K Smith wrote:

Rick wrote:
K Smith wrote:

Absolutely nothing worth the oxygen breathed during its typing.

I don't think I have ever seen so many lines of gibberish written about
so little.

Good grief, woman, do you not have anything better to do with your
wretched existence than post your interminable diatribes on issues
which, judging their "content" you have less comprehension than
experience or insight ...

Don't be an ass all your life, take a day off.

Rick


And this is from grease monkey Rick

Yawn. Karen Smith, the permanently ****ed off Australian troll doll.

Crawl back under your bridge.



--
__________________________________________________ __________
Email sent to will never reach me.

K Smith wrote:

Harry Krause wrote:

Oh you mean the ONLY 80HP diesel OB you've ever seen??


Well, I haven't actually seen it, Karen. All you've posted are some
****-poor photos that show a rusting hunkajunk that looks like an old
Chrysler outboard on steroids. I have seen a Yanmar diesel outboard,
though, of something like 35 or 40 hp, and it didn't look anything like
that piece of crap hanging on the back of your piece of crap boat.

No they wouldn't because they didn't design anew


You didn't design anew, either. You took someone else's diesel and
bolted it onto the ugliest lower unit I have ever seen. The Yanmar is a
manufactured product; yours is a hunka junk.

Gee you're hard on the new people Harry, so what Mercruisers are easy
because they use a GM core?? Honda OBs when they first started used the
civic engine & whey bought the lower leg/gearbox from Merc, so all they
made was the centre section (still no mean feat I can assure you:-))

But here I am with our own complete housings, transmission(s), sealed
heat exchanger cooling system AND it offers a way forward if you want to
build bigger OBs diesel or petrol that are instantly EPA compliant & you
say it's easy??? Damn I guess that's why everybody else is doing it??

Wow. You built a housing. That rusts. Yawn. Amd what's the implication
of "we?" You didn't have anything material to do with it.



See this is the socialist way you've never done a solitary thing with
your sad failed life so now you make up stories of how you wish your
life might have been, i.e.

Yeah, gee, I wish had watched a bunch of guys shove an 80 hp Japanese
diesel onto a homemade lower unit.




--
__________________________________________________ __________
Email sent to will never reach me.

Rick wrote:
K Smith wrote:

Absolutely nothing worth the oxygen breathed during its typing.

I don't think I have ever seen so many lines of gibberish written about
so little.

Good grief, woman, do you not have anything better to do with your
wretched existence than post your interminable diatribes on issues
which, judging their "content" you have less comprehension than
experience or insight ...

Don't be an ass all your life, take a day off.

Rick


And this is from grease monkey Rick who came here & lied about his
credentials, till of course he foolishly tried to post technical details
about diesel engines, whereupon it became obvious he has not the
faintest clue how or even why they operate.

Remember this liar claimed not just to be a diesel mechanic but a full
on diesel engineer!!! Lying simpletons.

It's no good just getting embarrassed & ignoring their lies becasue
they just keep making the claims more outrageous, you need to show them
for what they are; failed, inadequate, low IQ liars.


K

K Smith wrote:
Harry Krause wrote:

K Smith wrote:


Harry Krause wrote:


Oh you mean the ONLY 80HP diesel OB you've ever seen??


Well, I haven't actually seen it, Karen. All you've posted are some
****-poor photos that show a rusting hunkajunk that looks like an old
Chrysler outboard on steroids. I have seen a Yanmar diesel outboard,
though, of something like 35 or 40 hp, and it didn't look anything like
that piece of crap hanging on the back of your piece of crap boat.

No they wouldn't because they didn't design anew


You didn't design anew, either. You took someone else's diesel and
bolted it onto the ugliest lower unit I have ever seen. The Yanmar is a
manufactured product; yours is a hunka junk.


Gee you're hard on the new people Harry, so what Mercruisers are easy
because they use a GM core?? Honda OBs when they first started used the
civic engine & whey bought the lower leg/gearbox from Merc, so all they
made was the centre section (still no mean feat I can assure you:-))

But here I am with our own complete housings, transmission(s), sealed
heat exchanger cooling system AND it offers a way forward if you want to
build bigger OBs diesel or petrol that are instantly EPA compliant & you
say it's easy??? Damn I guess that's why everybody else is doing it??


Wow. You built a housing. That rusts. Yawn. Amd what's the implication
of "we?" You didn't have anything material to do with it.




See this is the socialist way you've never done a solitary thing with
your sad failed life so now you make up stories of how you wish your
life might have been, i.e.


Yeah, gee, I wish had watched a bunch of guys shove an 80 hp Japanese
diesel onto a homemade lower unit.





So you lying sack of waste did you check the uspto, the aus pat office
the aus corps register???

You see how it works now?? Liars like you can never produce any
independently verifiable evidence not ever. Whereas an actual person who
rarely makes "claims" can.

K

You haven't produced anything, Karen, except a mound of effluent that
rivals Everest.

--
__________________________________________________ __________
Email sent to will never reach me.

Harry Krause wrote:

K Smith wrote:


Harry Krause wrote:


Oh you mean the ONLY 80HP diesel OB you've ever seen??


Well, I haven't actually seen it, Karen. All you've posted are some
****-poor photos that show a rusting hunkajunk that looks like an old
Chrysler outboard on steroids. I have seen a Yanmar diesel outboard,
though, of something like 35 or 40 hp, and it didn't look anything like
that piece of crap hanging on the back of your piece of crap boat.

No they wouldn't because they didn't design anew


You didn't design anew, either. You took someone else's diesel and
bolted it onto the ugliest lower unit I have ever seen. The Yanmar is a
manufactured product; yours is a hunka junk.


Gee you're hard on the new people Harry, so what Mercruisers are easy
because they use a GM core?? Honda OBs when they first started used the
civic engine & whey bought the lower leg/gearbox from Merc, so all they
made was the centre section (still no mean feat I can assure you:-))

But here I am with our own complete housings, transmission(s), sealed
heat exchanger cooling system AND it offers a way forward if you want to
build bigger OBs diesel or petrol that are instantly EPA compliant & you
say it's easy??? Damn I guess that's why everybody else is doing it??


Wow. You built a housing. That rusts. Yawn. Amd what's the implication
of "we?" You didn't have anything material to do with it.




See this is the socialist way you've never done a solitary thing with
your sad failed life so now you make up stories of how you wish your
life might have been, i.e.


Yeah, gee, I wish had watched a bunch of guys shove an 80 hp Japanese
diesel onto a homemade lower unit.





So you lying sack of waste did you check the uspto, the aus pat office
the aus corps register???

You see how it works now?? Liars like you can never produce any
independently verifiable evidence not ever. Whereas an actual person who
rarely makes "claims" can.

K

Are you two having an affair?

-W

"K Smith" wrote in message
...
Harry Krause wrote:

K Smith wrote:

Harry Krause wrote:

K Smith wrote:

Harry Krause wrote:

Harry Krause wrote:

K Smith wrote:

Harry Krause wrote:

K Smith wrote:



Harry Krause wrote:


Oh you mean the ONLY 80HP diesel OB you've ever seen??


Well, I haven't actually seen it, Karen. All you've posted are some
****-poor photos that show a rusting hunkajunk that looks like an old
Chrysler outboard on steroids. I have seen a Yanmar diesel outboard,
though, of something like 35 or 40 hp, and it didn't look anything like
that piece of crap hanging on the back of your piece of crap boat.

No they wouldn't because they didn't design anew


You didn't design anew, either. You took someone else's diesel and
bolted it onto the ugliest lower unit I have ever seen. The Yanmar is a
manufactured product; yours is a hunka junk.


Gee you're hard on the new people Harry, so what Mercruisers are easy
because they use a GM core?? Honda OBs when they first started used the
civic engine & whey bought the lower leg/gearbox from Merc, so all they
made was the centre section (still no mean feat I can assure you:-))

But here I am with our own complete housings, transmission(s), sealed
heat exchanger cooling system AND it offers a way forward if you want to
build bigger OBs diesel or petrol that are instantly EPA compliant & you
say it's easy??? Damn I guess that's why everybody else is doing it??


Wow. You built a housing. That rusts. Yawn. Amd what's the implication
of "we?" You didn't have anything material to do with it.





See this is the socialist way you've never done a solitary thing with
your sad failed life so now you make up stories of how you wish your
life might have been, i.e.


Yeah, gee, I wish had watched a bunch of guys shove an 80 hp Japanese
diesel onto a homemade lower unit.





So you lying sack of waste did you check the uspto, the aus pat office
the aus corps register???

You see how it works now?? Liars like you can never produce any
independently verifiable evidence not ever. Whereas an actual person who
rarely makes "claims" can.

K


You haven't produced anything, Karen, except a mound of effluent that
rivals Everest.


No hang on lets be crystal clear about this dopey, you claimed there
was no evidence I had anything to do with the diesel OB which even in
those pics clearly carries my registered trade mark.

(i) I give you the US trade mark registration ## which was all through &
granted many years ago & of course is still live.

(ii) Now you know the details you can easily find that I have the mark
registered twice in Aus once for the motors etc & then our boats.

(iii) From there I even gave you my corp name so a simple search of the
Aus corps register will find me again as the owner & MD of my co. which
of course again carries my registered trade mark

(iv) If you liked to try even harder you can use the rego # off my boat
in the pic to find that boat is indeed mine & has been registered as
such for a very very long time (I like the #)

So unless you think I can spoof the uspto, the Aus pat office, the Aus
corps reg. the transport dept & others those things are now beyond
question, because that engine was designed & manufactured in my business
by my blokes & if that were not the case I'd be knocking off whoever
tried to infringe my mark. Clearly only the holder of the trademark can
register their corp accordingly. Now it's your turn to put up Harry,
anything that is independently verifiable is fine. Go on you sad sick,
dangerous ******* have a go but this time don't manufacture BS & more
lies because it'll need to be "independently" verifiable as mine is.

By the way you lies up above about you using Yoho nobody believes you &
hopefully the real owner will discover what you've been doing & chuck
you just as the real owner of the lobster boat did.


K

Clams Canino wrote:
Are you two having an affair?

-W

"K Smith" wrote in message
...

Harry Krause wrote:

K Smith wrote:


Harry Krause wrote:


K Smith wrote:

Harry Krause wrote:





No yuck Clams!!! what a nasty thing to suggest!!! & I make no claims
about me, certainly the young intelligent bride BS story is totally not
possible, this person is revolting in every sense of the word.

He's tried several tactics lately to try & claim he's not just a
BS'ting liar, first he claimed my abridged summary of his lies wasn't
right so these days I paste his actual lies, that shut him up on that issue.

The last few days he thought he's try saying I might not be who I am &
of course I provided independently verifiable material that anyone
anywhere can go to, now it's down to him to supply his, he won't of
course because there is none; he's just a liar.

K

K Smith wrote:

No hang on lets be crystal clear about this dopey, you claimed there
was no evidence I had anything to do with the diesel OB which even in
those pics clearly carries my registered trade mark.

I looked up the word "Rustbucket" but didn't see your name listed.



(i) I give you the US trade mark registration ## which was all through &
granted many years ago & of course is still live.

Nope. Never got any such number from you.


(ii) Now you know the details you can easily find that I have the mark
registered twice in Aus once for the motors etc & then our boats.

Your boats? Oh, now you claim to be a boat manufacturer, too?
What a giggle.

(iii) From there I even gave you my corp name so a simple search of the
Aus corps register will find me again as the owner & MD of my co. which
of course again carries my registered trade mark

Nope, you never gave me any such name. Sorry.


(iv) If you liked to try even harder you can use the rego # off my boat
in the pic to find that boat is indeed mine & has been registered as
such for a very very long time (I like the #)

You're not worth the trying.



So unless you think I can spoof the uspto, the Aus pat office, the Aus
corps reg. the transport dept & others those things are now beyond
question, because that engine was designed & manufactured in my business
by my blokes

No it wasn't. You used an engine manufactured in Japan or some other
Pacific nation. That is, if you used any engine at all. Frankly, I don't
believe a word of your tale you were involved in any significant way in
the evolution of that crappy looking, noisy, smelly, diesel outboard.



--
__________________________________________________ __________
Email sent to will never reach me.

K Smith wrote:

He's tried several tactics lately to try & claim he's not just a
BS'ting liar, first he claimed my abridged summary of his lies wasn't
right so these days I paste his actual lies, that shut him up on that issue.

The last few days he thought he's try saying I might not be who I am &
of course I provided independently verifiable material that anyone
anywhere can go to, now it's down to him to supply his, he won't of
course because there is none; he's just a liar.

K


You've provided no name, no address, no c.v., no nothing.



--
__________________________________________________ __________
Email sent to will never reach me.