When would you board someone else's boat??
 

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...


Some years ago, a neighbor who had two dogs, a sheltie and a cocker
spaniel, lost the sheltie to another neighbor's German shepherd. The two
little dogs were in their own yard, kept there by training and by an
"invisible" fence...one of those electronic fences.

About a month later, the shepherd came back for another visit, and
started going after the cocker spaniel. The spaniel owner came out and
bashed in the skull of the shepherd with a shovel, and then dragged the
carcass out to the middle of the road.

All's well that ends well.

I would've dragged the shepherd to the owner's home with the hope that his
children were there to see it. But that's me. Sometimes I like more drama
than other people.

Drama? You call that drama? Puss.
I would have dragged the dead animal over there, knocked on the door and
when the owner answered, I would have beat his ass into next week with the
dead carcass.

I have absolutely no patience for someone that takes on the responsibility
of another, and then abuses it.
An ex-neighbor had a cat named *Streudal*, a big champagne colored cat that
they let run loose through the neighborhood. I liked Streudal, him and I got
along fine, he would fequently spend the day in my home-office lounging
across the top of my Plotter in the sun.

One night while going to the convenience store I saw Streudal splattered on
the highway. It tore me up, bad. I went home and got a shovel, I intended to
bury Streudal off the side of the road. While driving back to get the shovel
I came up with another idea, one that might make a difference. I scooped
Steudal up and put him in the back of my truck and drove home. I re-scooped
Streudal out of my truck and rang the neighbors doorbell, interrupting their
movie rental/pizza party, and when the dad answered the door I threw
Streudal on their foyer floor. Their two kids were mortified, the dad was
stunned, the wife was ready to faint. They moved about a month later. I hope
I scared all of them for life, for seeing Streudal plattered on the road
scarred me. Payback is a whore.

When would you board someone else's boat??
 

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"Dave Hall" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 17:24:25 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:

That's a FAR better solution than Doug's "vanishing" act.



Mine's just another version of the same thing.

No it's not. An animal control person is acting within the boundaries
of the law. You are not. And they merely remove the animal. You kill
it.

Quite a few animals picked up by animal control end up euthanized, Dave.

Nationwide, 80% of all pets collected by gov't authorities are killed.
Call it what it is.
The word *euthanized* sounds too medicinal, so that the masses won't feel
guilty with their irresponsibility.

When would you board someone else's boat??
 

"Dave Hall" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 01:10:41 -0400, "Don"
wrote:


"Dave Hall" wrote in message
.. .
On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 13:39:16 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:
What would you REALLY do?

I guess this is the difference between you and I Doug. I suspect that
we both would get really ****ed off, and would desire to retaliate in
some way, which would ensure that it never happened again. The
difference is that you would probably carry it through, while I would
likely restrain myself by a very strong sense of ignorance and
cowardice.

Duh. It's more than obvious.



Hey Don, some pimply red headed kid called. He wants his game boy
back.....

Was he your wife?
Stupid ****ing socialist.......

When would you board someone else's boat??
 

"Dave Hall" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 01:13:23 -0400, "Don"
wrote:


"Dave Hall" wrote in message
.. .
On Tue, 27 Apr 2004 20:47:16 -0400, "Don"
wrote:

You're trying to debate with a socialist.
It's not possible to do so, they lack the intellect.
The best you can do is ridicule them.

Doug knows me well enough to know that I'm no socialist.

Yes you are.
Your collectivist nature is reflected in many of your posts.

Do you think that the U.S. is a socialist state?

Pay attention Dave.
I said YOU are a socialist.
You've proven it true.

The *pool/fence* post for example, and many others.

Care to cite some examples?

Pay attention Dave.
Your stand on pool fences indicates you to be a socialist.

Combine that with the fact that you think anarchy = chaos and it's clear
that you're braindead.


According to the American Heritage dictionary, the word "Anarchy" is
defined as:

1. Absence of governmental authority or law.

Since you now know what anarchy means there is no ise for your tripe that
foolowed, thus, I shredded it.

Now applying some simple logic; since anarchy is defined as disorder
and confusion,

Nope.
Pat attention Dave.
Anarchy = absence of gov't.
(see your definition above)


and chaos is defined as great disorder and confusion,
it is therefore a logical conclusion to conclude that Anarchy = Chaos.

Then, as a socialist, you have concluded wrong, Dave.

I fully expect that you will now resort to making feeble claims about
my sources of information, since you seem unwilling to see the world
through anything but your narrow warped viewpoint.

My only intention, Dave, is to let your socialist words speak for
themselves.
You are cowardly, of very low intellect, overweight, spend way too much time
in front of the TEEVEE and you believe you have the right to tell others
what to do, in usenet.
In reality you go to a job at barely minimim wage and are ordered around all
day long, then you go home and drink yourself to sleep in front of the
TEEVEE.
You are pathetic, stupid, cowardly and deserve to be killed right away, for
you are a vermin and a threat to all you encounter.
I wouldn't be surprised if you are a criminal. Maybe even a slovenly child
molester or worse.

Now go back to your dungeons and dragons game..... Your wisdom points
are fading.

YAWN
Go get another brew Dave, there's another sit-com coming on shortly, idiot.

When would you board someone else's boat??
 

"Dave Hall" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 17:46:30 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:



Ok, if we stick to your binary view of property, you are either on
your property or someone else's. When you leave your property, am I
to
assume that you are intending to damage someone else's property?

Don't say stupid things. We're talking about a dog, not a person.

Why not? The principle's the same.

Don't be ridiculous. I define **** on my property as damage. It's my
property, so my definition is the only one that's valid.

The law would seem to disagree with you.

Dave's been watching LA Law reruns.

When would you board someone else's boat??
 

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"Don" wrote in message
...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"Dave Hall" wrote in message

Ok, if we stick to your binary view of property, you are either on
your property or someone else's. When you leave your property, am I
to
assume that you are intending to damage someone else's property?

Don't say stupid things. We're talking about a dog, not a person.

You're kidding, right?
I'm still wondering why you are trying to argue with a child?




Sport. I can't go fishing until later. This one's like the lone bluegill
that bites your hook 673 times in the same afternoon, even though it's
hardly got any lips left.

Oh, I get it.
Like when the asshole in the bar gets into a fight and gets knocked down,
everyone gets a free kick.
Keep kickin'......

When would you board someone else's boat??
 

On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 23:12:46 -0400, "Don"
wrote:


"Dave Hall" wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 01:02:04 -0400, "Don"
wrote:


It is you that doesn't know that you are a socialist.
You don't seem to know much about anything at all, Dave.
You don't have a spine nor a brain and you speak like a child.
And you expect anyone at all to lend you any creedence?



Since we've

shred

Blah, blah, blahhhhhhh

You are a problem for society and deserve to be killed, immediately.



I'll take that as an acknowledgement.

Dave

When would you board someone else's boat??
 

On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 13:34:20 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:

"Dave Hall" wrote in message
.. .


You made a blanket statement. Do you kill silverfish if you find them in
your cellar? How about a mosquito biting your arm?



Doug, you're grasping at straws (Soon you'll have enough to build
another strawman) here. Is the amplification and the taking of
statements to the extreme and out of context your only means of
avoiding the core issue?

A life is a life, regardless of whether it's useful to you or not. If you
believe it's cruel to kill a dog, then you believe it's cruel to kill ANY
animal unless it threatens your life. You should not be killing bugs because
they annoy you or cows because you love steak.

Then the obvious corollary to that logic then is if you can justify
killing bugs, then you should be ok with killing people, since they
are, after all just "Another life".

So how many people have you killed?


Do you believe that you have the right to kill a dog that strays on
your property, despite what the law may say to the contrary?

Honestly, Dave, even if the law didn't explicitly allow it, and a specific
set of conditions*** were met, I'd do it anyway.

In other words, the law doesn't allow it. You're just a vigilante.


Want to know how I'd
justify it? I'd use YOUR rules: You kill mosquitoes without giving it a
second thought because they annoy you. I can kill a dog if it annoys me.
Unless you can tell me that you kill mosquitoes because you eat them, like
beef, you can't wiggle out of this one.

Society assigns a greater value to pets than it does to bugs. Your
feeble justification is just that. Nobody has ever been taken to court
for killing bugs, but the same in not true for those who wantonly kill
another's pet.

I don't EVER want you to accuse me of binary thinking ever again.
After this example of you hiding behind absolutes, if anyone thinks in
black and white, it's you.


Dave

When would you board someone else's boat??
 

On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 07:44:37 -0400, Harry Krause
wrote:

Dave Hall wrote:
On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 17:02:26 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:


What??? No - I'm guilty the moment the razor blades go into my pocket.


Ok then. The next question I have is, do you refrain from stealing
those $50 worth of razor blades because you know it's morally wrong,
or because you feel that you have a good chance of getting caught?

Dave

Choice A, Dave. If I shop in a store, it's because I like the place. The
owner or company has created a place that serves me well. They deserve to
prosper.


Well, that is an answer. Just not the answer to the question which I
asked. I didn't ask where you shop and why. I asked you whether you
refrain from stealing because you believe, through an inner sense of
morality, that it's the "right" thing to do, or whether you do so
because you don't want to take the chance of getting caught and being
forced to atone for your crime?



Wait! Let me head off your next question. No, I do not steal from places I
do NOT like.


Somehow I don't think you will give me a straight answer to my first
question. You are deliberately vague and non committal. Not unlike a
certain democratic presidential wannabee.

Dave


Get off your high horse, Dave. Your secret is out...DON has exposed you
as ... a socialist!


Does this mean that I can come to the next meeting with you Harry?

Dave

When would you board someone else's boat??
 

"Don" wrote in message news:Tqjkc.372
He's a lying cowardly *******, a socialist.
He thinks rules are for you and me, but not him.
He deserves to be gang raped and killed.
His *type* drag the rest of us backwards.

One wonders why Anarchist have such a bad reputation. You are now beginning
to sound more like Harry Krause.