On Mon, 15 Oct 2007 12:31:09 -0000, wrote:

On Oct 14, 2:20 pm, wrote:
On Oct 14, 1:59 pm, wrote:





On Oct 14, 11:41 am, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

On Sun, 14 Oct 2007 15:09:05 -0000, wrote:
On Oct 12, 11:06 am, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:
On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 12:30:19 -0000, wrote:
On Oct 12, 7:05 am, "Eisboch" wrote:
"HK" wrote in message

...

- - -

A terrific honor for Al and the United States.

Yep, and congrats to him for his award and commitment, regardless of whether
global warming is indeed, man induced.

It's ironic that had he been declared the victor in 2000, it is unlikely he
would receiving a Nobel prize today.

Eisboch

Most republicans think that global warming isn't happening in any way,
man made or otherwise. Imagine how awful they must feel realizing that
someone won the Nobel prize for something they believe to be
fictitous.

This is the citation of the Nobel Committee:

"Indications of changes in the earth's future climate must be treated
with the utmost seriousness, and with the precautionary principle
uppermost in our minds. Extensive climate changes may alter and
threaten the living conditions of much of mankind. They may induce
large-scale migration and lead to greater competition for the earth's
resources. Such changes will place particularly heavy burdens on the
world's most vulnerable countries. There may be increased danger of
violent conflicts and wars, within and between states."

So, if I have this straight, Gore won for proselytizing a less than
universally accepted "scientific" theory which, presumably, has led to
action which prevented (or not) possible future competition for
resources, possible future conflicts, and future wars which haven't
happened yet and which may (or may not) ever occur because they are
only a possibility.

I think is a great precedent! If one can win a Nobel Peace Prize for
preventing events from transpiring which never actually would have
happened anyway, than I am your man.

Year 2050: Shortwave Sportfishing's posting of the first rec.boats low
transom thread is finally received by the residents of Omicron Perseii
VIII, saving the Earth from brutal annexation.

Gimme my prize!! You can keep the medal, just give me the million
bucks.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Have you ever heard of a place called Somalia? It's universally
accepted that the civil wars there are attributed to climate change.
Drought.

And that has what to do with anything?

Climate change, peace. Nobel Peace Prize. Al Gore. Is ANYTHING hitting
those brain cells of yours yet?

Oh, and *I* have never had a heart attack, ever.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Oh bullcrap... Somalia was racist, corrupt, and at war long before Al
invented the idea of taxing corporations based on normal global
cycles, They are not connected. the way you are using them, they are
just words...

What do the Global Taxing folks say about the great historical freezes
in South America lately and the fact that the antarctic ice cap is
growing faster than any time in history. Well, they won't address
it, and when faced with the possiblity of be faced with these facts
they dismiss the query and run away...- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

"Global Taxing folks" WTF? And you, like a lot of conservatives with
there head in the sand can't possibly understand how the antarctic ice
cap is growing faster and still have the earth warming up, can you?
It's actually quite simple. Want to try, or do you need me to tell you
the answer?

Did you mean 'their' head in the sand?

On Mon, 15 Oct 2007 08:39:19 -0400, HK wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Mon, 15 Oct 2007 08:18:11 -0400, HK wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Mon, 15 Oct 2007 05:04:56 -0700, Tim wrote:

Three more Americans are Nobel winners

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071015/...obel_economics
Well, we'll see if they're foundations are full of errors, like the movie
that won the 'peace prize'.


Not to worry...someday some right-wing murderous dictator your side
admires will win a prize.

Harry, the prize is meaningless. It would make no difference who won it. I
wonder if 'murderous dictators' are mostly right or left wing.

I'll bet they own Meridians!


The Nobel Peace Prize is only meaningless to right-wingers. It is the
most highly regard prize in the world....

....by left-wingers in love with Al Gore and opposed to the administration.

wrote in message
oups.com...
On Oct 12, 12:47 pm, "D.Duck" wrote:
wrote in message

ups.com...





On Oct 12, 9:00 am, John H. wrote:
On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 07:53:37 -0400, HK wrote:
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 07:34:44 -0400, HK
wrote:

Global warming has quite a bit to do with boating. Weather, eh?

In particular for those with low transoms.

~~ that is just never going to get old ~~ :)

Unfortunately, neither are the failures of George W. Bush. I heard he
was about to be selected for the Forrest Gump Award until the
sponsors
realized Bush had never served his country honorably in an overseas
war.

Didn't the manufacturer of your Ranger go bankrupt? No wonder you
matched it up with an eTec?

I hear the eTec brand will be going national, as soon as the number
of
stocking, selling dealers increases from three.

:}

All joking somewhat aside, if the sea level rises as fast as Gore says
it
will, aren't you just a *little* bit worried that it might overflow
that
low transom?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Uh, the boat will float and ride at the same height whether in two
feet of water, or two hundred.

What if it's securely anchored?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Trying to be silly isn't working well for you.

Facts is facts....

On Oct 15, 8:31 am, wrote:
On Oct 14, 2:20 pm, wrote:





On Oct 14, 1:59 pm, wrote:

On Oct 14, 11:41 am, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

On Sun, 14 Oct 2007 15:09:05 -0000, wrote:
On Oct 12, 11:06 am, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:
On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 12:30:19 -0000, wrote:
On Oct 12, 7:05 am, "Eisboch" wrote:
"HK" wrote in message

...

- - -

A terrific honor for Al and the United States.

Yep, and congrats to him for his award and commitment, regardless of whether
global warming is indeed, man induced.

It's ironic that had he been declared the victor in 2000, it is unlikely he
would receiving a Nobel prize today.

Eisboch

Most republicans think that global warming isn't happening in any way,
man made or otherwise. Imagine how awful they must feel realizing that
someone won the Nobel prize for something they believe to be
fictitous.

This is the citation of the Nobel Committee:

"Indications of changes in the earth's future climate must be treated
with the utmost seriousness, and with the precautionary principle
uppermost in our minds. Extensive climate changes may alter and
threaten the living conditions of much of mankind. They may induce
large-scale migration and lead to greater competition for the earth's
resources. Such changes will place particularly heavy burdens on the
world's most vulnerable countries. There may be increased danger of
violent conflicts and wars, within and between states."

So, if I have this straight, Gore won for proselytizing a less than
universally accepted "scientific" theory which, presumably, has led to
action which prevented (or not) possible future competition for
resources, possible future conflicts, and future wars which haven't
happened yet and which may (or may not) ever occur because they are
only a possibility.

I think is a great precedent! If one can win a Nobel Peace Prize for
preventing events from transpiring which never actually would have
happened anyway, than I am your man.

Year 2050: Shortwave Sportfishing's posting of the first rec.boats low
transom thread is finally received by the residents of Omicron Perseii
VIII, saving the Earth from brutal annexation.

Gimme my prize!! You can keep the medal, just give me the million
bucks.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Have you ever heard of a place called Somalia? It's universally
accepted that the civil wars there are attributed to climate change.
Drought.

And that has what to do with anything?

Climate change, peace. Nobel Peace Prize. Al Gore. Is ANYTHING hitting
those brain cells of yours yet?

Oh, and *I* have never had a heart attack, ever.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Oh bullcrap... Somalia was racist, corrupt, and at war long before Al
invented the idea of taxing corporations based on normal global
cycles, They are not connected. the way you are using them, they are
just words...

What do the Global Taxing folks say about the great historical freezes
in South America lately and the fact that the antarctic ice cap is
growing faster than any time in history. Well, they won't address
it, and when faced with the possiblity of be faced with these facts
they dismiss the query and run away...- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

"Global Taxing folks" WTF? And you, like a lot of conservatives with
there head in the sand can't possibly understand how the antarctic ice
cap is growing faster and still have the earth warming up, can you?
It's actually quite simple. Want to try, or do you need me to tell you
the answer?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Please, educate us all.

On Mon, 15 Oct 2007 16:37:39 -0000, wrote:

On Oct 15, 11:17 am, wrote:
On Oct 15, 11:09 am, "Reginald P. Smithers III"





wrote:
wrote:
On Oct 14, 5:43 pm, BAR wrote:
wrote:
On Oct 12, 11:06 am, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:
On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 12:30:19 -0000, wrote:
On Oct 12, 7:05 am, "Eisboch" wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
...
- - -
A terrific honor for Al and the United States.
Yep, and congrats to him for his award and commitment, regardless of whether
global warming is indeed, man induced.
It's ironic that had he been declared the victor in 2000, it is unlikely he
would receiving a Nobel prize today.
Eisboch
Most republicans think that global warming isn't happening in any way,
man made or otherwise. Imagine how awful they must feel realizing that
someone won the Nobel prize for something they believe to be
fictitous.
This is the citation of the Nobel Committee:
"Indications of changes in the earth's future climate must be treated
with the utmost seriousness, and with the precautionary principle
uppermost in our minds. Extensive climate changes may alter and
threaten the living conditions of much of mankind. They may induce
large-scale migration and lead to greater competition for the earth's
resources. Such changes will place particularly heavy burdens on the
world's most vulnerable countries. There may be increased danger of
violent conflicts and wars, within and between states."
So, if I have this straight, Gore won for proselytizing a less than
universally accepted "scientific" theory which, presumably, has led to
action which prevented (or not) possible future competition for
resources, possible future conflicts, and future wars which haven't
happened yet and which may (or may not) ever occur because they are
only a possibility.
I think is a great precedent! If one can win a Nobel Peace Prize for
preventing events from transpiring which never actually would have
happened anyway, than I am your man.
Year 2050: Shortwave Sportfishing's posting of the first rec.boats low
transom thread is finally received by the residents of Omicron Perseii
VIII, saving the Earth from brutal annexation.
Gimme my prize!! You can keep the medal, just give me the million
bucks.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Have you ever heard of a place called Somalia? It's universally
accepted that the civil wars there are attributed to climate change.
Drought.
What caused the mid-west dust bowl in the 30's? Was that global warming?
Is every occurrence of drought caused by global warming? What happens
when the rains come again, has global warming stopped?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Global warming and simple climatic events are two completely different
things.

Bassy,
I hope you are feeling better, what was the problem that kept you away
from rec.boats for so long?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Hopefully he knows you are serious. But I doubt he understands that
unlike those who would see Cheney, Bush, Rush, etc, dead, and state it
regularly, We actually are/were concerned for, even Bassy. But then
again, most of "us" value every life, personally I don't want to see
anyone's wife grow old alone...

Bassy, there was a thread or two about you which I was in on when we
talked, before you knew who I was (sorry for that, did not think you
would respond if you did, meant everything I said then, as I do now).
Everyone on and off list that asked me about you wanted to see you
well, of not back, everyone, no exceptions... Think about that when
you are stereotyping us from now on and things will go much
smoother...- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Yeah, your holier than thou, huh? How about *your* sterotypes? Which
Hannity/Rush sterotype am I today, socialist? Communist? A liar?

Bassy, a simple, "Thanks for your concern," would have gone so much
further.

On Oct 15, 12:37 pm, wrote:
On Oct 15, 11:17 am, wrote:





On Oct 15, 11:09 am, "Reginald P. Smithers III"

wrote:
wrote:
On Oct 14, 5:43 pm, BAR wrote:
wrote:
On Oct 12, 11:06 am, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:
On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 12:30:19 -0000, wrote:
On Oct 12, 7:05 am, "Eisboch" wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
...
- - -
A terrific honor for Al and the United States.
Yep, and congrats to him for his award and commitment, regardless of whether
global warming is indeed, man induced.
It's ironic that had he been declared the victor in 2000, it is unlikely he
would receiving a Nobel prize today.
Eisboch
Most republicans think that global warming isn't happening in any way,
man made or otherwise. Imagine how awful they must feel realizing that
someone won the Nobel prize for something they believe to be
fictitous.
This is the citation of the Nobel Committee:
"Indications of changes in the earth's future climate must be treated
with the utmost seriousness, and with the precautionary principle
uppermost in our minds. Extensive climate changes may alter and
threaten the living conditions of much of mankind. They may induce
large-scale migration and lead to greater competition for the earth's
resources. Such changes will place particularly heavy burdens on the
world's most vulnerable countries. There may be increased danger of
violent conflicts and wars, within and between states."
So, if I have this straight, Gore won for proselytizing a less than
universally accepted "scientific" theory which, presumably, has led to
action which prevented (or not) possible future competition for
resources, possible future conflicts, and future wars which haven't
happened yet and which may (or may not) ever occur because they are
only a possibility.
I think is a great precedent! If one can win a Nobel Peace Prize for
preventing events from transpiring which never actually would have
happened anyway, than I am your man.
Year 2050: Shortwave Sportfishing's posting of the first rec.boats low
transom thread is finally received by the residents of Omicron Perseii
VIII, saving the Earth from brutal annexation.
Gimme my prize!! You can keep the medal, just give me the million
bucks.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Have you ever heard of a place called Somalia? It's universally
accepted that the civil wars there are attributed to climate change.
Drought.
What caused the mid-west dust bowl in the 30's? Was that global warming?
Is every occurrence of drought caused by global warming? What happens
when the rains come again, has global warming stopped?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Global warming and simple climatic events are two completely different
things.

Bassy,
I hope you are feeling better, what was the problem that kept you away
from rec.boats for so long?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Hopefully he knows you are serious. But I doubt he understands that
unlike those who would see Cheney, Bush, Rush, etc, dead, and state it
regularly, We actually are/were concerned for, even Bassy. But then
again, most of "us" value every life, personally I don't want to see
anyone's wife grow old alone...

Bassy, there was a thread or two about you which I was in on when we
talked, before you knew who I was (sorry for that, did not think you
would respond if you did, meant everything I said then, as I do now).
Everyone on and off list that asked me about you wanted to see you
well, of not back, everyone, no exceptions... Think about that when
you are stereotyping us from now on and things will go much
smoother...- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Yeah, your holier than thou, huh? How about *your* sterotypes? Which
Hannity/Rush sterotype am I today, socialist? Communist? A liar?

Whatever..

wrote in message
ups.com...
On Oct 15, 11:17 am, wrote:
On Oct 15, 11:09 am, "Reginald P. Smithers III"





wrote:
wrote:
On Oct 14, 5:43 pm, BAR wrote:
wrote:
On Oct 12, 11:06 am, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:
On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 12:30:19 -0000, wrote:
On Oct 12, 7:05 am, "Eisboch" wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
...
- - -
A terrific honor for Al and the United States.
Yep, and congrats to him for his award and commitment,
regardless of whether
global warming is indeed, man induced.
It's ironic that had he been declared the victor in 2000, it is
unlikely he
would receiving a Nobel prize today.
Eisboch
Most republicans think that global warming isn't happening in any
way,
man made or otherwise. Imagine how awful they must feel realizing
that
someone won the Nobel prize for something they believe to be
fictitous.
This is the citation of the Nobel Committee:
"Indications of changes in the earth's future climate must be
treated
with the utmost seriousness, and with the precautionary principle
uppermost in our minds. Extensive climate changes may alter and
threaten the living conditions of much of mankind. They may induce
large-scale migration and lead to greater competition for the
earth's
resources. Such changes will place particularly heavy burdens on
the
world's most vulnerable countries. There may be increased danger
of
violent conflicts and wars, within and between states."
So, if I have this straight, Gore won for proselytizing a less
than
universally accepted "scientific" theory which, presumably, has
led to
action which prevented (or not) possible future competition for
resources, possible future conflicts, and future wars which
haven't
happened yet and which may (or may not) ever occur because they
are
only a possibility.
I think is a great precedent! If one can win a Nobel Peace Prize
for
preventing events from transpiring which never actually would have
happened anyway, than I am your man.
Year 2050: Shortwave Sportfishing's posting of the first rec.boats
low
transom thread is finally received by the residents of Omicron
Perseii
VIII, saving the Earth from brutal annexation.
Gimme my prize!! You can keep the medal, just give me the million
bucks.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Have you ever heard of a place called Somalia? It's universally
accepted that the civil wars there are attributed to climate
change.
Drought.
What caused the mid-west dust bowl in the 30's? Was that global
warming?
Is every occurrence of drought caused by global warming? What
happens
when the rains come again, has global warming stopped?- Hide quoted
text -

- Show quoted text -

Global warming and simple climatic events are two completely
different
things.

Bassy,
I hope you are feeling better, what was the problem that kept you away
from rec.boats for so long?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Hopefully he knows you are serious. But I doubt he understands that
unlike those who would see Cheney, Bush, Rush, etc, dead, and state it
regularly, We actually are/were concerned for, even Bassy. But then
again, most of "us" value every life, personally I don't want to see
anyone's wife grow old alone...

Bassy, there was a thread or two about you which I was in on when we
talked, before you knew who I was (sorry for that, did not think you
would respond if you did, meant everything I said then, as I do now).
Everyone on and off list that asked me about you wanted to see you
well, of not back, everyone, no exceptions... Think about that when
you are stereotyping us from now on and things will go much
smoother...- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Yeah, your holier than thou, huh? How about *your* sterotypes? Which
Hannity/Rush sterotype am I today, socialist? Communist? A liar?


At least 2 of the 3.

wrote:

"Global Taxing folks" WTF? And you, like a lot of conservatives with
there head in the sand can't possibly understand how the antarctic ice
cap is growing faster and still have the earth warming up, can you?


Actually I can't either, especially when the ice cap is supposed to be
shrinking due to global warming.

Unless I'm missing something.

arctic:
http://www.nrdc.org/globalWarming/qthinice.asp


anarctic:

http://www.peopleandplanet.net/doc.php?id=2470

either, other, or the same.....

On Oct 15, 4:06 pm, Tim wrote:
wrote:

"Global Taxing folks" WTF? And you, like a lot of conservatives with
there head in the sand can't possibly understand how the antarctic ice
cap is growing faster and still have the earth warming up, can you?

Actually I can't either, especially when the ice cap is supposed to be
shrinking due to global warming.

Unless I'm missing something.

arctic:http://www.nrdc.org/globalWarming/qthinice.asp

anarctic:

http://www.peopleandplanet.net/doc.php?id=2470

either, other, or the same.....

Hummmm, I will retract my statement then till I do a little more
looking...

wrote in message
oups.com...
On Oct 15, 4:06 pm, Tim wrote:
wrote:

"Global Taxing folks" WTF? And you, like a lot of conservatives with
there head in the sand can't possibly understand how the antarctic ice
cap is growing faster and still have the earth warming up, can you?

Actually I can't either, especially when the ice cap is supposed to be
shrinking due to global warming.

Unless I'm missing something.

arctic:http://www.nrdc.org/globalWarming/qthinice.asp

anarctic:

http://www.peopleandplanet.net/doc.php?id=2470

either, other, or the same.....

Hummmm, I will retract my statement then till I do a little more
looking...


What was your previous statement based on? You sounded rather adamant about
it.