jps wrote in
:

On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 18:46:07 -0700, "Clave"
wrote:

"RD (The Sandman)" wrote in message
.. .
"Clave" wrote in
news:RJGdnQXeVYHNCkbXnZ2dnUVZ_vudnZ2d@cablespeedmi .com:

"RD (The Sandman)" wrote in
message ...
"Clave" wrote in
news:nKudnW3sNKyq_kfXnZ2dnUVZ_rKdnZ2d@cablespeedmi .com:

..

You can take your pick too, moron. Or are you still allergic to
facts?

http://www.google.com/search?sourcei...TF-8&rlz=1T4GW
YE_ en US316US317&q=court+rules+fox+can+lie

Those are opinion sites...

OK, you retards just go on believing it never happened. Your
collective need to deny recent history is even more well-documented
than the FOX case.

Then why do you have such a problem producing a cite for it?


I produced 83,000 of them.

I'm not interested in playing birther games with you or any of your
slurp buddies.

Jim

Birthers. Weren't they formerly known as "The Klan"?

They'll never believe anything if it goes against the grain of their
assumed/ratified/cemented ignorance. Cannot compute.


Ahhhhhh, Clave......you found a butt buddie......

--
Sleep well tonight,

RD (The Sandman)

Let's see if I have this healthcare thingy right. Congress is to pass
a plan written by a committee whose head has said he doesn't understand
it, passed by a Congress that hasn't read it, signed by a president who
hasn't read it, with funding administered by a Treasury chief who didn't
pay his taxes because he didn't understand TurboTax, overseen by an obese
Surgeon General and financed by a country that's nearly broke.
What could possibly go wrong?

"Clave" wrote in news:56edncvL3-
:

"RD (The Sandman)" wrote in message
...
"Clave" wrote in

...

What exactly are you denying? That Wilson and Akre v Fox never
existed, that Fox lost the initial case, or that Fox appealed and
won,
the court affirming that they had a right to lie?

I anxiously await your mother-of-all-retards reply.

And we anxiously await a cite to the case from you. I want to read
the
actual case, not a Daily Kos take on it.

DYOFH, retard.

IOW, you can only blow the same smoke as your blogs do and cannot produce
a case cite. Noted....


--
Sleep well tonight,

RD (The Sandman)

Let's see if I have this healthcare thingy right. Congress is to pass
a plan written by a committee whose head has said he doesn't understand
it, passed by a Congress that hasn't read it, signed by a president who
hasn't read it, with funding administered by a Treasury chief who didn't
pay his taxes because he didn't understand TurboTax, overseen by an obese
Surgeon General and financed by a country that's nearly broke.
What could possibly go wrong?

On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 14:05:03 -0500, "RD (The Sandman)"
wrote:

jps wrote in
:

On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 18:46:07 -0700, "Clave"
wrote:

"RD (The Sandman)" wrote in message
. ..
"Clave" wrote in
news:RJGdnQXeVYHNCkbXnZ2dnUVZ_vudnZ2d@cablespeedmi .com:

"RD (The Sandman)" wrote in
message ...
"Clave" wrote in
news:nKudnW3sNKyq_kfXnZ2dnUVZ_rKdnZ2d@cablespeedmi .com:

..

You can take your pick too, moron. Or are you still allergic to
facts?

http://www.google.com/search?sourcei...TF-8&rlz=1T4GW
YE_ en US316US317&q=court+rules+fox+can+lie

Those are opinion sites...

OK, you retards just go on believing it never happened. Your
collective need to deny recent history is even more well-documented
than the FOX case.

Then why do you have such a problem producing a cite for it?


I produced 83,000 of them.

I'm not interested in playing birther games with you or any of your
slurp buddies.

Jim

Birthers. Weren't they formerly known as "The Klan"?

They'll never believe anything if it goes against the grain of their
assumed/ratified/cemented ignorance. Cannot compute.


Ahhhhhh, Clave......you found a butt buddie......

That's your rebuttal? You're afraid of the truth so deflect.

It's not going to change the facts nor your fear of them.

jps wrote in news:61hqd55pj0s048sm5sp264gijt5or48jso@
4ax.com:

On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 11:06:50 -0500, "RD (The Sandman)"
wrote:

"Clave" wrote in
:

"Yer Pal Al" wrote in message
news:99084229-9e54-4c51-b7e9-
..
. On Oct 18, 1:43 pm, "RD (The Sandman)" rdsandman(spamlock)
@comcast.net wrote:
"Clave" wrote
innews:nKudnW3sNKyq_kfXnZ2dnUVZ_rKdnZ2d@cablespeed mi.com:

...

http://www.google.com/search?sourcei...&ie=UTF-8&rlz=
1T4GWYE
_en
US316US317&q=court+rules+fox+can+lie

Those are opinion sites like Daily Kos, Huffingon Post,
democraticunderground, etc.. I did not see any that sited the
actual
case nor were any of the cites AP, UPI or a news site.

I forgot to mention what an amazing feat that was for you to have
looked through all 82,300 of those links that fast.

Congratulations, retard.


I called it...

You got me curious here, Al.

What exactly are you denying? That Wilson and Akre v Fox never
existed, that Fox lost the initial case, or that Fox appealed and
won,
the court affirming that they had a right to lie?

I anxiously await your mother-of-all-retards reply.

And we anxiously await a cite to the case from you. I want to read the
actual case, not a Daily Kos take on it.

There were plenty of entrees available that had nothing to do with
Daily Kos.

That's true. Some came from the Huffington Post (which was acknowledged)
and other blogs or opinion pieces....none came from either credible
sources or a case cite.

You simply don't want to see them because it'll cause you to have to
reevaluate your fragile reality. Wouldn't want your hair to
spontaneously combust find that your cranium exploded from the
pressure of a severely constipated cortex.

If you have a case cite or credible news account, post it....otherwise,
you are considered another Daily Kos twit.



--
Sleep well tonight,

RD (The Sandman)

Let's see if I have this healthcare thingy right. Congress is to pass
a plan written by a committee whose head has said he doesn't understand
it, passed by a Congress that hasn't read it, signed by a president who
hasn't read it, with funding administered by a Treasury chief who didn't
pay his taxes because he didn't understand TurboTax, overseen by an obese
Surgeon General and financed by a country that's nearly broke.
What could possibly go wrong?

queenie wrote in
:

On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 14:09:06 GMT, KK wrote:

On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 22:17:19 -0400, queenie wrote:

On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 18:44:10 -0400, Demon Buddha
wrote:

Howard Brazee wrote:
On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 13:23:33 -0400, Demon Buddha
wrote:

Um... not likely. Runaway inflation is not a result of
economic
growth, but of out of control printing of paper money, which our
esteemed ex-president and congress were quite happy to kick off
and which our current Nobel laureate has taken to heights GW's
puny mind could unlikely wrap itself around.

I don't see that there is a significant difference between the two
presidents here. They both work for Big Business, with the huge
tax of a huge deficit we will pay.

I terms of principle, I fully agree. In terms of degree, I
must
part
company with you a bit. Though my logical mind knew things could be
worse than Bush, my heart didn't really want to believe it. Obama
shattered that by putting GW to shame in terms of incompetence,
avarice, hubris, out of control spending, and doing nothing of
value. I can hardly believe that it would have been possible to
outstrip Bush by such a margin, and yet here we are. Amazing.

Get back to me on that after eight years! Jeez, the man's been in
office for NINE months!!!!

And he's already given us a $1.4 TRILLION deficit and is entertaining
and engouraging some profoundly stupid legislation - the *cheaper and
less ridiculous version* of which will cost another $2.5 TRILLION

I don't know how many trillions--still, he's doing what he can to fix
the mess the Republicans left.

That mess was caused by both sides of the aisle, not just one.

Maybe things will balance out and
we'll have an amazing surplus like the one Bill Clinton left us

Clinton's surpluses were in 1999 and 2000 and consisted of $123B and
$230B respectively, however that was only on budgeted items since the
national debt increased in those two years by $147.9B and $1.61T overall
on his watch. Now, do you wish to saddle Clinton with that or charge it
to the Republican Congress?

--you
know, the surplus Bush and Co. squandered.

Yeah, uh huh......That was squandered by both sides of the aisle on Iraq
among other things.


--
Sleep well tonight,

RD (The Sandman)

Let's see if I have this healthcare thingy right. Congress is to pass
a plan written by a committee whose head has said he doesn't understand
it, passed by a Congress that hasn't read it, signed by a president who
hasn't read it, with funding administered by a Treasury chief who didn't
pay his taxes because he didn't understand TurboTax, overseen by an obese
Surgeon General and financed by a country that's nearly broke.
What could possibly go wrong?

On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 14:08:53 -0500, "RD (The Sandman)"
wrote:

jps wrote in news:61hqd55pj0s048sm5sp264gijt5or48jso@
4ax.com:

On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 11:06:50 -0500, "RD (The Sandman)"
wrote:

"Clave" wrote in
:

"Yer Pal Al" wrote in message
news:99084229-9e54-4c51-b7e9-
..
. On Oct 18, 1:43 pm, "RD (The Sandman)" rdsandman(spamlock)
@comcast.net wrote:
"Clave" wrote
innews:nKudnW3sNKyq_kfXnZ2dnUVZ_rKdnZ2d@cablespeed mi.com:

...

http://www.google.com/search?sourcei...&ie=UTF-8&rlz=
1T4GWYE
_en
US316US317&q=court+rules+fox+can+lie

Those are opinion sites like Daily Kos, Huffingon Post,
democraticunderground, etc.. I did not see any that sited the
actual
case nor were any of the cites AP, UPI or a news site.

I forgot to mention what an amazing feat that was for you to have
looked through all 82,300 of those links that fast.

Congratulations, retard.


I called it...

You got me curious here, Al.

What exactly are you denying? That Wilson and Akre v Fox never
existed, that Fox lost the initial case, or that Fox appealed and
won,
the court affirming that they had a right to lie?

I anxiously await your mother-of-all-retards reply.

And we anxiously await a cite to the case from you. I want to read the
actual case, not a Daily Kos take on it.

There were plenty of entrees available that had nothing to do with
Daily Kos.

That's true. Some came from the Huffington Post (which was acknowledged)
and other blogs or opinion pieces....none came from either credible
sources or a case cite.

You simply don't want to see them because it'll cause you to have to
reevaluate your fragile reality. Wouldn't want your hair to
spontaneously combust find that your cranium exploded from the
pressure of a severely constipated cortex.

If you have a case cite or credible news account, post it....otherwise,
you are considered another Daily Kos twit.

And your authority to judge me as such hails from what esteemed body?

You're afraid of the truth. It wouldn't matter how credible the
source, you'd set the bar ever higher to support your ill-formed
fantasies.

Have fun in your safe little cocoon.

jps wrote in news:8k2sd5p7vbrodu7r9v859k887upfpgd001@
4ax.com:

On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 14:05:03 -0500, "RD (The Sandman)"
wrote:

jps wrote in
m:

On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 18:46:07 -0700, "Clave"
wrote:

"RD (The Sandman)" wrote in message
.. .
"Clave" wrote in
news:RJGdnQXeVYHNCkbXnZ2dnUVZ_vudnZ2d@cablespeedmi .com:

"RD (The Sandman)" wrote in
message ...
"Clave" wrote in
news:nKudnW3sNKyq_kfXnZ2dnUVZ_rKdnZ2d@cablespeedmi .com:

..

You can take your pick too, moron. Or are you still allergic to
facts?

http://www.google.com/search?sourcei...&ie=UTF-8&rlz=
1T4GW
YE_ en US316US317&q=court+rules+fox+can+lie

Those are opinion sites...

OK, you retards just go on believing it never happened. Your
collective need to deny recent history is even more well-
documented
than the FOX case.

Then why do you have such a problem producing a cite for it?


I produced 83,000 of them.

I'm not interested in playing birther games with you or any of your
slurp buddies.

Jim

Birthers. Weren't they formerly known as "The Klan"?

They'll never believe anything if it goes against the grain of their
assumed/ratified/cemented ignorance. Cannot compute.


Ahhhhhh, Clave......you found a butt buddie......

That's your rebuttal? You're afraid of the truth so deflect.

It's not going to change the facts nor your fear of them.


What truth or what facts? You haven't posted any.

--
Sleep well tonight,

RD (The Sandman)

Let's see if I have this healthcare thingy right. Congress is to pass
a plan written by a committee whose head has said he doesn't understand
it, passed by a Congress that hasn't read it, signed by a president who
hasn't read it, with funding administered by a Treasury chief who didn't
pay his taxes because he didn't understand TurboTax, overseen by an obese
Surgeon General and financed by a country that's nearly broke.
What could possibly go wrong?

jps wrote in
:

On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 14:08:53 -0500, "RD (The Sandman)"
wrote:

jps wrote in
news:61hqd55pj0s048sm5sp264gijt5or48jso@ 4ax.com:

On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 11:06:50 -0500, "RD (The Sandman)"
wrote:

"Clave" wrote in
:

"Yer Pal Al" wrote in message
news:99084229-9e54-4c51-b7e9-
..
. On Oct 18, 1:43 pm, "RD (The Sandman)" rdsandman(spamlock)
@comcast.net wrote:
"Clave" wrote
innews:nKudnW3sNKyq_kfXnZ2dnUVZ_rKdnZ2d@cablespeed mi.com:

...

http://www.google.com/search?sourcei...&ie=UTF-8&rlz=
1T4GWYE
_en
US316US317&q=court+rules+fox+can+lie

Those are opinion sites like Daily Kos, Huffingon Post,
democraticunderground, etc.. I did not see any that sited the
actual
case nor were any of the cites AP, UPI or a news site.

I forgot to mention what an amazing feat that was for you to have
looked through all 82,300 of those links that fast.

Congratulations, retard.


I called it...

You got me curious here, Al.

What exactly are you denying? That Wilson and Akre v Fox never
existed, that Fox lost the initial case, or that Fox appealed and
won,
the court affirming that they had a right to lie?

I anxiously await your mother-of-all-retards reply.

And we anxiously await a cite to the case from you. I want to read
the actual case, not a Daily Kos take on it.

There were plenty of entrees available that had nothing to do with
Daily Kos.

That's true. Some came from the Huffington Post (which was
acknowledged) and other blogs or opinion pieces....none came from
either credible sources or a case cite.

You simply don't want to see them because it'll cause you to have to
reevaluate your fragile reality. Wouldn't want your hair to
spontaneously combust find that your cranium exploded from the
pressure of a severely constipated cortex.

If you have a case cite or credible news account, post
it....otherwise, you are considered another Daily Kos twit.

And your authority to judge me as such hails from what esteemed body?

I don't need any authority to judge you. You provide all that is needed.

You're afraid of the truth. It wouldn't matter how credible the
source, you'd set the bar ever higher to support your ill-formed
fantasies.

You haven't posted any so how can you make the comment?

Have fun in your safe little cocoon.




--
Sleep well tonight,

RD (The Sandman)

Let's see if I have this healthcare thingy right. Congress is to pass
a plan written by a committee whose head has said he doesn't understand
it, passed by a Congress that hasn't read it, signed by a president who
hasn't read it, with funding administered by a Treasury chief who didn't
pay his taxes because he didn't understand TurboTax, overseen by an obese
Surgeon General and financed by a country that's nearly broke.
What could possibly go wrong?

On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 18:30:29 -0500, "RD (The Sandman)"
wrote:

jps wrote in news:urgsd5d7e9qus0k87j549dd7io47982fp2@
4ax.com:

On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 18:08:07 -0500, "RD (The Sandman)"
wrote:

"Scout" wrote in
:


You mean the surplus that didn't exist, because the government spent
more than it got in revenue?


Ssshhhhhh, they can't handle the truth.

Yeah, that was the money Bush insisted was ours and proceeded to give
it to the wealthiest 1%.

China is financing that debt with our worthless dollars.

Who can't handle the truth?


YOu can't. The national debt increased by 1.6 Trillion dollars on
Clinton's watch and in no year was it reduced.

Really? And at what annual rate did the debt rise as an average/year
while he was in office? Based on your figures, that'd be $200
billion/anum.

And can you tell me at what rate the federal debt avg. increased/anum
during Reagan, Bush and Bush II years?

They make Clinton look like a penny pincher.

R's talk a good game while they're raiding the coffers for their
corporate buddies.

Can you deal with that reality or will you just plonk me so you can
turn the other way?

On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 18:35:44 -0500, "RD (The Sandman)"
wrote:

jps wrote in news:jrhsd5tueg7iippg5t76pbe366kpghtqvf@
4ax.com:

On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 19:27:06 -0400, "Scout"
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 18:08:07 -0500, "RD (The Sandman)"
wrote:

"Scout" wrote in
:


You mean the surplus that didn't exist, because the government
spent
more than it got in revenue?


Ssshhhhhh, they can't handle the truth.

Yeah, that was the money Bush insisted was ours and proceeded to give
it to the wealthiest 1%.

China is financing that debt with our worthless dollars.

Who can't handle the truth?

Attempt to change the subject, and hence your surrender, is noted.

Your stupidity is duly noted.

I'm simply following up on your ill-conceived notion that Dems are bad
stewards of the federal budget.

Have a look at the history of federal debt during presidencies and
you'll find the deficit has gone down during D administrations and up
during R administrations.

Unless you can't handle the truth, which I'm certain is the case.

And don't tell me to cite it. Prove that you have half a brain and
can use google.


Your claim......your cite.....although I have already seen the charts you
are referring to.

Yes, I'm sure you have. You know everything. Everything you can see
with sand surrounding your head.