![]() |
When would you board someone else's boat??
"Dave Hall" wrote in message ... On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 00:53:44 -0400, "Don" wrote: "Dave Hall" wrote Nature does not include guns. Nor do animals kill for sport or revenge. But a few weeks of rain will dissolve dog droppings. Then you would have no problem with someone else's dogs ****ting in your yard on a regular basis? Personally, I don't care. Thank you for admitting that. Many of us won't stoop to that trailer park level. When you get to the point of being a *homeowner* rather than a renter, you'll learn to appreciate property rights. Until then, shut the **** up. |
When would you board someone else's boat??
"Dave Hall" wrote in message ... On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 00:56:39 -0400, "Don" wrote: "Dave Hall" wrote I have mixed feelings about the pool/fence thing. On the one hand, unauthorized people have no business trespassing on your yard, and any problems they get into should be on them. On the other hand, since many laws are made to protect the irresponsible, they transferred the responsibility to everyone else when they require you to prevent kids from wandering into your pool. But while I disagree with the law in principle, the amount of effort to put up a fence is not that great, and if it saves even one life, it's probably worth it. Then why shouldn't the irresponsible people that let their kids run loose foot the bill for the fence, around their yard? Why should the people with the pool have to pay for the fence? The fence is your insurance. It protects you from liability lawsuits, and it's required by most homeowner's insurance policies. Maybe that's not the way it should be, but it's the way it IS. Jesus christ, what a ****ing socialist. I hope someone kills you. |
When would you board someone else's boat??
"Dave Hall" wrote The problem with your examples are that they are extreme. I would no more deliberately bring my dog to another property than I would deliberately pass by another boat at close range while pre-planing. You're full of **** and you don't own a boat, or anything of value. |
When would you board someone else's boat??
"Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "Dave Hall" wrote in message ... On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 16:23:53 -0400, DSK wrote: Dave Hall wrote: I grasp it just fine. In that case, when are you going to accept responsibility for your actions? I do, when they are truly mine. Liar. In another message, you said that if your dog crapped while you were walking it, you wouldn't clean it up. You wondered how you would clean it up. "With what?", you asked. Lame excuse. He's a lying cowardly *******, a socialist. He thinks rules are for you and me, but not him. He deserves to be gang raped and killed. His *type* drag the rest of us backwards. |
When would you board someone else's boat??
|
When would you board someone else's boat??
"Dave Hall" wrote in message ... On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 01:02:04 -0400, "Don" wrote: It is you that doesn't know that you are a socialist. You don't seem to know much about anything at all, Dave. You don't have a spine nor a brain and you speak like a child. And you expect anyone at all to lend you any creedence? Since we've shred Blah, blah, blahhhhhhh You are a problem for society and deserve to be killed, immediately. |
When would you board someone else's boat??
"basskisser" wrote in message m... "Don" wrote in message news:l%%jc.246 Logic? What's logical about anarchy? Anarchy is chaos, and chaos is the antithesis of logic. You're full of ****. Here, I'll help you out : www.m-w.com Go look it up and get back with us. Yes, Dave, socialist. You go with the flow, the collective, for you haven't the mental capacity to do otherwise. You simply parrot what you have seen on TEEVEE. Example: You silly notion that anarchy = chaos, just like the bought media has taught you. Hate to burst your bubble, but as usual, you are wrong: Wow. You're as stupid as everyone says you are. |
When would you board someone else's boat??
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Dave Hall wrote: On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 17:02:26 GMT, "Doug Kanter" wrote: What??? No - I'm guilty the moment the razor blades go into my pocket. Ok then. The next question I have is, do you refrain from stealing those $50 worth of razor blades because you know it's morally wrong, or because you feel that you have a good chance of getting caught? Dave Choice A, Dave. If I shop in a store, it's because I like the place. The owner or company has created a place that serves me well. They deserve to prosper. Well, that is an answer. Just not the answer to the question which I asked. I didn't ask where you shop and why. I asked you whether you refrain from stealing because you believe, through an inner sense of morality, that it's the "right" thing to do, or whether you do so because you don't want to take the chance of getting caught and being forced to atone for your crime? Wait! Let me head off your next question. No, I do not steal from places I do NOT like. Somehow I don't think you will give me a straight answer to my first question. You are deliberately vague and non committal. Not unlike a certain democratic presidential wannabee. Dave Get off your high horse, Dave. Your secret is out...DON has exposed you as ... a socialist! He reeks of socialism. He cowers from responsibility. He hates individuals. He is terrified that someone will kill him because of his cowardice. This is why he broadcasts false bravado in usenet. He is to be pitied and ridiculed. |
When would you board someone else's boat??
"Dave Hall" wrote No it's not. An animal control person is acting within the boundaries of the law. You are not. And they merely remove the animal. Is this boy really this stupid? Hey Dave, get off your fat ass and go down to the animal control and adopt a couple animals, so they won't be killed. What? You can't afford to take on a few animals? Well what kind of an asshole are you, Dave? Oh, I see, your infatuation with TEEVEE has caused you to devolve into a moron, and you somehow believe animal control takes care of thousands, no, millions of discarded animals, right, Dave? Come on Dave, do the right thing, pick up after your fellow socialists that have discarded their unwanted animals. Hell, even I, the anarchist (remember?, the guy in total chaos (LOL), the guy that doesn't believe in laws) have been to animal control many times and have taken on gasp 7 cats and OMG 2 dogs. My cats lounge around the pool all day in their private screened in porch and my 2 dogs recline on a $300 bed all day long in my office. Come on Dave, be the good socialist, pay your just dues. Moron. Hey Dave, our yard is contained by a 6' high estate fence so that YOUR kids won't get their ****ing necks rung while trying to drown in my pool. I installed that fence as a favor to YOU, Dave, so that I won't have to go dig one of your eyeballs out and **** the socket because one of your unsupervised miscreants tried to escape your sorry ass and die in my pool. LOL |
When would you board someone else's boat??
"John Smith" wrote in message news:7Z7kc.15737$RE1.1365917@attbi_s54... Well another compassionate liberal jumps in. The difference between a dog attacking his dog and a dog taking a **** in his yard should be obvious to anyone. You are allowed to protect yourself and your family (most people consider a pet as part of the family) when they are placed in immediate danger. Then you would be wrong, as usual, moron. A pet is *property*, just as ones yard is *property*. Pay attention. The LAW says that pets and land are property and the owner has the right to defend his property with whatever defensive measures he deems appropriate. If you don't like it, then do something about it, moron. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:57 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com