![]() |
Gas prices .. some good news
On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 11:38:58 +0000, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 02:12:16 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote: "D.Duck" wrote in message om... My hope is that the GM/Ford/Chrysler problems are resolved (if resolvable) in bankruptcy, not throwing more tax payer dollars at them. Duck, I couldn't agree with you more. Chapter 11 isn't permanent. It allows for "reorganization" which is exactly what the auto industry needs to do right now. Revise business plans, products and re-negotiate the union contracts under the watchful eye of a bankruptcy judge. Handing them a pile of taxpayer money, calling it a government "investment" just to keep them in business under their current organizational structures won't do a damn thing. I agree. Tough call. I don't like these bailouts, but can we afford not to? In this country, 1 in 10 jobs are connected to the auto industry. If the auto companies fail, we're talking depression, not recession. All of this, could get real scary, real quick. |
Gas prices .. some good news
Boater wrote:
Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 06:41:51 -0500, Boater wrote: Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 02:51:05 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote: His "package" (including benefits) was in excess of $85k/year and upon retirement could look forward to full, GM financed health coverage along with his pension. And, this is really a ****er, now GM wants the US Taxpayer to dig them out of the health care hole by paying for the ridiculous health care packages for their retireees. So now we have GM begging some working stiff who works, pays taxes and either doesn't have a health package or only Major Medical at an exhorbitant rate to sponsor some moron who put four screws in a dashboard for most of his life and was paid $34/hr plus benefits for doing so and now has a $4 co-pay for everything health care related. Here's what I think GM should do - pre-pack a Chapter 11 bankruptcy, get rid of the ridiculous union contracts and start over again with government backing (not loans) with reasonable labor costs and competitive products. That will do more for the American economy than any TARP. And perhaps like Japan, put the burden of paying for health care on society as a whole, and not on the manufacturers, eh? Would you go for that, too? Not at all, but let's face it - the health care provisions of the retirement package are onerous to the health of the corporation. I'll give you an example. My back operation cost $14,356 in total which was cheap considering that the main surgeon and assistant were freebies. That includes room, operating room, drugs, anesthesia, yada, yada, yada. My copay for that was $2,300. A UAW retiree, the guy who put four screws in the afore mentioned dashboard for his career, for that same operation, which would have included surgeon and assistant fees totaling about $21,000, would have been $4. A pre-packaged Chapter1 bankruptcy would allow for restructuring the health care provisions to something a little more reasonable. "Restructurings" usually are much harder on the working stiffs than the management pukes. And why should a retiree on a fixed income have to fork over $2300 for necessary surgery? I agree that the burden of paying for necessary health care should be lifted from US corporations, and handled the way it is in other modern countries. I'm also a bit wearing of hearing about Joe the Auto Assembly Line Worker, whose career consisted of putting four screws in a dashboard. If that is all Joe does, and it is unlikely, then that is the job management wants done. It isn't his fault. I haven't been in an auto plant in many years, but when I was last in one, I didn't see any jobs like that, and all the jobs I saw were certainly more valuable than being, oh, a stock broker or plumbing supply dealer or software pussy. Or a writer pansy pussy |
Gas prices .. some good news
On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 07:48:55 -0500, Boater wrote:
"Restructurings" usually are much harder on the working stiffs than the management pukes. Yup, sure is a lot of gnashing of teeth over working stiffs. Funny, I don't recall near as much about the billions in bonuses given to managers that actually ran their companies into the ground. Damn unions are ruining this country. So Harry, when did Lehman Brothers go union? |
Gas prices .. some good news
On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 02:51:05 -0500, "Eisboch"
wrote: "Wayne.B" wrote in message .. . On Wed, 12 Nov 2008 22:40:09 -0500, tin cup wrote: The average wage was around 58,000.00 a year. That's misleading, benefits add at least another 20,000. That is pretty good pay for unskiled labor, about 2 or 3 times what most factory workers get. I saw a news clip recently of a GM "worker" standing beside a console on the assembly line, supervising a bunch of robotic arms assembling a car. His primary job was to hit the red "Emergency Off" button, if something went screwy or was called to do so. His "package" (including benefits) was in excess of $85k/year and upon retirement could look forward to full, GM financed health coverage along with his pension. I don't deny anybody the right to hold a good job with decent pay and benefits, but it really should be in concert with the person's initiative to prepare him/her self for that career. I am sorry, but standing around watching an automated assembly line put cars together for that kind of pay and benefits just doesn't do it for me, especially when I see others who have worked hard to educate and qualify themselves for a trade making far less. Oh, please. "Educated geniuses" like Paulson of Goldman-Sachs, who pulled down +50 million his last year as CEO there, and sold his stock for $500 million to work for the guv, have managed to totally **** up this country. I just love it when auto workers are portrayed like you just did, and the cars and trucks just get produced by magic. While worthless ****s like those running this country, and who supposedly "create" magic wealth but who actually create debt are heros on the covers of news magazines. I want to puke whenever I see that idiot Jack Welch. Listening to anti-American morons like him is a primary reason this country is going down the tubes. Not that I disagree that Detroit management has screwed the pooch in giving the UAW stuff like sub-pay. That's their problem, and I don't care if they go bankrupt. Simple inattention to the ledger book is the primary problem of most businesses, and Detroit's sins are even more venal. BTW, U.S. Toyota and Honda plants offer similar non-union wages, but smarter management. And they have little legacy costs. If Detroit goes bust, the Honda/Toyota workers will likely vote in the UAW to represent them. National health care will eliminate most of that legacy cost. A big chunk of Toyota/Honda sales here are still being imported from Japanese plants, where they don't suffer health care costs. Don't know how much that figures in profitability, but the Japs also engineer in more quality too. Sorry to be disagreeable, but having spent years as both a production worker and in an "educated" field making much more money but producing nothing tangible, I have strong views of their relative values. There's a reason this country is going downhill, and it sure as hell isn't being caused by workers who actually produce goods. Too many chiefs and not enough working Indians is the problem. But that concept is too complex for the "educated" morons who are "creating" all that magic money. Well, here we are, and it's just going to get worse. Trust me. We need Pat Buchanan running the show. He knows what's up. If Obama is a real "free-trader globalist" we'll continue the decline. Bottom line is you can't consume more than you produce. The peasant Chinamen doing the work for us will own us if we continue down this path. --Vic Disclaimer: My opinions are worth exactly what you paid for them. |
Gas prices .. some good news
"Boater" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: "Canuck57" wrote in message ... I am going to keep my F150 thank you. Nice ride and pulls a boat and has 4x4 for the winter. Try that with a pint sized electric car up a long hill. Harry had a F-150 not too long ago and often reported in this NG what a great truck it was. That's before he sharpened his political correctness. Now a US made truck is crap because he owns a Japanese model. Eisboch I haven't owned an F150 for nearly 10 years. It was a good truck. The Toyota truck that replaced it was better. I doubt I ever stated the US-made truck was "crap." I have heard those sorts of allegations, however, from SW Tom and I believe from you. I think I only called one US truck I have owned as "crap" or a similar word and it really wasn't the truck .... it was the engine. The '05 F-350 with the Ford/Navstar 6.0 L diesel was failure prone. I was left stranded 3 times with it within the first 11k miles. "That" was crap. Boy, time flies when you're having fun, huh? Seems like only yesterday you were full of compliments for Ford regarding your F-150. Eisboch Eisboch |
Gas prices .. some good news
"Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in message ... On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 02:51:05 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote: His "package" (including benefits) was in excess of $85k/year and upon retirement could look forward to full, GM financed health coverage along with his pension. And, this is really a ****er, now GM wants the US Taxpayer to dig them out of the health care hole by paying for the ridiculous health care packages for their retireees. So now we have GM begging some working stiff who works, pays taxes and either doesn't have a health package or only Major Medical at an exhorbitant rate to sponsor some moron who put four screws in a dashboard for most of his life and was paid $34/hr plus benefits for doing so and now has a $4 co-pay for everything health care related. Here's what I think GM should do - pre-pack a Chapter 11 bankruptcy, get rid of the ridiculous union contracts and start over again with government backing (not loans) with reasonable labor costs and competitive products. That will do more for the American economy than any TARP. Not to mention control the salary & bonuses the top layer of management. Why should the CEOs of GM or Ford make many times more than the president of the US when they can't even keep their companies profitable. |
Gas prices .. some good news
|
Gas prices .. some good news
|
Gas prices .. some good news
|
Gas prices .. some good news
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:47 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com