![]() |
Gasoline prices - another record high/ supply and demand
"NOYB" wrote in message ink.net... "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... "NOYB" wrote in message ink.net... "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... "Eisboch" wrote in message ... "Don White" wrote in message ... If you don't mind paying $700.00 - 800.00 out of pocket, you can get an MRI scan within a week or two here at a private clinic. If Joe USA with a company paid HMO health plan had to do that, he'd scream bloody murder. Those without a health plan will get it for free, if it is related to a life threatening injury or disease. HMOs and PTOs screwed up health insurance here in the USA royally, IMHO. We should go back to inexpensive major medical coverage for catastrophic injury or illness. The rest we should pay for and it should be free for those that can't. Eisboch I agree. If I need an x-ray and money's tight, I can put it on a credit card. And, there's never a problem with $60 office visits to the internist. Meanwhile, I'm paying $300 a month for Blue Choice, for medical needs which may never happen. I'd love to have a policy that covered everything over X amount - $2K a year, or some such thing. Then get a Medical Savings Account: http://www.forhealthfreedom.org/Publ...hIns/MSAs.html Yeah...that's on my list of things to do during vacation, when the damned phones stop ringing. Speaking of work, can I interest you in 1150 cases (9,200 64 oz bottles) of Indian Summer apple juice? $16.00 per case, delivered, but you have to take the whole truck. $18,400.00. Net 10 days. Plastic or glass bottles? Plastic. Prepare to provide a D&B number. |
Gasoline prices - another record high/ supply and demand
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"Eisboch" wrote in message ... "Don White" wrote in message ... If you don't mind paying $700.00 - 800.00 out of pocket, you can get an MRI scan within a week or two here at a private clinic. If Joe USA with a company paid HMO health plan had to do that, he'd scream bloody murder. Those without a health plan will get it for free, if it is related to a life threatening injury or disease. HMOs and PTOs screwed up health insurance here in the USA royally, IMHO. We should go back to inexpensive major medical coverage for catastrophic injury or illness. The rest we should pay for and it should be free for those that can't. Eisboch I agree. If I need an x-ray and money's tight, I can put it on a credit card. And, there's never a problem with $60 office visits to the internist. Meanwhile, I'm paying $300 a month for Blue Choice, for medical needs which may never happen. I'd love to have a policy that covered everything over X amount - $2K a year, or some such thing. Who is forcing you to pay $300 per month for health insurance? Most employers will allow you to decline coverage. Just think of how you can better spend your money each month than some guy in a cubicle somewhere in Indiana with a slide rule and an actuarial table? |
Gasoline prices - another record high/ supply and demand
"NOYB" wrote in message nk.net... "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... "NOYB" wrote in message nk.net... "thunder" wrote in message ... On Thu, 03 Aug 2006 16:12:32 -0400, Bert Robbins wrote: Still why is the health care people receive in the US better than anywhere else in the world, even those socialist countries? I'm not sure that's an accurate statement. I have heard it argued that we have the best emergency health care system, with all the bells and whistles, but if you were to look at statistics directly related to health care, life expectancy, infant mortality, etc. we aren't at the top of the list. I posted this link to another of your posts: http://www.zmag.org/content/showarti...m?ItemID=10515 If money were no object, and you could choose to have a lifesaving procedure anywhere in the world, where would you choose to have it done? Israel. Why? It seems as if their best doctors are working in NY. Or at the Cleveland Clinic. ;-) |
Gasoline prices - another record high/ supply and demand
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"NOYB" wrote in message nk.net... "thunder" wrote in message ... On Thu, 03 Aug 2006 15:36:47 -0400, Bert Robbins wrote: Why do Canadian's come to the US for health care? Because they can see a doctor or get an MRI next week rather the 10 months from now. http://www.zmag.org/content/showarti...m?ItemID=10515 " by Physicians for a National Health Program " LOL. No bias there. Yeah. Like Doctors Without Borders, or Albert Schweitzer. Blinded by an agenda. They are not blinded by an agenda, they are guided by an agenda. Just because you believe it a good activity doesn't mean I have to believe the same. |
Gasoline prices - another record high/ supply and demand
thunder wrote:
On Thu, 03 Aug 2006 16:12:32 -0400, Bert Robbins wrote: Still why is the health care people receive in the US better than anywhere else in the world, even those socialist countries? I'm not sure that's an accurate statement. I have heard it argued that we have the best emergency health care system, with all the bells and whistles, but if you were to look at statistics directly related to health care, life expectancy, infant mortality, etc. we aren't at the top of the list. I posted this link to another of your posts: http://www.zmag.org/content/showarti...m?ItemID=10515 And, I responded that I do not believe that a National Health Care plan is what is needed. |
Gasoline prices - another record high/ supply and demand
"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... "NOYB" wrote in message ink.net... "thunder" wrote in message ... On Thu, 03 Aug 2006 15:36:47 -0400, Bert Robbins wrote: Why do Canadian's come to the US for health care? Because they can see a doctor or get an MRI next week rather the 10 months from now. http://www.zmag.org/content/showarti...m?ItemID=10515 "Most of what we hear about the Canadian health care system is negative; in particular, the long waiting times for medical procedures. But we found that waiting times affect few patients, only 3.5% of Canadians vs. 0.7% of people in the U.S." How is that not significant? If I wrote the headline, it would read: "Five times as many Canadian patients are affected by long waiting times compared to American patients". The fact that the author downplays that important fact, yet hypes another fact like "9.9% of U.S. respondents couldn't afford medicine vs. 5.1% in Canada", shows his bias. No matter what country you're talking about, why should it EVER be a luxury item? I know the usual drivel: It's not mentioned in the Constitution, but that's not a good enough reason. Health insurance ought to be made more affordable. Period. Start with the insurers. Repeal that damn McCarron-Ferguson Act, and put insurance under Federal regulation. Allow small businesses to band together across state lines and purchase insurance through their national associations. I wouldn't be opposed to paying higher taxes to cover medical insurance if I didn't have to spend what I currently spend on health insurance...*AND* I could get coverage at least as good as what I currently have. It costs my family $1200/month for insurance. Add that to the $800/month I spend for my employees, and that's $24000/year that I spend on health insurance. They could raise my tax rate 5 percentage points and it would still be cheaper than what I'm paying now. |
Gasoline prices - another record high/ supply and demand
"Bert Robbins" wrote in message ... JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "Eisboch" wrote in message ... "Don White" wrote in message ... If you don't mind paying $700.00 - 800.00 out of pocket, you can get an MRI scan within a week or two here at a private clinic. If Joe USA with a company paid HMO health plan had to do that, he'd scream bloody murder. Those without a health plan will get it for free, if it is related to a life threatening injury or disease. HMOs and PTOs screwed up health insurance here in the USA royally, IMHO. We should go back to inexpensive major medical coverage for catastrophic injury or illness. The rest we should pay for and it should be free for those that can't. Eisboch I agree. If I need an x-ray and money's tight, I can put it on a credit card. And, there's never a problem with $60 office visits to the internist. Meanwhile, I'm paying $300 a month for Blue Choice, for medical needs which may never happen. I'd love to have a policy that covered everything over X amount - $2K a year, or some such thing. Who is forcing you to pay $300 per month for health insurance? Most employers will allow you to decline coverage. Just think of how you can better spend your money each month than some guy in a cubicle somewhere in Indiana with a slide rule and an actuarial table? Long story. How do you plan to handle something like cancer care, which can reach 50-100K in less than a year? Out of your pocket? Sell the house? Cash in all your retirement investments? |
Gasoline prices - another record high/ supply and demand
"Bert Robbins" wrote in message ... JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "NOYB" wrote in message nk.net... "thunder" wrote in message ... On Thu, 03 Aug 2006 15:36:47 -0400, Bert Robbins wrote: Why do Canadian's come to the US for health care? Because they can see a doctor or get an MRI next week rather the 10 months from now. http://www.zmag.org/content/showarti...m?ItemID=10515 " by Physicians for a National Health Program " LOL. No bias there. Yeah. Like Doctors Without Borders, or Albert Schweitzer. Blinded by an agenda. They are not blinded by an agenda, they are guided by an agenda. Just because you believe it a good activity doesn't mean I have to believe the same. What's funny is that they might be right. It might work. Ha ha. |
Gasoline prices - another record high/ supply and demand
On Thu, 03 Aug 2006 20:51:54 +0000, NOYB wrote:
If money were no object, and you could choose to have a lifesaving procedure anywhere in the world, where would you choose to have it done? I have no problem with the quality of American health care. I do have concerns about availability and costs. Statistics of life expectancy, infant mortality, etc. show that our health care availability is not what it could be. It is also true that our health care costs are @ 15% GDP, as opposed to Canada's *universal* care at @ 10% GDP. Quality of care issues aside, that 5% puts us at a competitive disadvantage in the global marketplace. |
Gasoline prices - another record high/ supply and demand
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"NOYB" wrote in message ink.net... "thunder" wrote in message ... On Thu, 03 Aug 2006 15:36:47 -0400, Bert Robbins wrote: Why do Canadian's come to the US for health care? Because they can see a doctor or get an MRI next week rather the 10 months from now. http://www.zmag.org/content/showarti...m?ItemID=10515 "Most of what we hear about the Canadian health care system is negative; in particular, the long waiting times for medical procedures. But we found that waiting times affect few patients, only 3.5% of Canadians vs. 0.7% of people in the U.S." How is that not significant? If I wrote the headline, it would read: "Five times as many Canadian patients are affected by long waiting times compared to American patients". The fact that the author downplays that important fact, yet hypes another fact like "9.9% of U.S. respondents couldn't afford medicine vs. 5.1% in Canada", shows his bias. No matter what country you're talking about, why should it EVER be a luxury item? I know the usual drivel: It's not mentioned in the Constitution, but that's not a good enough reason. Nothing is preventing you from setting up a charitable foundation that will cover health costs for those that "can't afford" or simply don't want to pay for it. This method will enable you to do something good for you fellow man rather than bitching, complaining and whining about its not fair unless the government takes money from everyone to do it. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:34 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com