Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#131
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Is Paris/Isis Over?
|
#132
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Is Paris/Isis Over?
Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 11/27/2015 6:55 PM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 11/27/15 5:38 PM, John H. wrote: On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 22:44:25 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote: On 11/26/2015 9:40 PM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 11/26/15 9:03 PM, John H. wrote: On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 10:12:37 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote: On 11/26/2015 10:00 AM, John H. wrote: On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 11:33:11 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote: On 11/25/2015 10:25 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 11/25/15 10:15 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 11/25/2015 10:13 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 11/25/15 10:10 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 11/25/2015 10:03 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 11/25/15 7:41 AM, John H. wrote: On Tue, 24 Nov 2015 18:08:32 -0600, Boating All Out wrote: Will coverage of cop the killing a teen in Chicago be another 24/7 story? Can they manage two 24/7 stories? We'll see. The video definitely makes the cop appear in the wrong. But, a first degree murder charge has been filed. What more do the marchers want. Is this an excuse to begin looting and burning in Chicago? -- You probably didn't understand the civil rights demonstrations and marches of the 1960s, either. Point to ponder: In the 400 days since this cop committed this obvious murder, 396 blacks were shot and killed by another black in the Chicago area. Do they not understand the civil rights demonstrations and marches of the 1960s or that Black Lives Matter either? You don't "get it," either, eh? Yes Harry, I "get it". Probably better than you do. I don't think so. The 1960's demonstrations/marches were mostly against institutional racism and violence. The Chicago demonstration, such as it was, was also against institutional racism and violence. Police murder of blacks seems to be endemic these days. Institutional violence. We have, what, 30,000+ "deaths by gun" and mostly involving non-police individuals in this country each year. Peculiarly 'Merican, eh? How many by suicide? How many black on black? How many while a crime was being committed? How many with drug involvement? How many accidental? How many by illegal immigrants? If you have a point to make, make it. Otherwise admit that you are just parroting a statistic without having a clue as to what it implies. Am I right, O' clueless one? That one's probably way too hard for Krause to answer. -- Ban idiots, not guns! He's afraid of what I might say in response to his answer. The questions asked are easily answered with a little digging. When he's obviously put in a corner, he keeps his mouth shut. Most of the time he doesn't realize he was in a corner, opens his mouth, and looks even more stupid. -- Ban idiots, not guns! Apparently you right wing trashmeisters can't read. I've often stated I don't read FlaJim's posts firsthand and I usually ignore them when they get reposted, and I usually don't respond when another right wing trashmeister like you tries, and tries, and tries, et cetera. I really find that hard to believe, Harry. Only 'cause it's unbelievable. -- Ban idiots, not guns! 99.9% of FlaJim's comments here are totally devoid of content, which is one reason of many not to bother with them. Just the other day you said you only saw a miniscule number of his posts and only when they are quoted by others. Now you say that 99.9% of his posts are totally devoid of content. How do you know that if you only see a small fraction of them? He's a liar. That's a proven fact. He's a tax cheat - fact #2 that should also prevent him from having an opinion about how OUR tax dollars are spent. |
#133
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Is Paris/Isis Over?
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 11/27/15 7:11 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 11/27/2015 6:55 PM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 11/27/15 5:38 PM, John H. wrote: On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 22:44:25 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote: On 11/26/2015 9:40 PM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 11/26/15 9:03 PM, John H. wrote: On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 10:12:37 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote: On 11/26/2015 10:00 AM, John H. wrote: On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 11:33:11 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote: On 11/25/2015 10:25 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 11/25/15 10:15 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 11/25/2015 10:13 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 11/25/15 10:10 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 11/25/2015 10:03 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 11/25/15 7:41 AM, John H. wrote: On Tue, 24 Nov 2015 18:08:32 -0600, Boating All Out wrote: Will coverage of cop the killing a teen in Chicago be another 24/7 story? Can they manage two 24/7 stories? We'll see. The video definitely makes the cop appear in the wrong. But, a first degree murder charge has been filed. What more do the marchers want. Is this an excuse to begin looting and burning in Chicago? -- You probably didn't understand the civil rights demonstrations and marches of the 1960s, either. Point to ponder: In the 400 days since this cop committed this obvious murder, 396 blacks were shot and killed by another black in the Chicago area. Do they not understand the civil rights demonstrations and marches of the 1960s or that Black Lives Matter either? You don't "get it," either, eh? Yes Harry, I "get it". Probably better than you do. I don't think so. The 1960's demonstrations/marches were mostly against institutional racism and violence. The Chicago demonstration, such as it was, was also against institutional racism and violence. Police murder of blacks seems to be endemic these days. Institutional violence. We have, what, 30,000+ "deaths by gun" and mostly involving non-police individuals in this country each year. Peculiarly 'Merican, eh? How many by suicide? How many black on black? How many while a crime was being committed? How many with drug involvement? How many accidental? How many by illegal immigrants? If you have a point to make, make it. Otherwise admit that you are just parroting a statistic without having a clue as to what it implies. Am I right, O' clueless one? That one's probably way too hard for Krause to answer. -- Ban idiots, not guns! He's afraid of what I might say in response to his answer. The questions asked are easily answered with a little digging. When he's obviously put in a corner, he keeps his mouth shut. Most of the time he doesn't realize he was in a corner, opens his mouth, and looks even more stupid. -- Ban idiots, not guns! Apparently you right wing trashmeisters can't read. I've often stated I don't read FlaJim's posts firsthand and I usually ignore them when they get reposted, and I usually don't respond when another right wing trashmeister like you tries, and tries, and tries, et cetera. I really find that hard to believe, Harry. Only 'cause it's unbelievable. -- Ban idiots, not guns! 99.9% of FlaJim's comments here are totally devoid of content, which is one reason of many not to bother with them. Just the other day you said you only saw a miniscule number of his posts and only when they are quoted by others. Now you say that 99.9% of his posts are totally devoid of content. How do you know that if you only see a small fraction of them? I'm extrapolating from the few I see and I'm recalling some of what he posted in the past. Bull****. |
#135
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Is Paris/Isis Over?
On 11/27/2015 9:08 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
The reality is that the Republican You havent the foggiest idea what reality is. |
#136
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Is Paris/Isis Over?
Are you sure you are ok?
Its called "Gaslighting" Look it up, No cure. |
#137
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Is Paris/Isis Over?
On 11/28/2015 1:47 AM, wrote:
Are you sure you are ok? Its called "Gaslighting" Look it up, No cure. I wish you folks would learn to set up your news readers properly before you get on usenert and jump into conversations. I'm talking to you "moore" and, of course our old pal Dumb Donnie. I get the feeling you are referring to Harry Krause, right? Here's the lookup: https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog...ing-gaslighted |
#138
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Is Paris/Isis Over?
|
#139
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Is Paris/Isis Over?
On Fri, 27 Nov 2015 21:08:33 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 11/27/15 8:52 PM, wrote: On Fri, 27 Nov 2015 19:14:03 -0500, wrote: On Fri, 27 Nov 2015 18:53:37 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: Well, hell, they got rid of you as a teacher. Because I retired? What a stupid comment. -- Call it whatever you want. === Why did the NEA get rid of you? That seems like it should have been a good gig for your talents. He retired ;-) The reality is that the Republican lobbyist the NEA affiliate had on retainer in New York State sent my name and C.V. and a recommendation to Jacob Javits, a Republican U.S. Senator who was looking for a new press secretary, and the senator invited me down to D.C. for an interview. He wasn't sure whether he was going to run for another term, and I was reluctant to commit if he wasn't. In those days, many Republican officeholders were decent people, and progressive, and not crackpot conservatives. Javits was one of these decent pols. During the same trip to meet Javits, I had an interview with the then biggest AAAA Ad and PR agency in DC, and that agency hired me as the account exec on its labor union and political accounts, and two commercial accounts. I took the job because I was weary of working for the teachers union, and I had just completed two really significant tasks: "roadie" PR manager for a woman running for NEA president elect (successful) and merger of the NEA affiliate and the AFT affiliate in New York State (successful). So you say. Some years later, I was retained by the NEA to produce a series of political ads and brochures. I did have a lot of fun working for the teachers' unions in New York State. I had a professional staff of seven working for me, and we did our jobs. After I left, my first assistant took a job as director of PR for the teachers' union in Hawaii, which had to be a dream gig. Wow. I am totally f'ing impressed. You are the man, Krause. Is this story as truthfull as your Vietnam memory? -- Ban idiots, not guns! |
#140
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Is Paris/Isis Over?
On Fri, 27 Nov 2015 18:55:38 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 11/27/15 5:38 PM, John H. wrote: On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 22:44:25 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote: On 11/26/2015 9:40 PM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 11/26/15 9:03 PM, John H. wrote: On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 10:12:37 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote: On 11/26/2015 10:00 AM, John H. wrote: On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 11:33:11 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote: On 11/25/2015 10:25 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 11/25/15 10:15 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 11/25/2015 10:13 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 11/25/15 10:10 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 11/25/2015 10:03 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 11/25/15 7:41 AM, John H. wrote: On Tue, 24 Nov 2015 18:08:32 -0600, Boating All Out wrote: Will coverage of cop the killing a teen in Chicago be another 24/7 story? Can they manage two 24/7 stories? We'll see. The video definitely makes the cop appear in the wrong. But, a first degree murder charge has been filed. What more do the marchers want. Is this an excuse to begin looting and burning in Chicago? -- You probably didn't understand the civil rights demonstrations and marches of the 1960s, either. Point to ponder: In the 400 days since this cop committed this obvious murder, 396 blacks were shot and killed by another black in the Chicago area. Do they not understand the civil rights demonstrations and marches of the 1960s or that Black Lives Matter either? You don't "get it," either, eh? Yes Harry, I "get it". Probably better than you do. I don't think so. The 1960's demonstrations/marches were mostly against institutional racism and violence. The Chicago demonstration, such as it was, was also against institutional racism and violence. Police murder of blacks seems to be endemic these days. Institutional violence. We have, what, 30,000+ "deaths by gun" and mostly involving non-police individuals in this country each year. Peculiarly 'Merican, eh? How many by suicide? How many black on black? How many while a crime was being committed? How many with drug involvement? How many accidental? How many by illegal immigrants? If you have a point to make, make it. Otherwise admit that you are just parroting a statistic without having a clue as to what it implies. Am I right, O' clueless one? That one's probably way too hard for Krause to answer. -- Ban idiots, not guns! He's afraid of what I might say in response to his answer. The questions asked are easily answered with a little digging. When he's obviously put in a corner, he keeps his mouth shut. Most of the time he doesn't realize he was in a corner, opens his mouth, and looks even more stupid. -- Ban idiots, not guns! Apparently you right wing trashmeisters can't read. I've often stated I don't read FlaJim's posts firsthand and I usually ignore them when they get reposted, and I usually don't respond when another right wing trashmeister like you tries, and tries, and tries, et cetera. I really find that hard to believe, Harry. Only 'cause it's unbelievable. -- Ban idiots, not guns! 99.9% of FlaJim's comments here are totally devoid of content, which is one reason of many not to bother with them. How would you know, Mr. Bozo? -- Ban idiots, not guns! |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Next set - safaga 30-1-08 bunker barge isis aproaching jamma 2.jpg (1/1) | Tall Ship Photos | |||
Next set - safaga 30-1-08 bunker barge isis 02_cml size.jpg (1/1) | Tall Ship Photos | |||
Next set - safaga 30-1-08 bunker barge isis 02.jpg (1/1) | Tall Ship Photos | |||
Next set - safaga 30-1-08 bunker barge isis 01.jpg (1/1) | Tall Ship Photos |