On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 22:56:59 -0600, Alex DeLarge
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 18:46:07 -0700, "Clave"
wrote:

"RD (The Sandman)" wrote in message
...
"Clave" wrote in
news:RJGdnQXeVYHNCkbXnZ2dnUVZ_vudnZ2d@cablespeedmi .com:

"RD (The Sandman)" wrote in message
...
"Clave" wrote in
news:nKudnW3sNKyq_kfXnZ2dnUVZ_rKdnZ2d@cablespeedmi .com:
..

You can take your pick too, moron. Or are you still allergic to
facts?

http://www.google.com/search?sourcei...8&rlz=1T4GWYE_
en US316US317&q=court+rules+fox+can+lie
Those are opinion sites...
OK, you retards just go on believing it never happened. Your
collective need to deny recent history is even more well-documented
than the FOX case.
Then why do you have such a problem producing a cite for it?

I produced 83,000 of them.

I'm not interested in playing birther games with you or any of your slurp
buddies.

Jim

Birthers.

****ters?

Oh sorry, shouldn't have cited your family...

Whew, that's good. You're a genius.

Is your pointy white hat ready to go when the shooting starts?

jps wrote:
On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 22:56:59 -0600, Alex DeLarge
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 18:46:07 -0700, "Clave"
wrote:

"RD (The Sandman)" wrote in message
...
"Clave" wrote in
news:RJGdnQXeVYHNCkbXnZ2dnUVZ_vudnZ2d@cablespeedmi .com:

"RD (The Sandman)" wrote in message
...
"Clave" wrote in
news:nKudnW3sNKyq_kfXnZ2dnUVZ_rKdnZ2d@cablespeedmi .com:
..

You can take your pick too, moron. Or are you still allergic to
facts?

http://www.google.com/search?sourcei...8&rlz=1T4GWYE_
en US316US317&q=court+rules+fox+can+lie
Those are opinion sites...
OK, you retards just go on believing it never happened. Your
collective need to deny recent history is even more well-documented
than the FOX case.
Then why do you have such a problem producing a cite for it?
I produced 83,000 of them.

I'm not interested in playing birther games with you or any of your slurp
buddies.

Jim
Birthers.
****ters?

Oh sorry, shouldn't have cited your family...

Whew, that's good. You're a genius.


Ah shucks...sorta...

On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 23:06:05 -0600, Alex DeLarge
wrote:

jps sucks wet doggy dick.

Wow Alex. You field a compelling argument, for adult supervision.

Are your parents out tonight?

On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 23:24:56 -0600, Alex DeLarge
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 22:56:59 -0600, Alex DeLarge
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 18:46:07 -0700, "Clave"
wrote:

"RD (The Sandman)" wrote in message
...
"Clave" wrote in
news:RJGdnQXeVYHNCkbXnZ2dnUVZ_vudnZ2d@cablespeedmi .com:

"RD (The Sandman)" wrote in message
...
"Clave" wrote in
news:nKudnW3sNKyq_kfXnZ2dnUVZ_rKdnZ2d@cablespeedmi .com:
..

You can take your pick too, moron. Or are you still allergic to
facts?

http://www.google.com/search?sourcei...8&rlz=1T4GWYE_
en US316US317&q=court+rules+fox+can+lie
Those are opinion sites...
OK, you retards just go on believing it never happened. Your
collective need to deny recent history is even more well-documented
than the FOX case.
Then why do you have such a problem producing a cite for it?
I produced 83,000 of them.

I'm not interested in playing birther games with you or any of your slurp
buddies.

Jim
Birthers.
****ters?

Oh sorry, shouldn't have cited your family...

Whew, that's good. You're a genius.


Ah shucks...sorta...

Is your pointy white hat all clean, pressed and ready to got when the
shooting starts?

On 10/20/09 1:26 AM, jps wrote:
On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 23:06:05 -0600, Alex
wrote:

jps sucks wet doggy dick.

Wow Alex. You field a compelling argument, for adult supervision.

Are your parents out tonight?


He's another member of the Scott Ingersoll family.

H K wrote:
On 10/20/09 1:26 AM, jps wrote:
On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 23:06:05 -0600, Alex
wrote:

jps sucks wet doggy dick.

Wow Alex. You field a compelling argument, for adult supervision.

Are your parents out tonight?


He's another member of the Scott Ingersoll family.

On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 14:09:06 GMT, KK wrote:

On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 22:17:19 -0400, queenie wrote:

On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 18:44:10 -0400, Demon Buddha
wrote:

Howard Brazee wrote:
On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 13:23:33 -0400, Demon Buddha
wrote:

Um... not likely. Runaway inflation is not a result of economic
growth, but of out of control printing of paper money, which our
esteemed ex-president and congress were quite happy to kick off and
which our current Nobel laureate has taken to heights GW's puny mind
could unlikely wrap itself around.

I don't see that there is a significant difference between the two
presidents here. They both work for Big Business, with the huge tax
of a huge deficit we will pay.

I terms of principle, I fully agree. In terms of degree, I must
part
company with you a bit. Though my logical mind knew things could be
worse than Bush, my heart didn't really want to believe it. Obama
shattered that by putting GW to shame in terms of incompetence, avarice,
hubris, out of control spending, and doing nothing of value. I can
hardly believe that it would have been possible to outstrip Bush by such
a margin, and yet here we are. Amazing.

Get back to me on that after eight years! Jeez, the man's been in
office for NINE months!!!!

And he's already given us a $1.4 TRILLION deficit and is entertaining and
engouraging some profoundly stupid legislation - the *cheaper and less
ridiculous version* of which will cost another $2.5 TRILLION

I don't know how many trillions--still, he's doing what he can to fix
the mess the Republicans left. Maybe things will balance out and
we'll have an amazing surplus like the one Bill Clinton left us--you
know, the surplus Bush and Co. squandered.

On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 08:16:04 -0400, queenie
puked:

On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 14:09:06 GMT, KK wrote:

On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 22:17:19 -0400, queenie wrote:

On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 18:44:10 -0400, Demon Buddha
wrote:

Howard Brazee wrote:
On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 13:23:33 -0400, Demon Buddha
wrote:

Um... not likely. Runaway inflation is not a result of economic
growth, but of out of control printing of paper money, which our
esteemed ex-president and congress were quite happy to kick off and
which our current Nobel laureate has taken to heights GW's puny mind
could unlikely wrap itself around.

I don't see that there is a significant difference between the two
presidents here. They both work for Big Business, with the huge tax
of a huge deficit we will pay.

I terms of principle, I fully agree. In terms of degree, I must
part
company with you a bit. Though my logical mind knew things could be
worse than Bush, my heart didn't really want to believe it. Obama
shattered that by putting GW to shame in terms of incompetence, avarice,
hubris, out of control spending, and doing nothing of value. I can
hardly believe that it would have been possible to outstrip Bush by such
a margin, and yet here we are. Amazing.

Get back to me on that after eight years! Jeez, the man's been in
office for NINE months!!!!

And he's already given us a $1.4 TRILLION deficit and is entertaining and
engouraging some profoundly stupid legislation - the *cheaper and less
ridiculous version* of which will cost another $2.5 TRILLION

I don't know how many trillions--still, he's doing what he can to fix
the mess the Republicans left. Maybe things will balance out and
we'll have an amazing surplus like the one Bill Clinton left us--you
know, the surplus Bush and Co. squandered.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

Seriously, you're clueless.
--
lab~rat :-)
Do you want polite or do you want sincere?

On Oct 19, 11:37*pm, jps wrote:
On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 23:24:56 -0600, Alex DeLarge
wrote:





jps wrote:
On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 22:56:59 -0600, Alex DeLarge
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 18:46:07 -0700, "Clave"
wrote:

"RD (The Sandman)" wrote in message
. ..
"Clave" wrote in
news:RJGdnQXeVYHNCkbXnZ2dnUVZ_vudnZ2d@cables peedmi.com:

"RD (The Sandman)" wrote in message
0...
"Clave" wrote in
news:nKudnW3sNKyq_kfXnZ2dnUVZ_rKdnZ2d@cabl espeedmi.com:
..

You can take your pick too, moron. *Or are you still allergic to
facts?

http://www.google.com/search?sourcei...8&rlz=1T4GWYE_
en US316US317&q=court+rules+fox+can+lie
Those are opinion sites...
OK, you retards just go on believing it never happened. *Your
collective need to deny recent history is even more well-documented
than the FOX case.
Then why do you have such a problem producing a cite for it?
I produced 83,000 of them.

I'm not interested in playing birther games with you or any of your slurp
buddies.

Jim
Birthers. *
****ters?

Oh sorry, shouldn't have cited your family...

Whew, that's good. *You're a genius.

Ah shucks...sorta...

Is your pointy white hat all clean, pressed and ready to got when the
shooting starts?

Your house looks odd:
http://neatorama.cachefly.net/images...-sculpture.jpg

"Clave" wrote in
news:gsmdnaixV87Ci0DXnZ2dnUVZ_hCdnZ2d@cablespeedmi .com:

"RD (The Sandman)" wrote in message
...
"Clave" wrote in
news:RJGdnQXeVYHNCkbXnZ2dnUVZ_vudnZ2d@cablespeedmi .com:

"RD (The Sandman)" wrote in
message ...
"Clave" wrote in
news:nKudnW3sNKyq_kfXnZ2dnUVZ_rKdnZ2d@cablespeedmi .com:

..

You can take your pick too, moron. Or are you still allergic to
facts?

http://www.google.com/search?sourcei...F-8&rlz=1T4GWY
E_ en US316US317&q=court+rules+fox+can+lie

Those are opinion sites...

OK, you retards just go on believing it never happened. Your
collective need to deny recent history is even more well-documented
than the FOX case.

Then why do you have such a problem producing a cite for it?


I produced 83,000 of them.

Nope, you produced 83,000 references to blogs or opinion pieces including
duplicates. You aren't stupid enough to believe that those were all
separate references were you? Well, perhaps, you were..........

I'm not interested in playing birther games with you or any of your
slurp buddies.

Then why are you posting in here on those subjects?


--
Sleep well tonight,

RD (The Sandman)

Let's see if I have this healthcare thingy right. Congress is to pass
a plan written by a committee whose head has said he doesn't understand
it, passed by a Congress that hasn't read it, signed by a president who
hasn't read it, with funding administered by a Treasury chief who didn't
pay his taxes because he didn't understand TurboTax, overseen by an obese
Surgeon General and financed by a country that's nearly broke.
What could possibly go wrong?