Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Weiser, puffing up his macho chest, blusters:
================= If I get sick, either I come up with a way to pay for it, or I die. My choice. I don't blame the government, nor do I expect the government to bail me out or take care of me. Doing so is just socialistic whining. People have to take responsibility for themselves, and sometimes you die. Suck it up and accept that funding your health care (not to mention your retirement) is your responsibility, not the government's. ================ But very CLEARLY, if you'd bothered to respond to ALL the data I provided (not just the stuff convenient to you), you'd also realize that, in your attitude lies the answer to lower life expectancies and higher infant mortality rates in the USA. Very obviously, people in the USA do NOT take responsibility for their health or, more likely, many can't afford to. Thank god there's not many like you up here! frtzw906 |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
A Usenet persona calling itself BCITORGB wrote:
Weiser, puffing up his macho chest, blusters: ================= If I get sick, either I come up with a way to pay for it, or I die. My choice. I don't blame the government, nor do I expect the government to bail me out or take care of me. Doing so is just socialistic whining. People have to take responsibility for themselves, and sometimes you die. Suck it up and accept that funding your health care (not to mention your retirement) is your responsibility, not the government's. ================ But very CLEARLY, if you'd bothered to respond to ALL the data I provided (not just the stuff convenient to you), I believe I responded line by line to each cite...or was that somebody else's post. I lose track of which Netwit I'm debating with, you're all so much the same. you'd also realize that, in your attitude lies the answer to lower life expectancies and higher infant mortality rates in the USA. Very obviously, people in the USA do NOT take responsibility for their health or, more likely, many can't afford to. So what? That's their free choice, isn't it? The idea that the government has some duty or obligation to provide universal medical care is an extremely dangerous one because it's a direct path down the slippery slope of government regulation of behavior and conduct it deems "too dangerous" or "too likely to result in unnecessary medical costs." When you let government go there, the result is the ultimate Nanny State in which you are not allowed to do or own anything that might be deemed harmful to you because it might end up costing the government money. That would likely include dangerous sports like, oh, kayaking. You want proof? Try "mandatory seat belt laws" on for size. Time for the class to discuss the issue of government boating bans based on "unnecessary risks to rescuers" rationales. Anyone? Anyone? I'd rather live in a free society where I'm free to injure or kill myself in whatever way pleases me because my government doesn't think it's going to cost the taxpayers money if I do. Thank god there's not many like you up here! Be careful what you wish for. -- Regards, Scott Weiser "I love the Internet, I no longer have to depend on friends, family and co-workers, I can annoy people WORLDWIDE!" TM © 2005 Scott Weiser |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Scott thnks:
=========== I believe I responded line by line to each cite...or was that somebody else's post. ============ Nope! What about the lines pertaining to life expectancies and infant motality and measures of overall health system efficacy? frtzw906 |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
A Usenet persona calling itself BCITORGB wrote:
Scott thnks: =========== I believe I responded line by line to each cite...or was that somebody else's post. ============ Nope! What about the lines pertaining to life expectancies and infant motality and measures of overall health system efficacy? What about them? Sometimes you die. Get over it. I'd rather live with a somewhat (slightly) less efficacious system if it ensures that I get to make the decisions about my medical care. Liberty has costs, and that's one cost I'm glad to bear in order to be free of government interference in my health care choices. -- Regards, Scott Weiser "I love the Internet, I no longer have to depend on friends, family and co-workers, I can annoy people WORLDWIDE!" TM © 2005 Scott Weiser |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
OT Bush propaganda against Kerry | General | |||
Bush fiddles while health care burns | General | |||
OT- Ode to Immigration | General | |||
OT-Think government-controlled health coverage will work? Think again! | General |