Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#62
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
For animal lovers...
On 5/4/12 6:46 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 5/4/2012 1:08 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On Fri, 4 May 2012 11:42:28 -0400, wrote: In , says... On 5/4/2012 9:36 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On Thu, 03 May 2012 12:54:44 -0400, John wrote: ...and those who find hunters despicable. http://dribbleglass.com/images/billboards/animals.jpg More species are saved by hunters than all the PETA and "save the animals" kooks combined. Hunters put their money where their mouth is and they actually do things to preserve habitat and encourage species survival. They don't just whine about it. BTW I don't hunt. Yeah, killing animals saves them. Got it! Finally... Well it figures that you'd think that killing an animal is saving it. I do think it is funny that these avid fish hunters draw the line at killing a deer or a rabbit. Since I wrote the above, I take it you are talking about me. I catch and release. Maybe if we rigged an ear of corn with big treble hooks. snagged the deer, dragged the deer up to the truck with a winch, kicking and bleeding. Then put him, live, in an air tight box to slowly suffocate it would be OK. I catch and release. I won't even talk about what fishermen do to the bait. That is down right medieval. I know! Those rubber worms and Rapalas that I use are SO abused..... Bass fishermen are different, nobody wants to eat a freshwater bass anyway, and artificials are perfect for them... Other fishermen catch fish you want to eat, and they don't do as well with artificials. I suppose you are gonna' tell us you never took a fish, never killed a fish, and never used natural bait, right??? Pffffttt. I suppose you will. Lots of people eat freshwater bass, jerkwater. |
#63
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
For animal lovers...
On 5/4/12 6:36 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 5/4/2012 12:25 PM, wrote: On Fri, 4 May 2012 11:42:28 -0400, wrote: In , says... On 5/4/2012 9:36 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On Thu, 03 May 2012 12:54:44 -0400, John wrote: ...and those who find hunters despicable. http://dribbleglass.com/images/billboards/animals.jpg More species are saved by hunters than all the PETA and "save the animals" kooks combined. Hunters put their money where their mouth is and they actually do things to preserve habitat and encourage species survival. They don't just whine about it. BTW I don't hunt. Yeah, killing animals saves them. Got it! Finally... Well it figures that you'd think that killing an animal is saving it. I do think it is funny that these avid fish hunters draw the line at killing a deer or a rabbit. Maybe if we rigged an ear of corn with big treble hooks. snagged the deer, dragged the deer up to the truck with a winch, kicking and bleeding. Then put him, live, in an air tight box to slowly suffocate it would be OK. I won't even talk about what fishermen do to the bait. That is down right medieval. Yes, but private citizens can't protect themselves from Government with fish hooks... You couldn't protect yourself from two prepubescent girls. |
#64
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
For animal lovers...
On 5/4/2012 6:34 PM, BAR wrote:
In , says... On Fri, 4 May 2012 09:39:01 -0400, wrote: In , says... On 5/3/2012 1:07 PM, wrote: On Thu, 03 May 2012 12:54:44 -0400, John wrote: ...and those who find hunters despicable. http://dribbleglass.com/images/billboards/animals.jpg There's a place in gawds kingdom for all animals; usually right next to my mashed potatoes. Still folks out there that would rather see the things slowly starve to death... Makes you wonder how any animal species ever survived without man killing them in mass. Without man, there was nobody there to care, if they slowly starved to death from poor weather, diminished food stocks, or overpopulation. Who mourned the extinction of the dinosaurs? Species go extinct each and every day. Why do we care? Why don't you tell us, you are the one crying about it.. |
#65
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
For animal lovers...
|
#66
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
For animal lovers...
X ` Man wrote:
On 5/4/12 11:50 AM, JustWait wrote: On 5/4/2012 11:42 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On 5/4/2012 9:36 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On Thu, 03 May 2012 12:54:44 -0400, John wrote: ...and those who find hunters despicable. http://dribbleglass.com/images/billboards/animals.jpg More species are saved by hunters than all the PETA and "save the animals" kooks combined. Hunters put their money where their mouth is and they actually do things to preserve habitat and encourage species survival. They don't just whine about it. BTW I don't hunt. Yeah, killing animals saves them. Got it! Finally... Well it figures that you'd think that killing an animal is saving it. Figures you would bring it down to the single animal level to make a point, when the conversation is about hunting in general... Frekin' engineers... snicker It takes a really brave man to shoot a deer. It's so...sporting. I'm not a hunter, but I'd rather see one shot for food than hit by a car and killing the passengers. |
#67
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
For animal lovers...
wrote in message ...
On Fri, 4 May 2012 09:36:59 -0700, "Califbill" wrote: This is more the result of man killing the predators and then growing great food crops for the deer. A lot more deer than the natural world would support. That is true. There are far more deer in the US, particularly the east, than there were when the Mayflower landed. Crops are a real gravy train for them but it turns out that they also thrive on ornamental plants in suburbia. I am still not sure why they were on the Whitehurst freeway that night but I assume it was just a short cut from the yummy food up on Foxhall road and the parkland in Foggy Bottom. ------------------------------------------------ I live about 3 blocks from open space. Have had deer eat the roses, (local nursery never has to prune their roses.) and eat the hibiscus on the front porch. We have a mountain lion or 3 in the area. Friends have a sheep ranch and had to have the state hunter kill one last year. They have been seen on the local middle school grounds and the primary school. Probably same lion as was same day. Grocery shopping? Lots of deer in the area. As well as turkeys, that are not a native California bird. Almost hit one today leaving town as it walked across the road. 55 mph speed limit. Most of the game is because the hunters put up the money for the refuges. |
#68
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
For animal lovers...
wrote in message ...
On Fri, 04 May 2012 15:54:33 -0400, X ` Man wrote: On 5/4/12 3:47 PM, wrote: On Fri, 04 May 2012 15:17:34 -0400, X ` Man wrote: On 5/4/12 2:52 PM, wrote: On Fri, 04 May 2012 13:31:00 -0400, X ` Man wrote: On 5/4/12 1:09 PM, wrote: On Fri, 04 May 2012 12:39:56 -0400, X ` Man I don't do much fishing anymore. I do, however, think it is more sporting than hunting. There's nothing sporting about seeing an elk or a moose a few hundred yards away and then shooting it with a high powered rifle and scope. How is that any less "sporting" than sitting in the lounge of your sport fish, sipping a cold drink, waiting for a tuna to hit one of the ballyhoo you are trolling? The mate probably rigged the bait and struck the fish. All you did was reel it in. Well, it is less sporting because fishing for big pelagics is a lot more dangerous than shooting a moose or an elk, but I'm not a fan of that sort of "hunting," either. It is basically the same as the canned hunt you are talking about on a game ranch and I am not sure where the danger is ... unless the boat sinks. I wasn't making a comparison to a canned hunt but to "regular" hunting, and if you've never been aboard a boat targeting 500-pound fish, you have no idea of the dangers involved...that have nothing to do with the boat sinking. What dangers? We are not talking about Alaskan crab fishermen here. How many recreational fishermen are killed every year? (tossing out the ones who just get drunk and fall out of the boat) You mean, other than being pulled overboard by a fish, being bitten by a pelagic, falling and hitting your head, arm strain, neck strain, back strain, being impaled with large fish hooks, stabbed by knives, sun poisoning, and heatstroke, among other things? I am sure that pales in comparison to the number of hunters who fall out of tree stands, drown in freezing water, get attacked by the animal they are hunting, get bit by snakes, get shot by other hunters or just shoot themselves. They still have all of those exposure risks, knife injury risks and strain injuries trying to drag that elk out of the woods. I suppose we could get some kind of numbers but I don't care that much because they are probably meaningless. You are still ignoring all the fishermen who are simply bottom fishing off their dock. (probably analogous to shooting squirrels off porch) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Harry probably has not fished for big fish. Especially East Coast fishing. they fish out of fighting chairs, where they are strapped in and have heavy duty reels with set drag. I fish for tuna out of San Diego. We do stand up fishing, no chairs, just a fighting belt. I have caught 100# tuna and never felt that I was going to be pulled overboard. The drags on the reels prevent the excess pull on your body. Even with 150# test line, you are only going to feel maybe 35# pull. The line drag from the water will add a bunch of drag to the line, but not to the reel. My last fish was 96# and with about 350 yds of line out it took near an hour to land the fish. That is with 65# PowerPro and 50# mono topshot. Probably 40# Flouro leader. You are beat after the fishing landed, but still not feeling like you are going to be pulled overboard. Big Marlin in Cabo are a fighting chair fish, so still pretty safe except for stupidity. |
#69
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
For animal lovers...
|
#70
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
For animal lovers...
On 5/4/12 9:07 PM, Earl wrote:
X ` Man wrote: On 5/4/12 1:02 AM, wrote: On Thu, 03 May 2012 20:32:41 -0400, X ` Man wrote: On 5/3/12 8:25 PM, Richard Casady wrote: On Thu, 03 May 2012 18:44:24 -0400, X ` wrote: I live just outside Des Moines, and the local deer are so numerous as to be catagorized as vermin. I lost an auto to one. They cross my lawn on a daily basis. It would be great if hunters would kill vast numbers of them. Casady Typically, the problem you describe is the result of man encroaching on the natural habit of woodland critters and decimating it. So, we take away the land on which critters live, eat, and breathe, and then we shoot them. There are significantly more deer in the suburbs than there ever have been but the residents would not tolerate repopulating the predators necessary for natural control. It turns out white tail deer are very well adapted to suburban living. I have even seen them on the Whitehurst Freeway in downtown DC. Can you imagine the howl people would put up if we dumped a couple dozen cougars around the beltway and in Rock Creek Park? I doubt they would even tolerate that down in rural Calvert County. (yet they did it near where I live here in SW Florida) A few thousand cougars running loose in Florida could only improve the quality of life for everyone in that state. Isn't that the panther in FL? I've read several serious articles about the cats that indicate they are what are commonly known as cougars. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Animal Welfare or "animal rights"? | General | |||
A fact concerning livestock animal husbandry | General | |||
Don't forget - tonight - Animal Planet... | General | |||
Animal Welfare or "animal rights"? | General | |||
did someone say animal facts? | General |