wrote in message
ups.com...
On Oct 12, 2:18 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message

oups.com...





On Oct 12, 2:04 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message

groups.com...

On Oct 12, 1:31 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:
wrote in message

roups.com...

On Oct 12, 1:09 pm, "D.Duck" wrote:
"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message

...

"D.Duck" wrote in message
m...

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
wrote in message
groups.com...
On Oct 12, 8:51 am, "JoeSpareBedroom"

wrote:
wrote in message

glegroups.com...

On Oct 12, 8:40 am, "JimH" ask wrote:
wrote in message

oups.com...

On Oct 12, 7:05 am, "Eisboch"

wrote:
"HK" wrote in message

...

- - -

A terrific honor for Al and the United States.

Yep, and congrats to him for his award and
commitment,
regardless of
whether
global warming is indeed, man induced.

It's ironic that had he been declared the victor in
2000,
it
is
unlikely
he
would receiving a Nobel prize today.

Eisboch

Most republicans think that global warming isn't
happening
in
any
way,
man made or otherwise.

Bullcrap.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Let the lemmings go. Hillary told them that, and they
really
don't
have the guts to challenge. They are just ready for
communism,
then
they won't have to think at all...

Here you go again, using words that have nothing to do
with
the
discussion
in progress. Who's telling you to say "communism"? 'Fess
up.
Who's
coaching
you?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Yesterday the talking point he got from Limbaugh the drug
addict
was
"socialist", today it's "communism".

Yes. Hugh Bimbo, as Michael Savage calls him. The bimbo who
said
this:

"I always say my real purpose is to attract the largest
audience I
can,
and hold it for as long as I can, so I can charge
confiscatory
advertising rates," the talk show host says.

And what's wrong with that?

Nothing. It's free enterprise. But, it's got nothing to do
with
improving
the country politically.

Agree. I will occasionally listen to Limbaugh, not for substance
but
entertainment (to me) value.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Hurmph... I find him kind of boring, of course I have not heard
him
since 83' when they played it in the shop. Guess that's why I
find
it
funny that the intellectually dishonest here accuse me of it
every
day It's easy for them, kind of like talk radio.. they don't
really
want to work or produce a product anyone wants to hear, so they
will
legislate themselves into an income, they really have not
earned...
It's all about self indulgence, it's all about
non-accountability.

OK - we've eliminated Hush Bimbo as the source for your silly use
of
the
word "communism", or sometimes "socialism". That means you just
pull
the
word outta your ass when you need to torpedo a discussion.- Hide
quoted
text -

- Show quoted text -

Torpedo discussions? Next you will be accusing me of running from
accountability by linking to others thoughts, or asking silly
questions designed to "torpedo a discussion".

BTW, I answer most legit questions with my own thoughts. Most
educated/
honest folks can understand that I am no english or communications
major, but at the same time clearly understand my thoughts. You may
be
somewhat educated, however I doubt your ability to debate honestly.
I
read the link you sent and as much as you don't like it, Rush seems
to
work from a solid personal moral core, you should try it sometime,
it
feels pretty good... right or wrong....

What you just said has nothing to do with your tossing around words
that
have nothing to do with the discussion. Help me out here. Why do you
do
it?
Politicians who know what the words mean sometimes use them just to
get
crowds of idiots to grunt and say "hell yeah", because the crowds have
no
idea what they mean.

Is that why you use such words?

I suppose there's another possible reason, too horrible to consider:
You
are
completely unaware of typing the words.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

More baseless claimes and accusations. Yer' frekin' useless.

Well, you tell me: Why do you use words like "communism" in a discussion
that has absolutely NOTHING to do with that economic system or any other.
Look up at the subject line, Clevis. "Gore Wins Nobel Price Prize".

Maybe I'm wrong. Tell me how communism fits this discussion. If I'm
wrong,
I'll admit it.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


If I thought you were capable of honest debate, I would go back and
look, but you can't help yourself, I already answered you question as
to why I used the word, now you want me to explain why I used it
"then".. It's a silly game Joe. sorry, got no time for your games.


I don't see where you explained it, unless you mean this:

"....I am no english or communications major, but at the same time clearly
understand my thoughts."

That's no excuse.

This seems like a good time for you to eliminate the words "communism" and
"socialism" from your vocabulary until you've spent some time at the
library.

On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 12:29:47 -0000, wrote:

Uh, the boat will float and ride at the same height whether in two
feet of water, or two hundred.

Gotta be Bassy - only Bassy could make a blanket statement like that.

What about if the boat had a four feet draft and was in two feet of
water?

Seriously, glad you are feeling well enough to return - I heard you
weren't in good shape. Hope it all worked out in your favour.

On Oct 12, 2:34 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message

ups.com...





On Oct 12, 2:18 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message

groups.com...

On Oct 12, 2:04 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message

groups.com...

On Oct 12, 1:31 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:
wrote in message

roups.com...

On Oct 12, 1:09 pm, "D.Duck" wrote:
"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message

...

"D.Duck" wrote in message
m...

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
wrote in message
groups.com...
On Oct 12, 8:51 am, "JoeSpareBedroom"

wrote:
wrote in message

glegroups.com...

On Oct 12, 8:40 am, "JimH" ask wrote:
wrote in message

oups.com...

On Oct 12, 7:05 am, "Eisboch"

wrote:
"HK" wrote in message

...

- - -

A terrific honor for Al and the United States.

Yep, and congrats to him for his award and
commitment,
regardless of
whether
global warming is indeed, man induced.

It's ironic that had he been declared the victor in
2000,
it
is
unlikely
he
would receiving a Nobel prize today.

Eisboch

Most republicans think that global warming isn't
happening
in
any
way,
man made or otherwise.

Bullcrap.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Let the lemmings go. Hillary told them that, and they
really
don't
have the guts to challenge. They are just ready for
communism,
then
they won't have to think at all...

Here you go again, using words that have nothing to do
with
the
discussion
in progress. Who's telling you to say "communism"? 'Fess
up.
Who's
coaching
you?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Yesterday the talking point he got from Limbaugh the drug
addict
was
"socialist", today it's "communism".

Yes. Hugh Bimbo, as Michael Savage calls him. The bimbo who
said
this:

"I always say my real purpose is to attract the largest
audience I
can,
and hold it for as long as I can, so I can charge
confiscatory
advertising rates," the talk show host says.

And what's wrong with that?

Nothing. It's free enterprise. But, it's got nothing to do
with
improving
the country politically.

Agree. I will occasionally listen to Limbaugh, not for substance
but
entertainment (to me) value.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Hurmph... I find him kind of boring, of course I have not heard
him
since 83' when they played it in the shop. Guess that's why I
find
it
funny that the intellectually dishonest here accuse me of it
every
day It's easy for them, kind of like talk radio.. they don't
really
want to work or produce a product anyone wants to hear, so they
will
legislate themselves into an income, they really have not
earned...
It's all about self indulgence, it's all about
non-accountability.

OK - we've eliminated Hush Bimbo as the source for your silly use
of
the
word "communism", or sometimes "socialism". That means you just
pull
the
word outta your ass when you need to torpedo a discussion.- Hide
quoted
text -

- Show quoted text -

Torpedo discussions? Next you will be accusing me of running from
accountability by linking to others thoughts, or asking silly
questions designed to "torpedo a discussion".

BTW, I answer most legit questions with my own thoughts. Most
educated/
honest folks can understand that I am no english or communications
major, but at the same time clearly understand my thoughts. You may
be
somewhat educated, however I doubt your ability to debate honestly.
I
read the link you sent and as much as you don't like it, Rush seems
to
work from a solid personal moral core, you should try it sometime,
it
feels pretty good... right or wrong....

What you just said has nothing to do with your tossing around words
that
have nothing to do with the discussion. Help me out here. Why do you
do
it?
Politicians who know what the words mean sometimes use them just to
get
crowds of idiots to grunt and say "hell yeah", because the crowds have
no
idea what they mean.

Is that why you use such words?

I suppose there's another possible reason, too horrible to consider:
You
are
completely unaware of typing the words.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

More baseless claimes and accusations. Yer' frekin' useless.

Well, you tell me: Why do you use words like "communism" in a discussion
that has absolutely NOTHING to do with that economic system or any other.
Look up at the subject line, Clevis. "Gore Wins Nobel Price Prize".

Maybe I'm wrong. Tell me how communism fits this discussion. If I'm
wrong,
I'll admit it.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

If I thought you were capable of honest debate, I would go back and
look, but you can't help yourself, I already answered you question as
to why I used the word, now you want me to explain why I used it
"then".. It's a silly game Joe. sorry, got no time for your games.

I don't see where you explained it, unless you mean this:

"....I am no english or communications major, but at the same time clearly
understand my thoughts."

That's no excuse.

This seems like a good time for you to eliminate the words "communism" and
"socialism" from your vocabulary until you've spent some time at the
library.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

You snipped my quote, how dishonest...

On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 18:34:50 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

This seems like a good time for you to eliminate the words "communism" and
"socialism" from your vocabulary until you've spent some time at the
library.

In Marxist theory, communism is a system of organization based on the
holding of all property in common with actual actual ownership being
ascribed to the community as a whole or to the state.

Socialism is the stage following capitalism in the transition of a
society to communism, characterized by the imperfect implementation of
collectivist principles according to Marx.

Those are the classic interpretations.

Apply them at your peril. :)

On Oct 12, 8:40 am, "JimH" ask wrote:
wrote in message

ps.com...





On Oct 12, 7:05 am, "Eisboch" wrote:
"HK" wrote in message

...

- - -

A terrific honor for Al and the United States.

Yep, and congrats to him for his award and commitment, regardless of
whether
global warming is indeed, man induced.

It's ironic that had he been declared the victor in 2000, it is unlikely
he
would receiving a Nobel prize today.

Eisboch

Most republicans think that global warming isn't happening in any way,
man made or otherwise.

Bullcrap.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Well, let's just take a straw poll here....

I will guarantee that at least two thirds of the conservatives that I
know and associate with are in pure denial that global warming is
real. There's been pages and pages of debate right here in rec.boats.

wrote in message
...
On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 18:31:04 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"Tim" wrote in message
roups.com...

JoeSpareBedroom wrote:

I wonder who said this:

"I always say my real purpose is to attract the largest audience I can,
and
hold it for as long as I can, so I can charge confiscatory advertising
rates,"

Michael Moore?


Close, but no.

I thought we established this was Rush. It sure sounds like someone
who understands what "free" broadcasting is all about.
This is a guy who made millions "giving his show away for free".
The same is true of "free" TV and "free" internet services like Yahoo
and Google. You pay every time you buy something they advertise there
in higher prices. Of course Google et al is also a serious threat to
your privacy. If you are "logged in" or accept cookies your inbox is
certain to be stuffed with spam based on everything you ever looked at
on the web. They may also sell your search history to the highest
bidder. Certainly the government has free access to it.

All true, but his statement also explains what his mission is NOT, and his
most rabid devotees do not understand this.

wrote in message
ps.com...
On Oct 12, 2:34 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message

ups.com...





On Oct 12, 2:18 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message

groups.com...

On Oct 12, 2:04 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:
wrote in message

groups.com...

On Oct 12, 1:31 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:
wrote in message

roups.com...

On Oct 12, 1:09 pm, "D.Duck" wrote:
"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message

...

"D.Duck" wrote in message
m...

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in
message
...
wrote in message
groups.com...
On Oct 12, 8:51 am, "JoeSpareBedroom"

wrote:
wrote in message

glegroups.com...

On Oct 12, 8:40 am, "JimH" ask wrote:
wrote in message

oups.com...

On Oct 12, 7:05 am, "Eisboch"

wrote:
"HK" wrote in message

...

- - -

A terrific honor for Al and the United States.

Yep, and congrats to him for his award and
commitment,
regardless of
whether
global warming is indeed, man induced.

It's ironic that had he been declared the victor
in
2000,
it
is
unlikely
he
would receiving a Nobel prize today.

Eisboch

Most republicans think that global warming isn't
happening
in
any
way,
man made or otherwise.

Bullcrap.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Let the lemmings go. Hillary told them that, and they
really
don't
have the guts to challenge. They are just ready for
communism,
then
they won't have to think at all...

Here you go again, using words that have nothing to do
with
the
discussion
in progress. Who's telling you to say "communism"?
'Fess
up.
Who's
coaching
you?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Yesterday the talking point he got from Limbaugh the
drug
addict
was
"socialist", today it's "communism".

Yes. Hugh Bimbo, as Michael Savage calls him. The bimbo
who
said
this:

"I always say my real purpose is to attract the largest
audience I
can,
and hold it for as long as I can, so I can charge
confiscatory
advertising rates," the talk show host says.

And what's wrong with that?

Nothing. It's free enterprise. But, it's got nothing to do
with
improving
the country politically.

Agree. I will occasionally listen to Limbaugh, not for
substance
but
entertainment (to me) value.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Hurmph... I find him kind of boring, of course I have not
heard
him
since 83' when they played it in the shop. Guess that's why I
find
it
funny that the intellectually dishonest here accuse me of it
every
day It's easy for them, kind of like talk radio.. they don't
really
want to work or produce a product anyone wants to hear, so
they
will
legislate themselves into an income, they really have not
earned...
It's all about self indulgence, it's all about
non-accountability.

OK - we've eliminated Hush Bimbo as the source for your silly
use
of
the
word "communism", or sometimes "socialism". That means you just
pull
the
word outta your ass when you need to torpedo a discussion.- Hide
quoted
text -

- Show quoted text -

Torpedo discussions? Next you will be accusing me of running from
accountability by linking to others thoughts, or asking silly
questions designed to "torpedo a discussion".

BTW, I answer most legit questions with my own thoughts. Most
educated/
honest folks can understand that I am no english or
communications
major, but at the same time clearly understand my thoughts. You
may
be
somewhat educated, however I doubt your ability to debate
honestly.
I
read the link you sent and as much as you don't like it, Rush
seems
to
work from a solid personal moral core, you should try it
sometime,
it
feels pretty good... right or wrong....

What you just said has nothing to do with your tossing around words
that
have nothing to do with the discussion. Help me out here. Why do
you
do
it?
Politicians who know what the words mean sometimes use them just to
get
crowds of idiots to grunt and say "hell yeah", because the crowds
have
no
idea what they mean.

Is that why you use such words?

I suppose there's another possible reason, too horrible to
consider:
You
are
completely unaware of typing the words.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

More baseless claimes and accusations. Yer' frekin' useless.

Well, you tell me: Why do you use words like "communism" in a
discussion
that has absolutely NOTHING to do with that economic system or any
other.
Look up at the subject line, Clevis. "Gore Wins Nobel Price Prize".

Maybe I'm wrong. Tell me how communism fits this discussion. If I'm
wrong,
I'll admit it.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

If I thought you were capable of honest debate, I would go back and
look, but you can't help yourself, I already answered you question as
to why I used the word, now you want me to explain why I used it
"then".. It's a silly game Joe. sorry, got no time for your games.

I don't see where you explained it, unless you mean this:

"....I am no english or communications major, but at the same time
clearly
understand my thoughts."

That's no excuse.

This seems like a good time for you to eliminate the words "communism"
and
"socialism" from your vocabulary until you've spent some time at the
library.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

You snipped my quote, how dishonest...


If I could send you a shovel, I would gladly do so.

"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 18:34:50 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

This seems like a good time for you to eliminate the words "communism" and
"socialism" from your vocabulary until you've spent some time at the
library.

In Marxist theory, communism is a system of organization based on the
holding of all property in common with actual actual ownership being
ascribed to the community as a whole or to the state.

Socialism is the stage following capitalism in the transition of a
society to communism, characterized by the imperfect implementation of
collectivist principles according to Marx.

Those are the classic interpretations.

Apply them at your peril. :)

Do we need an interpreter or something? I know what the words mean. He does
not. They have nothing to do with this Nobel prize discussion, and THAT IS
MY BEEF with your little puppy. He, like millions of others, uses words he
doesn't understand, in contexts where they have no purpose.

He does this because at the moment when he has an uncontrollable need to
write something, anything, he just reaches into his panties and you've seen
the result.

wrote:
On Oct 12, 8:40 am, "JimH" ask wrote:
wrote in message

ps.com...





On Oct 12, 7:05 am, "Eisboch" wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
...
- - -
A terrific honor for Al and the United States.
Yep, and congrats to him for his award and commitment, regardless of
whether
global warming is indeed, man induced.
It's ironic that had he been declared the victor in 2000, it is unlikely
he
would receiving a Nobel prize today.
Eisboch
Most republicans think that global warming isn't happening in any way,
man made or otherwise.
Bullcrap.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Well, let's just take a straw poll here....

I will guarantee that at least two thirds of the conservatives that I
know and associate with are in pure denial that global warming is
real. There's been pages and pages of debate right here in rec.boats.



There are many conservatives who believe the dinosaur/flintstone
relationship in that cartoon series was real, and that Terry Schiavo
wasn't brain dead.

"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 12:44:31 -0400, "D.Duck" wrote:

Thus, for saving the world from the domination of Omicron Persei VIII,
I gladly claim the prize because it may (or may not) happen. The
precautionary principle is that I may (or may not) save the world from
alien invasion fits perfectly.

Gimme my money.

Would you like that in Euros or Green Backs? :-)

I'll take it in good old 'Merican money. :)

The way things are going...you better change that to Canadian money...and
soon!