Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
so, making a transom (that doesn't break) 10 times stronger is a *benefit*?
Sounds like a disadvantage to me. Extra cost, extra weight, slower boat speed, all to fix a problem that doesn't exist. JAXAshby wrote: dougie, a "benefit" is something that adds to the overall effect. In this case there is no benefit because there is no problem with transoms not being strong enough on the size and type sailboats under discussion. Calling it a benefit doesn't make it one. Let's see... an inherently stronger structure is not better than an inherently weaker one? What sort of engineering is this? Oh wait, it's JAXINEERING! Dsk |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
JAXAshby wrote:
so, making a transom (that doesn't break) 10 times stronger is a *benefit*? Sounds like a disadvantage to me. Extra cost, extra weight, slower boat speed, all to fix a problem that doesn't exist. That must explain why there's no such thing as hull speed... structural strength can be zero because they never break... that means boats can be weightless! Getting all this MC? DSK |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() DSK wrote: JAXAshby wrote: so, making a transom (that doesn't break) 10 times stronger is a *benefit*? Sounds like a disadvantage to me. Extra cost, extra weight, slower boat speed, all to fix a problem that doesn't exist. That must explain why there's no such thing as hull speed... structural strength can be zero because they never break... that means boats can be weightless! Getting all this MC? Yes I'm seeing your ass get whipped again on very basic concepts. Why not throw in the towel? Cheers |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() DSK wrote: JAXAshby wrote: so, making a transom (that doesn't break) 10 times stronger is a *benefit*? Sounds like a disadvantage to me. Extra cost, extra weight, slower boat speed, all to fix a problem that doesn't exist. That must explain why there's no such thing as hull speed... structural strength can be zero because they never break... that means boats can be weightless! Good lord! It's like a discussion with an imbecile. Cheers |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "MC" wrote in message ... DSK wrote: JAXAshby wrote: so, making a transom (that doesn't break) 10 times stronger is a *benefit*? Sounds like a disadvantage to me. Extra cost, extra weight, slower boat speed, all to fix a problem that doesn't exist. That must explain why there's no such thing as hull speed... structural strength can be zero because they never break... that means boats can be weightless! Good lord! It's like a discussion with an imbecile. It was! He was talking to Jax! Regards Donal -- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Dictionary of Paddling Terms :-) | Touring | |||
rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ | General | |||
rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ | General | |||
Third Florida trip report (long, of course!) | Cruising | |||
Boat Show Report | ASA |