Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#161
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Cannibal
"Jessica B" wrote in message
... On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 23:43:31 -0600, CaveLamb wrote: Emptied the bilges Why does a couple of feet of oar sticking out of the boat matter? Well, someone could get snagged on it or it could get snagged on something. Do you really need that extra couple of feet to power up? People who have to ask such a question (Cavelamb) are no sailors. Wilbur Hubbard |
#162
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Cannibal
"Jessica B" wrote in message
... Well, I think you're right, and I think I'm right too... I just posted a link from the first Google hit. Thanks, I saw that one. Just another nail in Bruce's coffin. LOL! Wilbur Hubbard |
#163
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Cannibal
"Bruce" wrote in message
... I think you are repeating yourself as I just answered your first message on that subject. Considering how thick your skull is at times, saying something twice might be the preferred way to get it through. Wilbur Hubbard |
#164
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Cannibal
"Bruce" wrote in message
... pumped out the bilge Nope. Referring your Internet posted, detailed, instructions about stealing a bottle of booze from Walmart.... You have a very selective memory. Wrong! I never posted about stealing booze. You must have me mixed up with somebody else. Hell, Wal-Mart doesn't even sell booze. And, besides, there isn't even a Wal-Mart around here. Only a Kmart. Wilbur Hubbard |
#165
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Cannibal
"Jessica B" wrote in message
... On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 13:17:17 -0500, "Wilbur Hubbard" wrote: "Bruce" wrote in message news snip And you certainly should know - Willie-the great Walmart Thief. Urban legend. Returning defective storage batteries for warranty exchange is not theft. Wilbur Hubbard What's wrong with a warranty exchange?? I don't get it. Wal-Mart is pretty good about taking stuff back.. Home Depot took back cabinet I bought that basically fell apart. All I needed was the receipt. Poor Bruce! He is really grabbing at straws now. He's failed to support his side about overly long oars so now he's trying to bring up a bunch of unrelated bilge in a failed attempt to do a little sidestepping acting. Wilbur Hubbard |
#166
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Cannibal
"Bruce" wrote in message
... snip What I'm doing is trying to get Willie to admit the truth. The license is one he originally posted to the Internet as belonging to Capt. Neal, if I remember correctly, and was a 6 pack license, i.e. he could carry up to 6 passengers for hire. to get one you take a simple written test and simply say that you have the required days of sea time. A very different story from what most people envision when someone says, "I've got a Marine Master's license." Jesus, my wife has a better license then Willie, she can captain a boat up to something like 50 tons. But unlike Willie she doesn't go around posting a picture on the Internet and bragging about it. Your memory sure isn't much to set any store by . . . Wilbur Hubbard |
#167
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Cannibal
On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 14:30:04 -0800, Jessica B
wrote: Why do they charge $100 for that card ..TIWC? Seems like it's kind of over the top. What does it get you? It gets you a fancy ID card that has all of your biometric data, including fingerprints, encoded on to an internal chip. All people involved in public transportation are now required to have one. |
#168
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Cannibal
On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 05:37:41 +0700, Bruce
wrote: On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 12:16:05 -0800, Jessica B wrote: On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 19:09:24 +0700, Bruce wrote: On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 17:01:49 -0800, Jessica B wrote: On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 18:38:40 +0700, Bruce wrote: On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 18:37:26 -0800, Jessica B wrote: On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 08:47:36 +0700, Bruce wrote: On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 11:39:35 -0500, "Wilbur Hubbard" wrote: "Bruce" wrote in message news:nbm2k6pn6j6ktvnj0fbr0rcld6g9sclibf@4a x.com... snippage Given that I have lived for more than half of my life in Asia I wonder where you came up with your misconception that I ever intended to go further. You expect me to believe your goal was a Bangkok backwater? Yah, right! But of course you don't have misconceptions you simply make it up, unfortunately your blathering is simply "ignorance in action'. Wilbur: The proper length for your dinghy oars is short enough to fit inside the boat. ONE of the attributes of a proper-length dinghy oar is that it fits into the length of the dinghy. Get a clue and stop twisting my words. I hadn't believed that you were actually as stupid as you just proved yourself. I guess that proves that you should never underrate your opponents abilities. The "attribute" of an oar is that it reaches the water..... (Oars originated for, and are still used today, as a devise to propel a boat (through the water). Certainly it may have other attributes such as weight, shape of blade, material of which it is made, etc, but fitting inside the boat is not one of them. Your argument is about as logical as saying that the mast should not be longer then the length of the cockpit....because that is where you want to keep it when you aren't using the sails. Cheers, Bruce Ok... dumb question time... if the oar doesn't fit in the boat, what the heck do you do with it when you're done using it? If you just leave it hanging out, it seems to me it would get torn off or damaged. Go down to the harbor and have a look at any row boats that may be around... or visit a collage and have a look in their boat houses... Or google "correct oar length". Do you see any of them recommend that ability to store inside the boat as an important factor in sizing them. Kind of like special ordering an outboard engine with a 12 inch shaft... cause that is the size of the locker you plan to store it in. Cheers, Bruce This was the first link for dinghy oar length with a google search... http://www.answers.com/topic/dinghy-oars "the typical yacht tender of 7 to 9 feet (2.1 to 2.7 m), they should be about 6 feet (1.8 m) long" Yes, you can go to the web and get fallacious answer or you could do a bit more study and come up with something like http://www.woodenboat.net.nz/Boats/Oarchoice.html to see what people who actually row boats think about generalizations regarding oar length. I might add that people who are serious about paddling canoes take as much care in choosing their paddles as an oarsman takes in choosing his oars. The difference is between the week-end dilettante and the individual that actually rows a boat. Cheers, Bruce Well, it seems like the guy who wrote this is talking about a different sort of rowing. There are sculling rowers out there who have oars that are very, very long. So what? Are you planning on towing one of those? I don't know who you're calling a dilettante, but if you're talking about Wil, I think he's being pretty logical about it. If you're talking about me, I've never made any claim to know much about boats (or rowing for that matter). I do know about logical thought, and he seems to be thinking it. Firstly, the article I provided the link for was by a bloke in N.Z. who is building a rowing boat, not a racing shell... Quite a difference. The point was to demonstrate that oars are a bit more complex then just a "they gotta fit in the boat" specification. I don't think Capt. Wil said that was the only criteria for an oar. I wasn't specifically referring to anyone when I used the words "weekend dilettante". I was simply referring to those who spend their time (on Sunday) sailing in the bay, and have all the toys. Cheers, Bruce |
#169
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Cannibal
On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 06:06:36 +0700, Bruce
wrote: On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 12:25:33 -0800, Jessica B wrote: On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 19:50:52 +0700, Bruce wrote: Actually in my case it was the trough that was the most noticeable. I was sitting on the cockpit combing and watching a catamaran and a mono hull, both headed toward Phi Phi and discussing, with my wife, which one would get there first when suddenly the horizon was only a very short distance away, perhaps 50 - 100 meters. By the time I could say, "What the...." the horizon was back to normal and we saw the wave hit an island some 3 miles east of us. So, nothing much happened on your boat. You noticed it, but that was about it. Jesus, what did you expect? Had the wave arrived an hour earlier it would have crushed the boat against an island and neither I or my wife would be here to talk about it. The discussion started with your talk about being "prepared" for calamities at sea. I was simply trying to demonstrate that not everything can be prepared for. Bruce, I don't think I said that. I specifically talked about getting run over by a tanker. Everyone deserves to be lucky from time to time! I'm glad you and your wife are ok! I recall hearing? reading? about people in their sailboat in the harbor who rode it out by getting going, then rescued a bunch of people. Seems to me you're safer moving and away from the marina, which was my point. Yes, we had some friends anchored in a bay on the S.W. side of Phuket and when the water suddenly went away, as they described it, they, a bloke and his wife, started the engine and knocked the lock off the anchor winch and ran the chain overboard and headed for the ocean. They said that they got far enough off shore by the time the crest got there that they just bounced up and down a bit. Sounds like they were prepared and did the right thing...? Nope. In the first place they didn't know what was happening when it occurred. All they knew was that "the water went away", as they said. Their reaction was simply to get into more water so if it continued to "go away" they would still be floating. Starting the engine... well you turn the key, so perhaps leaving the key in the switch (as nearly all Yachties do) is being prepared. Running the anchor chain out to get free of the anchor is actually being un-prepared as most people advocate tying a rope to the last link in the anchor chain so if you do run the chain all the way out you don't lose it. So, they were unprepared but did the right thing? Sounds like they were prepared to do the right thing! lol In the situation I described it will knock your boat down - lay it over on its side - which by itself is not particularly hazardous in a well found sloop (single masted boat), but will certainly make you sit up and take notice. Well, hang on a sec... I don't know what reef pulled in means, but when the wind blows against the sail, the boat leans over... knocks down? Ok. Then what? It comes back up or does it keep going? What happens if you release all the sails? If it happens at night, then ok, you got hit the first time, but then.... ? A knock down occurs when the wind against the sail comes from, broadly speaking, either side of the boat. If the wind suddenly blows hard enough to overcome the weight of the boat, the boat tips over. However, as the boat tips over (heels) the grip of the rudder on the water diminishes and there is less force holding the boat on its heading. What happens is that the wind forces the boat over on its side, but then the ruder is not holding the boat on its course so it turns into the wind, which decreases the wind pressure on the sails and allows the boat to right itself. Ok, so it rights itself, and hopefully everyone is still on the boat, along with the stuff... We released all the ropes when we brought them down at the end of the day... the sails and ropes just flapped around a lot and the boat stopped moving. Yes, because you released the "sheets" the ropes that hold the sail against the wind pressure and allot it to just flap - like a flag. Ok... well, if I got heeled, then I would release those sheets! In the book the Perfect Storm, the sailboat seems to take it long enough for the people to be rescued, and it seems like the winds in that storm are much higher than in a squall. I think that you are a bit confused as "The Perfect Storm" is a book about the swordfishing boa, the Andrea Gail, out of Gloucester, Massachusetts, that sank in 1991, in a large storm in the N. Atlantic. Cheers, Bruce There was definitely a sailboat.. Satoria I think. |
#170
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Cannibal
On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 19:05:11 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote: On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 14:30:04 -0800, Jessica B wrote: Why do they charge $100 for that card ..TIWC? Seems like it's kind of over the top. What does it get you? It gets you a fancy ID card that has all of your biometric data, including fingerprints, encoded on to an internal chip. All people involved in public transportation are now required to have one. Sounds like it gets the government a whole lot more than they need for people who take a few people sailing. I guess I could see it for a tanker or a ferry or something. I really wouldn't want all that info on a chip. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|