Harry Krause wrote:

K Smith wrote:

Harry Krause wrote:

K Smith wrote:



Harry Krause wrote:


Oh you mean the ONLY 80HP diesel OB you've ever seen??


Well, I haven't actually seen it, Karen. All you've posted are some
****-poor photos that show a rusting hunkajunk that looks like an old
Chrysler outboard on steroids. I have seen a Yanmar diesel outboard,
though, of something like 35 or 40 hp, and it didn't look anything like
that piece of crap hanging on the back of your piece of crap boat.

No they wouldn't because they didn't design anew


You didn't design anew, either. You took someone else's diesel and
bolted it onto the ugliest lower unit I have ever seen. The Yanmar is a
manufactured product; yours is a hunka junk.


Gee you're hard on the new people Harry, so what Mercruisers are easy
because they use a GM core?? Honda OBs when they first started used the
civic engine & whey bought the lower leg/gearbox from Merc, so all they
made was the centre section (still no mean feat I can assure you:-))

But here I am with our own complete housings, transmission(s), sealed
heat exchanger cooling system AND it offers a way forward if you want to
build bigger OBs diesel or petrol that are instantly EPA compliant & you
say it's easy??? Damn I guess that's why everybody else is doing it??


Wow. You built a housing. That rusts. Yawn. Amd what's the implication
of "we?" You didn't have anything material to do with it.





See this is the socialist way you've never done a solitary thing with
your sad failed life so now you make up stories of how you wish your
life might have been, i.e.


Yeah, gee, I wish had watched a bunch of guys shove an 80 hp Japanese
diesel onto a homemade lower unit.





So you lying sack of waste did you check the uspto, the aus pat office
the aus corps register???

You see how it works now?? Liars like you can never produce any
independently verifiable evidence not ever. Whereas an actual person who
rarely makes "claims" can.

K


You haven't produced anything, Karen, except a mound of effluent that
rivals Everest.


No hang on lets be crystal clear about this dopey, you claimed there
was no evidence I had anything to do with the diesel OB which even in
those pics clearly carries my registered trade mark.

(i) I give you the US trade mark registration ## which was all through &
granted many years ago & of course is still live.

(ii) Now you know the details you can easily find that I have the mark
registered twice in Aus once for the motors etc & then our boats.

(iii) From there I even gave you my corp name so a simple search of the
Aus corps register will find me again as the owner & MD of my co. which
of course again carries my registered trade mark

(iv) If you liked to try even harder you can use the rego # off my boat
in the pic to find that boat is indeed mine & has been registered as
such for a very very long time (I like the #)

So unless you think I can spoof the uspto, the Aus pat office, the Aus
corps reg. the transport dept & others those things are now beyond
question, because that engine was designed & manufactured in my business
by my blokes & if that were not the case I'd be knocking off whoever
tried to infringe my mark. Clearly only the holder of the trademark can
register their corp accordingly. Now it's your turn to put up Harry,
anything that is independently verifiable is fine. Go on you sad sick,
dangerous ******* have a go but this time don't manufacture BS & more
lies because it'll need to be "independently" verifiable as mine is.

By the way you lies up above about you using Yoho nobody believes you &
hopefully the real owner will discover what you've been doing & chuck
you just as the real owner of the lobster boat did.


K