A Usenet persona calling itself Michael Daly wrote:

On 20-Mar-2005, Scott Weiser wrote:

Wow! Forty-eight percent of income for health care that you can't get when
you need it. What a bargain!

Bull**** from weiser once again. He obviously can't read or think.

Take a pill, your blood pressure is spiking...


...and you can't buy supplemental insurance to protect yourself even if you
want to. Talk about your socialistic, egalitarian "share the pain"
bedfellows...Canada and North Korea don't care a fig if you, the individual,
suffers, they only care that everyone suffers together in comradely
communistic solidarity, while paying 48% of income for the privilege. Bleah.

More bull****. You can buy supplemental health insurance.

Nope, not for hospitalization or surgery.

It's sold by
many insurance companies. Maritime Life is one of the bigger players in
supplemental health insurance.

Funny, a credible AP reporter says Canadians are prohibited from buying
outside insurance for hospitalization and surgery. Canadians may be able to
buy supplemental insurance for outpatient services, but if you get *really*
sick, and need a hospital bed and surgery, you're ****ed.


Go back under your rock, weiser, we don't need any more of your
lies and BS on this newsgroup.

Er...make me.

--
Regards,
Scott Weiser

"I love the Internet, I no longer have to depend on
friends, family and co-workers, I can annoy people WORLDWIDE!" TM

© 2005 Scott Weiser

On 21-Mar-2005, Scott Weiser wrote:

Take a pill, your blood pressure is spiking...

**** off, dickhead. You are still posting nothing but lies and
bull**** and still wouldn't know a fact if it bit you in the
ass.

Nope, not for hospitalization or surgery.

Bull**** again. Not all medical care is covered by government
health care and you _can_ buy insurance for the rest. I live here
and I have such coverage. You haven't got a clue what you're
talking about, as usual.

Funny, a credible AP reporter says Canadians are prohibited from buying
outside insurance for hospitalization and surgery.

Yer credible AP reporter is wrong. Tough ****.

Mike

A Usenet persona calling itself Michael Daly wrote:

On 21-Mar-2005, Scott Weiser wrote:

Take a pill, your blood pressure is spiking...

**** off, dickhead. You are still posting nothing but lies and
bull**** and still wouldn't know a fact if it bit you in the
ass.

How erudite. How scholarly. How persuasive. Not.


Nope, not for hospitalization or surgery.

Bull**** again. Not all medical care is covered by government
health care and you _can_ buy insurance for the rest. I live here
and I have such coverage. You haven't got a clue what you're
talking about, as usual.

Funny, a credible AP reporter says Canadians are prohibited from buying
outside insurance for hospitalization and surgery.

Yer credible AP reporter is wrong. Tough ****.

And we should take YOUR word for it because....???

--
Regards,
Scott Weiser

"I love the Internet, I no longer have to depend on
friends, family and co-workers, I can annoy people WORLDWIDE!" TM

© 2005 Scott Weiser

On 22-Mar-2005, Scott Weiser wrote:

And we should take YOUR word for it because....???

Because I actually have the insurance you claim is illegal
and impossible to get.

You claim to be a journalist and editor and you don't have
any concern for the truth. Perhaps the AP writer went
to the same school of dickhead journalism that you did.

Mike

A Usenet persona calling itself Michael Daly wrote:


On 22-Mar-2005, Scott Weiser wrote:

And we should take YOUR word for it because....???

Because I actually have the insurance you claim is illegal
and impossible to get.

Does it insure you for hospitalization and surgery? If so, it would appear
to be illegal under Canadian law.


You claim to be a journalist and editor and you don't have
any concern for the truth.

This is the Usenet, where truth is a particularly rare commodity. It's not
"journalism." This is a debate where I'm free to assert anything I like.
It's up to you to prove me wrong if you can.

Perhaps the AP writer went
to the same school of dickhead journalism that you did.

Or perhaps you're lying, or are merely too stupid to know what your policy
actually covers.

--
Regards,
Scott Weiser

"I love the Internet, I no longer have to depend on
friends, family and co-workers, I can annoy people WORLDWIDE!" TM

© 2005 Scott Weiser

On 24-Mar-2005, Scott Weiser wrote:

Does it insure you for hospitalization and surgery? If so, it would appear
to be illegal under Canadian law.

Really? How about identifying the specific bill and section of the bill
that states what the law is so that we can verify?

This is the Usenet, where truth is a particularly rare commodity.

Well, from you sertainly.

It's up to you to prove me wrong if you can.

I've proved you wrong many, many times. However, it remains up
to you to prove your assertions - you make a claim, you back it up.

Or perhaps you're lying, or are merely too stupid to know what your policy
actually covers.

I know - you don't. You've never let your ignorance prevent you from
posting bull****. I know what the policy covers, since I've had
to make claims against it in the past. You're talking bull****, as usual.

Mike

A Usenet persona calling itself Michael Daly wrote:

On 24-Mar-2005, Scott Weiser wrote:

Does it insure you for hospitalization and surgery? If so, it would appear
to be illegal under Canadian law.

Really? How about identifying the specific bill and section of the bill
that states what the law is so that we can verify?

I'll stick with the published report, I find it credible. If you disagree,
feel free to refute it.


This is the Usenet, where truth is a particularly rare commodity.

Well, from you sertainly.

It's up to you to prove me wrong if you can.

I've proved you wrong many, many times.

Well, you'd like to think so, certainly...the truth, however, may be
somewhat less accommodating to you.

However, it remains up
to you to prove your assertions - you make a claim, you back it up.

Nah. It's up to you to refute them. I've got the AP on my side, which will
do just fine till you come up with some credible refutation.


Or perhaps you're lying, or are merely too stupid to know what your policy
actually covers.

I know - you don't.

Do you? I'm not so sure. Moreover, it's entirely likely you're lying.

You've never let your ignorance prevent you from
posting bull****. I know what the policy covers, since I've had
to make claims against it in the past. You're talking bull****, as usual.

So, does it cover hospitalization and/or surgery in a Canadian hospital?

--
Regards,
Scott Weiser

"I love the Internet, I no longer have to depend on
friends, family and co-workers, I can annoy people WORLDWIDE!" TM

© 2005 Scott Weiser

"Michael Daly" wrote in message
...
On 24-Mar-2005, Scott Weiser wrote:

Does it insure you for hospitalization and surgery? If so, it would
appear
to be illegal under Canadian law.

Really? How about identifying the specific bill and section of the bill
that states what the law is so that we can verify?

This is the Usenet, where truth is a particularly rare commodity.

Well, from you sertainly.

It's up to you to prove me wrong if you can.

I've proved you wrong many, many times. However, it remains up
to you to prove your assertions - you make a claim, you back it up.

Or perhaps you're lying, or are merely too stupid to know what your
policy
actually covers.

I know - you don't. You've never let your ignorance prevent you from
posting bull****. I know what the policy covers, since I've had
to make claims against it in the past. You're talking bull****, as usual.

Mike

Another lie by Scottie-poo debunked:
http://www.insurance-canada.ca/consp...pplemental.php

Mark

In article , Michael Daly
wrote:

On 21-Mar-2005, Scott Weiser wrote:

Take a pill, your blood pressure is spiking...

**** off, dickhead.


A killfile would work better

A Usenet persona calling itself Warren wrote:

In article , Michael Daly
wrote:

On 21-Mar-2005, Scott Weiser wrote:

Take a pill, your blood pressure is spiking...

**** off, dickhead.


A killfile would work better

Indeed. He's of the pinheaded stripe that ought to use a killfile.

killfiles are the final refuge of fractional intellects. It's the Usenet
equivalent of sticking your fingers in your ears and yelling "NYAH, NYAH,
NYAH, I CAN'T HEAR YOU!"

It's the tactics of a four year old, which fits Michael pretty well.

--
Regards,
Scott Weiser

"I love the Internet, I no longer have to depend on
friends, family and co-workers, I can annoy people WORLDWIDE!" TM

© 2005 Scott Weiser