more*
surprise when the horse doesn't speed up.

Your ideology isn't fueled by pragmatism, or economic reality. It's
fueled by anger, envy, and what I can only assume is a very sense of self-
worth and fear that you'll never amount to anything.


Not gonna happen silly ass.

Right, because you know.

"lab~rat :-)" wrote in
:

On Sat, 24 Oct 2009 12:26:37 -0500, "RD (The Sandman)"
puked:

He promised to close Guantanamo, pull the troops out of Iraq, etc..
within a year. He is not even close to doing either. He was aware of
the economy, Afghanistan, Iraq, public opinion, and the goals of his
own
party when he decided to run.

Patriot Act.

??? I appear to have lost context....


--
Sleep well tonight,

RD (The Sandman)

Let's see if I have this healthcare thingy right. Congress is to pass
a plan written by a committee whose head has said he doesn't understand
it, passed by a Congress that hasn't read it, signed by a president who
hasn't read it, with funding administered by a Treasury chief who didn't
pay his taxes because he didn't understand TurboTax, overseen by an obese
Surgeon General and financed by a country that's nearly broke.
What could possibly go wrong?

On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:58:52 -0500, "RD (The Sandman)"
puked:

"lab~rat :-)" wrote in
:

On Sat, 24 Oct 2009 12:26:37 -0500, "RD (The Sandman)"
puked:

He promised to close Guantanamo, pull the troops out of Iraq, etc..
within a year. He is not even close to doing either. He was aware of
the economy, Afghanistan, Iraq, public opinion, and the goals of his
own
party when he decided to run.

Patriot Act.

??? I appear to have lost context....

Obama hasn't done away with the Patriot Act. That was a bad thing
when Bush was in power, now the libs are ok with it because Obama gave
it his blessing.
--
lab~rat :-)
Do you want polite or do you want sincere?

On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 09:00:31 -0400, "lab~rat :-)"
wrote:

On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 18:54:10 -0400, queenie
puked:

Bush's war was Iraq. Both the Democrats and Obama have been saying
that the right war was Afghanistan.....well, now he has it. Don't
blame Bush for the war that the liberals wanted and felt was the right
one.

But Obama never said war with Iraq was the right thing. Now he's
stuck with it. He's been in office ten months and people are bitching
like he's been in office for years.

He's not stuck with it, he volunteered to administer it. snipped attempted to change the topic

Still, he's been in office ten months. It taking me longer than that
to decide how to redecorate my home.

On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 13:25:35 GMT, KK wrote:

On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 18:55:54 -0400, queenie wrote:

On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 12:58:26 GMT, KK wrote:


And - even if it did - it's been almost a ****ing *year*, dummy.

You're a real asshole, KK. You always have to resort to name calling.
I'm beginning to despise you.

It's not just "name calling" if it's justified and relevant.

No, it's an action by a frustrated child.

"lab~rat :-)" wrote in
:

On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:58:52 -0500, "RD (The Sandman)"
puked:

"lab~rat :-)" wrote in
m:

On Sat, 24 Oct 2009 12:26:37 -0500, "RD (The Sandman)"
puked:

He promised to close Guantanamo, pull the troops out of Iraq, etc..
within a year. He is not even close to doing either. He was aware
of
the economy, Afghanistan, Iraq, public opinion, and the goals of his
own
party when he decided to run.

Patriot Act.

??? I appear to have lost context....

Obama hasn't done away with the Patriot Act. That was a bad thing
when Bush was in power, now the libs are ok with it because Obama gave
it his blessing.

Gotcha'.....of course, that is true since it all depends on whose ox is
being fed and whose is being gored.


--
Sleep well tonight,

RD (The Sandman)

Let's see if I have this healthcare thingy right. Congress is to pass
a plan written by a committee whose head has said he doesn't understand
it, passed by a Congress that hasn't read it, signed by a president who
hasn't read it, with funding administered by a Treasury chief who didn't
pay his taxes because he didn't understand TurboTax, overseen by an obese
Surgeon General and financed by a country that's nearly broke.
What could possibly go wrong?

queenie wrote in
:

On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 09:00:31 -0400, "lab~rat :-)"
wrote:

On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 18:54:10 -0400, queenie
puked:

Bush's war was Iraq. Both the Democrats and Obama have been
saying that the right war was Afghanistan.....well, now he has it.
Don't blame Bush for the war that the liberals wanted and felt
was the right one.

But Obama never said war with Iraq was the right thing. Now he's
stuck with it. He's been in office ten months and people are
bitching like he's been in office for years.

He's not stuck with it, he volunteered to administer it. snipped
attempted to change the topic

Still, he's been in office ten months. It taking me longer than that
to decide how to redecorate my home.

I can't help it if you are slow and have nowhere near the advisors he
has.


--
Sleep well tonight,

RD (The Sandman)

Let's see if I have this healthcare thingy right. Congress is to pass
a plan written by a committee whose head has said he doesn't understand
it, passed by a Congress that hasn't read it, signed by a president who
hasn't read it, with funding administered by a Treasury chief who didn't
pay his taxes because he didn't understand TurboTax, overseen by an obese
Surgeon General and financed by a country that's nearly broke.
What could possibly go wrong?

On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 18:41:49 -0500, "RD (The Sandman)"
wrote:

"lab~rat :-)" wrote in
:

On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:58:52 -0500, "RD (The Sandman)"
puked:

"lab~rat :-)" wrote in
:

On Sat, 24 Oct 2009 12:26:37 -0500, "RD (The Sandman)"
puked:

He promised to close Guantanamo, pull the troops out of Iraq, etc..
within a year. He is not even close to doing either. He was aware
of
the economy, Afghanistan, Iraq, public opinion, and the goals of his
own
party when he decided to run.

Patriot Act.

??? I appear to have lost context....

Obama hasn't done away with the Patriot Act. That was a bad thing
when Bush was in power, now the libs are ok with it because Obama gave
it his blessing.

Gotcha'.....of course, that is true since it all depends on whose ox is
being fed and whose is being gored.

'...whose is being gored'. Get it? Gored, like Al.

Oh well.