On Oct 14, 11:09 am, wrote:
On Oct 12, 11:06 am, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:





On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 12:30:19 -0000, wrote:
On Oct 12, 7:05 am, "Eisboch" wrote:
"HK" wrote in message

...

- - -

A terrific honor for Al and the United States.

Yep, and congrats to him for his award and commitment, regardless of whether
global warming is indeed, man induced.

It's ironic that had he been declared the victor in 2000, it is unlikely he
would receiving a Nobel prize today.

Eisboch

Most republicans think that global warming isn't happening in any way,
man made or otherwise. Imagine how awful they must feel realizing that
someone won the Nobel prize for something they believe to be
fictitous.

This is the citation of the Nobel Committee:

"Indications of changes in the earth's future climate must be treated
with the utmost seriousness, and with the precautionary principle
uppermost in our minds. Extensive climate changes may alter and
threaten the living conditions of much of mankind. They may induce
large-scale migration and lead to greater competition for the earth's
resources. Such changes will place particularly heavy burdens on the
world's most vulnerable countries. There may be increased danger of
violent conflicts and wars, within and between states."

So, if I have this straight, Gore won for proselytizing a less than
universally accepted "scientific" theory which, presumably, has led to
action which prevented (or not) possible future competition for
resources, possible future conflicts, and future wars which haven't
happened yet and which may (or may not) ever occur because they are
only a possibility.

I think is a great precedent! If one can win a Nobel Peace Prize for
preventing events from transpiring which never actually would have
happened anyway, than I am your man.

Year 2050: Shortwave Sportfishing's posting of the first rec.boats low
transom thread is finally received by the residents of Omicron Perseii
VIII, saving the Earth from brutal annexation.

Gimme my prize!! You can keep the medal, just give me the million
bucks.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Have you ever heard of a place called Somalia? It's universally
accepted that the civil wars there are attributed to climate change.
Drought.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Did the "study" look at corruption and racism?

wrote in message
ps.com...
On Oct 14, 11:09 am, wrote:
On Oct 12, 11:06 am, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:





On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 12:30:19 -0000, wrote:
On Oct 12, 7:05 am, "Eisboch" wrote:
"HK" wrote in message

...

- - -

A terrific honor for Al and the United States.

Yep, and congrats to him for his award and commitment, regardless of
whether
global warming is indeed, man induced.

It's ironic that had he been declared the victor in 2000, it is
unlikely he
would receiving a Nobel prize today.

Eisboch

Most republicans think that global warming isn't happening in any way,
man made or otherwise. Imagine how awful they must feel realizing that
someone won the Nobel prize for something they believe to be
fictitous.

This is the citation of the Nobel Committee:

"Indications of changes in the earth's future climate must be treated
with the utmost seriousness, and with the precautionary principle
uppermost in our minds. Extensive climate changes may alter and
threaten the living conditions of much of mankind. They may induce
large-scale migration and lead to greater competition for the earth's
resources. Such changes will place particularly heavy burdens on the
world's most vulnerable countries. There may be increased danger of
violent conflicts and wars, within and between states."

So, if I have this straight, Gore won for proselytizing a less than
universally accepted "scientific" theory which, presumably, has led to
action which prevented (or not) possible future competition for
resources, possible future conflicts, and future wars which haven't
happened yet and which may (or may not) ever occur because they are
only a possibility.

I think is a great precedent! If one can win a Nobel Peace Prize for
preventing events from transpiring which never actually would have
happened anyway, than I am your man.

Year 2050: Shortwave Sportfishing's posting of the first rec.boats low
transom thread is finally received by the residents of Omicron Perseii
VIII, saving the Earth from brutal annexation.

Gimme my prize!! You can keep the medal, just give me the million
bucks.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Have you ever heard of a place called Somalia? It's universally
accepted that the civil wars there are attributed to climate change.
Drought.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Did the "study" look at corruption and racism?


Here's an obtuse clue that's related to the subject: Canada and some of our
states around the Great Lakes are discussing ways to deal with the
possibility of ships from certain countries filling up with water and
hauling it home.

Racism? Corruption?

On Sun, 14 Oct 2007 15:09:05 -0000, wrote:

On Oct 12, 11:06 am, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:
On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 12:30:19 -0000, wrote:
On Oct 12, 7:05 am, "Eisboch" wrote:
"HK" wrote in message

...

- - -

A terrific honor for Al and the United States.

Yep, and congrats to him for his award and commitment, regardless of whether
global warming is indeed, man induced.

It's ironic that had he been declared the victor in 2000, it is unlikely he
would receiving a Nobel prize today.

Eisboch

Most republicans think that global warming isn't happening in any way,
man made or otherwise. Imagine how awful they must feel realizing that
someone won the Nobel prize for something they believe to be
fictitous.

This is the citation of the Nobel Committee:

"Indications of changes in the earth's future climate must be treated
with the utmost seriousness, and with the precautionary principle
uppermost in our minds. Extensive climate changes may alter and
threaten the living conditions of much of mankind. They may induce
large-scale migration and lead to greater competition for the earth's
resources. Such changes will place particularly heavy burdens on the
world's most vulnerable countries. There may be increased danger of
violent conflicts and wars, within and between states."

So, if I have this straight, Gore won for proselytizing a less than
universally accepted "scientific" theory which, presumably, has led to
action which prevented (or not) possible future competition for
resources, possible future conflicts, and future wars which haven't
happened yet and which may (or may not) ever occur because they are
only a possibility.

I think is a great precedent! If one can win a Nobel Peace Prize for
preventing events from transpiring which never actually would have
happened anyway, than I am your man.

Year 2050: Shortwave Sportfishing's posting of the first rec.boats low
transom thread is finally received by the residents of Omicron Perseii
VIII, saving the Earth from brutal annexation.

Gimme my prize!! You can keep the medal, just give me the million
bucks.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Have you ever heard of a place called Somalia? It's universally
accepted that the civil wars there are attributed to climate change.
Drought.

And that has what to do with anything?

Bassy, you really need to try harder.

Or maybe not - wouldn't want you to have another heart attack.

On Oct 12, 2:34 pm, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:
On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 12:29:47 -0000, wrote:
Uh, the boat will float and ride at the same height whether in two
feet of water, or two hundred.

Gotta be Bassy - only Bassy could make a blanket statement like that.

What about if the boat had a four feet draft and was in two feet of
water?

There was no "blanket statement". We were talking about a specific
boat (Harry's).

On Oct 14, 11:41 am, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:
On Sun, 14 Oct 2007 15:09:05 -0000, wrote:
On Oct 12, 11:06 am, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:
On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 12:30:19 -0000, wrote:
On Oct 12, 7:05 am, "Eisboch" wrote:
"HK" wrote in message

...

- - -

A terrific honor for Al and the United States.

Yep, and congrats to him for his award and commitment, regardless of whether
global warming is indeed, man induced.

It's ironic that had he been declared the victor in 2000, it is unlikely he
would receiving a Nobel prize today.

Eisboch

Most republicans think that global warming isn't happening in any way,
man made or otherwise. Imagine how awful they must feel realizing that
someone won the Nobel prize for something they believe to be
fictitous.

This is the citation of the Nobel Committee:

"Indications of changes in the earth's future climate must be treated
with the utmost seriousness, and with the precautionary principle
uppermost in our minds. Extensive climate changes may alter and
threaten the living conditions of much of mankind. They may induce
large-scale migration and lead to greater competition for the earth's
resources. Such changes will place particularly heavy burdens on the
world's most vulnerable countries. There may be increased danger of
violent conflicts and wars, within and between states."

So, if I have this straight, Gore won for proselytizing a less than
universally accepted "scientific" theory which, presumably, has led to
action which prevented (or not) possible future competition for
resources, possible future conflicts, and future wars which haven't
happened yet and which may (or may not) ever occur because they are
only a possibility.

I think is a great precedent! If one can win a Nobel Peace Prize for
preventing events from transpiring which never actually would have
happened anyway, than I am your man.

Year 2050: Shortwave Sportfishing's posting of the first rec.boats low
transom thread is finally received by the residents of Omicron Perseii
VIII, saving the Earth from brutal annexation.

Gimme my prize!! You can keep the medal, just give me the million
bucks.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Have you ever heard of a place called Somalia? It's universally
accepted that the civil wars there are attributed to climate change.
Drought.

And that has what to do with anything?

Bassy, you really need to try harder.

Or maybe not - wouldn't want you to have another heart attack.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Gotta' come in here as I was the one that had contact and reported to
the group a few months back. To be clear, I got the impression that he
had suffered some critical and acute conditon that required treatment
and a long recovery. That is all I got, and all I asked. And for the
record Bassy, across all lines, everyone including me was happy that
you were well and recovering. And although we did not know what had
happened to you, most of us hoped it somehow involved broken fingers
but still happy/sad to see you doing better...

wrote in message
...
On Sun, 14 Oct 2007 15:33:21 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

Here's an obtuse clue that's related to the subject: Canada and some of
our
states around the Great Lakes are discussing ways to deal with the
possibility of ships from certain countries filling up with water and
hauling it home.

They are a lot more concerned with foreign ships dumping their water
here (along with zebra mussels and other exotics)

Different issue. I'm talking about water being illegally exported for use as
drinking water. It doesn't seem like it could have much of an impact on such
big lakes, but apparently, it's true. I'll see if I can wade through my 83
billion bookmarks and find you some information. Mostly, I've just read
local newspaper articles.

wrote in message
...
On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 07:34:44 -0400, HK wrote:

Global warming has quite a bit to do with boating. Weather, eh?


When the ice cap melts there will be more places to boat. ;-)

And longer seasons up north too. Hard to go boat fishing when it is -10C
outside.

On Oct 14, 11:41 am, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:
On Sun, 14 Oct 2007 15:09:05 -0000, wrote:
On Oct 12, 11:06 am, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:
On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 12:30:19 -0000, wrote:
On Oct 12, 7:05 am, "Eisboch" wrote:
"HK" wrote in message

...

- - -

A terrific honor for Al and the United States.

Yep, and congrats to him for his award and commitment, regardless of whether
global warming is indeed, man induced.

It's ironic that had he been declared the victor in 2000, it is unlikely he
would receiving a Nobel prize today.

Eisboch

Most republicans think that global warming isn't happening in any way,
man made or otherwise. Imagine how awful they must feel realizing that
someone won the Nobel prize for something they believe to be
fictitous.

This is the citation of the Nobel Committee:

"Indications of changes in the earth's future climate must be treated
with the utmost seriousness, and with the precautionary principle
uppermost in our minds. Extensive climate changes may alter and
threaten the living conditions of much of mankind. They may induce
large-scale migration and lead to greater competition for the earth's
resources. Such changes will place particularly heavy burdens on the
world's most vulnerable countries. There may be increased danger of
violent conflicts and wars, within and between states."

So, if I have this straight, Gore won for proselytizing a less than
universally accepted "scientific" theory which, presumably, has led to
action which prevented (or not) possible future competition for
resources, possible future conflicts, and future wars which haven't
happened yet and which may (or may not) ever occur because they are
only a possibility.

I think is a great precedent! If one can win a Nobel Peace Prize for
preventing events from transpiring which never actually would have
happened anyway, than I am your man.

Year 2050: Shortwave Sportfishing's posting of the first rec.boats low
transom thread is finally received by the residents of Omicron Perseii
VIII, saving the Earth from brutal annexation.

Gimme my prize!! You can keep the medal, just give me the million
bucks.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Have you ever heard of a place called Somalia? It's universally
accepted that the civil wars there are attributed to climate change.
Drought.

And that has what to do with anything?

Climate change, peace. Nobel Peace Prize. Al Gore. Is ANYTHING hitting
those brain cells of yours yet?

Oh, and *I* have never had a heart attack, ever.

On Oct 14, 1:59 pm, wrote:
On Oct 14, 11:41 am, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:





On Sun, 14 Oct 2007 15:09:05 -0000, wrote:
On Oct 12, 11:06 am, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:
On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 12:30:19 -0000, wrote:
On Oct 12, 7:05 am, "Eisboch" wrote:
"HK" wrote in message

...

- - -

A terrific honor for Al and the United States.

Yep, and congrats to him for his award and commitment, regardless of whether
global warming is indeed, man induced.

It's ironic that had he been declared the victor in 2000, it is unlikely he
would receiving a Nobel prize today.

Eisboch

Most republicans think that global warming isn't happening in any way,
man made or otherwise. Imagine how awful they must feel realizing that
someone won the Nobel prize for something they believe to be
fictitous.

This is the citation of the Nobel Committee:

"Indications of changes in the earth's future climate must be treated
with the utmost seriousness, and with the precautionary principle
uppermost in our minds. Extensive climate changes may alter and
threaten the living conditions of much of mankind. They may induce
large-scale migration and lead to greater competition for the earth's
resources. Such changes will place particularly heavy burdens on the
world's most vulnerable countries. There may be increased danger of
violent conflicts and wars, within and between states."

So, if I have this straight, Gore won for proselytizing a less than
universally accepted "scientific" theory which, presumably, has led to
action which prevented (or not) possible future competition for
resources, possible future conflicts, and future wars which haven't
happened yet and which may (or may not) ever occur because they are
only a possibility.

I think is a great precedent! If one can win a Nobel Peace Prize for
preventing events from transpiring which never actually would have
happened anyway, than I am your man.

Year 2050: Shortwave Sportfishing's posting of the first rec.boats low
transom thread is finally received by the residents of Omicron Perseii
VIII, saving the Earth from brutal annexation.

Gimme my prize!! You can keep the medal, just give me the million
bucks.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Have you ever heard of a place called Somalia? It's universally
accepted that the civil wars there are attributed to climate change.
Drought.

And that has what to do with anything?

Climate change, peace. Nobel Peace Prize. Al Gore. Is ANYTHING hitting
those brain cells of yours yet?

Oh, and *I* have never had a heart attack, ever.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Oh bullcrap... Somalia was racist, corrupt, and at war long before Al
invented the idea of taxing corporations based on normal global
cycles, They are not connected. the way you are using them, they are
just words...

What do the Global Taxing folks say about the great historical freezes
in South America lately and the fact that the antarctic ice cap is
growing faster than any time in history. Well, they won't address
it, and when faced with the possiblity of be faced with these facts
they dismiss the query and run away...

On Oct 14, 2:20 pm, wrote:
On Oct 14, 1:59 pm, wrote:





On Oct 14, 11:41 am, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

On Sun, 14 Oct 2007 15:09:05 -0000, wrote:
On Oct 12, 11:06 am, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:
On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 12:30:19 -0000, wrote:
On Oct 12, 7:05 am, "Eisboch" wrote:
"HK" wrote in message

...

- - -

A terrific honor for Al and the United States.

Yep, and congrats to him for his award and commitment, regardless of whether
global warming is indeed, man induced.

It's ironic that had he been declared the victor in 2000, it is unlikely he
would receiving a Nobel prize today.

Eisboch

Most republicans think that global warming isn't happening in any way,
man made or otherwise. Imagine how awful they must feel realizing that
someone won the Nobel prize for something they believe to be
fictitous.

This is the citation of the Nobel Committee:

"Indications of changes in the earth's future climate must be treated
with the utmost seriousness, and with the precautionary principle
uppermost in our minds. Extensive climate changes may alter and
threaten the living conditions of much of mankind. They may induce
large-scale migration and lead to greater competition for the earth's
resources. Such changes will place particularly heavy burdens on the
world's most vulnerable countries. There may be increased danger of
violent conflicts and wars, within and between states."

So, if I have this straight, Gore won for proselytizing a less than
universally accepted "scientific" theory which, presumably, has led to
action which prevented (or not) possible future competition for
resources, possible future conflicts, and future wars which haven't
happened yet and which may (or may not) ever occur because they are
only a possibility.

I think is a great precedent! If one can win a Nobel Peace Prize for
preventing events from transpiring which never actually would have
happened anyway, than I am your man.

Year 2050: Shortwave Sportfishing's posting of the first rec.boats low
transom thread is finally received by the residents of Omicron Perseii
VIII, saving the Earth from brutal annexation.

Gimme my prize!! You can keep the medal, just give me the million
bucks.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Have you ever heard of a place called Somalia? It's universally
accepted that the civil wars there are attributed to climate change.
Drought.

And that has what to do with anything?

Climate change, peace. Nobel Peace Prize. Al Gore. Is ANYTHING hitting
those brain cells of yours yet?

Oh, and *I* have never had a heart attack, ever.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Oh bullcrap... Somalia was racist, corrupt, and at war long before Al
invented the idea of taxing corporations based on normal global
cycles, They are not connected. the way you are using them, they are
just words...

What do the Global Taxing folks say about the great historical freezes
in South America lately and the fact that the antarctic ice cap is
growing faster than any time in history. Well, they won't address
it, and when faced with the possiblity of be faced with these facts
they dismiss the query and run away...- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

And they call that setteled science...