you don't know what causes tip vortex

oh, but I do indeed know, dougies. you just couldn't understand the six and
seven letter words I used to explain it. Either that or you believe vortices
are caused by hobgoblins.

you don't know what causes tip vortex

JAXAshby wrote:
oh, but I do indeed know, dougies. you just couldn't understand the six and
seven letter words I used to explain it.

Actually, your explanation (what there was of it) was commendably concise. And
you didn't throw in a lot of words like "sine function" at random.

But it was also incomplete, since you left out the two biggest reasons why tip
vortexes form in the first place. If you look back to see my answer to your
explanatory post, you'll see at least part of what you left out.

Fresh Breezes- Doug King

professor dougies -- who doesn't know the plural of vortex -- is lecturing the
world on how they form.

ain't dat nice.

you don't know what causes tip vortex

JAXAshby wrote:
oh, but I do indeed know, dougies. you just couldn't understand the six
and
seven letter words I used to explain it.

Actually, your explanation (what there was of it) was commendably concise.
And
you didn't throw in a lot of words like "sine function" at random.

But it was also incomplete, since you left out the two biggest reasons why
tip
vortexes form in the first place. If you look back to see my answer to your
explanatory post, you'll see at least part of what you left out.

Fresh Breezes- Doug King

JAXAshby wrote:

professor dougies -- who doesn't know the plural of vortex

Well, let's see... nine out of ten math references use 'vortexes' as the plural of
'vortex.' But Jax is smarter than they are.

-- is lecturing the
world on how they form.

I asked a question, so far have not lectured about anything. But you cannot answer
the question, and somehow you think that makes you look smart. But then, Jax is so
much smarter that he doesn't need to answer questions correctly nor explain
complicated things.



ain't dat nice.

Nothing has changed has it Jax.

DSK

bye-bye, idgit.

Crap Jaxxie... you've been hooked landed, fillet and fried by Doug on this!

Heh Jaxxies... how's the old BP holding up? Has your lithium assisted in
turning those hills and valleys of emotional upheaval into a gently rolling
golf course of bland confusion yet?

CM



"JAXAshby" wrote in message
...
| bye-bye, idgit.

"JAXAshby" wrote in message
...
bye-bye, idgit.

That is the first time that I have ever seen Jax completely TROUNCED.


Congratulations, Doug!


Regards


Donal
--

you are on HARD drugs, dude. Talking to dougies about anything technical is
like talking with a mangy cur about international economics.

bye-bye, idgit.

That is the first time that I have ever seen Jax completely TROUNCED.


Congratulations, Doug!


Regards


Donal
--

Donal wrote:
"JAXAshby" wrote in message
...

bye-bye, idgit.


That is the first time that I have ever seen Jax completely TROUNCED.


Congratulations, Doug!

Jax is "TROUNCED", more often than not.
One must realize, that most of his responses are designed to initiate a
negative response from someone, who has misread or misunderstood all of
the potential answers that could apply.
In this way, he can come back with a response designed to boost his own
ego and belittle the others.
In truth, anyone who has watched this total ass, soon realizes that he
is a totally incompetent, inexperienced amateur, who relies heavily on
"Google" for any answers.

G Nuff said .... don't waste your time with a reply, Jax.

BTW, since your enforced absence and return, I've noticed that on some
rare post your knowledge has improved slightly .... been doing a lot of
"googling" and reading, have we? .... don't answer.....

otn

DSK wrote:

you don't know what causes tip vortex

JAXAshby wrote:
oh, but I do indeed know, dougies. you just couldn't understand the six and
seven letter words I used to explain it.


Actually, your explanation (what there was of it) was commendably concise. And
you didn't throw in a lot of words like "sine function" at random.

But it was also incomplete, since you left out the two biggest reasons why tip
vortexes form in the first place. If you look back to see my answer to your
explanatory post, you'll see at least part of what you left out.



Well if you know the answer then post it. I'll be impressed if you can
correctly state the boundary conditions for vortex shedding.

Cheers