On 11/25/2015 10:13 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 11/25/15 10:10 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 11/25/2015 10:03 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 11/25/15 7:41 AM, John H. wrote:
On Tue, 24 Nov 2015 18:08:32 -0600, Boating All Out
wrote:

Will coverage of cop the killing a teen in Chicago be
another 24/7 story?
Can they manage two 24/7 stories?
We'll see.

The video definitely makes the cop appear in the wrong. But, a first
degree murder
charge has been filed. What more do the marchers want. Is this an
excuse to begin
looting and burning in Chicago?
--

You probably didn't understand the civil rights demonstrations and
marches of the 1960s, either.



Point to ponder:

In the 400 days since this cop committed this obvious murder, 396 blacks
were shot and killed by another black in the Chicago area.

Do they not understand the civil rights demonstrations and marches of
the 1960s or that Black Lives Matter either?


You don't "get it," either, eh?

It all depends on the definition of "it". Eh?

On 11/25/2015 11:21 AM, Justan Olphart wrote:
On 11/25/2015 10:13 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 11/25/15 10:10 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 11/25/2015 10:03 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 11/25/15 7:41 AM, John H. wrote:
On Tue, 24 Nov 2015 18:08:32 -0600, Boating All Out
wrote:

Will coverage of cop the killing a teen in Chicago be
another 24/7 story?
Can they manage two 24/7 stories?
We'll see.

The video definitely makes the cop appear in the wrong. But, a first
degree murder
charge has been filed. What more do the marchers want. Is this an
excuse to begin
looting and burning in Chicago?
--

You probably didn't understand the civil rights demonstrations and
marches of the 1960s, either.



Point to ponder:

In the 400 days since this cop committed this obvious murder, 396 blacks
were shot and killed by another black in the Chicago area.

Do they not understand the civil rights demonstrations and marches of
the 1960s or that Black Lives Matter either?


You don't "get it," either, eh?

It all depends on the definition of "it". Eh?


It also depends on the density of rose colored glasses.

On 11/25/2015 10:25 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 11/25/15 10:15 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 11/25/2015 10:13 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 11/25/15 10:10 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 11/25/2015 10:03 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 11/25/15 7:41 AM, John H. wrote:
On Tue, 24 Nov 2015 18:08:32 -0600, Boating All Out
wrote:

Will coverage of cop the killing a teen in Chicago be
another 24/7 story?
Can they manage two 24/7 stories?
We'll see.

The video definitely makes the cop appear in the wrong. But, a first
degree murder
charge has been filed. What more do the marchers want. Is this an
excuse to begin
looting and burning in Chicago?
--

You probably didn't understand the civil rights demonstrations and
marches of the 1960s, either.



Point to ponder:

In the 400 days since this cop committed this obvious murder, 396
blacks
were shot and killed by another black in the Chicago area.

Do they not understand the civil rights demonstrations and marches of
the 1960s or that Black Lives Matter either?


You don't "get it," either, eh?


Yes Harry, I "get it". Probably better than you do.



I don't think so. The 1960's demonstrations/marches were mostly against
institutional racism and violence. The Chicago demonstration, such as it
was, was also against institutional racism and violence. Police murder
of blacks seems to be endemic these days. Institutional violence.

We have, what, 30,000+ "deaths by gun" and mostly involving non-police
individuals in this country each year. Peculiarly 'Merican, eh?


How many by suicide?
How many black on black?
How many while a crime was being committed?
How many with drug involvement?
How many accidental?
How many by illegal immigrants?

If you have a point to make, make it.
Otherwise admit that you are just parroting a statistic without having a
clue as to what it implies.
Am I right, O' clueless one?

On 11/25/2015 11:30 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 11/25/2015 11:21 AM, Justan Olphart wrote:
On 11/25/2015 10:13 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 11/25/15 10:10 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 11/25/2015 10:03 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 11/25/15 7:41 AM, John H. wrote:
On Tue, 24 Nov 2015 18:08:32 -0600, Boating All Out
wrote:

Will coverage of cop the killing a teen in Chicago be
another 24/7 story?
Can they manage two 24/7 stories?
We'll see.

The video definitely makes the cop appear in the wrong. But, a first
degree murder
charge has been filed. What more do the marchers want. Is this an
excuse to begin
looting and burning in Chicago?
--

You probably didn't understand the civil rights demonstrations and
marches of the 1960s, either.



Point to ponder:

In the 400 days since this cop committed this obvious murder, 396
blacks
were shot and killed by another black in the Chicago area.

Do they not understand the civil rights demonstrations and marches of
the 1960s or that Black Lives Matter either?


You don't "get it," either, eh?

It all depends on the definition of "it". Eh?


It also depends on the density of rose colored glasses.


Ahhh density. We should do a study on Harry's density.

On 11/25/15 11:30 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 11/25/2015 11:21 AM, Justan Olphart wrote:
On 11/25/2015 10:13 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 11/25/15 10:10 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 11/25/2015 10:03 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 11/25/15 7:41 AM, John H. wrote:
On Tue, 24 Nov 2015 18:08:32 -0600, Boating All Out
wrote:

Will coverage of cop the killing a teen in Chicago be
another 24/7 story?
Can they manage two 24/7 stories?
We'll see.

The video definitely makes the cop appear in the wrong. But, a first
degree murder
charge has been filed. What more do the marchers want. Is this an
excuse to begin
looting and burning in Chicago?
--

You probably didn't understand the civil rights demonstrations and
marches of the 1960s, either.



Point to ponder:

In the 400 days since this cop committed this obvious murder, 396
blacks
were shot and killed by another black in the Chicago area.

Do they not understand the civil rights demonstrations and marches of
the 1960s or that Black Lives Matter either?


You don't "get it," either, eh?

It all depends on the definition of "it". Eh?


It also depends on the density of rose colored glasses.



Oh, I know the difference between typical street crime murder and murder
by cop. The former is, sadly, societal and cultural, but the latter is
more serious because it is institutional. There are circumstances in
which a cop is perfectly justified in firing his/her weapon and
shooting/killing a suspect, there are marginal circumstances subject to
interpretation, and then there is outright murder. We don't expect our
police departments or their employees to be engaging in felony murder.

Your boy in Florida probably cheers whenever the cops kill a person of
color for any reason.

On 11/25/2015 11:39 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 11/25/15 11:30 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 11/25/2015 11:21 AM, Justan Olphart wrote:
On 11/25/2015 10:13 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 11/25/15 10:10 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 11/25/2015 10:03 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 11/25/15 7:41 AM, John H. wrote:
On Tue, 24 Nov 2015 18:08:32 -0600, Boating All Out
wrote:

Will coverage of cop the killing a teen in Chicago be
another 24/7 story?
Can they manage two 24/7 stories?
We'll see.

The video definitely makes the cop appear in the wrong. But, a first
degree murder
charge has been filed. What more do the marchers want. Is this an
excuse to begin
looting and burning in Chicago?
--

You probably didn't understand the civil rights demonstrations and
marches of the 1960s, either.



Point to ponder:

In the 400 days since this cop committed this obvious murder, 396
blacks
were shot and killed by another black in the Chicago area.

Do they not understand the civil rights demonstrations and marches of
the 1960s or that Black Lives Matter either?


You don't "get it," either, eh?

It all depends on the definition of "it". Eh?


It also depends on the density of rose colored glasses.



Oh, I know the difference between typical street crime murder and murder
by cop. The former is, sadly, societal and cultural, but the latter is
more serious because it is institutional. There are circumstances in
which a cop is perfectly justified in firing his/her weapon and
shooting/killing a suspect, there are marginal circumstances subject to
interpretation, and then there is outright murder. We don't expect our
police departments or their employees to be engaging in felony murder.

Your boy in Florida probably cheers whenever the cops kill a person of
color for any reason.

You seem to be clueless about his boy in Florida. Your lame brained
assumptions say more about you than anyone else. Key words here are
"lame brained". Don't you have some more garbage to throw out on the
edge of your property. I hope you aren't throwing it on someone else's
property. That would be criminal. It would be an easy matter to notify
your neighbors of your activities and suggest that they check their
properties for illegal dumping. What say you, asshole?

On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 10:03:39 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 11/25/15 7:41 AM, John H. wrote:
On Tue, 24 Nov 2015 18:08:32 -0600, Boating All Out wrote:

Will coverage of cop the killing a teen in Chicago be
another 24/7 story?
Can they manage two 24/7 stories?
We'll see.

The video definitely makes the cop appear in the wrong. But, a first degree murder
charge has been filed. What more do the marchers want. Is this an excuse to begin
looting and burning in Chicago?
--

You probably didn't understand the civil rights demonstrations and
marches of the 1960s, either.

Those demonstrations were because they felt their grievances were not
being heard. Charging an on duty cop with murder 1 is far from that.
It is clear that the Chicago DA was doing more than a reasonable
reaction. He better add murder 2 and manslaughter as lesser included
charges or you might have a Zimmerman moment.

It is going to be hard to make a murder 1 case although murder 2 is
possible and manslaughter is reasonable.

Without a death penalty, there is really not a significant difference
in sentencing. In most states you can still do "life" for murder 2. As
prisons get more crowded "life" really means "until you get so old and
sick that we can't afford to keep you" anyway.

On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 10:25:20 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:




I don't think so. The 1960's demonstrations/marches were mostly against
institutional racism and violence. The Chicago demonstration, such as it
was, was also against institutional racism and violence. Police murder
of blacks seems to be endemic these days. Institutional violence.

We have, what, 30,000+ "deaths by gun" and mostly involving non-police
individuals in this country each year. Peculiarly 'Merican, eh?


Where is your outrage about the white kid who was shot by the cops for
flashing his high beams. That seemed to just go away and I never heard
that the cop was charged with anything.

On 11/25/15 12:00 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 10:03:39 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 11/25/15 7:41 AM, John H. wrote:
On Tue, 24 Nov 2015 18:08:32 -0600, Boating All Out wrote:

Will coverage of cop the killing a teen in Chicago be
another 24/7 story?
Can they manage two 24/7 stories?
We'll see.

The video definitely makes the cop appear in the wrong. But, a first degree murder
charge has been filed. What more do the marchers want. Is this an excuse to begin
looting and burning in Chicago?
--

You probably didn't understand the civil rights demonstrations and
marches of the 1960s, either.

Those demonstrations were because they felt their grievances were not
being heard. Charging an on duty cop with murder 1 is far from that.
It is clear that the Chicago DA was doing more than a reasonable
reaction. He better add murder 2 and manslaughter as lesser included
charges or you might have a Zimmerman moment.

It is going to be hard to make a murder 1 case although murder 2 is
possible and manslaughter is reasonable.

Without a death penalty, there is really not a significant difference
in sentencing. In most states you can still do "life" for murder 2. As
prisons get more crowded "life" really means "until you get so old and
sick that we can't afford to keep you" anyway.


It took 13 months for an indictment, and I think that only came about
because a journalist filed an FOIA and the tapes had to be released.
Thirteen months for an indictment? That's bull****, when you have tapes
in hand.

Might be more indictments. Apparently there was a coverup and part of
that involved cop erasures of video tapes from nearby security cameras.

The tape they have is going to be near impossible to refute. Emptying
your magazine into a guy who you've already shot and who is on the
ground...that's going to be tough to defend, eh?

I wonder if the cop will cop a plea.

wrote:
On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 10:25:20 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:




I don't think so. The 1960's demonstrations/marches were mostly against
institutional racism and violence. The Chicago demonstration, such as it
was, was also against institutional racism and violence. Police murder
of blacks seems to be endemic these days. Institutional violence.

We have, what, 30,000+ "deaths by gun" and mostly involving non-police
individuals in this country each year. Peculiarly 'Merican, eh?


Where is your outrage about the white kid who was shot by the cops for
flashing his high beams. That seemed to just go away and I never heard
that the cop was charged with anything.


My outrage includes the death of anyone wrongly shot by a cop.

--
Sent from my iPhone 6+