Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#141
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Is Paris/Isis Over?
On Fri, 27 Nov 2015 19:11:21 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote:
On 11/27/2015 6:55 PM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 11/27/15 5:38 PM, John H. wrote: On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 22:44:25 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote: On 11/26/2015 9:40 PM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 11/26/15 9:03 PM, John H. wrote: On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 10:12:37 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote: On 11/26/2015 10:00 AM, John H. wrote: On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 11:33:11 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote: On 11/25/2015 10:25 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 11/25/15 10:15 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 11/25/2015 10:13 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 11/25/15 10:10 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 11/25/2015 10:03 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 11/25/15 7:41 AM, John H. wrote: On Tue, 24 Nov 2015 18:08:32 -0600, Boating All Out wrote: Will coverage of cop the killing a teen in Chicago be another 24/7 story? Can they manage two 24/7 stories? We'll see. The video definitely makes the cop appear in the wrong. But, a first degree murder charge has been filed. What more do the marchers want. Is this an excuse to begin looting and burning in Chicago? -- You probably didn't understand the civil rights demonstrations and marches of the 1960s, either. Point to ponder: In the 400 days since this cop committed this obvious murder, 396 blacks were shot and killed by another black in the Chicago area. Do they not understand the civil rights demonstrations and marches of the 1960s or that Black Lives Matter either? You don't "get it," either, eh? Yes Harry, I "get it". Probably better than you do. I don't think so. The 1960's demonstrations/marches were mostly against institutional racism and violence. The Chicago demonstration, such as it was, was also against institutional racism and violence. Police murder of blacks seems to be endemic these days. Institutional violence. We have, what, 30,000+ "deaths by gun" and mostly involving non-police individuals in this country each year. Peculiarly 'Merican, eh? How many by suicide? How many black on black? How many while a crime was being committed? How many with drug involvement? How many accidental? How many by illegal immigrants? If you have a point to make, make it. Otherwise admit that you are just parroting a statistic without having a clue as to what it implies. Am I right, O' clueless one? That one's probably way too hard for Krause to answer. -- Ban idiots, not guns! He's afraid of what I might say in response to his answer. The questions asked are easily answered with a little digging. When he's obviously put in a corner, he keeps his mouth shut. Most of the time he doesn't realize he was in a corner, opens his mouth, and looks even more stupid. -- Ban idiots, not guns! Apparently you right wing trashmeisters can't read. I've often stated I don't read FlaJim's posts firsthand and I usually ignore them when they get reposted, and I usually don't respond when another right wing trashmeister like you tries, and tries, and tries, et cetera. I really find that hard to believe, Harry. Only 'cause it's unbelievable. -- Ban idiots, not guns! 99.9% of FlaJim's comments here are totally devoid of content, which is one reason of many not to bother with them. Just the other day you said you only saw a miniscule number of his posts and only when they are quoted by others. Now you say that 99.9% of his posts are totally devoid of content. How do you know that if you only see a small fraction of them? Great minds, etc. Should have read the posts out of sequence, but this way Krause can answer twice. It'll be interesting to see if the answers are the same. -- Ban idiots, not guns! |
#142
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Is Paris/Isis Over?
On Fri, 27 Nov 2015 19:17:45 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 11/27/15 7:11 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 11/27/2015 6:55 PM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 11/27/15 5:38 PM, John H. wrote: On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 22:44:25 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote: On 11/26/2015 9:40 PM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 11/26/15 9:03 PM, John H. wrote: On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 10:12:37 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote: On 11/26/2015 10:00 AM, John H. wrote: On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 11:33:11 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote: On 11/25/2015 10:25 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 11/25/15 10:15 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 11/25/2015 10:13 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 11/25/15 10:10 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 11/25/2015 10:03 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 11/25/15 7:41 AM, John H. wrote: On Tue, 24 Nov 2015 18:08:32 -0600, Boating All Out wrote: Will coverage of cop the killing a teen in Chicago be another 24/7 story? Can they manage two 24/7 stories? We'll see. The video definitely makes the cop appear in the wrong. But, a first degree murder charge has been filed. What more do the marchers want. Is this an excuse to begin looting and burning in Chicago? -- You probably didn't understand the civil rights demonstrations and marches of the 1960s, either. Point to ponder: In the 400 days since this cop committed this obvious murder, 396 blacks were shot and killed by another black in the Chicago area. Do they not understand the civil rights demonstrations and marches of the 1960s or that Black Lives Matter either? You don't "get it," either, eh? Yes Harry, I "get it". Probably better than you do. I don't think so. The 1960's demonstrations/marches were mostly against institutional racism and violence. The Chicago demonstration, such as it was, was also against institutional racism and violence. Police murder of blacks seems to be endemic these days. Institutional violence. We have, what, 30,000+ "deaths by gun" and mostly involving non-police individuals in this country each year. Peculiarly 'Merican, eh? How many by suicide? How many black on black? How many while a crime was being committed? How many with drug involvement? How many accidental? How many by illegal immigrants? If you have a point to make, make it. Otherwise admit that you are just parroting a statistic without having a clue as to what it implies. Am I right, O' clueless one? That one's probably way too hard for Krause to answer. -- Ban idiots, not guns! He's afraid of what I might say in response to his answer. The questions asked are easily answered with a little digging. When he's obviously put in a corner, he keeps his mouth shut. Most of the time he doesn't realize he was in a corner, opens his mouth, and looks even more stupid. -- Ban idiots, not guns! Apparently you right wing trashmeisters can't read. I've often stated I don't read FlaJim's posts firsthand and I usually ignore them when they get reposted, and I usually don't respond when another right wing trashmeister like you tries, and tries, and tries, et cetera. I really find that hard to believe, Harry. Only 'cause it's unbelievable. -- Ban idiots, not guns! 99.9% of FlaJim's comments here are totally devoid of content, which is one reason of many not to bother with them. Just the other day you said you only saw a miniscule number of his posts and only when they are quoted by others. Now you say that 99.9% of his posts are totally devoid of content. How do you know that if you only see a small fraction of them? I'm extrapolating from the few I see and I'm recalling some of what he posted in the past. Snerk! -- Ban idiots, not guns! |
#144
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Is Paris/Isis Over?
|
#145
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Is Paris/Isis Over?
On 11/28/2015 3:01 PM, John H. wrote:
On Fri, 27 Nov 2015 19:11:21 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 11/27/2015 6:55 PM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 11/27/15 5:38 PM, John H. wrote: On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 22:44:25 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote: On 11/26/2015 9:40 PM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 11/26/15 9:03 PM, John H. wrote: On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 10:12:37 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote: On 11/26/2015 10:00 AM, John H. wrote: On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 11:33:11 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote: On 11/25/2015 10:25 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 11/25/15 10:15 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 11/25/2015 10:13 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 11/25/15 10:10 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 11/25/2015 10:03 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 11/25/15 7:41 AM, John H. wrote: On Tue, 24 Nov 2015 18:08:32 -0600, Boating All Out wrote: Will coverage of cop the killing a teen in Chicago be another 24/7 story? Can they manage two 24/7 stories? We'll see. The video definitely makes the cop appear in the wrong. But, a first degree murder charge has been filed. What more do the marchers want. Is this an excuse to begin looting and burning in Chicago? -- You probably didn't understand the civil rights demonstrations and marches of the 1960s, either. Point to ponder: In the 400 days since this cop committed this obvious murder, 396 blacks were shot and killed by another black in the Chicago area. Do they not understand the civil rights demonstrations and marches of the 1960s or that Black Lives Matter either? You don't "get it," either, eh? Yes Harry, I "get it". Probably better than you do. I don't think so. The 1960's demonstrations/marches were mostly against institutional racism and violence. The Chicago demonstration, such as it was, was also against institutional racism and violence. Police murder of blacks seems to be endemic these days. Institutional violence. We have, what, 30,000+ "deaths by gun" and mostly involving non-police individuals in this country each year. Peculiarly 'Merican, eh? How many by suicide? How many black on black? How many while a crime was being committed? How many with drug involvement? How many accidental? How many by illegal immigrants? If you have a point to make, make it. Otherwise admit that you are just parroting a statistic without having a clue as to what it implies. Am I right, O' clueless one? That one's probably way too hard for Krause to answer. -- Ban idiots, not guns! He's afraid of what I might say in response to his answer. The questions asked are easily answered with a little digging. When he's obviously put in a corner, he keeps his mouth shut. Most of the time he doesn't realize he was in a corner, opens his mouth, and looks even more stupid. -- Ban idiots, not guns! Apparently you right wing trashmeisters can't read. I've often stated I don't read FlaJim's posts firsthand and I usually ignore them when they get reposted, and I usually don't respond when another right wing trashmeister like you tries, and tries, and tries, et cetera. I really find that hard to believe, Harry. Only 'cause it's unbelievable. -- Ban idiots, not guns! 99.9% of FlaJim's comments here are totally devoid of content, which is one reason of many not to bother with them. Just the other day you said you only saw a miniscule number of his posts and only when they are quoted by others. Now you say that 99.9% of his posts are totally devoid of content. How do you know that if you only see a small fraction of them? Great minds, etc. Should have read the posts out of sequence, but this way Krause can answer twice. It'll be interesting to see if the answers are the same. He already answered my question. Somehow reading .1% of what Jim posts allows him to deduce that the other 99.1% posts are complete devoid of content. Not many have that profound ability. |
#146
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Is Paris/Isis Over?
On Sat, 28 Nov 2015 16:02:28 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote:
On 11/28/2015 3:01 PM, John H. wrote: On Fri, 27 Nov 2015 19:11:21 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 11/27/2015 6:55 PM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 11/27/15 5:38 PM, John H. wrote: On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 22:44:25 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote: On 11/26/2015 9:40 PM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 11/26/15 9:03 PM, John H. wrote: On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 10:12:37 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote: On 11/26/2015 10:00 AM, John H. wrote: On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 11:33:11 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote: On 11/25/2015 10:25 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 11/25/15 10:15 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 11/25/2015 10:13 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 11/25/15 10:10 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 11/25/2015 10:03 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 11/25/15 7:41 AM, John H. wrote: On Tue, 24 Nov 2015 18:08:32 -0600, Boating All Out wrote: Will coverage of cop the killing a teen in Chicago be another 24/7 story? Can they manage two 24/7 stories? We'll see. The video definitely makes the cop appear in the wrong. But, a first degree murder charge has been filed. What more do the marchers want. Is this an excuse to begin looting and burning in Chicago? -- You probably didn't understand the civil rights demonstrations and marches of the 1960s, either. Point to ponder: In the 400 days since this cop committed this obvious murder, 396 blacks were shot and killed by another black in the Chicago area. Do they not understand the civil rights demonstrations and marches of the 1960s or that Black Lives Matter either? You don't "get it," either, eh? Yes Harry, I "get it". Probably better than you do. I don't think so. The 1960's demonstrations/marches were mostly against institutional racism and violence. The Chicago demonstration, such as it was, was also against institutional racism and violence. Police murder of blacks seems to be endemic these days. Institutional violence. We have, what, 30,000+ "deaths by gun" and mostly involving non-police individuals in this country each year. Peculiarly 'Merican, eh? How many by suicide? How many black on black? How many while a crime was being committed? How many with drug involvement? How many accidental? How many by illegal immigrants? If you have a point to make, make it. Otherwise admit that you are just parroting a statistic without having a clue as to what it implies. Am I right, O' clueless one? That one's probably way too hard for Krause to answer. -- Ban idiots, not guns! He's afraid of what I might say in response to his answer. The questions asked are easily answered with a little digging. When he's obviously put in a corner, he keeps his mouth shut. Most of the time he doesn't realize he was in a corner, opens his mouth, and looks even more stupid. -- Ban idiots, not guns! Apparently you right wing trashmeisters can't read. I've often stated I don't read FlaJim's posts firsthand and I usually ignore them when they get reposted, and I usually don't respond when another right wing trashmeister like you tries, and tries, and tries, et cetera. I really find that hard to believe, Harry. Only 'cause it's unbelievable. -- Ban idiots, not guns! 99.9% of FlaJim's comments here are totally devoid of content, which is one reason of many not to bother with them. Just the other day you said you only saw a miniscule number of his posts and only when they are quoted by others. Now you say that 99.9% of his posts are totally devoid of content. How do you know that if you only see a small fraction of them? Great minds, etc. Should have read the posts out of sequence, but this way Krause can answer twice. It'll be interesting to see if the answers are the same. He already answered my question. Somehow reading .1% of what Jim posts allows him to deduce that the other 99.1% posts are complete devoid of content. Not many have that profound ability. Omniscience is hard to come by. -- Ban idiots, not guns! |
#147
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Is Paris/Isis Over?
On 11/28/2015 3:01 PM, John H. wrote:
On Fri, 27 Nov 2015 19:17:45 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 11/27/15 7:11 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 11/27/2015 6:55 PM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 11/27/15 5:38 PM, John H. wrote: On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 22:44:25 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote: On 11/26/2015 9:40 PM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 11/26/15 9:03 PM, John H. wrote: On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 10:12:37 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote: On 11/26/2015 10:00 AM, John H. wrote: On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 11:33:11 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote: On 11/25/2015 10:25 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 11/25/15 10:15 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 11/25/2015 10:13 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 11/25/15 10:10 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 11/25/2015 10:03 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 11/25/15 7:41 AM, John H. wrote: On Tue, 24 Nov 2015 18:08:32 -0600, Boating All Out wrote: Will coverage of cop the killing a teen in Chicago be another 24/7 story? Can they manage two 24/7 stories? We'll see. The video definitely makes the cop appear in the wrong. But, a first degree murder charge has been filed. What more do the marchers want. Is this an excuse to begin looting and burning in Chicago? -- You probably didn't understand the civil rights demonstrations and marches of the 1960s, either. Point to ponder: In the 400 days since this cop committed this obvious murder, 396 blacks were shot and killed by another black in the Chicago area. Do they not understand the civil rights demonstrations and marches of the 1960s or that Black Lives Matter either? You don't "get it," either, eh? Yes Harry, I "get it". Probably better than you do. I don't think so. The 1960's demonstrations/marches were mostly against institutional racism and violence. The Chicago demonstration, such as it was, was also against institutional racism and violence. Police murder of blacks seems to be endemic these days. Institutional violence. We have, what, 30,000+ "deaths by gun" and mostly involving non-police individuals in this country each year. Peculiarly 'Merican, eh? How many by suicide? How many black on black? How many while a crime was being committed? How many with drug involvement? How many accidental? How many by illegal immigrants? If you have a point to make, make it. Otherwise admit that you are just parroting a statistic without having a clue as to what it implies. Am I right, O' clueless one? That one's probably way too hard for Krause to answer. -- Ban idiots, not guns! He's afraid of what I might say in response to his answer. The questions asked are easily answered with a little digging. When he's obviously put in a corner, he keeps his mouth shut. Most of the time he doesn't realize he was in a corner, opens his mouth, and looks even more stupid. -- Ban idiots, not guns! Apparently you right wing trashmeisters can't read. I've often stated I don't read FlaJim's posts firsthand and I usually ignore them when they get reposted, and I usually don't respond when another right wing trashmeister like you tries, and tries, and tries, et cetera. I really find that hard to believe, Harry. Only 'cause it's unbelievable. -- Ban idiots, not guns! 99.9% of FlaJim's comments here are totally devoid of content, which is one reason of many not to bother with them. Just the other day you said you only saw a miniscule number of his posts and only when they are quoted by others. Now you say that 99.9% of his posts are totally devoid of content. How do you know that if you only see a small fraction of them? I'm extrapolating from the few I see and I'm recalling some of what he posted in the past. Snerk! -- Ban idiots, not guns! |
#148
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Is Paris/Isis Over?
On 11/28/2015 3:01 PM, John H. wrote:
On Fri, 27 Nov 2015 19:17:45 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 11/27/15 7:11 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 11/27/2015 6:55 PM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 11/27/15 5:38 PM, John H. wrote: On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 22:44:25 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote: On 11/26/2015 9:40 PM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 11/26/15 9:03 PM, John H. wrote: On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 10:12:37 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote: On 11/26/2015 10:00 AM, John H. wrote: On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 11:33:11 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote: On 11/25/2015 10:25 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 11/25/15 10:15 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 11/25/2015 10:13 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 11/25/15 10:10 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 11/25/2015 10:03 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 11/25/15 7:41 AM, John H. wrote: On Tue, 24 Nov 2015 18:08:32 -0600, Boating All Out wrote: Will coverage of cop the killing a teen in Chicago be another 24/7 story? Can they manage two 24/7 stories? We'll see. The video definitely makes the cop appear in the wrong. But, a first degree murder charge has been filed. What more do the marchers want. Is this an excuse to begin looting and burning in Chicago? -- You probably didn't understand the civil rights demonstrations and marches of the 1960s, either. Point to ponder: In the 400 days since this cop committed this obvious murder, 396 blacks were shot and killed by another black in the Chicago area. Do they not understand the civil rights demonstrations and marches of the 1960s or that Black Lives Matter either? You don't "get it," either, eh? Yes Harry, I "get it". Probably better than you do. I don't think so. The 1960's demonstrations/marches were mostly against institutional racism and violence. The Chicago demonstration, such as it was, was also against institutional racism and violence. Police murder of blacks seems to be endemic these days. Institutional violence. We have, what, 30,000+ "deaths by gun" and mostly involving non-police individuals in this country each year. Peculiarly 'Merican, eh? How many by suicide? How many black on black? How many while a crime was being committed? How many with drug involvement? How many accidental? How many by illegal immigrants? If you have a point to make, make it. Otherwise admit that you are just parroting a statistic without having a clue as to what it implies. Am I right, O' clueless one? That one's probably way too hard for Krause to answer. -- Ban idiots, not guns! He's afraid of what I might say in response to his answer. The questions asked are easily answered with a little digging. When he's obviously put in a corner, he keeps his mouth shut. Most of the time he doesn't realize he was in a corner, opens his mouth, and looks even more stupid. -- Ban idiots, not guns! Apparently you right wing trashmeisters can't read. I've often stated I don't read FlaJim's posts firsthand and I usually ignore them when they get reposted, and I usually don't respond when another right wing trashmeister like you tries, and tries, and tries, et cetera. I really find that hard to believe, Harry. Only 'cause it's unbelievable. -- Ban idiots, not guns! 99.9% of FlaJim's comments here are totally devoid of content, which is one reason of many not to bother with them. Just the other day you said you only saw a miniscule number of his posts and only when they are quoted by others. Now you say that 99.9% of his posts are totally devoid of content. How do you know that if you only see a small fraction of them? I'm extrapolating from the few I see and I'm recalling some of what he posted in the past. Snerk! -- Ban idiots, not guns! Trouble with his lies is he has to tell more lies to fill the gaps in his stories. They say when you have yourself in a hole over your head, you should stop digging. |
#149
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Is Paris/Isis Over?
On 11/28/15 4:13 PM, John H. wrote:
On Sat, 28 Nov 2015 16:02:28 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 11/28/2015 3:01 PM, John H. wrote: On Fri, 27 Nov 2015 19:11:21 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 11/27/2015 6:55 PM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 11/27/15 5:38 PM, John H. wrote: On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 22:44:25 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote: On 11/26/2015 9:40 PM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 11/26/15 9:03 PM, John H. wrote: On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 10:12:37 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote: On 11/26/2015 10:00 AM, John H. wrote: On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 11:33:11 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote: On 11/25/2015 10:25 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 11/25/15 10:15 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 11/25/2015 10:13 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 11/25/15 10:10 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 11/25/2015 10:03 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 11/25/15 7:41 AM, John H. wrote: On Tue, 24 Nov 2015 18:08:32 -0600, Boating All Out wrote: Will coverage of cop the killing a teen in Chicago be another 24/7 story? Can they manage two 24/7 stories? We'll see. The video definitely makes the cop appear in the wrong. But, a first degree murder charge has been filed. What more do the marchers want. Is this an excuse to begin looting and burning in Chicago? -- You probably didn't understand the civil rights demonstrations and marches of the 1960s, either. Point to ponder: In the 400 days since this cop committed this obvious murder, 396 blacks were shot and killed by another black in the Chicago area. Do they not understand the civil rights demonstrations and marches of the 1960s or that Black Lives Matter either? You don't "get it," either, eh? Yes Harry, I "get it". Probably better than you do. I don't think so. The 1960's demonstrations/marches were mostly against institutional racism and violence. The Chicago demonstration, such as it was, was also against institutional racism and violence. Police murder of blacks seems to be endemic these days. Institutional violence. We have, what, 30,000+ "deaths by gun" and mostly involving non-police individuals in this country each year. Peculiarly 'Merican, eh? How many by suicide? How many black on black? How many while a crime was being committed? How many with drug involvement? How many accidental? How many by illegal immigrants? If you have a point to make, make it. Otherwise admit that you are just parroting a statistic without having a clue as to what it implies. Am I right, O' clueless one? That one's probably way too hard for Krause to answer. -- Ban idiots, not guns! He's afraid of what I might say in response to his answer. The questions asked are easily answered with a little digging. When he's obviously put in a corner, he keeps his mouth shut. Most of the time he doesn't realize he was in a corner, opens his mouth, and looks even more stupid. -- Ban idiots, not guns! Apparently you right wing trashmeisters can't read. I've often stated I don't read FlaJim's posts firsthand and I usually ignore them when they get reposted, and I usually don't respond when another right wing trashmeister like you tries, and tries, and tries, et cetera. I really find that hard to believe, Harry. Only 'cause it's unbelievable. -- Ban idiots, not guns! 99.9% of FlaJim's comments here are totally devoid of content, which is one reason of many not to bother with them. Just the other day you said you only saw a miniscule number of his posts and only when they are quoted by others. Now you say that 99.9% of his posts are totally devoid of content. How do you know that if you only see a small fraction of them? Great minds, etc. Should have read the posts out of sequence, but this way Krause can answer twice. It'll be interesting to see if the answers are the same. He already answered my question. Somehow reading .1% of what Jim posts allows him to deduce that the other 99.1% posts are complete devoid of content. Not many have that profound ability. Omniscience is hard to come by. -- Ban idiots, not guns! I've seen enough of Flatulent Jim's posts over the years to know that he's a low information voter on current events, that he has nothing of significance to post on topic, that he's a coward who insults while trying to hide behind anonymity, that he's somewhat of a racist, and that he's repetitive. In other words, there nothing there of interest. In other words, he's a lot like you, but even dumber. Why would I want to read posts from a Herring semi-clone, eh? |
#150
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Is Paris/Isis Over?
On 11/28/2015 6:01 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 11/28/15 4:13 PM, John H. wrote: On Sat, 28 Nov 2015 16:02:28 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 11/28/2015 3:01 PM, John H. wrote: On Fri, 27 Nov 2015 19:11:21 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 11/27/2015 6:55 PM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 11/27/15 5:38 PM, John H. wrote: On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 22:44:25 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote: On 11/26/2015 9:40 PM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 11/26/15 9:03 PM, John H. wrote: On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 10:12:37 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote: On 11/26/2015 10:00 AM, John H. wrote: On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 11:33:11 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote: On 11/25/2015 10:25 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 11/25/15 10:15 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 11/25/2015 10:13 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 11/25/15 10:10 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 11/25/2015 10:03 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 11/25/15 7:41 AM, John H. wrote: On Tue, 24 Nov 2015 18:08:32 -0600, Boating All Out wrote: Will coverage of cop the killing a teen in Chicago be another 24/7 story? Can they manage two 24/7 stories? We'll see. The video definitely makes the cop appear in the wrong. But, a first degree murder charge has been filed. What more do the marchers want. Is this an excuse to begin looting and burning in Chicago? -- You probably didn't understand the civil rights demonstrations and marches of the 1960s, either. Point to ponder: In the 400 days since this cop committed this obvious murder, 396 blacks were shot and killed by another black in the Chicago area. Do they not understand the civil rights demonstrations and marches of the 1960s or that Black Lives Matter either? You don't "get it," either, eh? Yes Harry, I "get it". Probably better than you do. I don't think so. The 1960's demonstrations/marches were mostly against institutional racism and violence. The Chicago demonstration, such as it was, was also against institutional racism and violence. Police murder of blacks seems to be endemic these days. Institutional violence. We have, what, 30,000+ "deaths by gun" and mostly involving non-police individuals in this country each year. Peculiarly 'Merican, eh? How many by suicide? How many black on black? How many while a crime was being committed? How many with drug involvement? How many accidental? How many by illegal immigrants? If you have a point to make, make it. Otherwise admit that you are just parroting a statistic without having a clue as to what it implies. Am I right, O' clueless one? That one's probably way too hard for Krause to answer. -- Ban idiots, not guns! He's afraid of what I might say in response to his answer. The questions asked are easily answered with a little digging. When he's obviously put in a corner, he keeps his mouth shut. Most of the time he doesn't realize he was in a corner, opens his mouth, and looks even more stupid. -- Ban idiots, not guns! Apparently you right wing trashmeisters can't read. I've often stated I don't read FlaJim's posts firsthand and I usually ignore them when they get reposted, and I usually don't respond when another right wing trashmeister like you tries, and tries, and tries, et cetera. I really find that hard to believe, Harry. Only 'cause it's unbelievable. -- Ban idiots, not guns! 99.9% of FlaJim's comments here are totally devoid of content, which is one reason of many not to bother with them. Just the other day you said you only saw a miniscule number of his posts and only when they are quoted by others. Now you say that 99.9% of his posts are totally devoid of content. How do you know that if you only see a small fraction of them? Great minds, etc. Should have read the posts out of sequence, but this way Krause can answer twice. It'll be interesting to see if the answers are the same. He already answered my question. Somehow reading .1% of what Jim posts allows him to deduce that the other 99.1% posts are complete devoid of content. Not many have that profound ability. Omniscience is hard to come by. -- Ban idiots, not guns! I've seen enough of Flatulent Jim's posts over the years to know that he's a low information voter on current events, that he has nothing of significance to post on topic, that he's a coward who insults while trying to hide behind anonymity, that he's somewhat of a racist, and that he's repetitive. In other words, there nothing there of interest. In other words, he's a lot like you, but even dumber. Why would I want to read posts from a Herring semi-clone, eh? I can remember the days when rec.boats was about boats and Jim often contributed with sage advice regarding out-drives and winterization issues of inboards. You often defended his contributions when Skipper would go on one of his rants on the subjects. Times sure have changed. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Next set - safaga 30-1-08 bunker barge isis aproaching jamma 2.jpg (1/1) | Tall Ship Photos | |||
Next set - safaga 30-1-08 bunker barge isis 02_cml size.jpg (1/1) | Tall Ship Photos | |||
Next set - safaga 30-1-08 bunker barge isis 02.jpg (1/1) | Tall Ship Photos | |||
Next set - safaga 30-1-08 bunker barge isis 01.jpg (1/1) | Tall Ship Photos |