On 11/28/2015 3:01 PM, John H. wrote:
On Fri, 27 Nov 2015 19:11:21 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote:

On 11/27/2015 6:55 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 11/27/15 5:38 PM, John H. wrote:
On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 22:44:25 -0500, Justan Olphart
wrote:

On 11/26/2015 9:40 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 11/26/15 9:03 PM, John H. wrote:
On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 10:12:37 -0500, Justan Olphart
wrote:

On 11/26/2015 10:00 AM, John H. wrote:
On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 11:33:11 -0500, Justan Olphart
wrote:

On 11/25/2015 10:25 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 11/25/15 10:15 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 11/25/2015 10:13 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 11/25/15 10:10 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 11/25/2015 10:03 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 11/25/15 7:41 AM, John H. wrote:
On Tue, 24 Nov 2015 18:08:32 -0600, Boating All Out
wrote:

Will coverage of cop the killing a teen in Chicago be
another 24/7 story?
Can they manage two 24/7 stories?
We'll see.

The video definitely makes the cop appear in the wrong. But,
a first
degree murder
charge has been filed. What more do the marchers want. Is
this an
excuse to begin
looting and burning in Chicago?
--

You probably didn't understand the civil rights demonstrations
and
marches of the 1960s, either.



Point to ponder:

In the 400 days since this cop committed this obvious
murder, 396
blacks
were shot and killed by another black in the Chicago area.

Do they not understand the civil rights demonstrations and
marches of
the 1960s or that Black Lives Matter either?


You don't "get it," either, eh?


Yes Harry, I "get it". Probably better than you do.



I don't think so. The 1960's demonstrations/marches were mostly
against
institutional racism and violence. The Chicago demonstration, such
as it
was, was also against institutional racism and violence. Police
murder
of blacks seems to be endemic these days. Institutional violence.

We have, what, 30,000+ "deaths by gun" and mostly involving
non-police
individuals in this country each year. Peculiarly 'Merican, eh?


How many by suicide?
How many black on black?
How many while a crime was being committed?
How many with drug involvement?
How many accidental?
How many by illegal immigrants?

If you have a point to make, make it.
Otherwise admit that you are just parroting a statistic without
having a
clue as to what it implies.
Am I right, O' clueless one?

That one's probably way too hard for Krause to answer.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!


He's afraid of what I might say in response to his answer. The
questions
asked are easily answered with a little digging.

When he's obviously put in a corner, he keeps his mouth shut. Most of
the time he
doesn't realize he was in a corner, opens his mouth, and looks even
more stupid.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!


Apparently you right wing trashmeisters can't read. I've often stated I
don't read FlaJim's posts firsthand and I usually ignore them when they
get reposted, and I usually don't respond when another right wing
trashmeister like you tries, and tries, and tries, et cetera.


I really find that hard to believe, Harry.

Only 'cause it's unbelievable.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!



99.9% of FlaJim's comments here are totally devoid of content, which is
one reason of many not to bother with them.


Just the other day you said you only saw a miniscule number of his posts
and only when they are quoted by others. Now you say that 99.9%
of his posts are totally devoid of content.

How do you know that if you only see a small fraction of them?


Great minds, etc.

Should have read the posts out of sequence, but this way Krause can answer twice.
It'll be interesting to see if the answers are the same.

He already answered my question. Somehow reading .1% of what Jim posts
allows him to deduce that the other 99.1% posts are complete devoid of
content.

Not many have that profound ability.